How Can I influence the Google Selected Canonical
-
Our company recently rebranded and launched a new website. The website was developed by an overseas team and they created the test site on their subdomain. The only problem is that Google crawled and indexed their site and ours. I noticed Google indexed their sub domain ahead of our domain and based on Search Console it has deemed our content as the duplicate of theirs and the Google selected theirs as the canonical.
The website in question is https://www.spaziointerni.us
What would be the best course of action to get our content ranked and selected instead of being marked as the duplicate?
Not sure if I have to modify the content to make it more unique or have them submit a removal in their search console.
Our indexed pages continue to go down due to this issue.
Any help is greatly appreciated. -
@Spaziohouston All the Best....
-
@Suvidit-Academy Thank you for your response. They did remove the test site and while they still show up in Google, the pages lead to a dead url which hopefully Google doesn't like at some point and removes them.
I did not think of having them add a search console account for the subdomain. That's a great idea to have them submit a removal request.
Our pages have finally surpassed theirs but the indexing of our site is slow and only 2 pages rank higher than theirs.Patience is key I guess
-
A clear answer here: the content has been cannabalised. Duplicate content can't be tweaked for Google ranking improvements. Now it's a case of removing the new website and editing your existing one. I suggest you start again because even making edits on your old website will still be a long slog after negative ranking impacts.
-
How Can I influence the Google Selected Canonical
To influence the Google selected canonical tag, you need to follow certain best practices. Here are a few suggestions:Implement rel="canonical" tag: Include the rel="canonical" tag in the HTML header of the duplicate content pages. This tag indicates the preferred version of the page that you want Google to index.
Ensure the canonical URL matches the preferred version: Make sure that the canonical URL specified in the tag matches the URL of the preferred version of the page. This should be a single, unique URL.
Redirect duplicate versions: If you have multiple versions of a page (e.g., HTTP and HTTPS, with or without www), set up proper redirects to the preferred version. This helps consolidate ranking signals and avoid confusion.
Consolidate internal linking: Ensure that internal links on your website point to the preferred version of the page. This helps reinforce the canonical signal.
Use the rel="alternate" hreflang attribute: If you have duplicate content across different language or regional variations, use the rel="alternate" hreflang attribute to indicate the relationship between the pages. This helps Google understand the language and geographic targeting of each version.
Monitor and resolve issues promptly: Regularly check Google Search Console for any issues related to canonical tags and duplicate content. Address them promptly to maintain control over the selected canonical.
While these practices can influence the Google selected canonical tag, it's important to note that Google ultimately has the final say in determining the canonical version of a page. Following these guidelines will help improve your chances of influencing Google's decision and ensuring the correct version of your page is ranked.
-
This is a common problem, and there are a few things you can do to fix it.
-
Contact the overseas team and ask them to take down their test site. If they are still using the test site ask them to block the access to google and other search engine or you can ask them to use it as a password protected site.
-
Ask them to create a search console account for the subdomain and the put the request of removal of all the indexed pages on google.
-
Implement canonical tags on your website. This will tell Google which URL is the preferred version of each page.
Be patient, it will take some time.
Warm Regards
Rahul Gupta
Suvidit Academy -
-
You cannot directly influence Google's selected canonical tag. Google's algorithm determines the canonical tag based on various factors, including the content of the pages and the structure of your website. To help guide Google's selection, you can use proper canonical tags on your pages and ensure that your website's internal linking is clear and well-organized. However, Google ultimately makes the final decision based on its understanding of your website and its content.
-
Influencing the Google selected canonical URL is crucial for proper SEO. Ensure your preferred URL structure, optimize content, and use rel="canonical" tags correctly. Monitor Google Search Console for changes and fix duplicate content issues promptly. Consistency and best practices lead the way!
-
Influence over Google's selected canonical tag is limited, as Google typically chooses the canonical URL that it believes best represents the preferred version of a webpage. However, there are several best practices you can follow to guide Google's selection:
(Canada PR)
Use a Self-Referencing Canonical Tag: Always include a canonical tag in your HTML that points to the URL you want to be considered the canonical version. This helps clarify your preference to Google.
( Student Direct Stream Canada)
Ensure Consistency: Make sure that all versions of your page (e.g., www vs. non-www, HTTP vs. HTTPS) are consistent and use the same canonical tag. This reduces confusion for search engines.Avoid Duplicate Content: Minimize duplicate content issues by ensuring that each page on your website has a unique purpose and content. Google is more likely to choose the correct canonical URL when pages are distinct.
(Study abroad)
Proper Redirects: If you've made changes to your website's URL structure, use 301 redirects to point old URLs to the new canonical versions. This helps Google update its index correctly.
PMP Exam Prep
XML Sitemap: Include the canonical version of your URLs in your XML sitemap. This can help Google discover and prioritize the right canonical URLs.
best digital marketing agency
Hreflang Annotations: If you have internationalized content, use hreflang annotations to specify the canonical URL for each language or region. This can help Google understand which version should be displayed in different locations.Content Quality and User Experience: Ensure that the canonical URL provides the best user experience and contains high-quality, relevant content. Google is more likely to choose a page that offers better value to users.
SEO Expert
Monitor Google Search Console: Regularly check Google Search Console for any issues related to canonicalization. It can provide insights into how Google is interpreting your canonical tags and whether there are any problems.Consistent Internal Linking: Ensure that internal links within your website consistently point to the canonical URL for each page. This reinforces your preference.
Follow Google's Guidelines: Keep up with Google's official guidelines and recommendations regarding canonicalization. Google may update its algorithms and recommendations over time.
Remember that while you can influence Google's choice of canonical URL to some extent, Google's primary goal is to provide the best user experience and serve the most relevant content in search results. Therefore, it's essential to focus on delivering valuable content and maintaining a clean website structure to enhance your chances of having the desired canonical URL selected by Google.
-
You cannot directly influence the Google-selected canonical URL. Google's algorithm determines the canonical URL based on various factors, including website structure, content, and user signals. To ensure Google selects the desired canonical URL for your web page, you can implement best SEO practices, maintain proper internal linking, and use canonical tags where appropriate. However, ultimately, Google's algorithms will make the final decision on the canonical URL based on its assessment of the page's content and user experience.
-
@Spaziohouston
I can provide screenshots of webmaster tools if needed. Hopefully someone has had or seen this problem before. Really just trying to ensure we are ranking at the top for our own brand name.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What Should We Do to Fix Crawled but Not Indexed Pages for Multi-location Service Pages?
Hey guys! I work as a content creator for Zavza Seal, a contractor out of New York, and we're targeting 36+ cities in the Brooklyn and Queens areas with several services for home improvement. We got about 340 pages into our multi-location strategy targeting our target cities with each service we offer, when we noticed that 200+ of our pages were "Crawled but not indexed" in Google Search Console. Here's what I think we may have done wrong. Let me know what you think... We used the same page template for all pages. (we changed the content and sections, formatting, targeted keywords, and entire page strategy for areas with unique problems trying to keep the user experience as unique as possible to avoid duplicate content or looking like we didn't care about our visitors.) We used the same featured image for all pages. (I know this is bad and wouldn't have done it myself, but hey, I'm not the publisher.) We didn't use rel canonicals to tell search engines that these pages were special made for the areas. We didn't use alt tags until about halfway through. A lot of the urls don't use the target keyword exactly. The NAP info and Google Maps embed is in the footer, so we didn't use it on the pages. We didn't use any content about the history or the city or anything like that. (some pages we did use content about historic buildings, low water table, flood prone areas, etc if they were known for that) We were thinking of redoing the pages, starting from scratch and building unique experiences around each city, with testimonials, case studies, and content about problems that are common for property owners in the area, but I think they may be able to be fixed with a rel canonical, the city specific content added, and unique featured images on each page. What do you think is causing the problem? What would be the easiest way to fix it? I knew the pages had to be unique for each page, so I switched up the page strategy every 5-10 pages out of fear that duplicate content would start happening, because you can only say so much about for example, "basement crack repair". Please let me know your thoughts. Here is one of the pages that are indexed as an example: https://zavzaseal.com/cp-v1/premier-spray-foam-insulation-contractors-in-jamaica-ny/ Here is one like it that is crawled but not indexed: https://zavzaseal.com/cp-v1/premier-spray-foam-insulation-contractors-in-jamaica-ny/ I appreciate your time and concern. Have a great weekend!
Local SEO | | everysecond0 -
Understanding Redirects and Canonical Tags in SEO: A Complex Case
Hi everyone, nothing serious here, i'm just playing around doing my experiments 🙂
Technical SEO | | chueneke
but if any1 of you guys understand this chaos and what was the issue here, i'd appreciate if you try to explain it to me. I had a page "Linkaufbau" on my website at https://chriseo.de/linkaufbau. My .htaccess file contains only basic SEO stuff: # removed ".html" using htaccess RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} ^GET\ (.*)\.html\ HTTP RewriteRule (.*)\.html$ $1 [R=301,L] # internally added .html if necessary RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME}.html -f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} !/$ RewriteRule (.*) $1\.html [L] # removed "index" from directory index pages RewriteRule (.*)/index$ $1/ [R=301,L] # removed trailing "/" if not a directory RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI} /$ RewriteRule (.*)/ $1 [R=301,L] # Here’s the first redirect: RedirectPermanent /index / My first three questions: Why do I need this rule? Why must this rule be at the top? Why isn't this handled by mod_rewrite? Now to the interesting part: I moved the Linkaufbau page to the SEO folder: https://chriseo.de/seo/linkaufbau and set up the redirect accordingly: RedirectPermanent /linkaufbau /seo/linkaufbau.html I deleted the old /linkaufbau page. I requested indexing for /seo/linkaufbau in the Google Search Console. Once the page was indexed, I set a canonical to the old URL: <link rel="canonical" href="https://chriseo.de/linkaufbau"> Then I resubmitted the sitemap and requested indexing for /seo/linkaufbau again, even though it was already indexed. Due to the canonical tag, the page quickly disappeared. I then requested indexing for /linkaufbau and /linkaufbau.html in GSC (the old, deleted page). After two days, both URLs were back in the serps:: https://chriseo.de/linkaufbau https://chriseo.de/linkaufbau.html this is the new page /seo/linkaufbau
b14ee095-5c03-40d5-b7fc-57d47cf66e3b-grafik.png This is the old page /linkaufbau
242d5bfd-af7c-4bed-9887-c12a29837d77-grafik.png Both URLs are now in the search results and all rankings are significantly better than before for keywords like: organic linkbuilding linkaufbau kosten linkaufbau service natürlicher linkaufbau hochwertiger linkaufbau organische backlinks linkaufbau strategie linkaufbau agentur Interestingly, both URLs (with and without .html) redirect to the new URL https://chriseo.de/seo/linkaufbau, which in turn has a canonical pointing to https://chriseo.de/linkaufbau (without .html). In the SERPs, when https://chriseo.de/linkaufbau is shown, my new, updated snippet is displayed. When /linkaufbau.html is shown, it displays the old, deleted page that had already disappeared from the index. I have now removed the canonical tag. I don't fully understand the process of what happened and why. If anyone has any ideas, I would be very grateful. Best regards,
Chris0 -
Content Issues: Duplicate Content
Hi there
Technical SEO | | Kingagogomarketing
Moz flagged the following content issues, the page has duplicate content and missing canonical tags.
What is the best solution to do? Industrial Flooring » IRL Group Ltd
https://irlgroup.co.uk/industrial-flooring/ Industrial Flooring » IRL Group Ltd
https://irlgroup.co.uk/index.php/industrial-flooring Industrial Flooring » IRL Group Ltd
https://irlgroup.co.uk/index.php/industrial-flooring/0 -
slug Link redirect to subdomain?
Hi !
Link Building | | Leviiii
Im Levi new here and new in the world of SEO, please dont judge if my questions are silly. Back on the days when the site was built we thought it is a good ideea to have subdomains that together with the domain name represent our main keywords.
ex. https://stansted.tonorwich.uk, https://heathrow.tonorwich.uk, https://luton.tonorwich.uk, https://gatwick.tonorwich.uk. There is content on this subdomains, would it make any difference from SEO perspective if we create slugs that redirect to these subdomains? for example creating https://tonorwich.uk/taxi-minibus-vip-tesla-norwich-to-stansted that redirects to https://stansted.tonorwich.uk ? Or better create these slugs with slightly different content?
Any ideeas would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance!0 -
Page Title Displaying Wrong Company Name in Google Search Results
Currently, in some of our keyword search results, the wrong company name is showing up in the page title. We are a family of companies that all provide different modes of transportation. When we search up "Herc Air Charters" in Google Search Engine, the wrong operating company shows up in the page title (see screenshot, second result: "Lynden Transport" is our trucking company, and does not offer any air charter, this should say "Lynden Air Cargo"). Google decides what is best to put in these titles, so what would be the best way to ensure the correct company name is being displayed? Google Search Issue.PNG
Community | | RyanD.0 -
How long Moz Keyword ranking get data from google ranking search
Hi, i got some keywords that already ranked in line 50 of google but Moz keyword ranking still show zero ranking keyword, it's almost a week or more. It's already showing in google ranking but how long Moz will collect the data, or is there something I miss about it please let me know, Thank you
Community | | ilhamyani0 -
Unsolved Moz Pro crawl signaling missing canonical which are not?
Hi,
Moz Pro | | rolandvintners
I'm trying MozPro considering using it.
One of the tool which is appealing is the crawl and insights.
After quick use, I really question many of the alerts, for instance, I got a "missing canonical tag" on this url: https://vintners.co/wine/grawu_gto#2020 but when I check my markup, there's clearly a canonical tag: <link rel="canonical" href="https://vintners.co/wine/grawu_gto"> Anybody can explain?
I asked Moz Pro staff when being onboarded but didn't get an answer...
Honestly, I'm questioning the value of these crawls, or may be I miss something?0 -
"Duplicate without user-selected canonical” - impact to Google Ads costs
Hello, we are facing some issues on our project and we would like to get some advice. Scenario
Paid Search Marketing | | Alex_Pisa
We run several websites (www.brandName.com, www.brandName.be, www.brandName.ch, etc..) all in French language . All sites have nearly the same content & structure, only minor text (some headings and phone numbers due to different countries are different). There are many good quality pages, but again they are the same over all domains. Current solution
Currently we don’t use canonicals, instead we use rel="alternate" hreflang="x-default": <link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr-BE" href="https://www.brandName.be/" /> <link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr-CA" href="https://www.brandName.ca/" /> <link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr-CH" href="https://www.brandName.ch/" /> <link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr-FR" href="https://www.brandName.fr/" /> <link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr-LU" href="https://www.brandName.lu/" /> <link rel="alternate" hreflang="x-default" href="https://www.brandName.com/" /> Naturally this si reflected in ""Duplicate without user-selected canonical” . Issue
We create the same ad in Google Ads for 2 domains. So the content is mostly identical, ads are identical, target URLs differ only in domain. Yet Google Ads “Quality score” is different (10/10 vs. 6/10) and “Landing page experience” is very different (Above average vs. Average). Some members of our team think lower “Landing page experience” increases the Google Ads costs, which I personally don't believe, but I want to double check. Question: Can “Duplicate without user-selected canonical” issue decrease the “Landing page experience” rating and as result can it cause higher Google ads costs? Any suggestions/ideas appreciated, thanks. Regards.0