Moz Pro recommends not using a keyword more than 15 times. If there is a lot of content and the density is low, is it okay to go over that?
-
From MOZ on-page grader...
"Recommendation: Edit your page to use your targeted keywords no more than 15 times."
But if I use a keyword 50 times and the keyword density is only 2 percent, is that ok? What is more important, the raw number used or the density?
-
Nobody outside of Google, knows this type of information with certainty. My guess is that Google is only concerned with what is within the article portion of the page.
My honest opinion is that Google is not concerned with keyword density unless it is outrageous. If I am writing an article with the hope of ranking for a one-word query, my use of that word on the page has a density of about five percent. I have that density because my writing is very precise and explicit.
I never even think about how many instances of a keyword is on the page. My only concern is if the article is easy to read, easy to understand, and contains value for the reader. Over and over, Google has told webmasters to write as though search engines did not exist. I believe that is what I should do.
-
Thanks, that helps a lot. Also, let's say for example my keyword is "soap". Does google include the amount of times "soap" is counted just in the body text, or on the entire page? Soap may appear on the navigation bar as well as in many product titles on a category page. In some cases, this may double the number of times the keyword is found.
-
The 50 at 2% was just an example. It seems like most people think as long as it sounds natural it is ok. Thanks.
-
Two things immediately come to mind for me.
-
Wow, 50 mentions at 2% kw density is sounds like a LOT of content for one page, and
-
When you read it out loud, does it sound like natural speech or does it sound like you're just banging away at one keyword over and over? Because I believe that's what Google and the tool are probably getting at - making sure you're getting the keywords in there while still keeping the language as natural as possible.
-
-
"Recommendation: Edit your page to use your targeted keywords no more than 15 times."
In my opinion this is something that Moz should reevaluate because this question is asked over and over and over again in Q&A. Lots of people could be tearing up their articles to avoid using their keyword more than 15 times.
My personal opinion is that I should use my targeted keyword in text as many times as is needed while writing in natural language. I have articles that rank high on the first page of google for really really difficult queries. I just visited two of them that quickly come to my mind. On one I have used the targeted keyword 94 times, the other I used the targeted keyword 123 times.
I think that the number of times that a keyword NEEDS TO BE USED in an article depends in part on the length of that article. The two articles described above were 1622 words (5.6% KW density) and 2628 words (4.6% KW density) in length, not counting image captions and tabular data. If I had limit my use of the primary keywords to 15 times these articles would be turned into total rubbish. I would have to resort to extremely unnatural writing to make these articles work. The experience given to the reader would be horrible. I am willing to bet that the rankings of these pages would plummet if I took them down to 15 instances of the targeted keywords.
This could be advice that, if followed diligently, could damage the results of people who follow it. Moz wants to follow the ethic of "First do no harm" and for that reason, I think that this automated advice needs reevaluated as soon as possible.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Duplicate Content on our own website
Our website sells tickets for events. We also have an news articles section with information about events / artists / venues. From time to time we release a product page and a related news article on a separate page. Some of the content in the news article would be perfect for our product page. Essentially its our product page we want too rank. Would it harm our SEO if we had some of the same content on both of these pages?
On-Page Optimization | | Alexogilvie0 -
Any benefit to using HeadSpace AND All in One?
I noticed that somewhere along the line (outside developer or SEO) I ended up with HeadSpace AND All in One on one of my WP sites. There are functions that I appreciate with both and I wonder if there is any danger to completing both forms for a post or page? Is there really any benefit or just a waste of time? I keep finding articles that compare the 2, but nothing that talks about using them together. If I get rid of All in One, …. WOW. Mid question, i realized I'm a dum-dum. All in One has the same no follow options I thought I would miss from HeadSpace. So new question…if I uninstall headspace, will I lose the data/settings that it was used to set up? Jenn
On-Page Optimization | | vernonmack0 -
Keyword density
hi there! to what extent is important "the keyword density" factor in the website optimization? I've read in the net that it's no more relevant but I'm not sure. In case has an impact in the SERPs, is there a % considered as appropiate or "reference" in the SEO world? Thanks.
On-Page Optimization | | juanmiguelcr0 -
Content placment best for SEO?
We currently have a scroll bar box at the bottom of our page with information in but from what I can see scroll bar boxes at the bottom of websites looking a little spammy (a lot of over optimized websites using them) would we be best in using a strategy like this site www.solopress.com/ which implement a show more link that drops information down would this be read as good information for Google or look just as spammy?
On-Page Optimization | | BobAnderson1 -
Forcing keywords into domain structure
Hi there, Over the last few years, I've seen people structuring their site so that their main content is all housed in a folder named after the site's primary keywords. For example, if I had some content about home insurance, normally naming conventions state that I might put the content at a URL such as: www.mydomain.com/home-insurance However, some sites, may change this structure to include their main keyword again in the URL string: www.mydomain.com/insurance/home-insurance The folder 'insurance' would normally hold the site's Sitemap to increase internal linking strategy too. I'd be really interested to hear whether anyone has seen any serious benefits from re-structuring their site in this way? What are your thoughts on this? Thanks,
On-Page Optimization | | theshortstack0 -
How to avoid content duplication of my websites
Hello, We are having 4 domains abc.com, abc.in, abc.co.uk, abc.com.au with same content and same inner pages (abc.com/page1, abc.in/page1 etc.) targeting on different geographical areas. How can we avoid duplicate content issue in the home page as well as in the inner pages. Abc.com is the major site. Thank you.
On-Page Optimization | | semvibe0 -
Can I use the first sentence of my page content as a meta description tag as well?
I just want to copy my content on the page and use the first or as well the second sentence of the content self for my meta description tag. Is that OK? Or should the Meta description tag be different?
On-Page Optimization | | paulinap19830 -
Keyword self cannibalization
Hello, I'm confused about the recommendations for avoiding keyword self cannibalization. I have a niche blog and some of my sticky posts on the homepage contain my site's main keyword in their title. For example, say if my homepage has "dog training" as it's main keyword, then there are going to be links to more longtail pages with titles such as "dog training London", "dog training Liverpool" etc. When I do this SeoMoz's on-page optimization tool tells me that this is keyword self cannibalization. I am building links to the inner pages using the longtail keywords only. 1. Do I need to rename pages with just "london" and "liverpool" etc and remove "dog training" from those links? 2. What is the best thing to do in this situation? Thanks, Kevin
On-Page Optimization | | KMack0