Moz Pro recommends not using a keyword more than 15 times. If there is a lot of content and the density is low, is it okay to go over that?
-
From MOZ on-page grader...
"Recommendation: Edit your page to use your targeted keywords no more than 15 times."
But if I use a keyword 50 times and the keyword density is only 2 percent, is that ok? What is more important, the raw number used or the density?
-
Nobody outside of Google, knows this type of information with certainty. My guess is that Google is only concerned with what is within the article portion of the page.
My honest opinion is that Google is not concerned with keyword density unless it is outrageous. If I am writing an article with the hope of ranking for a one-word query, my use of that word on the page has a density of about five percent. I have that density because my writing is very precise and explicit.
I never even think about how many instances of a keyword is on the page. My only concern is if the article is easy to read, easy to understand, and contains value for the reader. Over and over, Google has told webmasters to write as though search engines did not exist. I believe that is what I should do.
-
Thanks, that helps a lot. Also, let's say for example my keyword is "soap". Does google include the amount of times "soap" is counted just in the body text, or on the entire page? Soap may appear on the navigation bar as well as in many product titles on a category page. In some cases, this may double the number of times the keyword is found.
-
The 50 at 2% was just an example. It seems like most people think as long as it sounds natural it is ok. Thanks.
-
Two things immediately come to mind for me.
-
Wow, 50 mentions at 2% kw density is sounds like a LOT of content for one page, and
-
When you read it out loud, does it sound like natural speech or does it sound like you're just banging away at one keyword over and over? Because I believe that's what Google and the tool are probably getting at - making sure you're getting the keywords in there while still keeping the language as natural as possible.
-
-
"Recommendation: Edit your page to use your targeted keywords no more than 15 times."
In my opinion this is something that Moz should reevaluate because this question is asked over and over and over again in Q&A. Lots of people could be tearing up their articles to avoid using their keyword more than 15 times.
My personal opinion is that I should use my targeted keyword in text as many times as is needed while writing in natural language. I have articles that rank high on the first page of google for really really difficult queries. I just visited two of them that quickly come to my mind. On one I have used the targeted keyword 94 times, the other I used the targeted keyword 123 times.
I think that the number of times that a keyword NEEDS TO BE USED in an article depends in part on the length of that article. The two articles described above were 1622 words (5.6% KW density) and 2628 words (4.6% KW density) in length, not counting image captions and tabular data. If I had limit my use of the primary keywords to 15 times these articles would be turned into total rubbish. I would have to resort to extremely unnatural writing to make these articles work. The experience given to the reader would be horrible. I am willing to bet that the rankings of these pages would plummet if I took them down to 15 instances of the targeted keywords.
This could be advice that, if followed diligently, could damage the results of people who follow it. Moz wants to follow the ethic of "First do no harm" and for that reason, I think that this automated advice needs reevaluated as soon as possible.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should URL contain primary keyword or primary + extended keyword?
Hi All, This is a query regarding what keyword should be placed in URL. Below is the scenario. I have marketplace website where I can service providers with users. I have a page with a list of Dance providers and want to rank it for Dance Classes, Dance Coaching Classes keywords. Since these keywords represent same business purpose for us, should I keep the URL as www.abc.com/dance-classes or www.abc.com/dance-coaching-classes? What is SEO best practice in this scenario? Kindly suggest.
On-Page Optimization | | Avin1230 -
How does Indeed.com make it to the top of every single search despite of having aggregated content or duplicate content
How does Indeed.com make it to the top of every single search despite of having duplicate content. I mean somewhere google says they will prefer original content & will give preference to them who have original content but this statement contradict when I see Indeed.com as they aggregate content from other sites but still rank higher than original content provider side. How does Indeed.com make it to the top of every single search despite of having aggregated content or duplicate content
On-Page Optimization | | vivekrathore0 -
Moz Crawl Shows Duplicate Content Which Doesn't Seem To Appear In Google?
Morning All, First post, be gentle! So I had Moz crawl our website with 2500 high priority issues of duplicate content, not good. However if I just do a simple site:www.myurl.com in Google, I cannot see these duplicate pages....very odd. Here is an example....
On-Page Optimization | | scottiedog
http://goo.gl/GXTE0I
http://goo.gl/dcAqdU So the same page has a different URL, Moz brings this up as an issue, I would agree with that. However if I google both URL's in Google, they will both bring up the same page but with the original URL of http://goo.gl/zDzI7j ...in other words, two different URL's bring up the same indexed page in Google....weird I thought about using a wildcard in the robots.txt to disallow these duplicate pages with poor URL's....something like.... Disallow: /*display.php?product_id However, I read various posts that it might not help our issues? Don't want to make things worse. On another note, my colleague paid for a "SEO service" and they just dumped 1000's of back-links to our website, of course that's come back to bite us in the behind. Anyone have any recommendations for a good service to remove these back-links? Thanks in advance!!0 -
Duplicate Page Content
Hey Moz Community, Newbie here. On my second week of Moz and I love it but have a couple questions regarding crawl errors. I have two questions: 1. I have a few pages with duplicate content but it say 0 duplicate URL's. How do I know what is duplicated in this instance? 2. I'm not sure if anyone here is familiar with an IDX for a real estate website. But I have this setup on my site and it seems as though all the links it generates for different homes for sale show up as duplicate pages. For instance, http://www.handyrealtysa.com/idx/mls...tonio_tx_78258 is listed as having duplicate page content compared with 7 duplicate URLS: http://www.handyrealtysa.com/idx/mls...tonio_tx_78247
On-Page Optimization | | HandyRealtySA
http://www.handyrealtysa.com/idx/mls...tonio_tx_78253
http://www.handyrealtysa.com/idx/mls...tonio_tx_78245
http://www.handyrealtysa.com/idx/mls...tonio_tx_78261
http://www.handyrealtysa.com/idx/mls...tonio_tx_78258
http://www.handyrealtysa.com/idx/mls...tonio_tx_78260
http://www.handyrealtysa.com/idx/mls...tonio_tx_78260 I've attached a screenshot that shows 2 of the pages that state duplicate page content but have 0 duplicate URLs. Also you can see somewhat about the idx duplicate pages. rel="canonical" is functioning on these pages, or so it seems when I view the source code from the page. Any help is greatly appreciated. skitch.png0 -
Keywords per Page
Iv'e looked through the QA here and there are a lot of different conflicting opinions on what is a generally a good idea. For Example Florist Clearwater Clearwater Florist Florist in Clearwater Florist in Clearwater FL Clearwater FL Florist Clearwater Florida Florist Florist in Clearwater Florida Florist near Clearwater FL etc.... So for something like this example....should I have one page represent all of these keyword iterations or split them among different pages?
On-Page Optimization | | BenGMKT0 -
Low Bounce Rate
My site has a low bounce rate over the last 30 days of around 3%. I don't think that can be right can it? Could someone see if there is a problem with my analytics code. The site is http://www.top-10-dating-reviews.com [editor's note: site not safe for some workplaces]
On-Page Optimization | | SamCUK0 -
Meta keywords and meta news keywords
I've got a question regarding this. So normally Meta keywords it is not relevant and we shouldn't use them, however there are opinions that we can use them as these are signals for other Search Engines. Meta news keywords - are ok to be used in the news sites. what is your opinion on using both of them on a news site? Can this help, or harm? thanks, Irina
On-Page Optimization | | InformMedia0 -
Is it necessary to add keywords to all of your pages?
Hi Everyone he company I work for has just built a new website with approximately 87 pages/sub pages. Should i be looking to add keywords and descriptions to all of these pages, via the allocated areas in the back end of the site? I am using "google's key words" tool to generate relevant key words. If any one has any advice it would be much appreciated. Thanks for you help Regards Pete
On-Page Optimization | | dawsonski0