Thoughts on how to speed up my site? (Other site ideas.)
-
I was wondering if someone had a few minutes to talk a look at our site and see how to speed it up. I've ran some of the speed tests and I get different results, so I'm not sure if my site would be considered "slow" or not.
Also if there any other things that jump out at you (usability, side bar, things I should change / add / take away to make a users experience better, etc.) please let me know. Any feedback is good feedback to me.
I'm using WP Super Cache as well.
Thanks!
-
Paul,
Thank you very much for all the feedback. Such great info.
I've been working on improving many of these items over the weekend. I'm only using total cache, I set up a CDN, i took off on of the tabs on the activity widget and just let the popular posts. I'm trying to figure out how to resize the images better on the sidebar tab as you're right they are using css to rescale the images.
I'm actually saving up to have the site designed by a designer instad of my non-design self. But that's down the road as having something designed professionally isn't cheap (although it is worth it.)
I'm going to be working on your suggestions for the rest of the site. Thanks again for the feedback and for the kind words about our site. I'm really trying to help people through this site, and from the feedback we are getting it looks like it's been doing that.
Now I'm on the journey to make it an even better experience for people.
-
Be careful with WP Smushit. As mentioned it relies on Yahoo api that has been very unreliable, but it also uses memory mapping. If you exceed memory mapping (very easy to do on shared hosting) the plugin fails and can bring down the site with it.
-
Yea, I figured from some of the commentary and what I saw in his code he must have been acting on some of the suggestions right away. Just didn't want to assume, just in case
And yea, getting to the next level of performance may mean bigger changes like removing some items from the page altogether.
Paul
-
Looks like he's already implemented many changes since this question was posted. At the time, he was running just Supercache, now he's got W3TC, MaxCDN and he seems to have optimized some of the images.
Definitely agree with aiming for 1Mb or less per page, though.
-
First of all, just wanted to wish Noah a happy birthday!
You're right to be asking about speeding up your website, as there are a number of opportunities to improve page load times. I notice you also have questions posted asking about VPSs, and CDNs.The thing is, there is definitely an order in which these things should be tackled.
The first thing you must do is get your on page code as efficient as possible. The reality is that an inefficiently coded website can bring even the strongest of servers to its knees with just a little extra surge in traffic. It's never a good idea to try to make up for inefficient code by throwing additional hardware resources at the problem.
By default, WordPress is fairly easy to use and build, but that front-end simplicity comes at the cost of complexity and inefficiency of code on the back end. Every bit of functionality you add using plug-ins and widgets comes at the cost of additional files to load, more database calls to process, and more opportunities for someone else's inefficient code to get in the way.
In your case, your homepage is approx 2 MB in size, and some of your internal pages are over 4.5 MB. This translates into page load times anywhere from 10 to 25 seconds at typical cable Internet speeds. In practical terms, anything over 1 MB is awfully big.
Site speed optimization can be a fairly complex process, and needs an overall plan, rather than trying to implement one-off tactics and hoping for the best. I'd be happy to help you off-line to build up a plan, but in the meantime these are the kinds of things you should be taking into account:
- reduce the number of plug-ins and widgets adding content to your page to the bare minimum.
- Make sure the plug-ins/widgets you have chosen are the most efficient available in their class
- make certain photos are as efficiently compressed as possible, are being rescaled as opposed to resized in html, and be careful of using too many photos on any one page
- Ensure your caching plug-in is tweaked and tuned to be as efficient as possible for your server configuration.
Some specifics for you to think about:
- the Recommended sidebar widget (and to a lesser extent the Popular widget) are extremely inefficient in their use of images. Even though they're only showing 50x50px thumbnails, they're loading full-size images up to 550kb in the background.
- is there enough difference between Recommended and Popular for both to be of benefit to visitors?
- you're obviously using W3 Total Cache - hope you don't also have SuperCache enabled as well? If so, they'll compromise each other's performance. Only one caching plugin - ever.
- you have several different advertising networks providing ads to the page. Each one loads it's own set of backend scripts, many of which are VERY inefficient. Could you consolidate?
- you currently have over 1 megabyte of just Javascript loading on each page when target should be less than 1 MB for the whole page including content
- sidebar titles like "Like Us on FaceBook" have so little contrast from the background they're very hard to read (& likely disappear on dark monitors)
- you get so many comments on each post (a nice problem to have!) that it may be time to consider paginating the comments so that each page doesn't have hundreds of comments to load each time it displays
Overall, you're doing an absolutely kick-ass job with your website, from everything I can see. You're rocking the engagement and interest of your visitors, and you've tuned most of the things that are readily tuneable. The next level up in performance will require some tough decisions and perhaps even killing a few sacred cows. That's why I recommend you make a plan before randomly changing things.
With the way you're going, you may very well find that even the highly tuned site is going to outgrow shared hosting as a result of increasing traffic. If/when this does happen, you'll still benefit from having leaned out the website so it can take better advantage of whatever server hardware it's hosted on.
I'll close with a couple of really useful tools for visualizing exactly what's happening in the performance of your site.
First is webpagetest.org (if you haven't already found it) which allows you to run tests that directly mimic the experience a user and their browser would have. You can even have it test from different areas of the country, and using different typical Internet speeds. I usually test with the two lowest speeds, as they will cover the widest range of typical users including mobile.
The second is a plug-in called P3 Performance Profiler. It may seem counterintuitive to be adding another plug-in when what you're trying to do is reduce the complexity, but what P3 does is give you an actual readout of how much of your server's resources are being used by each of your site's plug-ins. You you can enable it for testing purposes, then turn it off again for normal running of your website.
No doubt this has created as many questions as it may have answered, so by all means fire away if you need additional clarification.
Paul
-
Pingdom says your page is 5.5mb big. But it loads pretty quick for me.
You can do alot better. Here's my recommendations.
1. Optimize your images before uploading. I would recommend the WP-Smushit plugin which does it on the fly, but lately the yahoo api hasn't been working.
2. Switch the W3 Total Cache. It does the same thing as Super cache, but there's some additional goodies.
3. Using W3TC, you should enable minify and combine for all the css and js. The plugin allows you to combine all your css and js in two files (from both your theme and other plugins).
4. Consider using a CDN. Again W3TC makes it easy. I use amazon cloudfront, and it's amazingly cheap. Essentially, you keep your current hosting, but actually serve all css, js, and images from the CDN. It makes an enormous difference.
-
Thanks. The host I'm using is really good, so I'm not sure switching hosts would be that different.
In regard to number of posts on home page, how many would you suggest?
-
After taking a quick look I would just utilize Cloud Flare (http://www.cloudflare.com). It is a free tool where they not only optimize your site with an increase of speed around 60%, but they also provide a CDN.
I tested this out a few weeks ago with a blog of mine and it took it down from 8 - 10 seconds to load, down to 1.8 seconds. Very impressive.
They also provide a Wordpress plugin.
No need to change hosting companies.
Two tools to help you as well.
-
Consider
- Moving to WPengine.com for hosting.
- Less posts on the home page.
- Compressing your CSS.
- Better optimization of images.
It was pretty quick for me. The slowest load was the externals, videos from you tube as it calls out for each one to "load" then in the browser.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
HELP! IE secure page display issue on new live site
For some reason IE 7, 8, & 9 do not display the following page: https://www.jwsuretybonds.com/protools.htm All they show is the Norton seal. It shows properly in all other browsers without issue (including IE 10+), but the earlier versions flash the page for a split second, then hides everything. Can someone shed some light on this? This is a new live site we just launched minutes ago and these browsers account for 12% of our overall traffic. UGH I hate you microsoft!!! Thanks all 🙂
Web Design | | TheDude0 -
How to add SEO Content to this site
Hi Great community and hope you guys can help! I have just started on a SEO project for http://bit.ly/clientsite , the clients required initial KPI is Search Engine Rankings at a fairly low budget. The term I use for the site is a "blurb site", the content is thin and the initial strategy I want to employ to get the keyword rankings is to utilize content. The plan is to: add targeted, quality (user experience & useful) and SEO content on the page itself by adding a "read more" link/button to the "blurb" on the right of the page (see pink text in image) when someone clicks on the "read more", a box of content will slide out styled much the same as the blurb itself and appear next to and/or overlay over the blurb and most of the page (see pink rectangle in image) Question: Is this layer of targeted , quality (user experience & useful) and SEO content (which requires an extra click to get to it) going to get the same SEO power/value as if it were displayed traditionally on the initial display? If not, would it be better to create a second page (2<sup>nd</sup> layer) and have the read more link to that and then rel-canonical the blurb to that 2<sup>nd</sup> page, so that all the SEO passes to this expanded content and the second page/layer is what will show up in the rankings? Thanks in advance qvDgZNE
Web Design | | Torean0 -
Average Time to Conversion on Site
I am curious to know if there is a way to view or calculate the average time it takes site visitors to convert per session. For example, based on a current website design, the average time on site might be 3 minutes and the number of conversions might be 100. is there a way to say that for the current website design, it takes 3 minutes for the average site visitor to submit a web form? Then, as I redesign the site, my goal would be to improve the average time to conversion by making the web form more accessible and require less information within the form itself. I don't think this is currently possible in GA. Has anyone figured out a way to accomplish this by use of traditional tracking tools? Or, am I facing having to code my site to record each visitor's time on site from the second they enter and then stop the clock when they submit the form?
Web Design | | dsinger0 -
New site or fix the old one
I have a delima. Basically the main business product I used to offer is not going to be offered anymore. The types of sales events we conducted for auto dealerships are not able to be insured any longer forcing the change. So I am pivoting to just offering direct mail and I plan on going into digital probably social, landing pages, content marketing and not sure what else. I was able to register http:www.roiautos.com and www.roidirectmail.com both variations of www.roiautosolutions.com withc was the original site. Also that is the closest to the actual name of the business. My question is whether to build a site focusing on direct mail using the direct mail dot com, or just to redo the current site. The current site doesn't have much rank if any because the old product was not something that was searched for. As a mater of fact 99% of my business came from referrals and word or mouth so I just never really bothered. My thoughts are that ROI Direct Mail will work better for search and I am even going to use that as a DBA and TM. But I am unsure of what to do for search. One thing that has to happen is that all references to offering staffed sales events have to be removed from any site per my insurance company. Any advice?
Web Design | | roiautos0 -
Does Using Magento With Multi Sites Affect SEO
We have a client who has 3 separate websites targeting the US, Australia, and the UK. Each of them has relevant ccTLD's such as: .com .com.au and .co.uk. Our client wants to use the Magento multi-site function so it combines all the stores (which are the exact same products) and merge it into one through Magento. These sites are all hosted in the US and had nothing to do with me haha! I understand Rand has mentioned on a video it would be best having the websites with ccTLD's hosted in that country (if budget permits), however in this case the budget doesn't permit us to go down that road. Has anyone any advice on this matter, has anyone did this before and had a lot of success with the SEO? At present there doesn't seem to be a lot of information about it and opinions are varied and sometimes divided. Any help would be very much appreciated guys Thanks, Matt
Web Design | | HigherthanSEO0 -
Preserve Rankings When Switching to a New Site
Hello community! I have a quick question for you regarding preserving my SERPs once I switch a development site to replace the current production site. Basically, we are switching to a new CMS and will be featuring the same content, architectural layout, URL structure, etc. Again, the only difference is that it's going to be on a new CMS. Upon switching to the new version of the site, what would be the best strategy for making sure we preserve our rankings for content already ranking highly within the search engines? Likewise, is there anything additional we may be able to do right-off-the-bat in order to assist content that may not be ranking highly in the SERPs, rank more highly?
Web Design | | NiallSmith0 -
Considering site navigation options
I am working on a site redesign and re evaluating concepts I haven't thought about for a few years. I generally see site navigation that is either "top-down" or "left bar". Top down navigation normally uses the left nav. for search refinements. The benefit of top nav. is that it clears up the center of the page for non navigation content. The drawback is that you can't fit as many categories in a top nav. Left side nav. can hold a long list of categories, but subcategories are often in the center of the page. In the past, I have preferred to use left nav. with a multi level scroll over search refinement. I believe this allowed users to get to their destination page with fewer clicks. (I have always believed that every required additional click causes lost customers). I also believe that this has caused me to get more juice flowing to deeper pages on sites and better long-tail conversion. This means I have had pages with a LOT of links. With this method, I have tightly controlled my categories. What on other sites are often dynamic search refinements, are on my sites additional categories. I am considering making a site with a top down navigation system. I like the additional screen space in the center I get to work with. Is my assumption about pages created by search refinement wrong? Is it ok for SEO to have a left nav that has a bunch of search refinements that are dynamically created?
Web Design | | EugeneF0 -
What is value in site aggregation?
If one was to own 5 sites that were in a similar vertical and at some point decide that managing 5 sites was more of a pain than managing 1,2, or 3, is it possible to combine sites via 301 redirects and increase the overall DA, and for urls that are similar, PA? So, we have site Hairbrush.com, comb.info, trimmer.com, hairmud.org, and barber.net: Assuming that they have a DA of Hairbrush.com = 32 Comb.info = 36 Trimmer.com = 27 Hairmud.org = 21 Barber.net = 44 Is there any testing that has shown combining the first 4 would increase the Comb.info from DA of 36 to DA of 51, etc? Is there any testing regarding the same, but with Page Authority? Thanks PS Assume other variables are equal. I also realize this could look as if they were all ECommerce, but what if they were service or bricks and mortar?
Web Design | | RobertFisher0