Have I over-optimized (on-site optimization using SEOMoz tool)?
-
Hey all,
Quite new to SEO although I tried to educate myself as much as I could. I just spent (really) a lot of time doing the onsite optimization of a few key pages of a website in 3 languages (in which I'm more or less conversational - with the help of Google Translate).
I know content should not be misleading and feel natural. I think the result is natural but I'm not sure... I optimized as much as I could so as to reach an "A" grade as per SEOMoz tool for each page, for 1-4 keywords per page. I feel sometimes I stretched a bit, but not sure what "stretching" is given my lack of experience.
So I was wondering if some of you could tell me what they thought and if there was some obvious don'ts in my work.
Here are a few key pages I have optimized:
-
The homepage: http://goo.gl/00Fti
-
The search results page: http://goo.gl/b1fxE
-
The property page: http://goo.gl/t2GdY
-
The destinations page: http://goo.gl/0Kc0l
Note that the other versions of the page - Italian & Spanish - may be more awkward, so I welcome your opinions for these as well (dropdown on top of the page to change the language).
Thanks!!
-
-
Spot on, native French speaker, learnt English as a second language.
Frugal traveling was referring to the NY Times blog "the frugal traveler", but I get your points, have corrected all issues mentioned, and will have the copy reviewed. Will also see if I can create "profiles" / "use case scenario" with profiles.
Thanks!
-
Thanks for the reply.
On the copywriting: it's just very awkward, although grammatically correct. As it happens, I speak French. And I'm guessing the copy was written by a Francophone. Many of the faux pas begin to make sense only when translated back into French.
No native English would refer to:
- hair "falling," (instead of "hair falling out")
- traveling "in frugal conditions" (instead of "on the cheap"]
- "stellar studies" (I think you mean academic achievements)
More importantly, it's just weird to say a fair proportion of your "client base is attached to discretion." Do they use scotch tape? I think you mean they appreciate discretion. But that still doesn't explain why you "abide by our discretion manifesto." Manifesto is just not a commonly used word in English and business people don't "abide" by them.
Nor would an English speaker write about a "hotel booking portal of a special kind." He would say "a special kind of hotel reservation site." The same comment applies to "on our side" (de notre cote?) when I think you mean "from our point of view."
Here's a real howler: "Cherry on the cake, her heavy travel website experience made us gain precious time."
I could go on. But the basic point is the copy reads like a word-for-word translation by someone who is not a native English speaker. There is no nuance, much less cultural sensitivity.
And at times, it is difficult to understand what you are trying to say.
On another matter:
Of course, you shouldn't make up testimonials. But for now, perahps you could include hypothetical profiles of people who might need your service. Write a few paragraphs abut each and maybe include a cartoon sketch. At the moment, you have a site without people.Not good.
-
Many of the titles are long so as to include several relevant keywords. For example, each of the homepage and search results titles has both "day rooms" and "hourly hotels"; the page destinations has both in it. Would you recomment removing the hotel name/brand?
I have done extensive keyword research, really. "Booking" or "reservation" and their derivatives are not drivers of traffic. I note your point on "reservation" with interest (and surprise), however, my benchmarking with the largest websites clearly shows that book/choose/find are consistently used over "reserve".
Yeah, the strategy includes PR & outreach to press & travel bloggers (though no blogging), but I thought onsite optimization was necessary before going after the links.
There are no testimonials at the moment, I don't think we should invent quotes, should we? Noted for the team member names (shortened due to privacy concerned). Regarding the general copy writing of the site, noted as well. Can you give another couple of hints as to what's wrong with it?
Much appreciated, thanks!
-
Keywords researched include hotels by the hour, day rooms, etc., but hotel partners do not wish their names to be associated with such terms, hence the ambiguous use of such terms. Needs to be visible to bring people in based on research, as this is close to what the site offers, but not too much.
-
Why in your content and metadata do you use the long tail keyword "not hourly hotels," but then in your footer you explicitly say you have hourly hotels?
-
Not to be unkind...
...but I think there are some major issues.
And the issues go beyond SEO.
Many of your page titles are too long. Some make no mention that the product is hotel rooms. Other titles repeat a word or phrase in un-natural ways that could be a problem. It's not clear to me whether this is intentional, or a CMS problem. You use the word "booking" in page titles; but the term is almost unknown in the US. Americans talk about "reservations." Have you done keyword research?
Do you have a link-building strategy that includes PR and blogging and outreach to travel bloggers?
But I think the biggest issue with the site is the very poor quality of the English translation. The copy is not at all idiomatic. This is a a bad trust signal to users. It conveys the impression that you don't care about them.
Another bad trust signal is the fact that you don't name your team, providing only initials for last names.
There are also no testimonials.
It's all very mysterious and sketchy -- even though you say it's not a shady hourly hotel deal.
I would suggest addressing the trust and transparency issues before even beginning to think about SEO. Even if people can find the site, I doubt many will part with their money until you do.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
In the U.S., how can I stop the European version of my site from outranking the U.S. version?
I've got a site with two versions – a U.S. version and a European version. Users are directed to the appropriate version through a landing page that asks where they're located; both sites are on the same domain, except one is .com/us and the other is .com/eu. My issue is that for some keywords, the European version is outranking the U.S. version in Google's U.S. SERPs. Not only that, but when Google displays sitelinks in the U.S. SERPs, it's a combination of pages on the European site and the U.S. site. Does anyone know how I can stop the European site from outranking the U.S. site in the U.S.? Or how I can get Google to only display sitelinks for pages on the U.S. site in the U.S. SERPs? Thanks in advance for any light you can shed on this topic!
International SEO | | matt-145670 -
Opening Up Webmaster Tools Geo-Targeting to Everyone Instead of US
Hi Mozzers, I wanted to get everyone's opinion on this. We have an e-commerce site that was targeting 3 different geo-locations. The main one is a .com. The other two were Canada and UK based. We recently turned off our Canada site and 301 to the .com. The .com site had been targeted towards United States in Google Webmaster Tools. Should I remove the Webmaster Tools geo-targeting now that Canada is pointing towards our main site? I don't want to lose rankings for US since that is our main market and the .com site is our main revenue driver and focus. I'm inclined to leave it as is because I still see our .com site ranking when I search in Google CA. From what I've seen is that it can take months for something to change and I definitely don't want anything to go awry. Just wanted to get everyone's thoughts on this. Thanks in advance.
International SEO | | SylviaH0 -
Webmaster tools - a drop in Views and Searches
Hi everybody I'm experience a very odd thing in Webmaster Tools (and Google Analytics). 4. March I can se a drop of views from about 2000 views a day to 250 views a day and the days thereafter they views are close to zero. Also some of the search term looks weird after this and is terms like w www.youtube.com, youtube musicas and youtube i put a spell on you, placing them in SERP in top 10 and refering to our /Youtube site (which is a blank site with no content). 5. March we got some new content on our site regarding danish flyers, and even though Webmaster Tools shows that our views are close to zero, Google Analytics shows an increase of trafic to our site from search terms from about 150 visits 4. March to about 600 visits 16. March. So what Webmaster Tools shows about views do not make any sense to me and especially not why we would rank on the term Youtube. I have also searched on some of these Youtube search terms and I can't see us ranking in SERP on these terms in top 10, but in Google Analytics I can see that we have got visits on these Youtube search terms. The domain we are using is an old domain that hosted an e-mail and chat site and I am a bit worried about the external links to our site. But the external links that Webmaster Tools and Open Site Explorer shows I don't see as bad links and the site has not had anything to do with Youtube clips. Our site is a https site - I don't know if that could have anything to do with it? So I'm really puzled about why Webmaster tools says our Views have dropped to zero, why Google Analytics says there is an increase of trafic from search to our site and what Youtube search terms have to do with our site?
International SEO | | Bulpen0 -
Best practice for multi-language site?
Recently our company is going to expand our site from just english to multi-language, including english, french, german, japanese, and chinese. I deeply understand a solid and feasible plan is pretty important, so I want to ask you mozzers for help before we taking action! Our site is a business site which sells eBook software, for the product pages, the ranks are taken by famous software download sites like cnet, softonic, etc. So the main source of our organic traffic is the guide post, long-tail keywords. We are going to manually translate the product pages and guide post pages which targeting on important keywords into other languages. Not the entire english site. So my primary question is: should I use the sub-domain or sub-category to build the non-english pages? "www.example.com/fr/" or "fr.example.com"? The second question: As we are going to manually translate the entire pages into other languages, should I use the "rel=alternate hreflang=x" tags? Because Google's official guideline says if we only translate the navigations or just part of the content, we should use this tag. And what's your tips for building a multi-language site? Please let me know them as much as possible Thanks!
International SEO | | JonnyGreenwood0 -
Impact of Japanese .jp site duplicate content?
Our main website is at http://www.traxnyc.com and we just launched a Japanese version of the site at http://www.traxnyc.jp domain. However all the images used on the .jp site are linked from the .com site. Would this hurt me in Google at all for hotlinking images? Also there is quite a bit of duplicate content on the .jp site at the moment: only a few things have been translated to Japanese and for the most part the layouts and words are exactly the same (in English). Would this hurt my Google rankings in the US at all? Thanks for all your help.
International SEO | | DiamondJewelryEmpire0 -
Any tips for optimization at the local level in Australia?
We only have P.O. boxes in Australia, but that will probably not work because of the rules. How do I infiltrate in the Australian market at local level- for the main cities? Note: We already have some pages on our website dedicated to Australia.
International SEO | | SCLTeamShip
Example: key phrase+Australia Thank you.0 -
Google search cache points to and uses content from different url
We have two sites, 1 in new zealand: ecostore.co.nz and 1 in Australia: ecostoreaustralia.com.au Both sites have been assigned with the correct country in Webmaster tools Both site use the same urls structure and content for product and category pages Both sites run off the same server in the US but have unique ip adresses. When I go to google.com.au and search for: site:ecostoreaustralia.com.au I get results which google says are from the Australian domain yet on closer inspection it is actually drawing content from the NZ website. When I view a cached page the URL bar displays the AU domain name but on the page (in the top grey box) it says: _This is Google's cache of http://www.ecostore.co.nz/pages/our-highlights. _ Here is the link to this page: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Zg_CYkqyjP4J:www.ecostoreaustralia.com.au/pages/our-highlights+&cd=7&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=au In the last four weeks the ranking of the AU website has dropped significantly and the NZ site now ranks first in Google AU, where before the AU site was listed first. Any idea what is going wrong here?
International SEO | | ArchMedia0 -
Multi-lingual SEO: Country-specific TLD's, or migration to a huge .com site?
Dear SEOmoz team, I’m an in-house SEO looking after a number of sites in a competitive vertical. Right now we have our core example.com site translated into over thirty different languages, with each one sitting on its own country-specific TLD (so example.de, example.jp, example.es, example.co.kr etc…). Though we’re using a template system so that changes to the .com domain propagate across all languages, over the years things have become more complex in quite a few areas. For example, the level of analytics script hacks and filters we have created in order to channel users through to each language profile is now bordering on the epic. For a number of reasons we’ve recently been discussing the cost/benefit of migrating all of these languages into the single example.com domain. On first look this would appear to simplify things greatly; however I’m nervous about what effect this would have on our organic SE traffic. All these separate sites have cumulatively received years of on/off-site work, and even if we went through the process of setting up page-for-page redirects to their new home on example.com, I would hate to lose all this hard-work (and business) if we saw our rankings tank as a result of the move. So I guess the question is, for an international business such as ours, which is the optimal site structure in the eyes of the search engines; Local sites on local TLD’s, or one mammoth site with language identifiers in the URL path (or subdomains)? Is Google still so reliant on TLD for geo targeting search results, or is it less of a factor in today’s search engine environment? Cheers!
International SEO | | linklater0