Localized vs Professional Images
-
When it comes to local directory sites such as Google+ Local for business, Yelp, Bing places for business, etc., what is everyone's opinion on the type of images that should be used?
I am trying to decide if I want to use 10 professionally produced images (the same 10 will be used across hundreds of locations under the same brand across the country) or if each location should use their own unique 10 images that show localized images from that exact location.
When it comes to profile completeness, I think each site does not care, as long as they represent your company well. However, I am curious if there are any case studies or the like that show that one image type is better to use over the other in terms of helping customers make decisions to contact your business or not.
really appreciate any comments you have to share.
-
i think my solution will be a unique exterior storefront image of each location and then 9 images that show the range of products and services offered at all locations, using the same 9 images on all like brand profiles. so, the primary image will be unique and the 9 supporting images will be the same across each brand (200-300 locations each).
If a location wants to go the extra mile and send me 9 unique images to use, I will add those as provided, but not make it a requirement.
the logistics of trying to get 921 busy business owners to send me 10 images that meet my requirements is nearly impossible, so I have to be realistic in my solution for now.
-
Hi Brad, I think you are right on with your instinct. You are, after all, a consumer as well.
While it may not in fact hurt your rankings online to use the same photo for all locations, I would suggest that the end-user would appreciate the opportunity to see location-specific images. That is what they are there for.
However, if you do have the 10 photos, you could offer these up to what I assume are either your partners, franchisors, or licensees as a benefit while making the suggestion that they also get their own images.
-
Thanks for your input, Miriam.
My instinct is that while local images set a stronger expectation for customers of what they can actually expect when they visit each location, ultimately, it probably has little influence on whether or not they decided to come in the first place.
Also, yes, each location will have an image of the outside of the building (storefront) as the first image and then probably the same general images for the other 9 spots.
Again, thank you for your feedback.
Anyone else have any insight?
-
Hi Brad,
Your question is so great, and I'm sorry not to be able to point right to a study that's been done along the lines you've mentioned. Unfortunately, I've never seen such a study defining that certain types of images engender better impressions than others, beyond people stating that the images should be appropriate and of high quality.
I think the question here is one of uniqueness vs. reasonableness. If the company has the ability to produce thousands of images (taking your hundreds of locations into account) then a completely unique approach might be possible, but this really seems like an enormous undertaking. Remember, too, that it is typically only the first photo uploaded to the Google+ Local dashboard that would appear side-by-side in something like local results, so I'm not sure there would be a genuine issue with duplication, if you could ensure that at least the first image on each profile was unique. This would cut the work down to one unique photo for each physical location, rather than 10 for each location. This might make the project a little easier to handle.
I hope others will comment on this, as it's such a good question, and if anyone has done a case study, please link to it!
-
also, please consider when replying that there may be occasions where several locations are in the same general geography and the likelihood of a customer seeing multiple locations next to one another in search results is probable.
My instinct as a marketer is to say that each location should look different than the others, but is this how consumers think?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
When does the 2020 Local Ranking Factors Survey come out?
Local marketing experts rank the most important factors that influence Google's local search algorithm. Looking for the updated 2020 Local Ranking Factors Survey. Doesn't it usually come out about this time ??
Reviews and Ratings | | Staff090 -
Star rating not showing up in local pack, and knowledge panel pulling in healthgrades
Hello, I have a client that when you Google just their business name a couple of odd things are happening. First off, they show up in the map pack, but it's now showing their review rating. They have 29 reviews, with an average star rating of 4.6, but at first glance, it doesn't look like they have any reviews:
Reviews and Ratings | | ElaineBushey0 -
Aggregate Rating Markup for Local Restaurant
Hello Moz Community, I am finally getting around to creating markup for a bunch of the sites we work with using JSON-LD. I have a question specifically regarding adding review markup for a local restaurant. It's my understanding that putting the aggregate rating on the homepage never results in stars being shown in the SERP's. So what would be the best practice for taking advantage of all the great Google reviews we've accumulated over the years? These are reviews for the restaurant in general and not for any specific service or product. Should I create a reviews page on the site and use the markup there? Thanks for any and all suggestions.
Reviews and Ratings | | robertsteck0 -
Local Listing only Showing out of the Local Market. Have you seen this? What are my options?
I have a client (law firm) who has been dominant locally for years. A few months ago he stopped showing locally when you search in his city, but when you search from other cities, he's still dominant. Here are a couple facts: 1. None of the competition is in his building. 2. He does rank dominant locally if you select "top rated" in Google maps.* *Interestingly enough, his competitors on regular searches have great ratings too so its a bit weird that he shows up in front of them but only when you select top rated. Have you seen this? Any suggestions?
Reviews and Ratings | | mgordon1 -
Why does Google return 1 star reviews in local listings as the "most helpful"?
I have a client who has recently received two 1 star reviews on Google local (unhappy customer and unhappy customers boyfriend). This is affecting an otherwise flourishing business as these two 1 star reviews are displayed prominently when you search for the brand in Google. They have since received more positive reviews, however Google insists on displaying, what they term, the "most helpful" reviews first. Why are these 1 star reviews deemed "most helpful"? In all honesty, they aren't even really that helpful, with the latter verging on slanderous. We are in the process of reporting this one as it personally attacks a member of staff, however, whilst we tentatively wait weeks for a response, I wondered if anyone has any idea on how G decides which reviews are "most helpful"? When there is no option for other users to rate these reviews as helpful (such as on play store).
Reviews and Ratings | | Silkstream0 -
Local review site discovery
Rand and others have shared a link to a free service where you type in a state location and it shows a list of the most used local listings & review sites for that area. I can't find this service or link anywhere. Was this a service that was on getlisted.org that no longer exists?? Anyone know where it is or where it went?
Reviews and Ratings | | clearlyseo1 -
URL Structure for a local listing site
Hi - We have a site that offers customers with wide range of local businesses information. We have URL structure for those these days like this - site.com/listings/plumbers/ca/sfo However here the "listings" doesn't add any value and are confusing for users who want to remember it, hence we decided to make it cleaner. The question here is, which one of the two should we do and why? site.com/plumbers/ca/sfo or site.com/ca/sfo/plumbers Any help on this matter would help.
Reviews and Ratings | | nunoz0 -
Wondering best ways to optimize for google maps/local listing
I'm wondering if there is any strategy to optimize a client to show up in the local listings. I assume a lot of this is tied to Google + / Google Places for Business. Is it possible to have a company show up in the local listings over a certain geographic area even if they are not technically addressed in that area? Any help is much appreciated. Thanks, Dan H.
Reviews and Ratings | | higherimages0