Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Canonical: Same content but different countries
- 
					
					
					
					
 I'm building a website that has content made for specific countries. The url format is: MyWebsite.com/<country name="">/</country> Some of the pages for <specific url="">are the same for different countries, the <specific url="">would be the same as well. The only difference would be the <country name="">.</country></specific></specific> How do I deal with canonical issues to avoid Google thinking I'm presenting the same content? 
- 
					
					
					
					
 In response to your second question, it's fine to have /usa/ although /us/ or /en/ would be a more typical deployment (lots of people go like, /en-us/ and /en-gb/ as that structure allows for really granular international deployment!) As long as the hreflangs are accurate and tell Google what language and region the URLs are for, as long as the hreflangs are deployed symmetrically with no conflicts or missing parts - it should be ok Note that Google will expect to see different content on different regional URLs, sometimes even if they're the same language but targeted at different countries (tailor your content to your audience, don't just cut and paste sites and change tags and expect extra footprint). Stuff like shipping info and prices (currency shown) should also be different (otherwise don't even bother!) Your hreflangs, if you are doing USA as your EN country, should not use 'en-gb' in the hreflang (instead they should use 'en-us') If you're thing God the HTML implementation will make the code bloated and messy, read this: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/189077?hl=en There are also HTTP header and XML sitemap deployment options (though IMO, HTML is always best and is the hardest, strongest signal) 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Yep every page should reference every language, including its own language. but obviously with different URLs in the link fields, as different pages should have different regional equivalents (hope that makes sense) 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Thank you, so if I had approximately 30 different countries, then I would reference all 30 different country URLs? 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Basically the canonical tags should self reference, so long as they are also supported by hreflangs. So for example if you had these two URLs: ... then on site.com/en/category/product you'd need: **... and on site.com/fr/category/product you'd need:**It's pretty simple really! Remember, only canonical URLs (usually not parameter-based child URLs) should self-reference with a canonical tag. Remember that Hreflangs need to be mutually agreed between pages for them to work (so if the FR page links to the EN page with a hreflang, but there's no hreflang coming back - it fails!) - Keep hreflangs simple and exactly symmetrical 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hi, newbguy, It appears that your concern is about losing the different language versions of the same page? I assume that the content is the same apart from language or location. If this is the case here are some links that should help. https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2011/12/new-markup-for-multilingual-content.html https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/182192?hl=en https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/182192?hl=en https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/189077 https://yoast.com/rel-canonical/ https://moz.com/learn/seo/canonicalization If after having a look through these you are still stuck, let me know. If you do need further help can you please tell me - Is the content the same on each page?
- Is the content in the same language on each page?
 Please keep in mind that the URLs in your example are technically different as they <country name="">is different in each one.</country> I hope this helps, Steve 
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
- 
		
		Moz ToolsChat with the community about the Moz tools. 
- 
		
		SEO TacticsDiscuss the SEO process with fellow marketers 
- 
		
		CommunityDiscuss industry events, jobs, and news! 
- 
		
		Digital MarketingChat about tactics outside of SEO 
- 
		
		Research & TrendsDive into research and trends in the search industry. 
- 
		
		SupportConnect on product support and feature requests. 
Related Questions
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Best practices for publishing sponsored content
 Hello, Our website hosts sponsored content from different brands. Should we be listing the sponsor either on the frontend and/or through markup? - Would either way have any sort of an impact? The content itself is already clearly marked as 'sponsored content' but we were more interested in listing the specific sponsor. Also, we’re assuming the outbound links would need to be marked rel="sponsored" but are there any other best practices we should be implementing? Any insight would be appreciated. On-Page Optimization | | Ben-R
 Thank you in advance.
 Best,0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Duplicate content in sidebar
 Hi guys. So I have a few sentences (about 50 words) of duplicate content across all pages of my website (this is a repeatable text in sidebar). Each page of my website contains about 1300 words (unique content) in total, and 50 words of duplicate content in sidebar. Does having a duplicate content of this length in sidebar affect the rankings of my website in any way? Thank you so much for your replies. On-Page Optimization | | AslanBarselinov1
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Rich Snippets appear differently for Wikipedia, Why?
 Hi All, I've been doing a bit of research for a customer and whilst I was looking through the google results pages I came across this interesting rich snippet for a Wikipedia page (see screen shot attached). Its returned some extra information i.e Owner, Water Source, Number of Stills and Capacity. Is this just Google playing around or is this something I've missed and you can markup additional information for your rich snippet? Thanks in advance Jon 4TmGvJh.png On-Page Optimization | | Jon-S0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Each page with a different meta description?
 each page on my website represents a different department, can I program the header to show a different meta description on each page or should there only be 1 meta description tag per domain? On-Page Optimization | | RonnieT0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Product Colour Variation and Canonicals
 Hi there, We are currently doing an SEO audit of an ecommerce website and we ar eunsure on the best practice in terms of using canonical link tag for some product variations. An example is that the company has a product with two colour variations: Black and Tan. These are for the same product and have 99% the same content. Within the content of the page the colour is the only thing that changes (along with the meta information and imagery of course). My question is should we choose one product and canonically link back to that one i.e. Black is the main product and we link Tan back to this via a canonical link? Many thanks in advance. On-Page Optimization | | yousayjump0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Difference in using dividers in TITLE TAG
 Hi everyone, i know that dividers in title or even title tag doesnt have much of an impact on better rankings. I had great rankings for many keywords, not using dividers or using only one divider. However for better reading comprehension and usability, and also aesthetics i started to use the pipe as my main divider and other secondary dividers. I saw many pages drop in rankings vs other less competent and with less content pages. My format was as follows: Product Brand | Product description - Additional info or local info ie. Fiber Glass MBI | Insulation Batts for Home and Commercial use - Acoustic and Thermal Insulation I changed the format for a handful of pages, and saw immediate results on rankings and traffic on those pages. Product Brand with Product Description - Additional Info ie. Fiber Glass MBI Insulation Batts for Commercial use - Acoustic and Thermal Insulation. Does it sound like something i should implement page wide. I personally like the aesthetics of the pipe as it gives a cleaner look, but the better rankings on the changed pages with using only one divider makes me think. Does it sound familiar, or its just a coincidence, Regards, On-Page Optimization | | JesusD0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Correct .htaccess settings for canonical url?
 I want to forward all urls to http:www.mysite.com but am a little confuse because I am getting duplicate content error: Pages with Duplicate Page Content as of Jan 15http://titanappliancerepair.com/ 1 duplicatehttp://titanappliancerepair.com 1 duplicatehttp://titanappliancerepair.com/index.html 1 duplicate*****************************************************************What should I put ion htaccess file so I can forwardhttp://titanappliancerepair.com/index.htmlhttp://titanappliancerepair.comhttp://titanappliancerepair.com/to http://www.titanappliancerepair.comor what is the correct way to do it?I'm confused because when I enter http://titanappliancerepair.com/ in browser it showshttp://titanappliancerepair.com so how can it be considered duplicate content?.Can someone help?I have godaddy and they have gave me this code to put RewriteEngine on On-Page Optimization | | webbutler13
 rewritecond %{http_host} ^coolexample.com [nc]
 rewriterule ^(.)$ http://www.coolexample.com/$1 [r=301,nc]What is correct?0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		How do I remove a Canonical URL Tag?
 Some of my report cards say I have too many canonical URL tags. However, there is no information no how to delete one. Can someone give me a link or explain? Thanks. On-Page Optimization | | dealblogger0
 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				