Changing existing URL's to improve SEO
-
Here's a general question: At what PR/page rank (or Moz 'page authority') would you no longer change an existing URL that's cryptic to one that includes the related page keyword or at least relevant terms? Does using a 301 redirect to the new URL preserve the page rank? Thanks!
-
Patrick - Great response, really appreciate the effort you put into that and the solid strategy. I do have a spreadsheet where I've mapped each page and related analytics, i.e. traffic to each page over time, meta tag info, PR, age, url, etc, and very few are driving any significant traffic so those are easy decisons. The few that ARE getting some decent traffic just make me think it's worth any temporary slippage for longer term benefit of being better optimized, presenting a clear theme for each page for both visitors and search engines. Knowing I'll retain 90% of the trust/authority by doing the 301 redirects makes it seem clear that's the right call.
I've added several of the link references you included in your response to my reading list for this week, they look like great resources. Thanks!
-
Thanks Umar. I'd call these 'last benchers' (like that phrase), they are relatively aged but really aren't carrying much weight. They're mainly content pages but are fairly obscure right now, so I'm hoping by putting the 301 redirect in place, and optimizing the new page/url, we'll get a little better visibility then we can work on collecting a few links to each of them.
Thanks for your response!
-
Hi Jason,
Thanks for the response! None of the pages are what I'd consider as critical. They're basically content pages produced by a law firm that speak to various topics their clients may be interested in, but they're essentially un-optimized, i.e. only the firm name in all the title tags, no clear keyword focus, nothing relevant in the URL, poor H1 tags, etc. Most of the pages get little traffic, but there are a few that get 30-40 views/month.
I only want to change those that are relevant to good keywords I want to optimize them for, and retaining 90% of the trust/authority is good enough. I'm thinking the benefit of optimizing will outweigh the 10% detriment from changing the currently indexed url.
Thanks again!
-
Hi there
I agree with what Umar says above. Besides the points he has for reason why you should or would change a URL, it'd be great to have context!
Alot of this is going to require research, conversations, and gut instincts - remember, whatever you plan on doing, you need to have a plan that can be explained clearly and concisely. We always hear from clients that they changed URL structures when in reality they just needed a little TLC.
Check the following:
-
All KPIs that matter most to your visibility / performance
-
Your site's goals over time
-
Google Search Console performance over time (impressions / rankings)
-
Take a look at your competitors
-
Is Google valuing domains that have a different or more categorized URL structure?
-
Not a reason to change yours, but it could help categorize your site a bit more
-
Check your on-site SEO
-
Check your backlinks
-
Check your content
-
Check your information architecture
-
Learn more about your audience
-
Are you capturing your audience at the right points? Do you have content to do so?
-
Are you doing everything you can do develop your brand(s) right now?
The reason you should check all of the above is because sometimes the URL structure is fine, it's a matter of other elements that could be hurting your organic visibility.
If you do your research and find that that a URL structure change would help, I would focus on the following:
URL Structures (Moz)
Information Architecture for SEO (Moz)
Moving Your Site (Google)
Website Migration Guide (Moz)All of these resources above will help you move your site in a SEO friendly way and help you preserve as much ranking equity as you can.
Would love to hear the context though! Hope this helps, good luck!
-
-
Hey Michael,
I would like to know what's the main reason that forcing you to change the existing URL? Is it because of the ranking? If yes, then how old is your current URL's format? And what about the traffic stats of this page, is it among the high ones or a last bencher? If everything is alright then I don't think you need to take a risk of changing/updating your URL.
You can change/update the URL if:
- It's a polluted URL (contains codes, special characters, parameters and other garbage)
- You're no longer offering those services specifically but as the Page Authority is good you don't want to remove that page.
In the above cases, you can consider for changing the URL with a 301 redirect. As the Jason said, 301 does preserve the PR and other metrics.
Remember, you might see a temporary ranking drop after implementing the 301 redirect. So make sure to have a proper action plan before.
Hope this helps!
Umar
-
301'ing the old page to the new page will keep about 90% of the trust and authority as the old page.
Regarding your first question, how critical is this page to the long-term success of you business?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Hiding body copy with a 'read more' drop down option
Hi I just want to confirm how potentially damaging using java script to hide lots of on page body copy with a 'read more' button is ? As per other moz Q&A threads i was told that best not to use Javascript to do this & instead "if you accomplish this with CSS and collapsible/expandable <DIV> tags it's totally fine" so thats what i advised my clients dev. However i recently noticed a big drop in rankings aprox 1 weeks after dev changing the body copy format (hiding alot of it behind a 'read more' button) so i asked them to confirm how they did implement it and they said: "done in javascript but on page load the text is defaulting to show" (which is contrary to my instructions) So how likely is it that this is causing problems ? since coincides with ranking drop OR if text is defaulting to show it should be ok/not cause probs ? And should i request that they redo as originally instructed (css & collapsible divs) asap ? All Best Dan
On-Page Optimization | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Should I remove 'local' landing pages? Could these be the cause of traffic drop (duplicate content)?
I have a site that has most of it's traffic from reasonably competitive keywords each with their own landing page. In order to gain more traffic I also created landing pages for counties in the UK and then towns within each county. Each county has around 12 towns landing pages within the county. This has meant I've added around 200 extra pages to my site in order to try and generate more traffic from long tail keywords. I think this may have caused an issue in that it's impossible for me to create unique content for each town/country and therefore I took a 'shortcut' buy creating unique content for each county and used the same content for the towns within it meaning I have lots of pages with the same content just slightly different page titles with a variation on town name. I've duplicated this over about 15 counties meaning I have around 200 pages with only about 15 actual unique pages within them. I think this may actually be harming my site. These pages have been indexed for about a year an I noticed about 6 months ago a drop in traffic by about 50%. Having looked at my analytics this town and county pages actually only account for about 10% of traffic. My question is should I remove these pages and by doing so should I expect an increase in traffic again?
On-Page Optimization | | SamCUK0 -
If I put 'keyword/url' combination to 'stop run weekly', will it dissapear from the summary page in the on-page grader?
The summary page of the on-page grader chooses the keyword and url combination itself. Now if I choose another combination, I would like the former to dissapear from the summary page. The only option is 'stop running weekly'. But will it disappear from the list also?
On-Page Optimization | | jongeneelbv0 -
Keyword repeats/presence in url's & over-optimisation
Hi I'm about to launch a redesigned site and worried about overdoing kw presence on-page, primarily using in url's since will already be using kw in titles as well as page content. What's current thinking re over optimisation: If kw is in titles and page content is it best not to repeat again in url structure i.e. less is more, even though this will cause things like SeoMoz on-page grade score to fall, or better to keep them/add them ? Personally i think it makes sense to include kw in url again since helps make the page relevant, and so long as matches the content should help as opposed to hinder rankings for the pages target keyword. However when i look into this some say don't do this since is over-optimisation The sites generally ranking quite well for its target kw which i obviously don't want to lose after re-launch & hopefully improve further, in the case of this example they are 'Sports Centre Services' & 'Sports Centre Equipment Rental'). The sites current url structure is similar to this below example: frankssportscentres.com/services/sports-centre-equipment-rental Would it be better to keep following existing/above format or to go with either of the below options i.e. more kw rich urls or less: frankssportscentres.com/sports-centre-services/sports-centre-equipment-rental Or frankssportscentres.com/sports-centre-services/equipment-rental Or even less frankssportscentres.com/services/equipment-rental Many Thanks in advance for any helpful comments Cheers Dan
On-Page Optimization | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Seo category or specific seo page?
To rank in google.bg for key phrase like "seo optimization for web" which do you thing is better: To make most of the backlinks with anchor text "seo optimization for web" to point to a link that is a category with many seo articles or to point to a single page from this category?
On-Page Optimization | | vladokan0 -
Rewrite URL for big website
My website is currently have over 1000 000 links indexed by Google , i'm going to rewrite all of these links, is this crazy ? Can someone give me a checklist to avoid going wrong way ? My website: http://www.webtretho.com/forum/ My current url format: webtretho.com/forum/f[forum_id]/[thread-title-thread_id/ Ex: Old URL: http://www.webtretho.com/forum/f90/chia-se-dau-hieu-mang-thai-1357342-new/ New URL: http://www.webtretho.com/forum/chuan-bi-mang-thai/chia-se-dau-hieu-mang-thai-1357342-new/
On-Page Optimization | | firstjames0 -
Status of Ajax and SEO? Changing navigation from plain HTML to AJAX.
We will change an old school HTML drop down navigation for an AJAX drop down one. What's your experience in regards to Google indexing AJAX? I know that Google is now able to read more stuff than in the past, but I need some stories "from the trenches" if you're willing to share. Thanks in advance.
On-Page Optimization | | gerardoH0 -
Canonical URL problem
On page analysis wanted me to add a canonical url tag. However I added then re ran the on page analysis and it came up with an error. What is the proper way to add a canonical url tag in the head of an index page? ie. add a canonical tag to www.hompeage.com/index.html would it be ? Or should I ignore this for a home page? Because I add it then run the analysis again and get this? Appropriate Use of Rel Canonical Moderate fix <dl> <dt>Canonical URL</dt> <dd>"http://www.ensoplastics.com/index.html"</dd> <dt>Explanation</dt> <dd>If the canonical tag is pointing to a different URL, engines will not count this page as the reference resource and thus, it won't have an opportunity to rank. Make sure you're targeting the right page (if this isn't it, you can reset the target above) and then change the canonical tag to reference that URL.</dd> <dt>Recommendation</dt> <dd>We check to make sure that IF you use canonical URL tags, it points to the right page. If the canonical tag points to a different URL, engines will not count this page as the reference resource and thus, it won't have an opportunity to rank. If you've not made this page the rel=canonical target, change the reference to this URL. NOTE: For pages not employing canonical URL tags, this factor does not apply.</dd> <dd>So do I add it or not? If I don't I get a lower page rating if I take it off I get a higher page rating with room for improvement. </dd> </dl>
On-Page Optimization | | ENSO0