My pages are not listed in search results
-
My URL is: puremobile.comI have two websites: puremobile.ca and puremobile.com : both same products, but different discription , but same title of productwhen i exact search a product for example :** "HTC 70H0029701M Smartphone Case Large"** , puremobile.ca shows up , but not puremobile.com I have no issues with indexing, webmaster tools is indexing normallywhen i search for: puremobile.com "HTC 70H0029701M Smartphone Case Large" , i get the puremobile.com product page.but when i search ANY product (no matter how unique its title or description is : google doesnt display puremobile.commy PR ( as i far as i can see was PR 5 last year, and today when i checked it was PR 0) .. I havent been doing any fishy Link building, some basic blogger outreach ( non paid), and social bookmarking. and my blog is very active and I have original content on my pages.what is causing this? and how can i resolve this issue.any help is greatly appreciated
-
Hi PureMobile, you've received some great responses. Has your question been answered?
-
Surely what I'm going to say need to be confirmed doing a proper audit, but your PageRank 5 may be dried by the giant mega menu you have, which is causing your site to have 421 internal followed links...
If you don't change that, all your pages are going to be too weak to compete in the SERPs, because they are literally bleeding all their PageRank out.
Related to your visibility problem, as already cited by the others, I suggest you to implement the rel="alternate" hreflang this way:
<rel="alternate" hreflang="en-ca" href="http://www.puremobile.ca/"></rel="alternate">
<rel="alternate" hreflang="en" href="http://www.puremobile.com/"></rel="alternate">
<rel="alternate" hreflang="x-default" href="http://wwww.puremobile.com"></rel="alternate">
The first line is telling Google to show only the URLs from the .ca site to users performing a Search in English from Canada.
The second line is telling Google to show only the URLs from the .com site to users performing a Search in English from all over the world (apart Canada, because of the first line)
The third line is telling Google to show always the URLs from the .com site to users performing a Search in a language other that English from all over the world.
You can find more information about the hreflang here:
-
First thing we need to be sure of is how you're doing your searching, puremobile. When you say "when I exact search a product for example" do you mean you are doing that search in your own browser?
Due to all the personalisation of search results that Google does, if you're doing that search from your own browser, it's pretty much guaranteed to give you the .ca results as you are searching from Canada. In fact, if you are doing a default search, you are probably searching from Google.ca which is even more likely to give you that .ca result. (Even using incognito browser mode, you'll still likely see this)
To get around this, you can set up Google.ca and Google.com as two different search engines to track rankings from in each of your SEOMoz campaign. Ideally, you'll want to set up a separate campaign for each version of your site (.com and .ca)
Still not 100% accurate as these rankings still don't take all the other personalisation elements into account, but will give you a better idea of the rankings for each site.
As Matt points out, you'll still want to do what you can to give the engines as much help understanding which site to serve which visitor as possible. That work will also be easier to track if you set up both sites and separate campaigns and track your efforts individually.
Hope that helps?
Paul
-
There are actually a number of ways to approach what you're doing, including implementing hreflang tags for en-ca or en-us but I'm seeing the .com here in Melbourne.
I would sort out your canonicals, hreflang, and get your pages setup to show the right one per search engine (.ca on google.ca, .com on the rest maybe.)
-
Well I'd say you've definitely been penalized. Reason being would most likely be that you have duplicate content on a massive scale. Every one of your pages are duplicated between the .com and the .ca versions without a rel=canonical tag listed anywhere to be seen.
It seems like a manual penalty seeing as how your PR is gone, so I'd keep my eye on GWMT but in any case you need to solve that duplicate content problem before you do anything.
Basically what you should do is redirect one to the other 301-style. Like.. right now would be a good time to do it!
Good luck!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should search pages be indexed?
Hey guys, I've always believed that search pages should be no-indexed but now I'm wondering if there is an argument to index them? Appreciate any thoughts!
Technical SEO | | RebekahVP0 -
Canonicalisation and Dynamic Pages
We have an e-commerce single page app hosted at https://www.whichledlight.com and part of this site is our search results page (http://www.whichledlight.com/t/gu10-led-bulbs?fitting_eq=GU10). To narrow down products on the results we make heavy use of query parameters. From an SEO perspective we are telling GoogleBot to not index pages that include these query parameters to prevent duplicate content issues and to not index pages where the combination of query parameters has resulted in no results being returned. The only exception to this is the page parameter. We are posting here to check our homework so to speak. Does the above sound sensible? Although we have told GoogleBot to not index these pages, Moz will still crawl them (to the best of my knowledge), so we will continue to see crawl errors within our Moz reports where in fact these issues don't exist. Is this true? Is there anyway to make Moz ignore pages with certain query parameters? Any other suggestions to improve the SEO of our results pages is most appreciated. Thanks
Technical SEO | | TrueluxGroup0 -
Google Search Results Display URL
Our urls show as www.domain.com/getproduct.aspx?productid=48376 (url #1) in Google search results. When you click on the link and go to the site the URL is www.domain.com/product-name.aspx (url #2) I checked in Google Webmaster Tools (Fetch as Google) and there is a 302 redirect from url #1 to url #2. It also shows a Set-Cookie value, ASP.NET_SessionID= If we make it a 301 redirect instead, will the url displayed in Google search results be the url #2? We need to get rid of the Set-Cookie for crawlers correct?
Technical SEO | | Guy_Huyett0 -
Bing search results
Hi I am getting little or no traffic via Bing. Why would this be? all my traffic is from Google and social media. my site is www.cocoonfxmedia.co.uk
Technical SEO | | Cocoonfxmedia0 -
Why do they rank the home page?
We are trying to rank for the key word Motorcycle Parts. We have moved up to page 2 over the past couple months; however, google is ranking our home page not our http://www.rockymountainatvmc.com/s/49/61/Motorcycle-Parts page that is for motorcycle parts. We are working on internal linking to help point the right signals too. Any other thoughts? ( we have new content written to put in as well we just have to wait for an issue to be fixed before we can put it in)
Technical SEO | | DoRM0 -
Cache pages in search results
My URL is: pure mobile . ca when searching on google for "puremobile note 2 defender" the search results are coming up with the incorrect title pages of my search results - for some reason all the search results are coming up with "unlocked cell phone" at the end of the title. but on the android and on my desktop - they show the correct title of my pages. we used to deal with unlocked cell phone ( over a year ago) - and all meta tags and title tags have been fully updated. how can i let google know to update these results.
Technical SEO | | puremobile0 -
Wrong listing in SERP
For one of the keyword of my website wrong URL appearing in SERP.I wanted to remove that listing in SERPs.How can i remove that listing in SERP?
Technical SEO | | Alick3000 -
Consolidate page strength
Hi, Our site has a fair amount of related/similiar content that has been historically placed on seperate pages. Unfortuantely this spreads out our page strength across multiple pages. We are looking to combine this content onto one page so that our page strength will be focused in one location (optimized for search). The content is extensive so placing it all on one page isn't ideal from a user experience (better to separate it out). We are looking into different approaches one main "tabbed" page with query string params to seperate the seperate pages. We'll use an AJAX driven design, but for non js browsers, we'll gracefully degrade to separate pages with querystring params. www.xxx.com/content/?pg=1 www.xxx.com/content/?pg=2 www.xxx.com/content/?pg=3 We'd then rel canonical all three pages to just be www.xxx.com/content/ Same concept but useAJAX crawlable hash tag design (!#). Load everything onto one page, but the page could get quite large so latency will increase. I don't think from an SEO perspective there is much difference between options 1 & 2. We'll mostly be relying on Google using the rel canonical tag. Have others dealt with this issue were you have lots of similiar content. From a UX perspective you want to separate/classifiy it, but from an SEO perspective want to consolidate? It really is very similiar content so using a rel canonical makes sense. What have others done? Thoughts?
Technical SEO | | NicB10