What do you when the wrong site links to you?
-
In doing research of our backlink profile, I've found a couple dozen of links from off-topic websites linking to us. You see, our domain is Voices.com and tends to scoop up links from unrelated sites that are clearly trying to link to another site such as evp-voices.com or areavoices.com or dozens of others.
What would you do? Ask the webmaster to remove them because they are completely unrelated? Or would you keep them if you believed they aren't causing any harm?
-
While I'm certainly not engaged in any form of blackhat techniques, we were severely affected by Penguin. Needless to say, we suffered a 50% drop on April 24 and have not risen back since. For that reason, yes, I do have link paranoia - good term
I'm thinking of making another post on the subject (YouMoz) because I've finally figured out what happened. I'm hoping this next update will catch my fix.
For the record, they are not spammy but rather topical sites and directories related to Ghosts or New Age stuff. Again, we have nothing to do with these topics.
Seems like the consensus is just leave them. There are about two dozen out of 2000 links I manually reviewed in a spreadsheet.
-
I have to disagree with the monetization sentiment. One presumes a business plan is based on the servicing core topics of the business. Monetizing off-topic traffic may give you some short term money but it would do nothing to serve your target audience and long term growth. EPV has nothing to do with voice overs - unless one of their actors is a ghost. Any pages on his site about EPV would only water down his messaging and confuse his audience. It would be distracting and disingenuous to try and monetize this traffic.
As to the first part, again: outcome of cost/benefit analysis (which should include opportunity cost).
-
I've noticed a lot of "link paranoia" lately. Ever since Google started to take action on sites that are seriously trying to game the SERPS webmasters are paying a lot more attention to their backlink profile.
A few unrelated links are not going to get you penalized.
Penguin and manual unnatural links penalties are not intended to granularly punish every single unrelated or anchor texted link. Rather, the idea was to punish sites that are actively engaging in webspam.
If you are not actively engaging in webspam, then there is no need to worry about your backlinks bringing you down. The one exception could be negative SEO. But, I personally believe that 99% of the people who think they are being negatively SEO'd are not. People look at their backlink profile and think AGH! There are links here that I didn't make! It must be a competitor trying to bring me down! When in reality, every site is going to attract unusual links from unusual sources.
I do believe that negative SEO is possible, but rare. In order to effectively do negative SEO you would need to bombard a site with followed links containing their desired anchor text. A few links here and there aren't going to do it. A campaign like that would be obvious. And if you are seeing a pile of anchor texted spammy links then just disavow them and that disarms the attacker.
Should you disavow or try to remove these links? I would say no. Should you write to the webmaster and say, "Hey, I think you meant to link to this other site, not me?" I suppose you could if you wanted to try to help the webmaster out. But given that those links could actually be helpful to your site, I would just leave them.
-
When I say that my site has about a million of these links that is not an exaggeration.
My rankings are great. If I decided to do something about these links I could spend tens of thousands of dollars fighting a problem that does not exist.
I'll wait until they prove to be a problem.
**If he's getting traffic from SEs on the wrong topic, the benefits of solving a few of the more authoritative back links would be worth the time. **
I'd enjoy that traffic and try to monetize it. I doubt that these links are causing any rankings that are unrelated.
-
At first glance I would not be worried about it. I tend to think those types of links won't hurt unless they're extremely excessive/abusive.. else negative SEO could really get out of hand. And you're website has some very strong relevant links pointing to it already.
-
Which would be the answer to your cost/benefit analysis.
If he's getting traffic from SEs on the wrong topic, the benefits of solving a few of the more authoritative back links would be worth the time.
-
I don't enjoy these links pointing at my site.... but I don't think that it is a good use of my time trying to chase down invisible people in another hemisphere who are probably behind the links and would not take them down if I could get in touch with them.
-
I agree but only after doing a link profile and cost/benefit analysis. Assuming away spam, if a significant number of sites are linking to him on the wrong topic, that would be something I would want to correct.
-
Every website with any amount of traffic and spider action will pick up unrelated links.
Some of them are from blackhats, some are from scrapers, some from people building some type of conglomerated site, some even from university experiments.
One of my sites has about a million of these links.
I don't worry about them. I rarely even look at my links because these are so numerous I have a hard time finding the good ones.
You have a great domain, looks like you have a fantastic website. I would not worry about this for a minute.
-
This case is a little tricky in that there are degrees of 'wrong'. I'm assuming these are not spam links but just off topic. Here you have to weigh the value of the general link equity vs potentially confusing SE's about your site's topic.
Rand just finished a Whiteboard on how important topic is becoming.
If you decide they are hurting, I suggest contacting the site to outline how the link isn't serving their visitors. Even provide a couple alternative site that would be better (ie, make it worth their time)
I would hesitate to use the disavow tool. It's supposed to be a last resort for spam links and that doesn't really apply here.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
INBOUND LINKS FROM OTHER OWNED BRANDS HARMING MY MAIN SITE?
Hey, I work for a company that owns 5 brands, all pretty large sites with 10,000s of pages. We have one primary site, that has inbound links from all the other owned sites (4) resulting in 950k backlinks pointing to the domain. For context, the primary domain has 781 referring domains (with 4 of them being the other owned sites). My question was, will this excess of linking be harming the primary domain? Will the ration of backlinks to referring domains be seen as a negative quality indicator? Charlie
Link Building | | charliehowes10 -
Other sites linking to our site through sitewide footers
Hello, We have other sites linking to our site through images in sitewide footers, resulting in a link from every page of each site. Those sites are not owned by us and they decided to link to us on their own. They usually link to us as their "sponsor" or "partner", sponsor as in sponsor of some event and partner as in we sometimes work together on joint initiatives. I've searched Moz forum and other articles, but haven't been able to find an answer to this question. We'd like to make sure Google doesn't consider it to be spammy and we don't get any sort of penalty. Should we ask them not to link to us through those images in a sitewide footer or ask them to simply add "nofollow"? We don't want to remove those links if they are not considered to be harmful and removing them will hurt our DA/PA.
Link Building | | marynau0 -
I am looking for a software to keep track of the back links or link building
Hi Guys, I am very new hear. I just joined. I have a few websites that I need to manage. I am looking for a software that will allow me to manually add the links that I have been able to acquire. It would also be a bonus if it could search for the links to my site and to see if its still active. Because I have a freelancer working a few hours a week on link building and I need to keep track of the links. I am looking for something simple and good. Any suggestions? By the way, I used Raven Tools many years ago, and it had this feature. But since joining Moz, I don't want to be paying for 2 subscriptions. And I don't know if Raven still has this feature. Your suggestions would be appreciated. Thank you. Ryan
Link Building | | RyanNewman0 -
I have links coming from spammy sites that DO NOT exist anymore... Disavow or not?
Hi There !!! I´m cleaning the link profile of one of our sites and making the typical analysis I have found the following scenario: All SEO tools that helped me to gather the data (WMT, opensite, majestic) are showing me that I have links coming from spammy sites that actually are not online any more. In other words, the spammy site where the link is coming is not alive (when I try to check the page itself I´m having a 404 or domain expired). My main question is… Should I disavow these domains links? or should I simply ignore them? We got an unnatural penalty and we are doing the whole proccess (checking sites, contacting, etc….). Many Thanks for your help
Link Building | | AutoEurope0 -
Back linking to t foreign sites
One of our major competitors seems to be linking to an Asian speaking website that has a blog/product review formant. I was wondering how they are achieving this. Are there any non English /Asian sites worth submitting to and what is the best way to go about this if English is the only language you speak! And of course is it worth while doing this from an SEO perspective.
Link Building | | Hardley10 -
How to handle bad DoFollow links to pages on my site that no longer exist
I briefly had a forum on one of my sites, but after getting inundated with spam I decided to remove it for the time being. During the brief time it was up, most of the spammers were stopped from registering, but a few managed to get through and posted tons of links to their prescription drug sites. These posts were deleted almost instantly, but the spammers also created DoFollow backlinks on high authority community sites like ning. The forum posts they linked to were deleted immediately, so the links never went anywhere and the forum has been deleted entirely for a few months now. When clicked, the spam backlinks now bring someone to a "Sorry, that page doesn’t exist" page on my site. My site suffered a bit in the last Panda update and it made me look through my backlink profile, finding lots of these links - even though the pages on my site are long gone, could these links be hurting my site? Can a DoFollow link to a site help or hurt the main domain, even if the actual page it's linking to is deleted?
Link Building | | adventurenick0 -
Keyword links are not showing up in majesticseo or open site explorer
I've been doing link building by writing good content and getting other blogs to post my articles with keyword links embedded. One example is: Original article: http://www.cleanedison.com/blog/setting-the-stage-for-greenbuild-2012-1997 Re-published article: http://www.renewableenergyfocus.com/blog/2012/11/7/guest-blog-setting-the-stage-for-greenbuild-2012/683.aspx (Keyword is LEED Certification - it goes to http://www.cleanedison.com/leed) I have 2 questions: Why isn't this backlink being found by majesticseo or open site explorer? Why isn't my original article showing up a google search at all? P.S. Overall, despite my best efforts, my keyword rankings have been falling recently, is there anything obvious that I'm doing wrong?
Link Building | | CleanEdisonInc0 -
Which link should I use for link building?
I have an article which have high rank on Google. But recent, I use mod rewrite url so this article have new url. old: mywebsite.com/c1/p-1 new: mywebsite.com/c-e/p-1 Now, google is indexing old url. I want to ask when I build linking to my site, which link should I use for link building? I should build linking for new url or old url. Thanks
Link Building | | sonzin13040