How long before we show up in Google+ 7 packs?
-
Some of our generic, non localized keywords (ex: "Information technology services") are triggering Google+ 7 Pack listings with local results. We are ranking on the first page for those keywords in organic. The companies listed in the 7 packs have worse link profiles, mediocre SEO fundamentals, fewer citations, and no +s or reviews. Our Google+ page has been up for a few weeks, and we added content: images, videos, a detailed profile, and articles. Our competitors have nothing but a blank site. We did our research, and we also built well-optimized pages for each of the keywords that triggers a 7 Pack.
Assuming Google decides we deserve to be there, how long should it take for Google to place us in the 7 Packs?
Our vertical is a little different - IT Support - the 7 packs are localized within a 40 mile radius, and the organic SERPs are a mix of regional and national (ex: IBM) players. Are the results totally geocentric?
Does it pay to build legitimate backlinks to our Google+ page or link there from content on our corporate site?
-
Thanks Ruhul
"Some areas don't pop 7 packs at all for the same keywords."
I think it's mainly based on search volume. I can give you lots of examples but here's a good one.
I was consulting for an SEO I trained that was working for a roofing client. I told him he was wasting one of the Places categories because that key phrase didn't even pull a pack. He said "I learned well from your training and I KNOW I checked to be sure it pulled a pack! Turns out that was 3 months ago when he set up the listing. Also turns out that was the rainy season. So in that small town there were enough searches for that type of roof repair, but when the rain stopped that search volume dried up too!
So if your KWs are a little nichey for local OR competition is low OR you are dealing with fairly small towns, that could be why.
A good KW to test with is Sedation Dentistry, in larger cities it will pull a pack. In some smaller ones - no pack.
Re: my AOL trick. Did you see Dr. Pete's post today? http://moz.com/blog/how-does-google-count-local-results
I think my AOL trick is easier and I like StartPage even better for some things. But he found a way to pull pure organic with a Google search parameter - which is pretty cool. I need to find time to test and compare with my method this weekend but I think it's pulling the same results for all 3.
-
Great Answer Linda - Your Article was awesome! One of the best I've read in a long time. It really cleared up a lot.
Based on my "expert" assessment, we are much stronger than the top listing in the 7 Pack. So at some point, according to your research, we should hit that top spot.
Our niche is a little different than the typical 7 pack. We have a large service area essentially a 90 mile radius, and growing. What is fascinating is how our rankings change depending on where I'm connected. We are in northern NJ, not a large geography. Some areas don't pop 7 packs at all for the same keywords. Looking at the rankings in our Niche for keywords that don't pop a 7 Pack, the results mix is actually similar to the 7 pack. There are some locals, some articles, and some nationals. For one of my treasured keywords, (non-7 Pack) my ranking at home is #4, and my ranking at the office (35 miles away) is #134. (I've checked and double checked...) Bizarre.
What was really interesting is that for a few days (about 60 days ago), the 7 Packs were all over my keywords, and then many of the 7 packs disappeared. Google must have been testing something.
Your AOL trick is the answer to my biggest frustration. My rankings reports vary wildly based on where I sit. AOL clears that up.The only real way to control rankings is to be 1-2 in AOL. Who knew?
-
The local blended algo in the 7 pack is more about organic ranking factors. Claiming, filling out, # or reviews and citations does not matter as much as organic does.
I just did a huge post about it showing how you can research and see this and how to do competitive analysis to see why whos at the top of the 7 pack is really there.
But additionally new Place pages can take 6 - 8 weeks to fully work into the local database. So if you recently pin verified you won't show in local at all for KW searches and will only show on maps for direct phone or name+ city searches.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How google find, if google + likes were fake?
How google find, if google + likes were fake? Is there any negative effects of it? For example, I have 300 google accounts, can I manually make likes?
Social Media | | bondhoward0 -
Requirement full bleed image share Google+?
Hi everyone, Im sort of a Google+ nutter and I wanted to figure out exactly what is required for a full bleed image to appear for +1 share on the page itself. I got it figured out and I think it requires: canonical url og:image image wider then 506px type article or page (microdata format) But sometimes it seems that pages without a canonical url still show full bleed image when shared as link when I insert the url directly into a google+ post. My question is if this could be a cached version of the page where it had a canonical url? Don't really know if that anyone is interested but I made a simple tool that checks if a page meets requirements for having a full bleed image when share as link on Google+. Think I nailed it pretty close but can't seem to get the full bleed image to appear for the tool itself do:) Please dont ask. It's driving me mad already. http://www.googlewiki.nl/seo-checker/check-fullbleed.php Try it. Take a blog post url, check it with this tool and then see for yourself if it's accurate. If not I would like to hear very much as it would help me pin point it better! Examples of pages with specific no no factors for you to try are:
Social Media | | DanielMulderNL
http://www.copyblogger.com/google-authorship/ (img to small)
http://www.theverge.com/2014/7/14/5896979/gmail-api-isnt-the-end-of-email-its-a-new-beginning (no og prefix but works)1 -
How to recover Google+ business page if it gets deleted by mistake ?
Hi, i have a client who has by mistakenly deleted its G+ business page which is having good expousre on Google+. he got worried how to recover it . even i don't know how to do it. any help or discussion for the solution would be appreciated Thanks,
Social Media | | ShaunPhilips0 -
Google+1 on site or on google+ for SEO?
Hi Have just read an inspiring post by Cyrus @ www.seomoz.org/blog/tips-to-use-google-for-seo But before I ask my existing social media contacts and email lists who have a Google account to +1 my site, what offers most benefit from a search visibility perspective? Should I ask my contacts to +1 my homepage (there is a +1 button on there) or Click on the +1 button on my businesses Google+ page and also ask them to join my circles? Hope this makes sense? Many Thanks
Social Media | | ocelot0 -
Can Twitter really help your Google Rankings??
Hi Guys, Can anyone tell me if Twitter really does help with your Goolge rankings? If I go to the trouble of setting up a Twitter account for my business will it really help with me getting higher rankings? If so is it a case of me just posting tweets all the time and links to my website? Any help or guidance be grateful guys Thanks Gareth
Social Media | | GAZ090 -
Rel=author?? google auth?
Hi everyone, i need some help with this rel=author and google auth which has come into place. Some questions: 1., I write a blog on our e-commerce site, do i need rel=authort? 2., i write on other sites do i need rel=author If so is there an easy way to implement this, i know it links in with the Google+ profile but i am confussed as i keep seeing different ways to do it. I've also been told to do good auth, what is this? ive been given a piece of code to use in my site to auth it? is this worth it? Any help really appreciated 🙂
Social Media | | pauledwards0 -
Social Media Plugins advice - Google+ Pages - what is best for SEO?
I'm seeking some social media plugin advice, in relation to SEO. This may not be possible to answer yet, or ever? But it could be worth a discussion. As far as i can see, there are two main forms of plugins (taking facebook as an example): 1 that directly connects a user to your brand page on said platform (eg like us on facebook) 1 that allows a user to 'like', 'share', 'recommend' the page that you are on as a sign of respect and/or sharing content For a home page, I am confused as to which one to use, without filling out the whole page with plugins. One objective is to increase fan numbers, the other is to increase content sharing, and possibly SEO? I've noticed that Google has been returning some personalised results based on mine, or my google+ connections +1's. So to the question... Do you think having more fans on the new Google Pages for business accounts will improve SEO to the same, if not higher weighting than a +1 does? and therefore is it more important to get more brand page followers, or +1's of the homepage?
Social Media | | ARMofficial0 -
Google Plus 1 Button
Aside from your blog would anyonme here think about adding the Google Plus 1 Button to their website?
Social Media | | GrouchyKids0