Local SEO: 1 Location Covering Multiple Surrounding Cities
-
I am setting up local pages on our main site for each of our dealers. Some of them cover multiple cities. For example, one dealer in Santa Rosa, CA, but also covers San Francisco (50 mile drive). While I know that with Google+ Local I can add coverage radius or zip code/cities covered, what about on that dealer's local page on our site? Should I create local pages for each city covered or cram local optimization into one? Keep in mind I only have one address to work with for each dealer (P.O. Boxes or Virtual Mail Boxes are NOT a good solutions).
Looking for any white hat tips before I implement for all 100+ dealers.
-
Google updated their webmaster guidelines about a year ago to specifically frown on lists of keywords like this. See:
-
Got it. Thank you!
One more question... Could a list of counties, small surrounding cities, towns, districts boroughs, etc covered on each dealer's local page add value or be seen as a negative? Imagine a NYC dealer targeting boroughs Manhattan, The Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens and Staten Island or on a smaller scale an Indianapolis Dealer targeting districts Broad Ripple Village, Massachusetts Avenue, and Fountain Square. Asking because I have a list of each of these for each dealer from their old websites. And yes, I meant list. Not a paragraph about each as they are now.
-
So glad to help! I'll number my recommendations for easiest reading:
-
Use only the legal business name for each dealer. Do not add keywords of any kind, nor change the legal business name in any way. If the company is ABC Plumbing, this is how it should be listed in all cities. Use the legal business name with absolute consistency on the website, the Google+ Local pages and on third party citations.
-
Each dealer must have his own local phone number. Do not use a toll free number, a vanity number, a call tracking number or a shared number. If you want to put a toll free number in an image on the website landing pages, that's fine, and you can list a toll free number as the secondary number on the Google+ Local pages, but always put the unique, local number first.
-
Yes, the complete NAP will exist only on those website landing pages that relate to the cities in which the business is physically located. You will not be putting NAP on the 'location-less' city landing pages. That's good that you have the resources to create unique copy for these pages! You can optimize these pages for the service cities and the business name, but do not put the address and phone number of the physical office in the neighboring city on these pages.
That should cover it. Good luck with the work ahead!
-
-
Actually, I just looked at what I thought was our Santa Rosa, CA dealer and their address is actually in Rohnert Park, CA (15 miles north of Santa Rosa). So to go a little further, should the dealer be listed on Google+ Local and their local page as "ABC Plumbing Rohnert Park", "ABC Plumbing Santa Rosa" or "ABC Plumbing San Francisco"? FYI - Currently, they are optimized as "Northern California", which I do not feel is helping at all.
-
It is a pretty competitive market, so I am not sure of its reach. Looking at competition though, I think if we optimize correctly we could still rank even from Santa Rosa.
-
You are correct, it is an in-home service. And Miriam, once again you are awesome!
Currently, only 12 of them cover 2-3 cities, but this will most likely increase over the next year. We have the resources to implement a local page for each of the 2-3 cities they cover and create good unique content. If we were to do this though, there could only be one "true" NAP (true as in a street address registered with Google+ Local, etc). While these secondary city pages will not have back links from local listing/directory sites, it seems it would still be better to go this route then cram into one page, right?
If I were to create these secondary city pages I could change the dealer name to include each city name "ABC Plumbing Santa Rosa", have them get a local number for each city and include just the city/state. Also, I mentioned that they get a local number for each city they want to be optimized for, is this true? If their main NAP uses a toll-free number could each of that dealer's local pages use that same number, or would that be a duplicate issue? Leaning toward local numbers for each city anyway for better ux, but curious if it matters.
-
Good Morning!
If I'm understanding your question correctly, you are saying that you have 100+ dealers. The term 'dealer' may be confusing to me, as I'm associating it with something like car dealers (brick-and-mortar businesses without a service radius). Do your dealers travel to cities to have face-to-face transactions with customers, like a plumber would? As you've mentioned that you're using the service radius tool on the Google+ Local page, I'm going to assume that these employees do travel to various cities within their service radius to give service. If I'm wrong, please do explain.
So, back to the equation here. You have 100 dealers, and let's say that each of them has a 50 mile service radius with 20 towns and cities in it. If you went the route you're asking about of creating a page for each of these cities, that would mean developing 2000 pages on the website (20 X 100). While this is not an impossible task, it is an enormous one, and the chief danger in it would be the creation of thin, duplicate content that could lower the quality of the website. So, if you were to use this strategy, the requirement would be the manpower and money to create 2000 excellent pages on the website. These city landing pages would need to feature unique content, perhaps showcasing each dealer's projects in a given city.
A half-hearted approach, however, would do more harm than good, so if the business lacks the resources to pull this off, then a better strategy would be to create 100 pages (one for each dealer) optimized with the complete NAP encoded in Schema and featuring an overview of the dealer's work in his city of location. I would not recommend optimizing these pages for the other cities in the service radius. Google's Webmaster Guidelines frown on lists of cities served, so this would not be something you'd want to put on these pages. You could include some type of map on these pages illustrating the service area, to get the point across.
If you are forming a long-term strategy under a long-term contract with this business, then once you've got the 100 pages developed, you might create a plan for beginning to develop service city landing pages for each dealer over time, at a rate that is commensurate with the client's resources to get this work done correctly. It would likely be the work of many months or years to cover every town and city, so finding a way to scale this would likely be the chief challenge in such a project.
Again, if I've misunderstood the business model, please do clarify.
-
Hi, I think without a dealer in San Francisco with a physical address then you need to optimise the page on your site for the dealer you have in Santa Rosa complete with citations for their location (Name, Address, Phone number).
The success of the Santa Rosa dealer's page for searches for San Francisco will largely depend on the competitiveness of other dealers listed on the Internet that are selling the same products with local citations closer to San Francisco. If there are limited dealers to be found for San Francisco then Google will spread it's net wider to find other relevant results. That said, your Google+ Local listing showing coverage should help your site page.
I hope that helps,
Peter
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Best place to employ "branded" related keywords to gain SEO benefits and rank for "non branded" keywords?
Hi all, I want to put this question straight with an example rather than confusing with a scenario. If there is company called "vertigo", a tiles manufacturer. There are many search queries with thousands of searches like "vertigo tiles life", "vertigo tiles for garden", "vertigo tiles dealers", "vertigo tiles for kitchen", etc....These kind of pages will eventually have tendency to rank for non-branded keywords like "tiles for garden", "tiles for kitchen", etc. So where to employ these kind of help/info pages? Main website or sub-domain? Is it Okay to have these pages on sub-domain and traffic getting diverted to sub domain? What if the same pages are on main website? Will main website have ranking improvement for non branded keywords because of employing the landing pages with related topics? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Prioritising SEO Tasks for Biggest Impact
Hi I want to find out, what people feel the top 3 focuses should be for an SEO (I know there are hundreds)...Content/Backlinks/Social/Technical I'm trying to better prioritise my work - I work on a large ecommerce site - with just me as the SEO & a development team in France So most of the technical stuff is controlled there. I focus on audits, KWD research & briefing content how to better optimise products. A lot of time is taken up by that as the site is so big & I'm concerned I am not putting enough effort into other areas. What should these areas be?! Backlinks/Content/Blogs - I can't do everything but would like to prioritise tasks which will have the
Algorithm Updates | | BeckyKey
biggest impact Can anyone help0 -
In one site a 3rd party is asking visitors to give feedback via pop-up that covers 30-50% of the bottom of the screen, depending on screen size. Is the 3rd party or the site in danger of getting penalized after the intrusive interstitial guidelines?
I am wondering whether the intrusive interstitial penalty affects all kinds of pop-ups regardless of their nature, eg if a third party is asking feedback through a discreet pop-up that appears from the bottom of the screen and covers max 50% of it. Is the site or the third party who is asking the feedback subject to intrusive interstitial penalty? Also is the fact that in some screens the popup covers 30% and in some others 50% plays any role?
Algorithm Updates | | deels-SEO0 -
Are there any alternative ranking strategies for not a blog site other than on site SEO, speed improvement, building backlinks and social media engagement to improve rankings?
We own a horoscope website and looking for some SEO advice.However most of the websites are blog sites therefore most of the SEO content is about how to rank a blog site better. IE getting new quality content, use anchor text link out etc. However if your site is different by nature it is hard to find good advice on how to rank better in these scenarios. I would like to know if there are alternative ways of increasing rankings apart from the usual strategies of improving social media fan pages, building backlinks and optimising the site speed wise and making it accessible and understandable to crawlers and people too.
Algorithm Updates | | websitebuilder0 -
SERP Question - Site showing up for national term over local term recently
Hey Moz, This has been happening to me with a couple of clients recently and I wanted to kick it out to the community and see if anyone else has experienced it and might be able to shed some light on why. (Disclaimer: Both clients are in the elective healthcare space)
Algorithm Updates | | Etna
Scenario: Client's site is optimized for a fairly competitive "procedural keyword + location" phrase. Historically, the site had been ranking on the first page for a while until it suddenly dropped off for that query. At the same time, the page now ranks on the first page for just the procedural term, without the location modifier (obviously much more competitive than with the location modifier). Searches on Google were set to the city in which the client was located. Not that I'm complaining, but this seems a little weird to me. Anyone have a similar situation? If so, any theories about what might have caused it? TL;DR - Site ranked on 1st page for "keyword + location modifier" historically, now ranking on 1st page for "keyword" only and not found with "keyword + location modifier" TRQd9Hu0 -
Recent Rank drop after Penguin 2.1?
Recently, a lot of pages from our website have moved from page one or ranking number one, to page ten or something. We got a manual penalty message from Google Team, we removed a lot of unnatural links pointing to our pages and disavowed the rest. This got the penalty removed and we got a message from Google confirming the same. Before the manual penalty we were getting about 140,000 visits per day, after the penalty about 80,000. However, after Hummingbird or Penguin 2.1 all our ranks have vanished. We are nowhere in Google for our primary keywords and we getting like 40,000 visits per day. Most are direct or from sources other than Google. We had another look at the links we disavowed, a list of about 11000 domains, we found about 3000 domains to be good. We fixed the disavow file about one week back, but no changes in traffic since. We checking the domains again to see if we have missed more good domains in there; yes, we have. There are still a very few good domains in there. But we are not touching the disavow list; waiting to see the change for the last submitted. We have a dedicated user base, good liking on Facebook, all the stats in Analytics speak good, about 40% repeat visits about 30% direct. About 3000 people search for the site using our brand name as reported in Analytics. I doubt the on-page optimization, the pages could be over-optimized. But the on-page factors for other pages ranking for the keywords are similar. The keyword density is similar, so are the usage of headings and stuff. We have not made any recent changes to these on-page patterns. Our team is not able to figure out what could have gone wrong.
Algorithm Updates | | Develop410 -
Does the Search Algorithm vary considerably locally?
Hey, i am from india and I just noticed that most of our searches are extremely different to those from the gooogle.com searches. Not some searches. I mean entire layouts. For instance, there were no google places in the search results in India. There was hardly any integration with the G+ for a long time after it launched, even though a large population on G+ was Indian. I got thinking on these lines. Any pointers?
Algorithm Updates | | rahul.bitmesra0 -
What are the differences between Google SEO and Bing SEO?
I came across this question on why the poster's rankings in Bing/Yahoo were so much lower than his rankings in Google. One of the links responded with was a presentation Rand gave about the difference in ranking elements of Google and Bing. My purpose for looking into this is to boost rankings in Bing to be more in line with my Google rankings. My takeaways from Rand's presentation were that Bing likes shorter URLs than Google and it's better to have more links from more root domains with more precise anchor text. Unfortunately this presentation was given at last year's SMX Advanced and is almost a year old. Since then Microsoft has been accused of basically scraping the Google SERPs and Google unleashed at least two maybe three rabid Pandas. Needless to say the environment has changed. So my question is for those people who are happy with how they rank in Bing: What SEO factors are you seeing make a bigger impact in Bing vs. how they impact your Google rankings?
Algorithm Updates | | rball11