Why is our website ranked lower but beats most competitors in full SERP report?
-
We are analysing why our website ranks so low (currently position 8 in serp). We beat our competitors in most areas. Also we produce by far the most useful content. Do not buy links or do any other malpractice. We have been for a long time ranked in top 3 (well mostly 1-2) positions. In the last year we have seen a decline to position 8-10 and we are not sure why this is the case.
Can anyone suggest what we should be focusing on? We are clueless. All the practices we used to "know" now seem obsolete.
-
Hello Jane,
You make some really good points here. It is amazing how easy it is to get hung up on one thing or another and miss the real issue. Quality will typically win out every time. I have clients who hire someone to put out a post a day, etc. Focusing on putting out content people want to see or products presented in a way that is not a mirror of everyone else, will always pay dividends. Focusing on business outcomes as opposed to rankings is the other "aha moment"more need to have.
Keep up the great work at Moz, Best,
-
Hi there,
Just to round off this thread, I would say that Robert is right - often low rankings aren't about what you are doing "wrong" but are about what your competitors have done right that you have not considered. If your SEO practices are out of date (I am guessing here, but things like seeking links from directories, focusing on the minutiae of markup rather than robust site structure and quality, unique content, pushing out small daily "blog" updates that are repetitive rather than writing two or three longer, quality pieces per week, etc.) then your rankings will suffer if your competitors are more up to date.
If you are still seeking links from third party sites with solely "optimised" anchor text (e.g. links saying "Car insurance" pointing to the car insurance page) you can end up with a penalty or poorer rankings as a result, usually at the hands of the Penguin algorithm or a manual action (although if you are still ranking 8th, you do not have a penalty.
-
Michael - I disagree, if you are doing everything naturally then you don't need to worry about Google updates.
If you are producing, good original content then that people naturally link too then Google isn't going to penalise you. All Google wants to do is rank relevant content to keep people using Google happy and not going to other search engines. Play by their rules and you don't need to worry about future updates.
-
I experienced the same. Its been since the last penguin update for us. We had no manual actions in google but automated actions are very common. My site was especially effected because i had several sites with similar content from same database. I was forced to streamline down to one site with one database. I also had to disavow links that may no longer be acceptable to Google's new guidelines. Check out authorship and content canonical's on your site, these are very big factors with Penguin. Its frustrating to go from top 10 to below 50 for us. Lost lots of business because of these changes. Just chasing the dragons tail with Google changing the game with every update.
-
1/ About links : page and domain authority are not all; anchors text match to keyword can make the difference.
2/ About content/text : try to understand regarding the other results what is the expected semantic according to Google. Besides, a length of 2000+ words will help.
-
Hi Urkeman
I would have to partly agree with Robert, with what are the competition doing that is better what you are doing, but I would also look at the "produce the most useful content" like Robert said that is subjective - have you looked at how much of your great content is generating links to it, it could be as simple as that your competitors are better at using their "less useful content" but getting good quality links to it.
Writing brilliant, amazing unique content is only part of the content strategy you must outreach this content to gain links, mentions traffic to it.
I would maybe look at what links your competitors are getting that you are not.
-
All the practices we used to "know" now seem obsolete.
If you have used these on your site they may have generated a reduction in your SERPs.
-
Urkeman,
There is no concrete answer for "Why?" Please understand you are not the only one who has ever asked this question. The answers are many, but first I suggest you take a step back and understand that what you or I think is "the most useful content" is very subjective. You may not be doing anything outwardly wrong, "malpractice," but still not doing the best in terms of the algorithm and what result it has calculated based on your site.
Is your content regularly changed up? Is your content relevant to whatever group you are trying to reach? Is your on page SEO great? Are your links high quality even if you have more than the other guy? Is your content DEEP, in other words, more than just a rehash of all the other info on the web.
I decided some time back to look at what the sites ranked ahead of me are doing better as opposed to bothering myself with, "Why are they in that position?"
SEO is something that is done over time and requires a semblance of patience. Take your time, look at any possible changes that improve your site in the eyes of Google, Bing, etc. And if you are relentless, you will move up.
Best,
Robert
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is it possible to find out how many indexed pages a website had at particular dates in the past?
I've found all kinds of websites and tools that can tell me how many pages a site has indexed currently, but how about historically? Does such a tool exist?
Competitive Research | | bigvibes9090 -
How important is a keyword rich domain name for ranking?
I've read that Google has lowered the relevancy of a keyword rich domain name in recent years, but I have a scenario with a client that makes me think otherwise. My client has a particular phrase that they're trying to get rank for and are currently in position 3 of Google. Their primary competitor has position1. Using the Keyword Analysis in Moz Pro, my client has a competitor beat out in Page Authority (45 vs 36), # Root Domains Linking to Page (98 vs 9), Domain Authority (35 vs 24), and # Root Domains Linking to Domain (122 vs 15). The main difference is that the competitor has the exact phrase as part of their domain. Other than that, the phrase (on my client's site) is used in title tags, heading tags, and throughout page content. I can provide additional information if necessary, but does anybody have any general advice about this scenario?
Competitive Research | | robotninja0 -
Ecommerce Website Product Rich Snippet Image
Greetings Mozzers, I'm working on an ecommerce site and my goal is to have the product rich snippets on each of them however, I would like an image to start displaying in the SERPs. Looking for some guidance on this issue. Here is a well phrased questioned I found that sums up my thoughts: Product schema has the "image" attribute, but it is not displayed in rich snippets in SERP. However, there is recipe schema and it allows to show image directly on SERP. It means that we can define two entities on a page (product and recipe, it is allowed) and it should display an image from recipe's part + the rest of information (price, availability) from product's part. I know it is a dirty hack and semantically incorrect, but will it work? If so, would it affect rankings or not? Any other drawbacks? Thank you for any advice/clarification!
Competitive Research | | MonsterWeb280 -
Thoughts on Nofollow My Account / Shopping Cart Pages on an eCommerce Website
I recently noticed most of my competitors (eCommerce sites) have linked to pages within their sites that do not always contain product information (my account, shopping cart, etc) using rel="nofollow". My site does not currently do this. Are there any advantages to using rel="nofollow" on similar pages on our site? Any disadvantages?
Competitive Research | | Gordian0 -
Competitor research: No data / results displaying on Keyword tools, Aexa
Hi there! I'm trying to research a few competitors using various Keyword tools (SEM Rush, Compete, Keyword Spy -- even Alexa for high level insight). While the bulk of the competitors generate expected results through these tools (a smattering of their top organic and paid search keywords, some traffic estimations through Alexa), ONE of these competitors lists "No results" across all categories and all tools: http://www.bgstar.ca Despite this, we know that they invest heavily in search -- and my SEM Rush toolbar indicates that they have a Google PR of 5 (though I recognize that that should be taken with a grain of salt). So I'm stumped! Has anyone encountered this before? Is there something structural that they might be doing, that's blocking not only Google-based platforms, but Alexa too? Thanks for your help!
Competitive Research | | MACJ0 -
Comparing competitor folder path
Hi All I've just take on a new client and need to be able to compare their performance with a competitor's sub-folder site. The competitor is http://thebestof.co.uk/local/brightonandhove/ I've tried to add that to the competition structure in my campaign but can't use "Path" info. What do you guys do in these types of cases. BTW - TheBestOf.co.uk is a franchise with a /local/CityNames across the UK
Competitive Research | | stevecounsell0 -
Unjustified ratings and reviews in google SERP?
I was checking Google US for some search term my company is interested for and found a thing I cannot explain well. The site Tradecarview is shown with a rating of 4.4 stars from 4209 reviews. (Please see attached image).The same rating is shown on their homepage, but I could not find much more details. (By the way: Tradecarview is a sort of directory for used car dealers to post their vehicles, something similar to Ebay or Yahoo motors.) The question is simple: is Google trusting the ratings given directly on the website? Maybe just summarizing the ratings shown here? http://www.tradecarview.com/pr/providerlist.aspx?pn=0&st=7 Or are there other sources I couldn't find that Google used to specify the rating? What do you think? Thank you in advance for your answers, Dario Pe1ft.jpg
Competitive Research | | Darioz0 -
How to compare my pages with a Keyword Difficulty Report
I'm very new to SEO, but know just enough to be dangerous. I've run my first full KWD report and formatted the results per Jordan Judson's blog post. Now I'd like to compare how related pages on my site compare to these results. Unfortunately I can't figure out how to accomplish this task. Any guidance would be very much appreciated. Thanks, Steve
Competitive Research | | SteveMaguire0