Question about schema.org
-
Hi guys,
I have a website that has many local based pages. In other words we're featuring local businesses in many many cities. So my question is, will it help if i add schema markup to each page while each markup will be appropriate to the city each page belongs to? Will it help with ranking those local pages?
Thanks
-
Hi Miriam, thank you for helping! Yes, this is what i wanted to know if there is a way to somehow to mark local page with numbers of vendors on it (not individual pages with only one vendor).
Thanks
-
Wow, great discussion going on here, everybody!
Marina, you would use local business Schema markup on the individual listings. So, markup for plumber A and markup for plumber B ... but not local business markup for the page itself.
...At least, I'm pretty sure that's what you're asking
-
Thank you all for helping me to figure it out!
Richard, i'm trying to assign structured data to identify the whole page itself as a list of plumbing businesses from specific area. I just want to add a location markup and potentially type of vendor (i.e. plumber, roofer..). Is that possible?
Andy, can you elaborate what you mean by "you can add schema to the listings on the page though?"
Thanks!
-
As per the confusion I too was thinking it would be individual pages for each business in a location. As for the markups I suppose it depends on the different businesses being used.
If however they are all on one page then as per Andy I am not sure you can feature all the schema at the same time without causing some issues.
-
Hi Marina,
Im afraid you cant do this. There is no page level markup for a page like this. You can add schema to the listings on the page though.
-Andy
-
Marina,
This is an excellent question. Thank you for clarifying. Just to be clear, Are you trying to assign structured data to identify each of the businesses in this listing as plumbers from that area, or simply trying to identify the page itself as a list of plumbing businesses from that area?
Sorry for any confusion. Thanks again for clearing that up. Sorry to keep asking question, just want to be absolutely sure I know your intent. Thanks!
-
Thank you for answering!
So yes, i see i haven't articulated my question clearly enough. Andy is right, i have local pages where there are several local businesses are featured on the same local page. For example, 5 plumbers in Atlanta, GA. So all of these local businesses are located in Atlanta, GA but they don't have any relation to each other.
My initial question was if i can mark such local pages (with number of local businesses from the same city on every page) with schema.org so search engines will only see that this page is about a local business (let's say plumbers) and its location (let;s say Atlanta GA).
THank you again!
-
No need to apologise Richard - We need Marina to confirm the structure
-Andy
-
If that is the case, then by all means I apologize. From what I gathered, she said she has local business in many cities. I'm assuming that each of the "local pages" she is referring to, is a page optimized for that business in a specific city, with different pages for each city.
If I am wrong I stand corrected and apologize for any confusion.
-
And this is absolutely correct for a business, but from what I understand, it is the page that all of these businesses sit on that Marina was referring to.
If I have this wrong and Marina is only looking to markup each business on a page, then this is what you would do and there is absolutely no issues with that.
-Andy
-
She said she has a website that has many local based pages. You can easily markup different pages for different locations.
-
Marina, here is an example of how you can do this for your business.
Your Business Name
Your Street Address
You City/Town,
Your State
Your Zip CodeUnited States
Your Phone Number
Cash
Credit Card
Check
Mon-Sat 9am - 5:30pm -
From what I understand Richard, Marina is wishing to Markup a page that relates to multiple different businesses that are not related. I'm not even sure what Markup you would use in this instance.
Local Markup relates to businesses, not pages that are more like a directory.
If I have misunderstood the page concept, then I could have this wrong, but I don't think I have.
-Andy
-
I completely understand what you are saying Andy. I just don't see much risk with location markup so long as the correct location is used and the markup is valid. It will certainly help Marina to add structured data to improve location association for a page already optimized for Local SEO for that city. If Marina is simply adding this markup for a business location, I can't see how a penalty would arise so long as the correct information was used.
If Marina was using structured data to associate a location to a business page that the business wasn't actually located at, then I'd be worried. I agree with what you are saying, but I think the risk is minimal in this instance so long as your markup is correct and your location data is correct.
-
Hi Marina,
The trouble is, Markup isn't meant to be used in this manner. It is for a single item or single entity. If you had a page dedicated just to one business or chain, then it's a little different. Someone might be able to suggest a way around this but I am not aware of a way to Markup a page in the manner you are looking for.
Have a read of these examples over at Google.
-Andy
-
Hi guys. Thank you so much for insights! I really appreciate so rapid responses!
Tim Holmes, can you please advise what markups i should add to better determine the locality of the pages? You also said "just make sure you implement it correctly so you don't conflict with each entry." Can you please give me more details on how to implement it correctly so i don't make conflict with each entry?
Andy Drinkwater, yes i read these guidance and i totally understand them. However, as i understand this applies to rating and reviews only. What i want to do is just to mark each local page with local markups. Please let me know if i'm missing something.
Thank you in advance!
-
It's not so much the writing of spammy markup Richard - it's the incorrect use of it. You wouldn't use Markup to help classify a page full of businesses in a specific location in this manner. This goes against the uses that are suggested as they are not specific items.
It's a little difficult to imagine the exact setup of the site and pages without seeing them, but I would be hard pushed to say this would be a recommended technique as it goes against the uses that Google suggests.
-Andy
-
As far as what Andy is saying, you should have no worries if your website is being monitored in Google Search Console. If you have Structured Data on your website, Google will notify you if there are any issues with the markup of your structured data. However, you can easily prevent the possibility of writing bad structured data markup.
Google provides a Structured Data Testing Tool, as well as an on page data highlighting tool directly in Google Search Console to test structured markup with. In Google Search Console, there is a tab called Search Appearance in the side navigation. Under this tab, you can find Structured Data. If you have structured data on your website, you can also use this tab to validate that Google is aware of your structured data, and that there are no errors.
While Andy is correct that Google is now penalizing websites for spammy structured data markup, you can easily avoid these penalties with tools that they provide you, as well as receive notifications directly from Google if you website is in violation of these rules. Just make sure your website is added to your Google Search Console account, and that you are receiving notifications. Hope this helps!
-
Hi Marina,
Approach this with caution. Google is penalising sites that abuse / over optimise their schema markups. What you are suggesting sounds like you could cause your site harm:
Review and rating markup should be used to provide review and/or rating information about a specific item, not about a category or a list of items. For example, "hotels in Madrid", "summer dresses", or "cake recipes" are not specific items. See also our structured data policies for multiple entities on the same page. Read more here
Tread very carefully and I would advise testing with a small control group first of all if you want to do this. Remember that Google is targeting spammy use of markup, so just don't fall into this category. You are wanting to markup other locations that are not directly related to yourself.
My gut feeling is don't do this if you think what you have planned falls into this e.g "business in LA" or "restaurants in London".
-Andy
-
As per the previous two posts, I would imagine that it will help Google determine the locality of the pages and that of the featured businesses a little easier, just make sure you implement it correctly so you don't conflict with each entry.
More details on local schema markup can be found below.
https://schema.org/LocalBusiness
https://developers.google.com/webmasters/business-location-pages/schema.org-examples
Brett provided the great testing tool above too
Cheers
Tim
-
Hello Marina,
I would certainly recommend it, you will also future proof the sites structure as schema.org seems to be the only thing the 3 top engines can agree on to mark it up Google has a free tool https://developers.google.com/structured-data/testing-tool/ with some tutorials. Hope this helps
-
Hi Marina,
Good question, it most certainly will have an impact on how Google sees the page as you have spend some time making sure the pages are marked up in the right way. I would never put it as a first priority but would make sure that your pages have some some elements of the markup.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Unsolved Duplicate LocalBusiness Schema Markup
Hello! I've been having a hard time finding an answer to this specific question so I figured I'd drop it here. I always add custom LocalBusiness markup to clients' homepages, but sometimes the client's website provider will include their own automated LocalBusiness markup. The codes I create often include more information. Assuming the website provider is unwilling to remove their markup, is it a bad idea to include my code as well? It seems like it could potentially be read as spammy by Google. Do the pros of having more detailed markup outweigh that potential negative impact?
Local Website Optimization | | GoogleAlgoServant0 -
Can I have multiple GeoShape Schema for one page on one domain?
Hi Mozers, I'm working on some Schema for a client of mine, but whilst doing the research on GeoShapes with my developer, we came across a potential issue with this particular mark-up. My client is B2C business, operating in numerous places across the UK. I want to use the Circle property from GeoShape to draw out multiple circles across the UK, but am I able to do this? From looking at some other websites, most seem to just have one GeoShape. Can I have multiple on the same page and same domain? Thanks! Virginia
Local Website Optimization | | Virginia-Girtz0 -
Question about partial duplicate content on location landing pages of multilocation business
Hi everyone, I am a psychologist in private practice in Colorado and I recently went from one location to 2 locations. I'm currently updating my website to better accommodate the second location. I also plan continued expansion in the future, so there will be more and more locations as time goes on. As a result, I am making my websites current homepage non-location specific and creating location landing pages as I have seen written about in many places. My question is: I know that location landing pages should have unique content, and I have plenty of this, but how much content is it also okay to have be duplicate across the location landing pages and the homepage? For instance, here is the current draft of the new homepage (these are not live yet): http://www.effectivetherapysolutions.com/dev/ And here are the drafts of the location landing pages: http://www.effectivetherapysolutions.com/dev/denver-office http://www.effectivetherapysolutions.com/dev/colorado-springs-office And for reference, here is the current homepage that is actually live for my single Denver location: http://www.effectivetherapysolutions.com/ As you can see, the location landing pages have the following sections of unique content: Therapist picture at the top testimonial quotes (the one on the homepage is the only thing I have I framed in this block from crawl so that it appears as unique content on the Denver page) therapist bios GMB listing driving directions and hours and I also haven't added these yet, but we will also have unique client success stories and appropriately tagged images of the offices So that's plenty of unique content on the pages, but I also have the following sections of content that are identical or nearly identical to what I have on the homepage: Intro paragraph blue and green "adult" and child/teen" boxes under the intro paragraph "our treatment really works" section "types of anxiety we treat" section Is that okay or is that too much duplicate content? The reason I have it that way is that my website has been very successful for years at converting site visitors into paying clients, and I don't want to lose aspects of the page that I know work when people land on it. And now that I am optimizing the location landing pages to be where people end up instead of the homepage, I want them to still see all of that content that I know is effective at conversion. If people on here do think it is too much, one possible solution is to turn parts of it into pictures or put them into I-frames on the location pages so Google doesn't crawl those parts of the location pages, but leave them normal on the homepage so it still gets crawled on there. I've seen a lot written about not having duplicate content on location landing pages for this type of website, but everything I've read seems to refer to entire pages being copied with just the location names changed, which is not what I'm doing, hence my question. Thanks everyone!
Local Website Optimization | | gremmy90 -
Schema Markup adds whitespace
We have this white space below our logo when our local schema markup is added: http://d.pr/i/73EmV0 Can the markup be hidden to remove the space and still be indexed by google? Kevin
Local Website Optimization | | KevnJr1 -
What is the SEO effect of schema subtype deprecation? Do I really have to update the subtype if there isn't a suitable alternative?
Could someone please elaborate on the SEO effect of schema subtype deprecation? Does it even matter? The Local business properties section of developers.google.com says to: Define each local business location as a LocalBusiness type. Use the most specific LocalBusiness sub-type possible; for example, Restaurant, DaySpa, HealthClub, and so on. Unfortunately, the ProfessionalService page of schema.org states that ProfessionalService has been deprecated and many of my clients don't fit anywhere else (or if they do it's not a LocalBusiness subtype). I find it inconvenient to have to modify my different clients' JSON-LD from LocalBusiness to ProfessionalService back to LocalBusiness. I'm not saying this happens every day but how does one keep up with it all? I'm really trying to take advantage of the numerous types, attributes, etc., in structured data but I feel the more I implement, the harder it will be to update later (true of many things, of course). I do feel this is important and that a better workflow could be the answer. If you have something that works for you, please let us know. If you think it's not important tell us why not? (Why Google is wrong) I understand there is always a better use of our time, but I'd like to limit the discussion to solving this Google/Schema.org deprecation issue specifically.
Local Website Optimization | | bulletproofsearch0 -
Applying NAP Local Schema Markup to a Virtual Location: spamming or not?
I have a client that has multiple virtual locations to show website visitors where they provide delivery services. These are individual pages that include unique phone numbers, zip codes, city & state. However there is no address (this is just a service area). We wanted to apply schematic markup to these landing pages. Our development team successfully applied schema to the phone, state, city, etc. However for just the address property they said VIRTUAL LOCATION. This checked out fine on the Google structured data testing tool. Our question is this; can just having VIRTUAL LOCATION for the address property be construed as spamming? This landing page is providing pertinent information for the end user. However since there is no brick and mortar address I'm trying to determine if having VIRTUAL LOCATION as the value could be frowned upon by Google. Any insight would be very helpful. Thanks
Local Website Optimization | | RosemaryB1 -
SEO: .com vs .org vs .travel Domain
Hi there, I am new to MOZ Q&A and first of all I appreciate all the folks here that share their expertise and make everyone understand 'the WWW' a bit better. My question: I have been developing a 'travel guide' site for a city in the U.S. and now its time to choose the right domain name. I put a strong focus on SEO in terms of coding, site performance as well as content and to round things up I'd like to register the _best _domain name in terms of SEO. Let's suppose the city is Atlanta. I have found the following domain names that are available and I was wondering whether you guys could give me some inside on which domain name would perform best. discoveratlanta.org
Local Website Optimization | | kinimod
atlantaguide.org
atlanta.travel
atlantamag.com Looking at the Google Adwords Keyword tool the term that reaches the highest search queries is obviously "Atlanta" itself. Sites that are already ranking high are atlanta.com and atlanta.gov. So basically I am wondering whether I should aim for a new TLD like atlanta.travel or rather go with a .org domain. I had a look around and it seems that .org domains generally work well for city guides (at least a lot of such sites use .org domains). However, I have also seen a major US city that uses .travel and ranks first. On the other hand in New York, nycgo.com ranks well. Is it safe to assume that from the domain names I mentioned it really doesn't matter which one I use since it wouldn't significantly affect my ranking (good or bad)? Or would you still choose one above the other? What do you generally thing about .travel domain names (especially since they are far more expensive then the rest)? I really appreciate your response to my question! Best,
kinimod0 -
NAP question about wider service area
My business is based in Suffolk, UK, but I serve an area that includes Essex, Cambs, Herts and Norfolk. I've been making an effort to include a constant NAP across all my local citations for Suffolk in an effort to rank better in local search.
Local Website Optimization | | schitz011
However, what effect does this have on pages when trying to rank for searches for areas where I have no physical location? If my entire site has NAP across it referencing Suffolk, does this impact the ability to rank organically for areas outside Suffolk? If so, what would be the best practice for increasing organic rank in these areas?0