Outbound links
-
Hi everyone,
Just a quick question about using info/statistics from other sources in my articles.
If I use a quote/piece of info from another online article do I just say where it's from and link to it? Is this acceptable or do you have to get permission? I find the whole permissions thing quite confusing! I know that outbound links are good for SEO so just wanted to check this.
Thanks!
-
Thanks, EGOL!
You've been very helpful!
-
If they are taking your original content it can be illegal if...
-
they do not have a case for fair use
-
you have not done something to make your content available for other use (such as make it public domain, creative commons, etc.)
Copyright infringement is covered by Federal statute in the United States. If your content is registered you might have a case to sue, even if no financial damage is suffered. It can be considered criminal if the infringer is knowing and willful.
I am not an attorney. I recommend consulting with one if you have copyright problems.
I have done my due diligence and regularly file DMCA's, send informal take down notices, and have my attorney handle situations that might be complex or are against an infringer of note.
-
-
Thank you for your fast response!
Is it actually illegal to do so or is it just frowned upon? I actually compete against some of these sites and it's not just one or two articles, it's the ENTIRE blog (30+ articles).
-
Verbatim articles on a website can often outrank the original source, especially if the original source website is not very strong.
If they do it with my content, I will probably file a DMCA with Google and perhaps with their host.
-
Hello, EGOL.
I like your detailed answer here! I have seen some blogs copy other entire articles (verbatim, images and all) and then just source the original blog link at the bottom of the article. Unfortunately, these sites rank very well for not doing any REAL work.
Is this something that will eventually come back to bite them or are they just going to get away with it forever? Your expertise is very much appreciated!
Thank you!
-
EGOL - thanks so much for this answer. You have really explained this well and put my mind at rest! I will check out the wiki article.
Thanks again.
-
Here is how many people handle these...
If you write your own sentence that incorporates a statistic or a fact that is not original to you, then it is proper to attribute that information to your source. This is usually done in footnote fashion similar to what you see in Wikipedia articles.
This wikipedia article on "citation" is a good place to see examples of how to dot it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation
Permission is not required if the work is publicly available on a website or in a published book, unless you have agreed to confidentiality of the informaiton. Just use a footnote and a link to their website or a reference to a printed document. Instead of a link you can give the full url if you don't want to use a hyperlink.
If you are going to quote verbatim a sentence or two, but not more than that, then placing that verbatim text in
is often done. This indents the text, separating it from your own, with a footnote number in brackets at the end. [2] Permission is not needed for a short quote from a book or from a website (unless there is a confidentiality agreement). Just make it clear that you have quoted and keep the length of your quote very short - a sentence or two at most. Many people will also place the
text in italics to really make it clear that you have cited.
How many times can you do this in an article? If you do it once with a sentence or two it should be fine. But if you are going to do it multiple times you could run into an infringement problem. How many times? I would get permission if I was going to use multiple blockquotes from a single source.
If you have any doubts about using the text of others in references or quotes, then it is best to consult an attorney about the "fair use" part of copyright law. I am not an attorney and can't give exact answers on this. In fact, many attorneys will tell you that they can't give exact answers because copyright problems often need to be tested in court in front of a jury. It is hard or impossible what a jury will return in many situations.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Tag Clouds in Google Despite Canonical Links for Single Tags/Articles
I am frustrated to see a lot tag clouds in Google even though I programmed my tagged pages to display a canonical link to the linking article if the is only one result for the tag cloud. The goal to to make sure that the article, which is of better quality than the tag page, ends up in Google without a bunch of thin tag pages getting in there. For instance this article should be in Google and this tag should not be because that tag has a canonical URL for that article. I do not have a lot of experience with tag cloud SEO because I prefer to limit such pages to categories, but I have found tag clouds to be important for aggregating information for specific issues, people, or places that are not already a site category. Some tags I have used to power social media pages that update automatically from RSS feeds for their related tag archives. That is quite useful for pages like that. Should I start using Meta noindex for those instead of rel canonical? I have already done that for author profiles because author profiles get a lot of on site links compared to individual articles because my gridviews use javascript for paging. The same is true for the tags, so if a tag is tagged in 30 articles it will have links from 30 articles but if those articles are not in the latest 20 for that tag only the latest 20 will have links back from the tag archive. I also suspect having a lot of tag pages with little content to negatively impact my indexing rate. I will see a number of recent tag pages added before new articles.
On-Page Optimization | | CopBlaster.com0 -
No followed links, what happens to the PR?
Hi, I have read a few times, on here and other places that when a website applies a no follow tag to a link the PR is not retained but instead disappears (evaporates) thus neither website benefiting. Is that true? If so what is the actual benefit of no following a link?
On-Page Optimization | | Bondara0 -
Navigation causing too many links
If I add pages to my site to cover major cities/towns/counties in the UK where I offer wedding bands and link them from the navigation using drop down menus/categories ( I believe this is the best option to allow users to find what they are looking for) I get a'too many links on page' flag. How can I best get around this problem?
On-Page Optimization | | SamCUK0 -
Internal links
Hi, I am working on a project with very few really important pages - its now about 20 pages and this number will not increase to more than 30 by the end of the year. Today the majority of these Pages is 2 clicks away from the Homepage for navigational reasons. Now I am wondering: 1. If I should set links from the Homepage directly to these Pages to pass more juice?
On-Page Optimization | | Naturalmente
2 If you would suggest so - how would you recommend me to do this in Terms of usability and SEO? thanks in advance for your help.0 -
Blog outgoing links to a certain domain?
Hi Mozzers, I am working with a website with very decentralized ownership. There are two different languages, each with a different owner. Owner A keeps linking to crap sites, that hurt the entire site. My question is this: Is there a way - through .htaccess or robots.txt - that Google can be asked NOT to crawl the links to external crap sites? The problem is that Owner B cannot control Owner A's html, and thus not implement rel="nofollow" on links. Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | ThomasHgenhaven0 -
Too many On-Page Links on a WP based Website
Hi, I've already browsed through various of the Q&As on the "too many On-Page links" issue, but I would really need some advice concerning a WP Site with a dropdown navigation. As outlined in the on-page report, every site has about 180 outgoing links, which pretty much is the number of site featured in the navigation. Even though the 100 link limit is somewhat outdated I'm still worried about the distribution of linkjuice from the starting page and how Google perceives the importance of the various pages. Would it make sense to adapt the structure of the navigation, so that the starting page only links to the 5 category pages and the category pages only link to the detail pages they contain? The site has good rankings for several pages and I assume that Google can tell that the large number of links is caused by the navigation. But with every page having appr. 180 links it may be difficult for Google to tell, which of those pages are the most important regarding internal link structure... Looking foward to your opinion and insights! Cheers, Chris
On-Page Optimization | | adwordize0 -
What is the best way to make use of internal anchor text links without appearing to be a 'spammy' webpage?
I've recently been spending some time going through all the content on our website, henstuff.com, adding internal anchor text links to product copy with the link following back to the product's generic catagory. I've been focusing on the search term 'hen party accessories', but have also been using 'hen do accessories' and 'hen night accessories'. I know that internal linking has value when it comes to SEO and rankings, but was keen to find roughly at what point usage of a certain search term for anchor links is seen as spam by the engines. Is there a certain formula to follow when it comes to internal anchor text links? You can see some examples at: http://www.henstuff.com/hen-night-accessories/hen-party-accessories/willy-bubbles http://www.henstuff.com/hen-night-accessories/hen-party-devil-horns/hen-night-pink-devil-horns Many thanks Oli
On-Page Optimization | | RobertHill1 -
Social media links/buttons - best practices
Has anyone tested social media buttons, to see which types, styles, and placements get the most clicks? Should they go at the top of an article, or are they OK at the bottom? Should the icons definitely have labels? Display # of tweets and Likes? How big should they be? My preference is for discrete buttons with a smallish, plain icon and a label. I don't display tweets or Likes, unless it's a healthy number. And I still think a "share by email" icon is important. I put them at the bottom of the article, to keep the home page uncluttered and lead the eye into reading the article. I'm also concerned about leaking rank from the homepage, especially for a site that's still establishing itself. But if moving buttons to the top gets more shares, that's probably better. Is there a Wordpress plugin that you really like? (I haven't found one yet - I'm still hardcoding my social media buttons.) Opinions are great, but test results are better! Can anyone share?
On-Page Optimization | | mattotoole1