Any problems with two sites by same owner targeting same keyword search?
-
I have a site, let's call it ExcellentFreeWidgets.com. There is a page on the site that is very popular and we'll call the page title, "Big Blue Widget." That page is currently #1 for the search "big blue widget." This week, I was able to buy the exact match domain for that page, we'll call it BigBlueWidget.com.
I want to build a site on BigBlueWidget.com to better capitalize on that search "big blue widget," which is huge. The content would not be the same wording at all, but it would be the same subject. It would probably be a five page or so website, all about Big Blue Widgets: what they are, where to get them, etc.
The sites will not reciprocally link to each other. New new site, BigBlueWidgets.com, would link to the existing site, ExcellentFreeWidgets.com.
The new site and the current page will compete for position in the SERPs.
Here are my questions to you experts:
1. Will Google care at all that the same entity owns both sites, or will just just rank for the term as they normally would.
2. I am not sure I'll run Adsense on the new site or not. I will be pointing a link back my ExcellentWidgets.com site from a button that says, "Get an Excellent Widget." But if I do run Adsense on it, does Google Adsense care that the same entity has a site and another site's page that are competing for the same term that both have Adsense add on them?
Note: I do not want to start a new entity for the new site (I'm in CA and LLC's are $800/year) as it's probably not worth all that hassle and money.
Thank you so much. I hope the that obfuscating the real domain names did not confuse the issue too much.
-
I have adsense on niche sites that are on same topic as small portions of much larger sites.
I don't see any problem at all with adsense.
-
Thanks for the answers thus far. I should add the following:
The existing site has perhaps 300 pages. The target keyword for the new site only competes with one of those 300 page's primary keyword on the existing site. All the other pages of the existing site are optimized around other keywords that are in the industry but not the same. And the new site will not even contain the words that are the keyword base for most of the entire existing site. Hope that makes sense.
So far we've talked about SERPs, but what about Adsense (if I add it to the new site). Do they care about any of this?
-
This is going to sound off topic at first... stick with it....
Two years ago you could easily get double listings by having two or more pages about the same keyword on your website. Now those are really hard to get.
Two years ago it was easy to have a page of your site on the first SERP and another page of your site on the second SERP. Now those are really hard to get.
Google has really cut down on the ability of one website to get two listings in the top thirty positions of the SERPs. They have successfully increased the DOMAIN DIVERSITY of the SERPs. (Yes there are some exceptions - but well deserved or in low competition.)
Now, it is possible that Google is trying to increase the COMPANY DIVERSITY of the SERPs.
One company having multiple websites on page one of the SERPs is not showing searchers much company diversity. It would not surprise me if Google started making it very very difficult for the same company to have two sites competing.
I watch some websites owned by the same company and many of them have been struggling - for no good reason that I can see. So, I am starting to think that Google has some company diversity happening. I don't have data to publish about this, just my gut from what I have seen and I have been watching this alot. If you link your sites together I think that this make you a real target.
-
Way Way Way back Google penalized a well know company that I believe were selling gifts and also owned 5+ others sites that basically took the first half of page 1 for major keywords.
Google's terms and conditions suggest not doing this, especially if you are already targeting the same niche or similar with similar content. If asked by Google would you be able to explain it that would not sound like you were trying to game the results?
HOWEVER! So many sites are getting penalized so easily these days that you would have to be a fool not to have backups. This is the very bad side to slow and sometimes impossible recoveries that many site owners have been reduced to owning multiple sites because anything can happen.
-
Why not expand and optimize the current website to focus even more on "big blue widget"? What things can you do to serve the visitors better?
You're success in ranking well for that phrase (congrats by the way), is a result of the effort you put into the entire site, not just that page. -assuming the volume is decent
If it were I who needed to make this decision, I would do so WITHOUT the #1 ranking being a deciding factor. Though it's hard to say w/o knowing the details of your situation and the risks you're willing to take.
With a new site, you're essentially starting over, so I'd look at it w/ a long term focus in-mind.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Site dropped in search for 95% after 18-19 feb
Hi people. I have a client which holds a escort agency website operating in Amsterdam the Netherlands. Please take note that Escort Agency is legal and holland is a liberal country with permit and all, so just trying to point out that it's a perfectly legal crafted business. To the point: we are seeing a 95% drop in traffic (basicly back to barely 10 clicks a day) after 18 to 19 feb. We've inspected the incoming links, and we did see some things going on that where not quite healthy. At first a banner was bought on a dutch advertising website. On their behalf, this sitewide banner got published with a follow on roughly 132k of pages. That was strike 1 (i think). After tossing this in disavow for temporarily basis and informed the advertisal website to put any sitewide link to nofollow in the first place, nothing changed. We found a 2nd site doing the same mistake. Frankly the banner got exposed on roughly 100k of pages on which some of 'm where barely 2 days old. Strike 2. Solved this by putting it in disavow for the time being and asking politely to put the banner again, nofollow. We cleaned out any incoming potential spammy links by using disavow. The data we obtained was a mix of google webmaster itself and moz profiling. However we're one month further now, and the graph is still a big phat flatline. What is going on? I've noted that, one other sites, which share the same brand, but completely different websites / subnets / content and all, has the same threatment going on showing a huge drop from 18th of feb 2019 and is unable to recover. We cannot see anything 'bad' actually going on @ webmasters and there is no manual action taken. So we're kind of stuck now on a site that was my project but now completely fell into oblivion and hurting someone's business. The url is https://www.qualityescort.nl/ - anyone has a reasonable advice to this issue? full.jpg full.jpg
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Jvanderlinde0 -
Best way to go about merging 2 sites with significant search volume?
Hi everyone! A client of ours ('Company A') recently acquired another company ('Company B') - both brands carry weight within their industry. Company A's brand name currently registers over 6,500 searches per month, while Company B's brand name draws about 2,500 searches per month. While Company B is smaller, their search volume isn't insignificant. The powers that be plan to discontinue Company B's site at an unspecified date in the future, but it's on the backburner. We'd obviously like to transfer as much of their current ranking as possible, but we also don't want to confuse users. There's additional search volume for term variations such as 'Company B jobs' & 'Company B locations' that we'd like to capture for as long as there's still volume there. Would a microsite with Company B's look & feel (to make it easier to house pages built to capture careers/locations searches) justify its inherent cost, or would it be just as valuable to build a series of landing pages on Company A's site? (Obviously assuming that valid redirects would be in place once Company B's site is taken down.) Thanks in advance!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | wilcoxcm0 -
Google cache is showing my UK homepage site instead of the US homepage and ranking the UK site in US
Hi There, When I check the cache of the US website (www.us.allsaints.com) Google returns the UK website. This is also reflected in the US Google Search Results when the UK site ranks for our brand name instead of the US site. The homepage has hreflang tags only on the homepage and the domains have been pointed correctly to the right territories via Google Webmaster Console.This has happened before in 26th July 2015 and was wondering if any had any idea why this is happening or if any one has experienced the same issueFDGjldR
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | adzhass0 -
Website URL Structure - keyword targeting on homepage vs internal pages
I have developed a few websites before where the homepage contains the content for the keywords I was targeting. This has been reasonably successful as I have found it easy enough to get links to the homepage. I am considering a new site in a totally different industry that I am thinking about structuring like this: mybrand.com (not necessarily targeting any keywords) mybrand.com/important-keyword-1/ (definitely want to target) mybrand.com/important-keyword-2 (equally important as 1st keyword) There will be several (30-ish) other pages targeting keywords but they are not as significant as the two mentioned above, more so they are about publishing informative information. The two important keywords are quite different but industry related. My questions are: should I be careful targeting keywords away from the homepage when the homepage gets the most links? Would I be better off building 2 different websites where the keyword content is captured in the homepage? Thanks,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BGu0 -
Since two years i lost place in google search
Hi, First excuse my but english. I am from France. Since two years i have lost place for the most important of my keyword in google search. The loss is gradual. It's been more than two years as I do not do link building. I do not know what to do. I just read your article on link building. (http://moz.com/blog/beginners-guide-to-link-building)
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Pascaltall
I would like if possible for someone to take a look at my website to see what is wrong and what i have to do do. For reasons of discretion I do not want to link the site name here, but you can see the domain name by following this link. http://riador.com/lien.html
Thank you to all.0 -
Will an inbound follow link on a site be devalued by an inbound affiliate link on the same site?
Hey guys, quick question I didn't find an answer to online. Scenario: 1. Site A links to Site B. It's a natural, regular, follow-link 2. Site A joins Site B's affiliate program, and adds an affiliate link Question: Does the first, regular follow link get devalued by the second affiliate link? Cheers!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ipancake0 -
Two Sites Similar content?
I just started working at this company last month. We started to add new content to pages like http://www.rockymountainatvmc.com/t/49/-/181/1137/Bridgestone-Motorcycle-Tires. This is their main site. Then i realized it also put the new content on their sister site http://www.jakewilson.com/t/52/-/343/1137/Bridgestone-Motorcycle-Tires. the first site is the main site and I think will get credit for the unique new content. The second one I do not think will get credit and will more than likely be counted as duplicate content. We are changing this so it will no longer be the same. However, I am curious to see ways people think we could fix this issues? Also is it effecting both sits for just the second one?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DoRM0