Skip to content
    Moz logo Menu open Menu close
    • Products
      • Moz Pro
      • Moz Pro Home
      • Moz Local
      • Moz Local Home
      • STAT
      • Moz API
      • Moz API Home
      • Compare SEO Products
      • Moz Data
    • Free SEO Tools
      • Domain Analysis
      • Keyword Explorer
      • Link Explorer
      • Competitive Research
      • MozBar
      • More Free SEO Tools
    • Learn SEO
      • Beginner's Guide to SEO
      • SEO Learning Center
      • Moz Academy
      • MozCon
      • Webinars, Whitepapers, & Guides
    • Blog
    • Why Moz
      • Digital Marketers
      • Agency Solutions
      • Enterprise Solutions
      • Small Business Solutions
      • The Moz Story
      • New Releases
    • Log in
    • Log out
    • Products
      • Moz Pro

        Your all-in-one suite of SEO essentials.

      • Moz Local

        Raise your local SEO visibility with complete local SEO management.

      • STAT

        SERP tracking and analytics for enterprise SEO experts.

      • Moz API

        Power your SEO with our index of over 44 trillion links.

      • Compare SEO Products

        See which Moz SEO solution best meets your business needs.

      • Moz Data

        Power your SEO strategy & AI models with custom data solutions.

      Track AI Overviews in Keyword Research
      Moz Pro

      Track AI Overviews in Keyword Research

      Try it free!
    • Free SEO Tools
      • Domain Analysis

        Get top competitive SEO metrics like DA, top pages and more.

      • Keyword Explorer

        Find traffic-driving keywords with our 1.25 billion+ keyword index.

      • Link Explorer

        Explore over 40 trillion links for powerful backlink data.

      • Competitive Research

        Uncover valuable insights on your organic search competitors.

      • MozBar

        See top SEO metrics for free as you browse the web.

      • More Free SEO Tools

        Explore all the free SEO tools Moz has to offer.

      NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic
      Moz Pro

      NEW Keyword Suggestions by Topic

      Learn more
    • Learn SEO
      • Beginner's Guide to SEO

        The #1 most popular introduction to SEO, trusted by millions.

      • SEO Learning Center

        Broaden your knowledge with SEO resources for all skill levels.

      • On-Demand Webinars

        Learn modern SEO best practices from industry experts.

      • How-To Guides

        Step-by-step guides to search success from the authority on SEO.

      • Moz Academy

        Upskill and get certified with on-demand courses & certifications.

      • MozCon

        Save on Early Bird tickets and join us in London or New York City

      Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints
      Moz API

      Unlock flexible pricing & new endpoints

      Find your plan
    • Blog
    • Why Moz
      • Digital Marketers

        Simplify SEO tasks to save time and grow your traffic.

      • Small Business Solutions

        Uncover insights to make smarter marketing decisions in less time.

      • Agency Solutions

        Earn & keep valuable clients with unparalleled data & insights.

      • Enterprise Solutions

        Gain a competitive edge in the ever-changing world of search.

      • The Moz Story

        Moz was the first & remains the most trusted SEO company.

      • New Releases

        Get the scoop on the latest and greatest from Moz.

      Surface actionable competitive intel
      New Feature

      Surface actionable competitive intel

      Learn More
    • Log in
      • Moz Pro
      • Moz Local
      • Moz Local Dashboard
      • Moz API
      • Moz API Dashboard
      • Moz Academy
    • Avatar
      • Moz Home
      • Notifications
      • Account & Billing
      • Manage Users
      • Community Profile
      • My Q&A
      • My Videos
      • Log Out

    The Moz Q&A Forum

    • Forum
    • Questions
    • Users
    • Ask the Community

    Welcome to the Q&A Forum

    Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

    1. Home
    2. SEO Tactics
    3. Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    4. Over-optimizing Internal Linking: Is this real and, if so, what's the happy medium?

    Moz Q&A is closed.

    After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.

    Over-optimizing Internal Linking: Is this real and, if so, what's the happy medium?

    Intermediate & Advanced SEO
    2
    2
    710
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as question
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with question management privileges can see it.
    • SearchStan
      SearchStan Subscriber last edited by

      I have heard a lot about having a solid internal linking structure so that Google can easily discover pages and understand your page hierarchies and correlations and equity can be passed. Often, it's mentioned that it's good to have optimized anchor text, but not too optimized.

      You hear a lot of warnings about how over-optimization can be perceived as spammy: https://neilpatel.com/blog/avoid-over-optimizing/

      But you also see posts and news like this saying that the internal link over-optimization warnings are unfounded or outdated:
      https://www.seroundtable.com/google-no-internal-linking-overoptimization-penalty-27092.html So what's the tea? Is internal linking overoptimization a myth? If it's true, what's the tipping point? Does it have to be super invasive and keyword stuffy to negatively impact rankings? Or does simple light optimization of internal links on every page trigger this?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • effectdigital
        effectdigital last edited by

        Just so you know, EMA (exact-match anchor text), which is also referred to as 'over' link optimisation, is more a concern for your off-site links. In terms of your internal site structure, that's much more lenient. Obviously if it impacted UX (e.g: site nav buttons with ridiculous amounts of text that become over-chunky, annoying users) then that's bad. If you can satisfy UX and also do some light keyword optimisation of your internal site links, I honestly don't see that as a massive problem. If anything it just gives Google more context and direction

        I don't think internal link over-optimisation is a myth, because there's always someone stupid enough to pick up a spoon and run with it (taking it to ridiculous extremes that would also impact UX and the readability of the site). But as long as you don't go completely mental and the links make sense for users (they end up where they would expect to end up, with concise link / button text that doesn't bloat the UI) then you're fine. Don't worry about this overly much, but don't take it to an unreasonable extreme

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • 1 / 1
        • First post
          Last post

        Got a burning SEO question?

        Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.


        Start my free trial


        Browse Questions

        Explore more categories

        • Moz Tools

          Chat with the community about the Moz tools.

        • SEO Tactics

          Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers

        • Community

          Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!

        • Digital Marketing

          Chat about tactics outside of SEO

        • Research & Trends

          Dive into research and trends in the search industry.

        • Support

          Connect on product support and feature requests.

        • See all categories

        Related Questions

        • Bankable

          How will changing my website's page content affect SEO?

          Our company is looking to update the content on our existing web pages and I am curious what the best way to roll out these changes are in order to maintain good SEO rankings for certain pages. The infrastructure of the site will not be modified except for maybe adding a couple new pages, but existing domains will stay the same. If the domains are staying the same does it really matter if I just updated 1 page every week or so, versus updating them all at once? Just looking for some insight into how freshening up the content on the back end pages could potentially hurt SEO rankings initially. Thanks!

          Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Bankable
          1
        • hjsand

          Rankings rise after improving internal linking - then drop again

          I'm working on a large scale publishing site. I can increase search rankings almost immediately by improving internal linking to targeted pages, sometimes by 40 positions but after a day or two these same rankings drop down again, not always as low as before but significantly lower than their highest position. My theory is that the uplift generated by the internal linking is subsequently mitigated by other algorithmic factors relating to content quality or site performance or is this unlikely? Does anyone else have experience of this phenomenon or any theories?

          Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | hjsand
          1
        • _nitman

          What's the best possible URL structure for a local search engine?

          Hi Mozzers, I'm working at AskMe.com which is a local search engine in India i.e if you're standing somewhere & looking for the pizza joints nearby, we pick your current location and share the list of pizza outlets nearby along with ratings, reviews etc. about these outlets. Right now, our URL structure looks like www.askme.com/delhi/pizza-outlets for the city specific category pages (here, "Delhi" is the city name and "Pizza Outlets" is the category) and www.askme.com/delhi/pizza-outlets/in/saket for a category page in a particular area (here "Saket") in a city. The URL looks a little different if you're searching for something which is not a category (or not mapped to a category, in which case we 301 redirect you to the category page), it looks like www.askme.com/delhi/search/pizza-huts/in/saket if you're searching for pizza huts in Saket, Delhi as "pizza huts" is neither a category nor its mapped to any category. We're also dealing in ads & deals along with our very own e-commerce brand AskMeBazaar.com to make the better user experience and one stop shop for our customers. Now, we're working on URL restructure project and my question to you all SEO rockstars is, what can be the best possible URL structure we can have? Assume, we have kick-ass developers who can manage any given URL structure at backend.

          Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | _nitman
          0
        • Atlanta-SMO

          Does Google Read URL's if they include a # tag? Re: SEO Value of Clean Url's

          An ECWID rep stated in regards to an inquiry about how the ECWID url's are not customizable, that "an important thing is that it doesn't matter what these URLs look like, because search engines don't read anything after that # in URLs. " Example http://www.runningboards4less.com/general-motors#!/Classic-Pro-Series-Extruded-2/p/28043025/category=6593891 Basically all of this: #!/Classic-Pro-Series-Extruded-2/p/28043025/category=6593891 That is a snippet out of a conversation where ECWID said that dirty urls don't matter beyond a hashtag... Is that true? I haven't found any rule that Google or other search engines (Google is really the most important) don't index, read, or place value on the part of the url after a # tag.

          Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Atlanta-SMO
          0
        • trung.ngo

          Remove URLs that 301 Redirect from Google's Index

          I'm working with a client who has 301 redirected thousands of URLs from their primary subdomain to a new subdomain (these are unimportant pages with regards to link equity). These URLs are still appearing in Google's results under the primary domain, rather than the new subdomain. This is problematic because it's creating an artificial index bloat issue. These URLs make up over 90% of the URLs indexed. My experience has been that URLs that have been 301 redirected are removed from the index over time and replaced by the new destination URL. But it has been several months, close to a year even, and they're still in the index. Any recommendations on how to speed up the process of removing the 301 redirected URLs from Google's index? Will Google, or any search engine for that matter, process a noindex meta tag if the URL's been redirected?

          Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | trung.ngo
          0
        • esiow2013

          May know what's the meaning of these parameters in .htaccess?

          Begin HackRepair.com Blacklist RewriteEngine on Abuse Agent Blocking RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^BlackWidow [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Bolt\ 0 [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Bot\ mailto:craftbot@yahoo.com [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} CazoodleBot [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^ChinaClaw [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Custo [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Default\ Browser\ 0 [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^DIIbot [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^DISCo [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} discobot [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Download\ Demon [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^eCatch [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ecxi [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^EirGrabber [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^EmailCollector [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^EmailSiphon [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^EmailWolf [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Express\ WebPictures [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^ExtractorPro [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^EyeNetIE [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^FlashGet [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^GetRight [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^GetWeb! [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Go!Zilla [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Go-Ahead-Got-It [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^GrabNet [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Grafula [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} GT::WWW [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} heritrix [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^HMView [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} HTTP::Lite [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} HTTrack [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ia_archiver [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} IDBot [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} id-search [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} id-search.org [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Image\ Stripper [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Image\ Sucker [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} Indy\ Library [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^InterGET [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Internet\ Ninja [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^InternetSeer.com [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} IRLbot [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ISC\ Systems\ iRc\ Search\ 2.1 [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Java [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^JetCar [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^JOC\ Web\ Spider [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^larbin [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^LeechFTP [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} libwww [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} libwww-perl [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Link [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} LinksManager.com_bot [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} linkwalker [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} lwp-trivial [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Mass\ Downloader [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Maxthon$ [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} MFC_Tear_Sample [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^microsoft.url [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} Microsoft\ URL\ Control [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^MIDown\ tool [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Mister\ PiX [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} Missigua\ Locator [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Mozilla.*Indy [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Mozilla.NEWT [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^MSFrontPage [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Navroad [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^NearSite [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^NetAnts [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^NetSpider [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Net\ Vampire [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^NetZIP [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Nutch [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Octopus [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Offline\ Explorer [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Offline\ Navigator [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^PageGrabber [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} panscient.com [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Papa\ Foto [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^pavuk [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} PECL::HTTP [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^PeoplePal [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^pcBrowser [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} PHPCrawl [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} PleaseCrawl [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^psbot [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^RealDownload [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^ReGet [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Rippers\ 0 [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} SBIder [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^SeaMonkey$ [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^sitecheck.internetseer.com [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^SiteSnagger [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^SmartDownload [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} Snoopy [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} Steeler [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^SuperBot [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^SuperHTTP [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Surfbot [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^tAkeOut [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Teleport\ Pro [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Toata\ dragostea\ mea\ pentru\ diavola [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} URI::Fetch [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} urllib [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} User-Agent [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^VoidEYE [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Web\ Image\ Collector [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Web\ Sucker [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} Web\ Sucker [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} webalta [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WebAuto [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^[Ww]eb[Bb]andit [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} WebCollage [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WebCopier [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WebFetch [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WebGo\ IS [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WebLeacher [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WebReaper [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WebSauger [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Website\ eXtractor [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Website\ Quester [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WebStripper [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WebWhacker [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WebZIP [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} Wells\ Search\ II [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} WEP\ Search [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Wget [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Widow [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WWW-Mechanize [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^WWWOFFLE [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Xaldon\ WebSpider [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} zermelo [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^Zeus [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ^(.)Zeus.Webster [NC,OR]
          RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} ZyBorg [NC]
          RewriteRule ^. - [F,L] Abuse bot blocking rule end End HackRepair.com Blacklist

          Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | esiow2013
          1
        • JustinTaylor88

          Duplicate internal links on page, any benefit to nofollow

          Link spam is naturally a hot topic amongst SEO's, particularly post Penguin. While digging around forums etc, I watched a video blog from Matt Cutts posted a while ago that suggests that Google only pays attention to the first instance of a link on the page As most websites will have multiple instances of a links (header, footer and body text), is it beneficial to nofollow the additional instances of the link? Also as the first instance of a link will in most cases be within the header nav, does that then make the content link text critical or can good on page optimisation be pulled from the title attribute? I would appreciate the experiences and thoughts Mozzers thoughts on this thanks in advance!

          Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JustinTaylor88
          0
        • Romancing

          URL Length or Exact Breadcrumb Navigation URL? What's More Important

          Basically my question is as follows, what's better: www.romancingdiamonds.com/gemstone-rings/amethyst-rings/purple-amethyst-ring-14k-white-gold (this would fully match the breadcrumbs). or www.romancingdiamonds.com/amethyst-rings/purple-amethyst-ring-14k-white-gold (cutting out the first level folder to keep the url shorter and the important keywords are closer to the root domain). In this question http://www.seomoz.org/qa/discuss/37982/url-length-vs-url-keywords I was consulted to drop a folder in my url because it may be to long. That's why I'm hesitant to keep the bradcrumb structure the same. To the best of your knowldege do you think it's best to drop a folder in the URL to keep it shorter and sweeter, or to have a longer URL and have it match the breadcrumb structure? Please advise, Shawn

          Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Romancing
          0

        Get started with Moz Pro!

        Unlock the power of advanced SEO tools and data-driven insights.

        Start my free trial
        Products
        • Moz Pro
        • Moz Local
        • Moz API
        • Moz Data
        • STAT
        • Product Updates
        Moz Solutions
        • SMB Solutions
        • Agency Solutions
        • Enterprise Solutions
        • Digital Marketers
        Free SEO Tools
        • Domain Authority Checker
        • Link Explorer
        • Keyword Explorer
        • Competitive Research
        • Brand Authority Checker
        • Local Citation Checker
        • MozBar Extension
        • MozCast
        Resources
        • Blog
        • SEO Learning Center
        • Help Hub
        • Beginner's Guide to SEO
        • How-to Guides
        • Moz Academy
        • API Docs
        About Moz
        • About
        • Team
        • Careers
        • Contact
        Why Moz
        • Case Studies
        • Testimonials
        Get Involved
        • Become an Affiliate
        • MozCon
        • Webinars
        • Practical Marketer Series
        • MozPod
        Connect with us

        Contact the Help team

        Join our newsletter
        Moz logo
        © 2021 - 2025 SEOMoz, Inc., a Ziff Davis company. All rights reserved. Moz is a registered trademark of SEOMoz, Inc.
        • Accessibility
        • Terms of Use
        • Privacy

        Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.