301 redirect www.brandname.com to www.brandname-keyword.com
-
It seems I've been reading about 301 for hours now, but I still didn't find an answer to my question, so I'm hoping someone can help me out here.
I'm starting a new webshop which is relaunching a semi known brand within its specific niche, say kids toys. Now my question is - since the brand name is relatively known and it is only 5 letters short, the website will be www.xxxxx.com. However the brand name itself doesn't say anything about the products we sell, so I was thinking to buy www.xxxxx-toys.com and 301 redirect www.xxxxx.com to this new site, but still use the shorter version in all marketing material since it's a lot easier to type and remember.
Apparently Google doesn't give extra juice to sites with keywords in the domain name anymore (?) but it would still say something about site to new customers unaware of the brand name.
Any advice?
-
"Therefore what weighs more - a domain name with a lot of years behind it or a domain name with the no. 1 keyword included in the domain name."
I'd go for the domain name with lots of years behind it every time. Put your site under this.
_ "writing thousands of unique product descriptions, and I was actually wondering if it is really worth the effort?"_
How many other companies are selling the same product, using the stock description? IMO it's worth spending time creating unique product descriptions along with your other SEO activities - the more ways you differentiate yourself, your site and your products the better. There are no short cuts, all areas need attention however long it takes.
-
The domain was originally registered in 1996.
I do realize most of the seo work will be on-site optimization, creating great quality content and doing quality link building.
We already bought some related domains including "www.xxxxx-toys.com" and therefore have the option to redirect either to the other - there is hardly any work involved doing so at the present moment. Therefore what weighs more - a domain name with a lot of years behind it or a domain name with the no. 1 keyword included in the domain name. Most people will search for the generic "toys" and not the specific brand. And it is one of those products like a "pencil", most people just want to buy a pencil, very few search for square pencil, although we are definitely targeting those niche keyword combinations as well. With Google no longer favoring keyword-in-url its just a matter of making people aware of the type of product we are selling - and keyword in url is still highlighted with bold. Which way to go?
Robert - you mentioned the importance of creating unique pages for e-commerce product pages. I have to say that in one of our other webshops this is presently one of the more time consuming creative tasks that we do - writing thousands of unique product descriptions, and I was actually wondering if it is really worth the effort?Its not we're writing the news, most products are sold on other webshops. Is a unique product description vs generic text from manufacturer worth the countless hours that could be spent on other seo tasks?
Anyone did some longterm split tests out there?
-
JaneVO
If you take a look at all you could do within SEO in terms of having your branded site rank, where would using a 301 redirect to a site with brand + one keyword rank in terms of return on effort and resources?
All to often in SEO, I see us trying to use a single device to change an outcome; wouldn't we be better served to understand the broader picture, evaluate all the options, then focus our resources on those mechanisms that give us the highest return? Do you believe that a single keyword with the brand will return more to you than:
initiating product Schema if you do not already have it,
insuring that you have set your meta descriptions to captivate the searcher and bring them to your site,
insuring that in an eCommerce site you have pages that are not duplicates of all others selling the same product,
learn enough about analytics to know how to measure your results in a way that allows you to make outcome changing modifications
create a great blog that captures great links,
develop infographics around your brand that speak to the buying audience and provide links to the site and products,
Believe me when I tell you that I can keep adding to this list for another hour. You are the only one who can take a step back, survey your niche, and develop a plan of action that cuts away the low return items and maximizes the return on effort and resources.
Think about it,
Robert
-
Ah right. I'd still go with putting a site straight onto the domain you have bought.
How old was is the domain / how long has it been registered before you bought it and what are the DA/PA of the domain?
-
There is no existing www.xxxxx.com website (we bought the brand and the site is currently redirecting to our unrelated main website). So I'm deciding on a brand new main domain name.
-
Keyword specific urls no longer have the value they once did, although I suspect that they do give some advantage when trying to rank for a specific keyword.
Personally, I wouldn't look to change an already established 'mini' brand url just to include keywords. There are lots of massive websites that started off small, ranking well and generating brand awareness. You wouldn't necessarily know what they are selling either judging by their domains, but it hasn't hindered them. Look at Amazon, play.com, or even Google - no keywords in the domain - just great sites with great products and customer service.
I would continue with the brand, improve onpage and content where needed, keep marketing the way you have been and carry on.
You could always build a separate blog on a different c class with the keyword rich domain.
-
How old is the existing www.xxxx.com website? How many pages are indexed?
If its a new site, with only a few pages indexed, and you are thinking of rather using www.xxx-toys.com then it will be a fairly hassle free process.
When your dealing with many pages, it can be a bit more time consuming and complicated,
Greg
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
.com vs .co.uk domain
I have a client who has a site live at example**.co.uk** and would like to rank for the term "example". But example**.com** is owned by another company who offers a different product and service and has been live since 2003. I know that I can make example**.co.uk** rank for keywords related to their service but I think it's going to be a struggle to get them to rank for the brand term "example" as the .com site already owns Page 1 with their domain name, Facebook page, Wiki page etc etc. The only variation is that example**.com** is a US based company and my client want to ranks in the UK only. What are the chances I can out rank example**.com** for the brand term on www.google.co.uk if example**.com** currently owns Page 1 on google**.co.uk**?
On-Page Optimization | | Marketing_Today0 -
Will google regards www.example.com and www.example.com?331457 as the duplicate content?
Our site has some affiliates, and the affiliate id is the suffix following with the url "?xxxxxx". I can see Google Analytics regards www.example.com and www.example.com?331457 as the different page, but in fact they are exactly the same, the version www.example.com?331457 is the visit from our affiliate site. And yesterday I start up my Moz Pro membership, and in the crawl issues I see SEOMoz thinks www.example.com and www.example.com?331457 are duplicate content. Is this really an issue? Will the search engine thinks these two pages are duplicate content?? Thanks you guys My first question here, not too dumb I hope. -----------------Update---------------------- I should explain how our affiliates work. We are an eBook related software company, and anyone can apply an affiliate account on the transaction platform "RegNow" even without our permission because we have opened the affiliate door. When a visitor come to our order page from an affiliate site, the url will add the affiliate ID suffix "?xxxxxx", and it's combined in cookies. After the deal is done, the affiliate gets his commission. So no matter how I customize the url with URL Builder, there must be the suffix "?xxxxxx". It's the ID of our affiliate, or they will get nothing. So the key point is, will the suffix "?331457" makes Google think www.example.com and www.example.com?331457 are different pages and duplicate content?
On-Page Optimization | | JonnyGreenwood0 -
If I want to rank well on one keyword would it be better to optimize multiple pages on the website for the keyword or should I only optimize one page for that keyword?
If I want to rank well on one keyword would it be better to optimize multiple pages on the website for the keyword or should I only optimize one page for that keyword?
On-Page Optimization | | CustomOnlineMarketing0 -
Broad keyword usage vs appropriate keyword usage
May I ask what is the difference between "broad keyword usage" and "appropriate keyword usage" that is included on the on-page reports? thank you!
On-Page Optimization | | karalyte0 -
Content Tabs and Keyword Stuffing
I am in the process of drawing up content templates to guide my company's marketing team in creating SEO optimized content as we move over our retail website to a new platform. On each product page, we will have multiple tabs that are crawl-able, each one containing different chunks of information on the products. Within each tab, I was thinking of breaking up the content and adding SEO value by using headers (h2 or h3) that have a keyword included. So, for example: "How The PRODUCT NAME Works" and "User Manuals for your PRODUCT NAME." Between the multiple tabs, in headers alone, the main keyword for the product (which will usually be the product name) will be on the page 7 times. Between this and the keywords that are part of the actual content (ex: product description), is this too many keyword instances? I know headers are often skimmed or skipped when used to simply break up the content, so I don't think they will impact user experience too much. However, I would love some feedback on if you agree with that and if you think I should cut down on the number of keywords or if I am headed in the right direction. Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | Marketing.SCG0 -
Optimizing for another keyword than the menu name
Hi I would like to hear if someone could help me decide whether or not it is important regarding SEO that the menu name is the same as the keyword we want to rank for. The site is a static site and one of our most important keywords. To give an example. Our menu name is "cars" and we want to rank for "cheap rental cars".
On-Page Optimization | | KennethK0 -
Title Keyword Question
I'm writing up keywords for new pages on a website. There are a number of variations on the way we can say what we're looking for, and I don't want to post the specific keywords but I'll give an example using fruits. Let's say I want to optimize for Granny Smith apples, McIntosh apples, Jonathan apples, etc. Could my title be Apples - Granny Smith, McIntosh, Jonathan and my page will come up when someone searchs "Granny Smith apples" or "McIntosh apples" etc. or do the words have to be repeated in order. Obviously I will also be repeating these in the description and on the page I'm optimizing. Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | crlana0 -
Importance of Keyword density?
Short, Sweet and easy for you guys!! How important is keyword density??? Cheers
On-Page Optimization | | wazza19850