Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
disavow link more than 100,000 lines
-
-
I recieved a huge amount of spamy link (most of them has spam score 100)
-
Currently my disavow link is arround 85.000 lines but at least i have 100.000 more domain which i should add them.
-
All of them are domains and i don't have any backlink in my file.
My Problem is that google dosen't accept disavow link which are more than 2MB and showes this message :
File too big: Maximum file size is 100,000 lines and 2MB
What should i do now?
-
-
@theuser23 said in disavow link more than 100,000 lines:
If you have long URLs, just divide the disavow file.
I wanted to say that Google allows uploading the disavow file by property. If you have links pointing to different pages, divide spam links by these pages.
For example, URL A has 30 000, while URL B has 70 000 spam links. Google does not support domain properties.
You can send here a link to the disavow file.
I hope this helps.
-
Hi friend,
The Google Disavow Tool accepts .txt files. If you have domains, not individual pages in your file, the .txt file will be about 200 kb. At the same time, CSV can be about 1.5-1.8 MB. Extension .txt is very light, or your domains are longer than Amazon River.
If you have long URLs just divide the disavow file.
Top 100 000 domains (Alexa rank, .txt file, about 200kb)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fuoeNM80DMGghd4CcQoLFC8OeKPCVxFQ/view?usp=sharingI hope this helps. If you have any questions, you are welcome.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
I'm having trouble removing SPAM from my site
I make the list of disavow links every week, plus they keep popping up. Does anyone know any techniques to remove them all at once ?
SEO Tactics | | Gabriel1710 -
How to Diminish the spam score of the site?
I AM HERE TO DISCUSS MY PROBLEM AFTER THE GOOGLE CORE UPDATE OF OCTOBER MONTH MY WEBSITE SPAM SCORE IS INCREASING RAPIDLY HOW TO CONTROL THIS PROBLEM PLEASE HELP ME ASAP MY WEBSITE NAME IS EGYPT DIRECT
Link Building | | aprase1 -
Spam on Google SEO
Do you know any good tips to reduce spam and if spams have an on google ranking?
SEO Tactics | | easyjobber0 -
block primary . xxx domain with disavow tool
Hi friends I discovered spam url attack on top sites with good google positions for specific keyword. Can I block primary domain like .xxx with disavow tool? There is hundreds of different domains but primary domain is always the same. for example like this domain:xxx? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | netcomsia0 -
How does link juice flow through hreflang?
We want to use the hreflang tag on our site (direct users searching for the Spanish version of spanishdict.com to spanishdict.com/traductor). Before doing so, we were wondering how link juice flows through hreflang? Any insight or resources on this would be very helpful. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | CuriosityMedia0 -
Should I disavow links from pages that don't exist any more
Hi. Im doing a backlinks audit to two sites, one with 48k and the other with 2M backlinks. Both are very old sites and both have tons of backlinks from old pages and websites that don't exist any more, but these backlinks still exist in the Majestic Historic index. I cleaned up the obvious useless links and passed the rest through Screaming Frog to check if those old pages/sites even exist. There are tons of link sending pages that return a 0, 301, 302, 307, 404 etc errors. Should I consider all of these pages as being bad backlinks and add them to the disavow file? Just a clarification, Im not talking about l301-ing a backlink to a new target page. Im talking about the origin page generating an error at ping eg: originpage.com/page-gone sends me a link to mysite.com/product1. Screamingfrog pings originpage.com/page-gone, and returns a Status error. Do I add the originpage.com/page-gone in the disavow file or not? Hope Im making sense 🙂
Technical SEO | | IgorMateski0 -
Updating inbound links vs. 301 redirecting the page they link to
Hi everyone, I'm preparing myself for a website redesign and finding conflicting information about inbound links and 301 redirects. If I have a URL (we'll say website.com/website) that is linked to by outside sources, should I get those outside sources to update their links when I change the URL to website.com/webpage? Or is it just as effective from a link juice perspective to simply 301 redirect the old page to the new page? Are there any other implications to this choice that I may want to consider? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | Liggins0 -
Self-referencing links
I personally think that self-referencing links are silly. It's blatantly easy for Google to tell and my instinct says that the link juice for this would simply evaporate rather than passing back to itself. Does anyone have information backing me up from an authoritative source? I can't find any info about this linked to Matt Cutts, Rand or any of those I look up to.
Technical SEO | | IPROdigital0