SEO value of a 'Most Popular Stories' widget?
-
Hi there,
I work for a theater and live performances publishing site. We write 15-20 quality articles per day on the New York City and national theater community.
We show a "Most Read" stories widget on all of our pages, but click rates for these are really low - 1% of readers click to read a story from this.
As such we're considering replacing this with higher-value content.
My question, however, is this: Is there any SEO value in keeping this widget? I want to make sure we're taking this aspect into consideration.
Thank you!
-
At Moz, we've considered using one to better serve our content. Many allow you to "buy out" the ads and only show your own content.
-
For small brands, most definitely yes. But ESPN uses Outbrain and I don't think it damages their credibility or brand.
-
If you are referring to the "stinky" nature of these ads, then my personal opinion is "yes". Although, I have not seen any formal studies where someone devised tests to determine the impact upon the brand. I don't run them on my site because I think that they can damage the credibility of my content when those types of ads are adjacent to it. So, instead, I promote my own content, hoping to earn additional pageviews and the income from other forms of advertising that will come with those pageviews.
-
Is there any evidence that using Taboola, Outbrain, etc., style ads negatively affect the host brand, causing said host brand to lose future visitors?
-
but click rates for these are really low - 1% of readers click to read a story from this.
"Most popular stories" widgets are usually really valuable. Don't replace the widget until you test a better version.
If you go to some of the big news sites, at the bottom of articles you will see the content marketing ads run by Taboola, Outbrain, ContentAd, Gravity and Adblade. These have big, juicy, provocative images and quite honestly, they are a bit stinky. However, you can learn something from them. Learn their format and try a widget with very attractive images about your articles, with a caption that elicits clicks. I think that you will get more than one percent click rate.
IF "Most popular stories" does not work then try "Related Stories"..... Really nice images are very important for these to succeed, but they can succeed spectacularly if you have the right kind of image and content that catches the visitor's desire for more.
Look at the Gravity ads on the bottom of this Forbes article.
ADDED: Since you are a news site, you might make a "most recent" widget because people are looking for the fresh news.
Something important about running "most popular" and "related stories" widgets. If you have them on a page that is sleepy content or uninspiring the visitor might not be motivated to click your widget because they expect to find "more of the same". Including sleepy or uninspiring content in the widget will assure that it will not be clicked. Good images and spectacular images can perform very differently. Strive to have spectacular images.
Also, the widgets need to be updated frequently. If you have lots of returning visitors, if they have already seen your widget and clicked the interesting items, showing that same widget over and over again will produce worse results. We update our widgets several times per hour with all different content.
-
As the widget is on each page of your site, it is generating a lot of internal links to these articles. If these articles have value for search, it could help them to get better positions.
On the other side, widgets like these are very ofter positioned in the same column as advertising, newsletter subscriptionboxes, ...etc - so I am not sure if Google attributes the same value to these links as to the links which are really embedded/integrated in your content.
If you can replace it by higher value content I would do it - but you'll have to make sure that the new content has indeed a higher value for your visits (try some A/B testing and check vitals stats like bouncerate, avg time on site, pageviews/visit, clickrates,..)
Hope this helps,
Dirk
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
A dumb SEO question
Is it possible for a blog to rank only with fantastic content without any purchasing of backlinks... And how long does it take (on average) to get for example 500 active readers daily?
Link Building | | ImeuOkou0 -
I'm stuck by internal linking.
What structure should a football website follow? Silo or Topic Cluster?
Link Building | | gogoanimetp
I need advice on my website. My website: https://tructiepbongda.site
I hope there are answers!
Thanks0 -
Is anybody else noticing a dramatic change to their 'links to your site' section in Google Webmaster Tools?
Hey,
Link Building | | ChrisHolgate
Over the last six months or so we've been going through our backlink profile and cleaning up links from poor quality sources. Week by week there have been small changes in our Google Webmaster Tools 'links to your site' section to reflect this. I logged on this morning however and there has been a dramatic shift in the information displayed. Pretty much every bad link has been removed from the list including sites I know for a fact are still linking to us as they didn't communicate at all to our removal requests. Additionally, rather than showing the top 1000 links to our site as it used to, WMT is only showing 73 linking domains. The remaining 73 domains are good natural links from high quality sources. I'm guessing Google are just in the middle of an update and that the remaining linking domains (including the bad ones) will reappear shortly. This isn’t a request for advice or help but I’m just curious as to whether anybody else is seeing anything similar?0 -
Your recommendation for a SEO friendly bulletin board software?
Hi there, if you set up a public bulletin board in the context of a SEO project, what product can you recommend? phpBB? A great plugin for Wordpress? ...? My requirements are complete configuration options of the relevant onsite elements, editing/moderation capability of all posts, authentication. Thanks!
Link Building | | kqkq0 -
Ontolo vs Raven SEO Tools
Ontolo referred me to Raven in one of their videos and ended up losing by business as a link building partner. What are your experiences with these tools-either, one, both?
Link Building | | Uramark0 -
What's your strategy for guest blogging?
How long? a.) 500 words b.) 1000 words c.) As many as I need to get a link How good should it be? a.) Digg/StumbleUpon worthy b.) A decent article that the webmaster wouldn't mind posting. c.) Good enough for a link Who should you go for? a.) Go big or go home! High authority b.) Start small Other thoughts and strategies?
Link Building | | 10JQKAs0 -
Has anyone seen positive results from using Submiteaze to submit to directories? I know an SEM agency that uses it for clients' link building campaigns, but I don't know if it is worth buying. Are there better alternatives?
I would like to start a link building initiative at my company for a new website, and would like to know if the value of the links built using Submiteaze would be worth the money.
Link Building | | pbhatt0 -
What's the difference between follow and nofollow links?
I understand this may be a really dumb question and from my understanding there is a piece of code in some url's that tell search engines not to follow that link. I am interested in finding out what the purpose of nofollow links are and how they apply to search rankings. Thanks for the help
Link Building | | A2890