Any ranking success with Moz Local?
-
In the last three months, our Tampa office has gone from a listing score of 2% to 72% and is considerably higher than everyone else on the first page for Moz Local...but we are on the 13th page! We have not improved at all, even though our score has dramatically.
I know that the listing is only a part of the local equation, but it just a little shocking to me we haven't moved up even one page. Anyone have any success with this tool that translated to increased rankings for local? If so, how long did it take you to see results?
Thanks,
Ruben
-
Excellent discussion going on here, ladies and gents! I am so impressed by the deep questions and answers present here. Our community makes me proud!
Ruben, I'd like to bring up a couple of things to add to this good topic.
-
You might like to read my Moz Post http://moz.com/blog/local-landing-pages-guide which covers the concept of building out pages for various locations in some depth.
-
Citations are a big part of the picture - absolutely! They serve 2 main functions which are a) to help customers find you on a wide variety of platforms and b) to build a consistent, trustworthy body of information about your business on the web, which is then crawled by search engines, causing them to have confidence in the cluster of data they have about your business which can then increase your chances of being considered a relevant answer for certain queries.
So, it's a 1-2 punch kind of thing, building citations. There are direct benefits in a customer finding your listing on a site like Superpages and indirect benefits in the consistency and prevalence of your citations helping search engines to feel confident about the validity and prominence of your business.
This being said, it's my belief and understanding that it takes time for validity/prominence to actually start affecting rank. Every local business platform has its own schedule for taking a citation from zero to live, and then I have to think about search engine bots picking this up and stirring it around in the bucket in which they've got all my other business data. Then, I have to take into account whether my citation building has, in fact, surpassed what my direct local competitors have done or has simply brought me on par with them, meaning citation building will not be the difference-maker I'd love it to be, because my toughest competitors have done the same thing I have (meaning, I'm going to have to find some other way to distance myself from the field).
In sum, citation building is a must-do for any local business that doesn't want to fall behind in their niche, but it takes time to see the positive effects from it and the level of positivity is going to directly relate to the stiffness of the competition. You are in a tough market - law in major cities, which I would consider one of the most difficult ranking environments. Yes, you've got to get those citations in good shape, but my honest appraisal of this is that you are going to have to go way beyond these basics to surpass what is doubtless a highly active/ heavily marketed competitor base. The usual advice of build excellent content, implement on-page Local SEO, build citations, earn reviews is going to be common to all your competitors', so finding something that they're not all already doing may be necessary to see yourself rise in the SERPs by dint of some extra creative, superior effort.
Hope these thoughts are helpful! Glad you brought up this topic, and I hope once Moz Local has had a few more months to bake in the oven, we'll be able to publish some case studies that prove a correlation between participation and positive results!
-
-
Will do, thanks!
- Ruben
-
I concur wholeheartedly with every point Robert has made.
Bottom line, and you know this - you said you did - Moz is only one piece of the puzzle. As Robert said, it's in its early days, but I like it. For $49 it doesn't promise the world. It says it'll update 10 of the most important recipients and aggregators of local data with our your most important local data. It does that. And it provides a wealth of educational material to accompany it.
I recommend you take Robert up on his offer or continue down the path of self-optimization making sure you fill in remaining blanks. I have a post on how to do local SEO if you want to start there. It won't answer all your questions, nor will it result in as good an outcome as you'll get from hiring a pro like Robert, but it might help.
Donna
-
Ruben
I did not mean for that to come off as harsh or a judgement, it was meant really as being based on what you had written. When I re-read it, to me it seemed a bit blunt. Sorry.
With what you are trying to accomplish around Tampa, there are some things you need to change with all you are doing and, unfortunately, they are a bit long for this format. I am willing to provide you a site you can look at that I know they will not mind where you can see in real life the way to approach this. If you will email or PM me, I will provide that to you. (I am unwilling to put a site name out for this forum since it is a client site and not one I own.)
With your last statement:_ Though, now it looks like I have some other strategies thanks to you all to implement, and that's exciting, but I'm still disappointed. MozLocal, at least for me, has been completely worthless. _I think you have to put it into perspective.
For me, as an agency, most of these Local tools we do not use. I am speaking to any like Yext, etc. and including Moz Local in that. I want to be clear that my respect for Moz is only 1000 times more than Yext, and their product has been out a relatively short amount of time. If there has been a company I have come to trust it is Moz, so if they are not providing a service at the highest level, I believe they will make it right and you should email them or put in a support ticket.
With any SaaS, you have to be very clear what it is they are providing and I will tell you oftentimes I have to force myself to take the time to read everything they say they are supplying so I can be clear as to what I will or will not receive. As an agency and having a bit of notoriety, I get a call a day about ranking software, linking software, Local software, etc. I try a lot of it, but only end up using any of it rarely. We use Moz analytics, megalytics (which IMO is the best reporting software in the business), MajesticSEO, SEMRush, ahrefs, etc.
With the Local like Yext, I think it is simply not appropriate to accept money over time and then if someone quits paying you take down all their info. There is NO WAY that taking it down will improve the outcomes of Yext and certainly it will damage the business. In essence a person/business is held hostage. I do not know what Moz does, but IMO Yext is in it for the money based on their actions. It is not about improving outcomes.
So, with the local, once you have your listings correct, you are at a place where you then must maintain your NAP and guard it and then make sure your site is as optimized as possible to take advantage of Local.I know that is a lot to take in, but I hope it provides clarity.
Best,
Robert
edited to provide info on valuing Local SaaS
-
"I think the issue you are having is looking at Moz Local as if it is a tool to guarantee you will show up on page one of the 7 pack.:"
I do not think that at all, and that's the part I want to make clear. I have not seen ANY change in the ranking. When I saw Moz's pitch about this product, yes, I thought it might get me a really good ranking, but at the very least, I would have sworn there would be some improvement.
When I went through the Moz Pro software and optimized all my pages, etc, etc, I saw massive improvement. This product...nothing.
Though, now it looks like I have some other strategies thanks to you all to implement, and that's exciting, but I'm still disappointed. MozLocal, at least for me, has been completely worthless.
-
You can rank in both Ruben. We handle several law firm clients and about 30 sites for them. Yes, I have clients who are in Houston and other near areas and we do have them ranking in both areas. You are doing overkill if you are trying to do a separate page for every service at the firm for each location for simply business reasons. First and foremost, a search on Tampa is more "locally" global. In other words there are people in Trinity or St. Pete, etc. who will search on attorney Tampa. There are not that many in Tampa who will search attorney Trinity. So, you need a Tampa page minimally for the Tampa office. Kemprugelawgroup.com/Tampa... /Trinity, etc. Here is how I would set it up. The site would be a Tampa site with dropdown menu for "areas Serviced" or something similar. You might have Trinity, St. Pete, and Clearwater. (Just because a bunch of people will want to say you cannot do that- yes you can. What you cannot do is say you have an office in those other areas when you do not.) Frankly, if you handle it correctly, you can even show up for those searches.
I think the issue you are having is looking at Moz Local as if it is a tool to guarantee you will show up on page one of the 7 pack. I think that is a much more dynamic process than listing with data aggregators, citation sites, etc. It would be nice if someone from Moz Local would chime in here.
I suggest you create two pages for any city you want to rank in. One will be your "contact" page and one a "content" page. We try out variations until we find which works best for a given site in terms of ranking in local and organic. One page for each.
LMK if this helps you understand it a bit better.
Robert
-
Sorry. It's a best practice and has been for a while. Extra work, but adds clarity for visitors and search engines alike.
-
Hi Donna,
Well, I was under the impression, if you have two brick-and-mortar offices then you can rank in each location, but I didn't know I needed separate pages for everything. I...guess that's wrong. I will check out the SEJ article; I appreciate you providing it for me.
Thanks,
Ruben
-
Robert,
I understand what you are saying about how to check where you rank, but not how we are optimized for Trinity and not Tampa. Earlier this year, we opened a second office in Tampa. After we got verified by Google and everyone else. I got MozLocal to help us rank there.
I made sure to add our new phone, address and everything else to the site. So, I'm not sure what else I could do other than that for on-page optimization? I guess I could build out separate pages for each location as Donna suggested?
Either way, I'd greatly appreciate any concepts you'd like to share with me on any ways to improve our performance. Feel free to respond here, message me or email me at ruben@kempruge.com
Thanks,
Ruben
P.S. I'm glad you liked it here!
-
I agree with Robert, you're mixing apples and oranges - trying to rank in Trinity and Tampa at the same time. You're also correct in noting that listings are only part of the equation.
Search Engine Journal published a post back in April that succinctly summarizes what you need to do to rank well in multiple locations. It also points you to the Google's Places Quality Guidelines if you're not already familiar with them.
Bottom line though, you need a dedicated page per location on your website. Each location page has to be clearly differentiated with a unique (and local !) phone number and content. This is the page you should be submitting to Google Places via Moz Local.
Make sense? Or am I telling you something you already know?
-
Ruben,
I hate to hear anyone is struggling to rank locally and I have an agency and we do Local for clients. I am a huge Moz fan, but do not use the Moz Local. I am answering because you are making an assumption that I think I can assist in. When I read what Moz Local does, they get you listed on the major data aggregators (easy big picture version). You are located in Trinity, FL. (I had a business in Tampa for several years).
When I search from a computer based in Trinity with an incognito search for - Personal Injury Lawyer - you are ranked second in the 7-pack and 4th in organic.When I add - Tampa - to the search (and computer still in Trinity) you are not in the 7 pack, but you are ranked 20th in organic (page 2 # 10) for ..../personal-injury.
The issue is you are locally optimized for Trinity FL where you are. (So, I guess, it is working for you.) The problem is if you are trying to rank locally in Tampa even though really your are in the Tampa/St. Pete/ Clearwater area, you are really in Trinity and you are ranking well there. To truly know how you rank, you have to be set to an incognito or &PWS=0 search and have the computer geo located to the area you are searching for.
I know this is confusing and I also know it makes people want to go get virtual offices ( don't do it please), but there are other tools you can use to assist you beyond just optimizing locally and still being able to rank in some of these areas. LMK if you understand and I will be happy to lay out a few concepts that might help.
Best of luck
Robert (I miss running around the bay there!)
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Local News or National News backlinking?
Hello guys, I got an two offers, one from national newspaper and one from local newspaper (both online and printed editions, but here is online edition relevant.) to write about my company because we had some remarkable results in our niche. They would write a text about 2.000 words long and put a backlink to my website with the anchor text of my choice! The national newspaper has DA 49, whereas local newspaper has DA 39 but comes from the same city where we are based and writes just about the specific city and district in this city. Which one would you choose for your SEO?
Local Listings | | Suksinho0 -
How to rank for local keywords (cities) when you don't have brick and mortar stores
Hi folks, We have developed a site that connect local consumers with local businesses (brick and mortar). The keywords that consumers search for are e.g. "plumber san diego" or "hairdresser" + "local area" and so on...good old fashioned local searches. Sometimes even without the location added in the search. But how do we BEST optimize our site to get the most organic traffic from these local searches? We don't have brick and mortar stores or offices but our service is of high value and will save consumers lots of money and even help the local businesses when in need of extra customers. Thanks in advance for all your input. Have a nice day. Chris
Local Listings | | Henrik_Kruse1 -
Local SEO Issue or Penguin? Or both?
Hey folks I have a fairly complicated SEO issue we have been looking at for a few years now. There are two parts to this problem so would be interested to get the input of the community here and any experienced in Penguin and Local SEO issues. I am going to have to change the names to protect the innocent a bit here as some of the issue relates to a competitor and a shared address. History My client originally worked for company A which we will call Events R us. He then set up on his own at a new address and lets call his company Fantastic Events. EventsRus never had a good website or SEO Fantastic Events set up a great website and really focused on adding tons of relevant content for all the myriad event options available and subsequently did really well. This is a few years back and they were also doing some article marketing on sites like ezinearticles.com to build links (1). As time went on they did get a bit carried away with these low quality links and were buying $5 spun content articles and other low quality links. They ranked really well for a few key terms. There was a suspected local SEO issue as fantastic events used the same office as their fathers business called fantastic finance and the citations / phone number issues etc all had to be cleared up (2). Fantastic Events and Events R Us remained friends and over time Fantastic Events moved to the same farm address as Events R Us so they could offer a wider range of services based on the farm (and ran by fantastic events) and to some extent run away from the address confusion with the same office and very similar name to the other fantastic finance business. Events R Us wanted some of the Fantastic Events success and built a new website and largely copied the website of Fantastic Events - at times even lifting entire pages of content but certainly mirroring the structure of the site. Fantastic Events tussled with them for a few years over this and over time they updated the content but the structure and services and address all pretty much mirrored what was offered on the Fantastic Events site. (3) Two companies - same address (it's a farm so whilst there are different barns I believe Google can only get as far as the farm gate so same address to all intents and purposes. Same services give or take. Events R Us was the older company overall by several years and was at the farm address many years longer than Fantastic Events (4). Fantastic Events starts running a blog and adding regular, useful event orientated content. The first true team building blog out there as far as we could tell and traffic tripled over a six month period. Penguin hits and Fantastic Events loses a lot of traction - this gets worse with Penguin 2.0. Both the homepage and the evening events page lose visibility and traction. The owner gives up on the blog to a large degree. Subsequent clean up happens and is rigorous - all bad links are pretty much removed and the remaining elements are disavowed. (90% of it is actually gone by now). Penguin 3.0 comes and no recovery at all. Nothing. If anything it gets worse and the once strong blog is now losing traction. Events R Us starts to do really well in search for exactly the same terms that Fantastic Events used to do well for. In particular one page ranks for exactly the same keywords and in exactly the same position (#1) as what was believed to be the primary traffic driver on the Fantastic Events site. It is almost like they exchanged positions and Events R Us went from nowhere to a strong footing with some national and local keywords and Fantastic Events fell from grace. A new website is built. All content is refreshed and bought up to date. Some light investment back in the blog. Some light link building is done around digital PR and infographics. Some initial movement in the right direction but overall this did not move the dial. Certain pages on the site that used to rank are nowhere - looks very much like a page level / keyword level penguin penalty. These same pages rank great, often first on the competitor site (an exchange of positions to some extent). Advice from myself and other esteemed consultants was to clean up, build some good links and wait for Penguin 4.0 to remove that eventuality. Also that the address issue could be causing some local SEO issue where Google believes the two businesses are one and has somehow merged the two with some local SEO filter or some such (same business with multiple websites at same address). Penguin 4.0 comes along and no improvements. Events R us sit pretty. Feeling is that the local issue must play a part here now that Penguin should be eliminated due to the extensive link clean up etc and there must now be some action to resolve this address / local issue. Issues low quality links - but cleaned up 100% now. same business name and address as fathers business initially older business copied the structure and content of newer business moved to same address as older more established business with very similar content older business now seems to have taken all the exact keywords and positions the newer business used to occupy Penguin 4.0 and no resolution. Local SEO issue seemingly remains Summary So we are left in a difficult position. The business does not want to move. But if there is some filtering or merging going on here then how can we get around this? The client is likely collateral damage to an algorithmic component designed to stop single businesses having multiple websites. I know there are reports of this happening but I have never seen such a thing for an innocent business like this but the nature of the address (two separate barns on a gated farm) and the history and similarities between the businesses makes this difficult. Things are somewhat desperate though - a move has to be made now. Even if that is a physical one. The client has considered a virtual address to take that variable out the picture but I have advised caution. I am even cautious about a change in physical address. Google has a long memory. If such a move was made at considerable expense would it help or would the other business retain Is the best option a new start? New brand, address, website, services etc - cut all ties with the historic Fantastic Events brand and by association the Events R Us brand. This is not a recommendation I can quickly or easily make so would be really interested to hear the feedback on anyone who has come across such a multi faceted and complex issue before. This is a tough one. We know what we are doing on the local front. We know what we are doing on the Penguin front. We know how to build links and authority. We are doing this work of the clock to help a long term friend / client get back to where they really deserve to be. The history is not spotty clean but the good work and effort far outway a short spell building dodgy links several years ago now. As an SEO consultant I don't want to advise for the company to rebrand and move offices at considerable expense but whilst I have a theoretical understanding of the issue how can we prove it and be sure this is the best possible advice? Thanks folks - hope this at least makes for interesting reading. This is something of an edge case. A good business likely caught up in a filter designed to stop abuse. Cheers
Local Listings | | Marcus_Miller
Marcus1 -
Local Citation Building Services Similar to Yext
I have several clients looking for local submission services similar to Yext (since they are already subsribers). Can anyone suggest a service similar to Yext for an SBO. Likewise, do any of you know any local citation services that are similar to Yext, but specifically for the hotel/hospitality industry? I was considering localeze.com, but I'm skeptical because I believe the citations I will be getting there will be similar to the ones I'm getting on Yext. Any and all suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Local Listings | | maxcarnage1 -
Local Rankings for Second Business Location in the SAME City
I have an issue regarding local rankings for multiple locations within the SAME city, and I'm hoping to start a productive discussion about the various options for helping a second location gain visibility in the local pack. Here's the context…My business is an electronic cigarette shop in New Orleans, called Crescent City Vape. Our first location (Uptown) opened up a year ago and ranks very well in the local-pack as well as organic results for target keywords, as well as brand terms. Our second location opened up 2 months ago, also in New Orleans (Lower Garden District), about 3 miles away from the first shop. This shop, however, is not visible locally or organically, unless we get extremely specific with a branded search query like "Crescent City Vape Lower Garden District" or "Crescent City Vape St. Charles Ave." It does not rank locally for "Crescent City Vape" or "Crescent City Vape New Orleans" We have one website: crescentcityvape.com -- and both shops have a location landing page on the main site: crescentcityvape.com/uptown
Local Listings | | djreich
crescentcityvape.com/lower-garden However, when we launched our local SEO work for the first shop, we used the homepage as the URL in Google+ Local, as well as all of our citations. When we launched the second shop, we used the location landing page as the URL for G+ and all of our citations. We also added a location modifier to the business name on G+ Local: Crescent City Vape - Lower Garden District Both shops have 5+ reviews on Google+ Local, and both shops have citation profiles that are better than any other competitor. I'm confident that the local SEO basics are covered…and this is evident from the solid local and organic rankings for the original shop. My concern isn't that the second shop is ranking worse than the first. I expected this. But I am very concerned that the second shop doesn't even rank for a branded search like "Crescent City Vape." You have to get unrealistically specific with local descriptors to see the G+ local result for the second shop. e.g. "Crescent City Vape Lower Garden District". Here are some of the options and questions I've been pondering. Would love anyone's thoughts on what's worth trying and what might be too risky…since obviously I do not want to sacrifice rankings for the original shop. Changing the G+ URL of the second shop to the homepage (rather than that local landing page). In this case, G+ pages for both locations would link to the homepage. Then updating Moz Local and other citations accordingly with the URL as the homepage. My concern is that this will end up hurting rankings for the original shop more than helping rankings for the second shop. Removing the location modifier from the second shop's Google+ Local business name. When you google "Starbucks" or "McDonalds" you get a local-pack that usually includes 3 of their locations in the pack, and none have location modifiers. I'm wondering if the modifier is sending the wrong signal, because right now, when you Google "Crescent City Vape" only the original location shows up with a local result. Changing the modifier for the second shop's Google+ Local business name to something like "Crescent City Vape: New Orleans E-Cigs". Some of our competitors have added keywords to their G+ names and it's been effective for them. I know this is not aligned with Google guidelines, and may be a risky play. We don't have anything to lose with the second location if we try this…However, is there any chance this would negatively affect our original shop's rankings (since it's the same domain)? If we went in this direction, should I update our citations accordingly? And build new ones with this new "name"? Does page authority of the business URL have an impact on G+ Local rankings? i.e. would building quality links to the local landing page have much of an impact? i.e. is that a productive use of time and resources, as opposed to promoting the homepage and other more important landing pages? Appreciate your thoughts and feedback! Hopefully this discussion will be helpful for other businesses trying to rank for more than one location in the same city. Thanks!0 -
2 listings on Google Local....Need Help!
Hi All, One of our client have 2 business listings on Google Local for same business (same NAP but different website). Actually, their first website was under Google Penalty. They tried to remove the penalty but could not get rid of it so they bought a new domain and started working on it and listed the same business with new website URL. Now, their business is having 2 listings but with different URLs. How can we merge these two? Please advice. Thanks in Advance.
Local Listings | | sachin-sv0 -
Local listing ranking higher than domain name
Hi everyone,I was wondering why on my ranking report there is a fluctuation between the local listing page and the domain name page. Is it a way to always get the domain name ranking higher than the local listing?Thanks for your support,RM
Local Listings | | skrauss0 -
Difference between Moz Local and Whitesparks
What is the largest difference between Moz Local account and using Whitesparks Citation Builder? Does anyone use both together?
Local Listings | | cschwartzel0