Did Google Search Just Get Crazy Local?
-
Hey All,
I think it's a known fact at this point that when signed into a personal Google account while doing a search, the results are very oriented around keywords and phrases you have already searched for, as well as your account's perceived location; for instance when I wanted to check one of my own web properties in SE listings I would sign out or it would likely appear first as a false reading.
Today I noticed something very interesting: even when not signed in, Google's listings were giving precedence to locality. It was to a very extreme degree, as in when searching for "web design," a firm a mile away ranked higher than one 1.5 miles away and such.
It would seem that the algos having this high a level of location sensitivity and preference would actually be a boon for the little guys, which is, I assume why it was implemented. However, it brings up a couple of interesting questions for me.
1. How is this going to affect Moz (or any SE ranking platform, for that matter) reports? I assume that Google pulls locations from IP Addresses, therefore would it not simply pull the local results most relevant for the Moz server(s) IP?
2. What can one do to rise above this aggressive level of location based search? I mean, my site (which has a DA of 37 and a PA of 48) appears above sites like webdesign.org (DA of 82, PA of 85). Not that I'm complaining at the moment, but I could see this being a fairly big deal for larger firms looking to rank on a national level.
What gives? I'd love to get some opinions from the community here if anyone else has noticed this...
-
Thanks David. Very helpful info.
-
Hi David,
To answer your first question what you are seeing does not affect Moz at all as we use multiple IPs to avoid bias. In OpenSiteExplorer links are not affected by locality.
Check out the FAQ we have for Universal Rankings at the bottom of this link: http://moz.com/help/pro/rankings
Hope that helps!
-
Thanks, Miriam!
-
Great discussion going on here! David, I will ask our help staff to look at your question #1.
-
I'm on PC but only shows for me on FF not Chrome yet.
-
I was just looking at it on Chrome for the sample term "italian restaurant". It also works in Firefox for me. Are you running a Mac? I'm on one of our office PCs right now.
-
Just announced this AM. If you read my post previously, read again. I just added a Q & A from Googler Jade.
I just got the carousel to come up myself now. Does not work for me on Chrome but does on FF oddly. So I'm off to explore and see what I can figure out.
-
Local Carousel is pretty cool, Linda. I did not know it had launched yet!
I assume they finally switched over a proprietary rating system and it's not Zagat based any more (I can only get the carousel to come up for restaurants)?
-
David, assumed you were talking organic but then you said: "Google's listings were giving precedence to locality. It was to a very extreme degree, as in when searching for "web design," a firm a mile away ranked higher than one 1.5 miles away and such."
Since you mentioned distance thought then that maybe you were looking at a map result, so I wanted to clarify and make sure you were not seeing something new. But I guess since you know the area you just know where others in your market are located.
BTW on a semi related note, I just announced the new Local Carousel display was officially launched. Pretty exciting! (Related talking about Google Local algo and display changes at least.)
-
Well said, Marcus.
-
Hey, I don't think that has changed much really. Just now you will be competing not only against other national players but against local companies as well.
Open your Yellow Pages book (yeah, we have one, it's kind of thin nowadays though) and you see adverts for brands in the local search and local companies - search seems to be edging ever closer to this.
Oh, and there is always PPC - I don't see Google dropping that any time soon.
I think we are entering a time where a well rounded out digital marketing plan includes local, national, social, content and paid search adverts in search and across display networks. We also have all the other aspects here including lead generation, re-targeting and the like that really help round things out.
It's good that someone can't just buy links and rely on Google - people have to market properly and that is why this industry is just so much fun.
-
With regards to question number one in my initial post, I can only assume that Moz and other ranking platforms will in fact broaden the local search radius to a national level by default.
That again raises the question of what to do if you or an entity you represent wish to rank internationally...
-
Marcus,
I totally agree that this is a good thing and can't deny it's pretty helpful for us. I think in general it's pretty cool to see a tech giant taking major strides toward helping small businesses compete and building local community networks up. Kind of refreshing actually...
If you take a look at the following, it actually appears that you cannot turn location based search off now; just widen the geographical area.
-
Hey David
We don't tend to see a 7 pack for web design companies in the UK but we are seeing more and more localisation even in the standard organic results. A search for 'web design' shows local companies and is not a million miles away from a search for 'web design Birmingham' which is where I am based.
Same as my initial response though, I see this being primarily a good thing and most people searching for 'web design' or even one of the more traditional business categories will likely be looking for a local company and Google would want to best match the results to the intent of the search query and in this case, I think they are doing a pretty good job.
So, whether that is more localised organic results or more blending of 1 packs, 3 packs and 7 packs in amongst organic results (which are themselves seemingly more localised) this is a good thing that helps users and levels the playing field.
Hope that helps
Marcus
-
To clarify; I am talking about pure organic results, not a 7-pack (formerly 10-pack?). Take a look at the attached image to verify if you'd like.
As I said, you can change the target location using the Search Tools function, however I can't see that many people knowing to do this and the query automatically detects your location by default.
-
Hey David, sounds like you are seeing a shift that's different than what you normally see? I'm curious if you are seeing an algo change and would like to explore further.
Google does not normally show local 'pinned' results that show in a 7 pack for web design type keywords. Yet you are talking how close one listing is over another so it sounds like maybe you are seeing a pack?
Could you share the exact search term you are using and whether you are seeing and talking about pure organic or 7 pack?
-
Hey David
I am seeing similar things in the UK and in most industries localisation has really been turned up in the last 12 months (and seemingly even more since penguin 2.0 / 4.0).
In most cases it seems this is a good thing and searching for the kind of business that would generally have a local intent returns local results. We also now see a 7 pack of local results directly after the PPC for a wide range of queries and business categories.
Now, if we search for the obvious ones: accountant, lawyer, builder etc it is almost always localised. No need for a city or town either as it uses the assumed location.
I think this is interesting in a number of ways
- click to call from mobile meaning folks don't even need to visit the website
- organic #1 is now really #11 at best for many highly commercial terms
- even organic listings seem much more influenced by localisation
I tend to think that this will train people to search like this more and more and for many commercial terms traditional SEO will lose a lot of value. Obviously, search still has tons of opportunities for organic and content marketing but if this helps small local businesses get found more easily and further halts the tiresome tactics that have tainted this industry then it's all good in my mind.
We are having some great success with small companies with Local SEO, localised organic and region specific PPC campaigns and it's always nice to help the little man get found over the big national brand.
Marcus
-
You can of course change your location from the auto detected one to whatever you wish using search tools, but I doubt most would do that.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How Google could quickly fix the whole Links problem...
A Thursday morning brainstorm that hopefully an important Google manager will see... Google could quickly end all the problems of link buying, spammy links, and negative SEO with one easy step: Only count the 100 best follow links to any domain. Ignore all the nofollows and everything beyond the 100 best. They can choose what "best" means. Suddenly links would be all about quality. Quantity would not matter. Fiverr links, comment links, and all the other mass-produced spam links would literally be ignored. Unless that's all a domain had, and then they would surely be stomped by any domain with 100 decent natural links. Would it be an improvement over today's situation?
Industry News | | GregB1230 -
Can a Google Local listing be merged with a Goolge+ page?
I have a google+ company page set up and have recently added a Google local listing but have noticed it automatically sets up an additional company G+ page. Is there a way to merge the two? Can not see any reference to this issue on Google Q&A. Thanks, Stacey
Industry News | | skehoe0 -
Google Will Penalize Sites Repeatedly Accused Of Copyright Infringement
Has someone filed a large number of DMCA “takedown” requests against your site? If so, look out. That’s the latest penalty that may cause you to rank lower in Google’s search results. It joins other penalties such as “Panda” and “Penguin.” We’re dubbing it the “Emanuel Update” in honor of Hollywood mogul Ari Emanuel, who helped prompt it. Read more here: http://searchengineland.com/dmca-requests-now-used-in-googles-ranking-algorithm-130118 What do you guys think MOZERS?
Industry News | | Chenzo0 -
Displaying desired domain in search engines
Last year I registered a hosting and domain account for Mummyzboy.tv. Then we added Mummyzboy.com domain to the account. Then the client wanted the .com to be the main domain so we: Made the .com become primary domain for the hosting account. Changed the webmastertool account url to the .com Changed all .tv for .com in the sitemap and re-submit it. It's been a month now since the last mods and over a year the the primary domain was change but Google still displays Mummyzboy.tv in his results, any tips?
Industry News | | escteam0 -
Google+ profiles and Rel Author. Extensive question
A bit of a mammoth question for discussion here: With the launch of Google+ and profiles, coupled with the ability to link/verify authorship using rel=me to google+ profile - A few questions with respect to the long term use and impact. As an individual - I can have a Google+ Profile, and add links to author pages where I am featured. If rel=me is used back to my G+ profile - google can recognise me as the writer - no problem with that. However - if I write for a variety of different sites, and produce a variety of different content - site owners could arguably become reluctant to link back or accredit me with the rel=me tag on the account I might be writing for a competitor for example, or other content in a totally different vertical that is irrelevant. Additionally - if i write for a company as an employee, and the rel=me tag is linked to my G+ profile - my profile (I would assume) is gaining strength from the fact that my work is cited through the link (even if no link juice is passed - my profile link is going to appear in the search results on a query that matches something I have written, and hence possibly drain some "company traffic" to my profile). If I were to then leave the employment of that company - and begin writing for a direct competitor - is my profile still benefiting from the old company content I have written? Given that google is not allowing pseudonyms or ghost writer profiles - where do we stand with respect to outsourced content? For example: The company has news written for them by a news supplier - (each writer has a name obviously) - but they don't have or don't want to create a G+ profile for me to link to. Is it a case of wait for google to come up with the company profiles? or, use a ghost name and run the gauntlet on G+? Lastly, and I suppose the bottom line - as a website owner/company director/SEO; Is adding rel=me links to all your writers profiles (given that some might only write 1 or 2 articles, and staff will inevitably come and go) an overall positive for SEO? or, a SERP nightmare if a writer moves on to another company? In essence are site owners just improving the writers profile rather than gaining very much?
Industry News | | IPINGlobal541 -
Google Panda 2.5 Update?
On Sunday 18th Sept I noticed a huge drop in our rankings for keywords that we were doing extremely well. Majority of the keyword SERP positions for our main targetted keywords were #1 and #2. These have all drop the bottom part of first page. Other new keywords we were targetting had climbed very well (some hovering just below top 10 and some in top 10 of Google UK SERP. These have all completely dropped off. Although analysing the site thouroughly (both on-page and link profile) it doesnt appear to have any issue significant enough to cause a penalty. From Monday 20th Sept (everybody back to work) the threads here http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=76830633df82fd8e&hl=en&start=5760 and http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/4364389.htm seem to be buzzing over unexpected SERP drops and increases. By that I assume Panda 2.5 or at least some form of update taken/taking place? If anybody know of the reent heavy fluctuations which seem to have started in the weeken or have experienced unexpected positions increaes/drops, I would be very interested to hear/read from you. Cheers, Mo Raja
Industry News | | MoRaja0 -
How long after making changes will position on Google be altered?
I'm curious as to how long Google updates take these days? I'm just getting back into SEO after 9 years and I recall back in the day there was a monthly "dance" during which page results were updated. Is it more frequent now? Thanks
Industry News | | celife0