Video SEO: Should I add Video Transcriptions to You Tube Videos Even with Google CC?
-
So, You Tube allows plenty of room from descriptions. I think 5,000 characters. Google does a poor Closed Caption of our audio. Should I also be adding accurate transcriptions to the description field in YouTube to help my Video SEO.
What are the pro's cons and is it worth doing?
-
Quite.
However, they don't use the machine generated transcriptions to rank your videos yet. i don't think it was the intention of Jeff to suggest that, but It's a bit of a misnomer. They currently onyl regularly index the one's you upload (because they're deemed as more accurate).
-
One of my analysts found this form a WBF in Ausgust:
“The fourth YouTube ranking factor on the content side is transcription. This is something that most people don't know about. I'm going to tell you about it today. That is that YouTube has a feature where it's going to try to transcribe your video for you, and it is horrible at transcribing your video. If you've ever tried to read the transcription that it does by machine, it is awful. However, something else that they don't tell you is that they use those transcriptions to rank your video for keywords.
So, if you were to slip something, and there's actually been some tests done on this, where someone transcribes a video and throws in a word that isn't mentioned anywhere in the description, anywhere in the title, and then you type that in a search in YouTube and up comes that video. They are indexing the transcriptions. So take the time to go ahead and transcribe your video word for word. Upload the text file. It will match up the words. It will then make your video closed caption, which will increase your click through rate, and it will also allow you to rank better for that video. Just a quick tip on that. Definitely worth doing. If you're going to take all the time to make the video, take a few extra minutes and transcribe it and make it happen.”
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/youtube-ranking-factors-whiteboard-friday
-
I think they'll eventually get to the point where the auto-generated transcriptions are also indexed, but currently the transcription quality just isn't quite accurate enough across the board to make that possible.
-
Phil,
Thanks. You were the first to point out the defining reason for transcription: "YouTube's machine generated transcriptions don't get indexed, but transcripts you upload will."
That's really what was not clear to me. I guess if I were Google and owned YouTube, I would to index CC, but I am not.
At least for now it seems transcription is well worth the effort.
-
Yes. YouTube's machine generated transcriptions don't get indexed, but transcripts you upload will. This will then allow your YouTube videos to rank for long tail queries relevant to the text of your transcript (much like page copy). You can also "keyword stuff" your Transcriptions to optimise the video for certain keywords.
NOTE: You can and should keyword stuff in a Whitehat way, not just plough tons of versions of the keyword into the text at random points. What i mean by this is... for example, if you want to rank for the name of the actor performing in your video - then you could append "actor's name: " to any line that they speak. Additionally, you could add some descriptive text explaining what's going on - rather than just copying the recited text.
-
We had recently tested them. I think that will be our route.
-
SpeakerText is awesome. You will be in good hands. I wish we had the volume of videos to go enterprise with them because their Caption Box is wicked cool.
-
thanks for the +1 vote on Dana's comments. We did the first 80 videos transcribed via an elance contractor, but I think the service is probably the route to go.
-
Thanks for the reply Dana. I guess I was getting concerned over somehow the transcription being considered duplicate content. You actually answered the better question of how should we deal with transcriptions in general.
With 700+ videos to transcribe, nice to get it right the first time. The service we are considering is speakertext.com. I believe they can automate the CC need.
-
I agree with Dana - there really aren't any negatives and a huge amount of positives to adding closed captions to YouTube videos. If you have any kind of narrative in your videos I can't think of a single reason why you shouldn't.
Also, take advantage of good (but still cost effective) transcription services and upload closed captions in as many other languages as you want/need to.
Carla
-
Yes. It is definitely worth doing. IMHO, there are absolutely no "cons" to adding transcriptions, especially good ones. You are right, the Google machine transcriptions are just plain horrible.
I wouldn't load the transcription into the description area on YouTube, because that's not really what that space is intended for. I would create a transcript, upload it to YouTube and then disable the machine transcription. There is one very compelling reason to do this. YouTube displays a "CC" for all videos that have been closed-captioned. People wanting to watch videos with captions (and that's not just hearing-impaired people, it can be people on mobile devices without headphones, or people at work without speakers on their computers), can search and sort by this parameter. This means if they are looking for a video on a particular topic and they need it to be closed-captioned and they sort by that, your videos will come up on the list. If you transcription is just in the description area, then your video wouldn't come up as having captions available.
I use http://www.dotsub.com to create timed captions for all of my company's videos. They provide a wonderful, easy-to-use and free tool that does a splendid job. Exporting your transcript and uploading them to YouTube is a piece of cake.
There are of course services that you can pay to do it for you too, and they tend to be fairly inexpensive.
Once uploaded, your close-caption file content is 100% indexable content to search engines. It isn't hidden in a iframe or anything like that. The only downside is the same downside you face interms of SEO by hosting your videos on YouTube instead of a 3rd party like Wistia. YouTube will always outrank you for your own content. When your videos get ranked in Google, they will link back 99% of the time to YouTUbe and not to your Website, no matter what you do...transcription or no transcription.
Bottom line is those transcriptions can only help you. They cannot hurt you.
I hope that's helpful!
Dana
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How can we boost our rankings in a London-based Google search?
Hi all, I work for enterprise app development & mobile consultancy, Mubaloo. We tend to rank fairly well on Google for our targeted keywords in the Bristol area but not as well in London. Obviously there is more competition in London but that aside, we still don't rank brilliantly. We use our London address as our main address on our website, same for our London telephone number. Both of our offices are submitted to Google Maps and we include blog content with London and Bristol in the headers. Our main HQ is in Bristol but the London office is growing. What are the ways we can improve our rankings from a London-based Google search? Thank you in advance!
Image & Video Optimization | | donaldsze0 -
Video SiteMap Updating
Hi all! We noticed some issues with our sitemap and so we went through and optimized it to re-submit it. At the same time, it seemed prudent to optimize our video sitemap, however we probably should have thought through that more as we are seeing the numbers of indexed videos going down. Why and what we changed: We recently moved from flash/flv video to Html5 videos with webm and mp4. So it seemed prudent to change our sitemap which was using the old flv videos. At the same time updating our videos with more SEO friendly titles seemed prudent. So far our indexed videos from the video sitemap have gone from 70,000 to 28,000, so: A. How much does a video sitemap depend on the URL of the web page versus the title and the video itself? I am assuming that Google sees a new file extension and title and assumes that it is a completely new video and that might be why they are de-indexing the old ones? I suppose we could go back and put the old sitemap to the old flv videos back up, but maybe we should just tough out the change and wait for the new videos to be indexed. Thanks!! Craig
Image & Video Optimization | | TheCraig0 -
Google+ Business Page Location Problem
I run a business in the St. Louis area. Oddly, St. Louis is broken up into more than 100 municipalities. Google keeps listing my plus page by the small municipality I am in within St. Louis, which limits my ability to show up in the St. Louis local search results. However, other businesses in town are being listed under St. Louis instead of their municipality. Any ideas on how to change this? When I go in and try to change it myself, it just stays the same. Thanks, Steve
Image & Video Optimization | | BardolLawFirm0 -
Google Knowledge Graph - change bio image
I have a client who is a well known personality in a particular niche that I've done some general event and design work for, but he hasn't had interest in SEO or social help until this point. He is very displeased by the image that was chosen for his Google Knowledge Graph result when you search his name. The issue isn't due to a poor photo, but rather due to the site it links through to. Google has chosen to use a bio image for his Knowledge Graph result which links to an "anti-" site. This site is opposed to the organization he leads. If you click on the image, it sends you to an image result page backed by an article which is full of misinformation and overall negativity about this individual. The source is also listed under the image on the Knowledge Graph result, a source he doesn't believe deserves any publicity, especially in conjunction with his name. So, what best practices might you suggest should be employed to go about getting Google to choose a replacement image for his Knowledge Base bio? Optimize his own bio page and bio image on his website? Get an image on his Wikipedia page? Create a G+ page with the bio image? Integrate the rel author syntax into his articles pointing back to his bio page? He doesn't want this to become a public matter, so he's against posting the issue to Google's Help Boards or reporting it in a public fashion. I'm not sure what should be the best first steps and top priorities for him and am hoping the SEOmoz team is starting to see some trends with Knowledge Graph. Let me know your thoughts when you can. Thanks so much! iLqNW iLqNW.png
Image & Video Optimization | | windturbines2 -
Would 2 Google Places locations help my Google Places ranking?
Hi. Our agency office is located in a "bad" zip code relevant to active businesses who would need our agency services. In a nutshell, we get really bad inquiries who can never afford our services...and it's coming directly from the Google geolocation function. We plan to relocate our offices within 1 year. Would it help us in Google Places if we created a "new" physical office location to cover up the "bad" one we are currently in? We could use a paid location like a UPS Mail Center physical address that is located within a more desiring zip code. Thanks for any input. Jay
Image & Video Optimization | | theideapeople0 -
Is there a very quick way to geenrate the google top 100 for a any given keyword
I ma looking to produce a list of the top 100 websites in a list format from any given keyword. Bascially a process or ftool that will generate a list so i dont have to copy and paste all of them.....any ideas guys and gals
Image & Video Optimization | | raytax0 -
Multi-site listings in Google Local/Place pages
I've had problems with a client that is a local medical center with multiple sites/addresses. We've created a Place Page for each location and linked it to the location page on the client's website that matches the address on the Place page. But that means we're not linking to the medical center's home page -- and Google Places doesn't like that. I know this because after we'd owner-verified each Place Page, Google went in and just changed the website link that was a deep link to a location page and replaced it with a link to the home page. But now there's not an address match. How should we handle this? Related question: Does it make sense to claim a separate listing in Yelp and other local directories for each of the separate locations since they each have a unique address? Will Yelp & other local directories allow for links to non-home pages on the client's website?
Image & Video Optimization | | DenisL0 -
What is the best way to push your video in Youtube?
I would like that my videos rank better in Youtube. How to do that?
Image & Video Optimization | | MichaelJanik0