Honest thoughts needed about link building / removal.
-
I have a small online business that has suffered through Google updates over the past year. Turns out that the links built by a previous SEO were harmful - yes, it's the usual story, I know.
I've been in touch with an SEO about link removal/link building and have had a proposal. It's not cheap and I would need to dig deep, but it'll certainly be worth it if things work out. If it doesn't, it'll probably become impossible to continue the business. Personally speaking, it's a sorry situation.
For link removal, the SEO's proposing to contact the webmasters followed by disavowing, if needed. There's 15k links, but I think a high percentage of these are from industry blogs that I sponsor that have site wide links.
Have you heard many success stories about outsourced link removal?
For link building, they will be targeting industry websites and blogs. The thing is, I know most of the industry bloggers anyway, and can probably reach out to them myself, if I can develop the right high quality content that they will want to feature. Call me a cynic, but I'm not sure how the SEO can do this. The quality of content on these blogs is extremely high as it's a very creative/visual industry that I'm involved in. I'm just not sure how much scope there is for a third party (with no knowledge of the industry) to do this effectively. That said, there's blogs that aren't directly related to my niche, and I suppose there's possible opportunity there. Maybe??!
If the link removal is a good idea, am I better off trying to build links myself and combine that with the link removal service?
-
Wow, Dr Pete replied to my question! Thank you - and, actually, thanks to everyone who took the time to post.
UPDATE...
Since my last posts, I have actually moved forward a little. I did have an audit undertaken by someone that specialises in traffic drops. It transpires that it's not very clear cut - definitely not entirely a clear link-based penalty situation - and the indications are that it's probably Panda with a touch of Penguin. Upshot is, I'm having the site redesigned to minimise duplicate/thin content issues (and generally improve the user experience) and I have engaged someone to do the link removal outreach/disavow. Still early days, but now I have some kind of game plan, I feel a little more optimistic.
TBH, I'm still a little wary about the link removal/disavowal process, but we'll see... I had such varying quotes for this work, it's crazy.
And, still need to crystallise in my mind how I'm going to earn new links.
-
Some of the risks of using the disavow tool (especially the more conspiratorial ones) are overblown, IMO. There are two main risks:
(1) You might disavow the wrong links or links that are actually helping you. Considering that you've already requested removal and decided to get rid of these links one way or another, this is a bit of a moot point.
(2) It might not work. The reality is that Google might not honor the disavow if you haven't shown progress in link removal, disavowal may not help if the problem wasn't what you thought it was, and/or disavowal may not help if you don't get the problem links.
I think (2) is where things get tricky. If you disavow a ton of low-quality links, but it turns out that Google really was targeting just a handful of paid links, then the disavowal may do nothing (that's just an example).
I'm concerned from your comments that this doesn't sound like a clear link-based penalty situation, and so you may end up spending a lot of money to solve the wrong problem and take a hatchet to your links in the process. I think you'd be better off putting some cash toward a second opinion than paying someone to send emails and submit a disavow (both of which take time but you can pretty easily do yourself).
-
Hi again Coral. There is a communication gap happening hear around a few certain words. Just fixing that will help you a lot in moving forward. Here it is...
Panda is not the same as Penguin......Panda is not the same as Penguin.....
Panda is a manual action, where you get de-indexed, get a notice, and have to do the whole terrible link removal and re-consideration request nightmare. You do not have this problem. So forget all about massive link removals and re-consideration requests.
From what you describe, you have a Penguin problem. That's just Google's programming noticing some weirdness in your link profile and either not counting the funky links or giving you a slap, a penalty, relating to those funky links (as in too high a % of a certain anchor text = a slap for your ranking for that anchor text keyword).
There are no re-consideration requests accepted for a Penguin penalty. All you can do is fix the links. And there are just a few ways to do that. Here are the ones I know of:
-
if the page the funky backlinks all point to is a sub-page, and there are few good links pointing to it, you can just abandon that original page (make it a 404) and create a new page to replace it. This rarely works because usually the funky links are pointing to the homepage and you can't abandon that.
-
get the links removed. If they come from a site you have some control or influence over, this is nice. But usually they are junk automated sites and there is almost zero chance of having the links removed
-
Disavow the domains that the funky links are coming from. Disavowing domains is usually better that individual URLs. Especially to get rid of sitewide links. You can use it to thin out your number of links using the exact anchor text you are getting slapped for. And to get rid of links from nasty toxic malware and porn sites.
Google gave us the Disavow option for this purpose. It can be used wrong, but most tools can. A good SEO group can check out your history and link profile and tell where the problem lies. I would suggest that it is not critical that the SEO company be UK based, but it is critical that they be good and that they are willing to work with small businesses affordably. It does matter that they speak english, so UK, Canada, US, New Zealand, or Australia are all fine.
-
-
Thanks Greg, I've just been mulling everything over before responding and posting further.
Your last post gives me a glimmer of hope. Congratulations on recovering the site, you must have been seriously pleased that it paid off. I must admit, though, that everything else that I have read on Moz and elsewhere suggests that I should do the whole emailing (probably several rounds), documenting and then disavow thing. Do you have any links that you can possibly share, please? Just want to ensure that I'm doing the right thing, before embarking on it.
As a general update, since my last post, I have:
-
Scrutinised traffic trends in Google Analytics against Penguin/Panda update dates. There really aren't any sudden drops that I can pinpoint, but more continual erosion over time. Like your situation, I have also seen rankings plummet for certain keywords only. Due to over use on exact match in anchor text, undoubtedly. But, these keywords didn't necessarily yield high search volume, so hard to see trends with these too.
-
**Ran a Link Detox report. ** This shows -
- 78 toxic links (6.6%)
- 759 suspicious links (64%)
- 347 healthy links (29.3%)
-
Had a quote for link removal from a different SEO - unsure whether to outsource this or do it myself. The quote seems reasonable (and a lot cheaper than the original SEO's quote).
-
Arranged a telephone call with an industry PR company, who can maybe assist with gaining earned links.
So, moving forward, I'll look to get a quote for a site audit. (Thanks for your links, I'm UK based though so probably would be best to use someone in the same country).
Any other options to consider? Should I do the link removal myself (using Link Detox and rmoov) or outsource it to someone who's done it before (not sure how successfully though)?
-
-
I've used it with no bad effects, and probably good results.
I have (or had) a keyword on one of my sites with very over-optimized anchor text links. That keyword suddenly dropped from page 1 to page 7. Just that one keyword, which points to a algorithmic (Penguin) penalty. So I analyzed my link profile (not any easy job) and did a Disavow listing enough domains containing those anchor text links to re-balance my link profile somewhat. That's all I did. No reconsideration request, no removal of links. After about 6 or 8 weeks, that keyword suddenly popped back from page 7 to page 3. Page 3 still sucks, but at least that makes it easier to do the work to scramble back to page 1.
Was it because of the Disavow? I don't know for sure, but it sure doesn't look like it hurt anything.
This stuff is often a bit vague and voodoo like, which is why it helps to get a site review from a professional. Check your PM's as I sent you a reply to your reply.
-
I've spent the last few hours just reading up on disavowing. (This by Marie Haynes, who contributes on MOZ, has some eye-opening articles on it).
Based on this, I think it might be just too risky to use the disavow tool. I haven't read any success stories with using the tool, and think it could even harm my site.
-
Thanks, I have read through the information on the link that you sent over. Sounds fairly simple on the face of it, although I was under the impression that you had to demonstrate that you had made the effort to have the links removed prior to going down the disavow route. Perhaps this is no longer the case?
Re: desperate measures, I'm not quite there yet, but if I spend a whole chunk of cash (investment level, certainly, for my business) and it doesn't work, then that would probably be it really, very sadly.
-
Thank you, replied.
-
So here's what I would do: Follow Google's instruction and use their disavow those bad links.
Link Detox produces the file that Google requires to disavow links. Perhaps your old SEO sent it to you? Anyway, I would get that file, browse through it and make certain that those links are indeed bad or at least questionable, and then follow the steps in the article to remove them.
This eliminates the hassle from emailing 15k webmasters requesting they take time out of their day to remove your link. SEO Snobs may frown on such a 'baby with the bathwater' approach, but desperate times call for desperate measures and it sounds like the next steps for you if you don't take action, would be to close your business. Working from that as a worst case scenario, this is exactly what I would do.
-
It's tweaked/refreshed continually, albeit at a pretty low level. I'm certainly not blogging every day, for example.
-
Thank you.
My last SEO actually generated some reports using link detox. He thought it was a good tool. But, he never did any link removal. (That was never his remit). He forwarded a list of links to me to action. I started to email the 'webmasters' but never got anywhere - literally nothing from a couple of hundred emails.
I should add that the first link building company went bust. I think all the links they built were perhaps on a blog network, e.g. Wordpress 'blogs' with no real person managing them. Which is a problem!
If link removal requests are going into the ether, what options do I have?
Saying the link removal requests don't work, I would go down the disavow route. If (big if) I manage to successfully disavow, is there a chance my rankings could get worse??
Sorry, I'm asking more questions now. Any further guidance much appreciated.
-
Hi Coral. I sent you a PM (which is accessed by clicking the little human shape next to the question mark and the magnifying glass at the top of these pages)
-
How fresh is your content on your site? Fresh (good) content brings the engines back.
-
That is a really tough, but all too common story. I definitely would not start over on a new brand if that's the case. Would it possible to switch from Brand.com to brandwidgets.com? Just wondering.
Either way, before I scrap the domain or hire this high priced company, I would check these guys out: http://www.linkdetox.com/plans-pricing/. You obviously are smart enough to use Moz so I think this tool could help you disavow the bad links. It would take a while to see the results but using a tool like this to get rid of bad links would be the first step I take before you pay a kings ransom to a firm (assuming you cannot afford) or (gulp) shut down your business (<------don't do this!!).
p.s. I'm always a little skeptical when people push a product on me so for the record, I in no way benefit from the product i mentioned earlier. There are plenty of competitors who do what they do as well.
-
It's a brand (which is pretty established now) so can't really start all over.
-
Sorry if I've not been very clear. I'm not particularly concerned about industry blog links, it was more that I was just trying to convey link volume. (But not very well, admittedly).
No unnatural links warning in Google WMT.
Nor was there a sudden plummet of traffic either, as far as I can tell.
-
I would check your DA of where the links are pointing from if it is higher than your DA they are probably not the problem. If you go through WMT like EGOL suggested. If it were me I would get a second opinion and quote from another SEO or perhaps a webmaster.
-
if you say it is as serious as your business going under if the removal of the bad links fails... wouldn't it be better to start a fresh with a new site?
Rather then spend all that money in removing those links... spend the money on a new site with a new structure and new content, or redirect the old content to the new site..
Just a thought...
Hope it all goes well for you
-
So, do you have a message about unnatural links in webmaster tools... or do have your rankings tanked without a message - which would indicate Penguin (or a variety of other causes).
-
I don't think industry bloggers are your issue. If these are legitimate bloggers writing about topics in your industry then they should be great links. I don't think you want to get these removed.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How many links per week/month should a link building campaign acquire?
I am running a linkbuilding campaign for my company. I am mostly focusing on guest blogging opportunities and responding to emails from HARO. How many links would I have to acquire each week or month to be considered doing a good job over a 6 month or a year time period? Thank you,
Link Building | | fersu0 -
Best Methods - Link Building
We are having more and more "new" customers coming to us who have been hit by various algorithms imposed by google. After we have run a site health check and corrected everything, we plan and come up with a link development plan which suits the clients needs. Much of out link development work is safe comprising of; 1. Guest Blog Posts - where we develop creative content with the customer to publish. 2. Industry blog posts - where bloggers write about i.e. "the company" 3. Social media - posting pictures, commenting on forums, etc 4. Paid directories with authority We don't develop links in any other way and it brings results in the long term. Is anyone out there doing something else? Link building can sometimes be like walking on a tight rope. Thanks and happy holidays Gary - Elite Group Marketing London
Link Building | | GaryVictory0 -
Need Expert Footer Link Advice
We have a sister company that provides online administrative services to .EDUs. The administrative site has thousands of pages, with good pagerank, excellent trust, and a clean bill of health from Google, as does our corporate site. We have the ability to put footer links on every page back to our corporate website. Options: 1. Do nothing for fear of getting penalized by Google 2. Footer Link: Web Design by Logo, with "Web Design" being the anchor text. 3. Footer Link: Web Design by XYZ with "Web Design" and "XYZ" being the anchor text for link diversity. 4. Footer Link: Web Design by Logo with "Web Design" and the Logo (Alt Text "XYZ Corp") being anchors for link diversity. 5. Put up a page (or 2) about web design on the administrative site, have all of the footers link to that page, and have that page link back to our corporate site. We really aren't doing anything wrong here, but both sites have a clean bill of health and the Google spam police have me paranoid. Our corporate site has an excellent link profile with hundreds of links from .gov, .us, and .edu. The links have commercial value, and can drive traffic to our site. Looking for your thoughts before we make a move.
Link Building | | CsmBill0 -
Confirming unnatural link removed
My SEO firm confirmed on 4/5 that they've removed links from a site www.fantake.com. However, as of today, it still shows on GWM there are 1100 links coming from that site. Questions: where can I find out bad links from root domain listed on GWM? There are some domains showing they have hundreds of links to our site. Between the lag time of GWM crawling, is there a tool that I can use and verify if a link is indded removed?
Link Building | | ypl0 -
Multiple link building strategy for multiple clients
We deal with about 200 clients for a series of websites. We create a number of articles articles per site per month. A company we used to do link building for the websites it turns out were doing a lot of spinning which has been hard hit by the new penguin update. I'm actually really happy about it as it means we can now do some legitimate SEO on their sites. Any ideas of what the best strategy would be for this amount of sites which we are already creating shareable content for?
Link Building | | acs1110 -
Using an SEO Agency to build one-way links for you via link exchange
There are a number of SEO agencies which offer link building as part of their SEO offerings. I believe they build one-way links to the client site, by offering another link in exchange to the liking site. So, if the client site is "C", and link is being requested from site "A", the site "A" owner is offered a link from site "B" in return. Is this a good and/or recommended practice?
Link Building | | thinkvidya0 -
Removal of "bad" incoming links
I have had my site registered for a long time (since January 1995) and in that time we have built a good number of incoming links. We have a vendor database that we expose as a service to our visitors, which numbers around 5,500. These sites vary dramatically from low-end, Mom-and-Pop type web sites (some ugly in the extreme :)) to nationwide, established vendors. Back in the day, we had the basic tactic to request a link to our site if the vendor wanted to be listed in our vendor database. We stopped that practice years ago but still have many sites linking to us. The quality of some of these sites is very poor. I want to come up with a strategy for dealing with these. To that end, some questions: How "costly", from an SEO perspective, is a poor quality site that links to our site? What metric(s) should be used to assess the quality of sites linking to us? If possible, for the aforementioned metric is there a "bar" we might try to hit? For example, would it be useful to request removal of links where <metric>is less than x? What is x?</metric> Given that we have thousands to assess, is there any report I can create to identify these sites? Is it generally preferred to have vendors link simply to our home page or is it more effectice to have them link to particular pages on our site (each vendor can generally be associated with a "topic" on our site). In short, I am willing to go through this process if there is real value in it. Thanks. Mark
Link Building | | MarkWill0 -
Link Building PR versus topic
Regarding link building, what counts the most in terms of PR and relevance(topic). Is it whether, the link comes from a domain/page with high domain/page rank or that the link come from a domain with similar/relevant content? I know, we should always aim to get links from domains with both relevance and good page rank. But which is most important? For example: If we have a web site about swiss made watches. Should i focus on getting links from other domains with information about swiss made watches. Or can i achieve just as good link juice, by getting links from un-related web sites with high PR? We will of course get more qualified traffic from related domains. But from a pure search ranking, what plays the biggest factor?
Link Building | | petersen0