I have a WP site which uses categories to display the same content in several locations. Which items should get a canonical tag to avoid a ding for duplicate content?
-
So...I have a Knowledge Center and press room that pretty much use the same posts. So...technically the content looks like its on several pages because the post shows up on the Category listing page.
Do I add a Canonical tag to each individual post...so that it is the only one that is counted?
Also...I have a LONG disclaimer that goes at the bottom of most of the posts. would this count as duplicate content? Is there a way to markup a single paragraph to tell the spiders not to crawl it?
-
Hi Kane,
Thank you so much for your quick response even in the holiday season, I really appreciate that. I don't think that there is any unique content on tag or category pages. I will go ahead and noindex them right away.
Once again, thanks for your help.
Happy Holidays...
Jatin
-
Hi Jatin,
If you have any kind of unique content on a tag or category page, then it's reasonable to index it. For example, a category page with 1-2 paragraphs of intro text explaining what types of content are found in that category. In this case, any posts or post teasers showing up on that category/tag page would not be unique content.
If there is no unique content on that page, then I'd suggest noindex for category and tag pages.
-
Hello Kane,
I am also facing this issue and found some answers here in Q&A section. Most of the members are recommending to make tag & categories page non-index. But, you are not recommending this. Do you think that in the matter of duplicate content issue, it is better to non-index the tags and categories page?
If not, then should I worry about the duplicate content issues about these pages?
-
Let's resolve the boilerplate disclaimer text first: it is fine to have a section of content that is duplicated on lots of blog posts - the most important consideration is that each page has a decent amount of unique text from all other URLs on the website. Now there are limits to this - if every post has 200-400 words unique content (not really enough) and the boilerplate is 500 words, then your balance is off in that ratio. If you have 300-1000+ unique words on post and boilerplate text that is <100 words, then I would not worry about that at all. However, you can use the tag that Nick mentioned if you want to - it shouldn't hurt anything.
Now, regarding the canonicalization of posts and how it relates to category/archive pages:
Each post will have its own canonical tag, for example:
- http://www.domain.com/blog/best-post-ever/
- http://www.domain.com/blog/big-announcement-new-product
- http://www.domain.com/blog/annual-company-report
Then each category page or archive page would have it's own canonical tag:
When you are viewing a category or tag or archive page that lists a bunch of posts - there is only one canonical tag visible in the code for that page, and it's for the page itself - not for the posts listed on the page.
I'm guessing you're asking this question because you read that duplicate content on category and tag pages was common, and that is true. However - canonicals are not involved in fixing this at all. The thing with Wordpress is that unless you built a theme yourself - you shouldn't have to touch any of this. Default Wordpress with Yoast SEO plugin installed will handle this for you. I have worked on hundreds of Wordpress sites for 10 years and can count the number of times I manually specified a canonical tag in Wordpress on one hand.
The duplicate content of two pages such as your knowledge center and press room should be mitigated by 1) reducing the number of posts that fall into both categories, 2) making sure there is some unique content (50-300 words) on the knowledge center and press room pages other than a list of blog posts, and 3) not stressing too hard about duplicate content on these pages.
Hope that helps, please feel free to respond with questions if I missed something.
-
Hi Lindsay,
I'd recommend limiting the number of categories you select for each post - generally my rule is 3 categories maximum. That being said, I've found that the most successful strategy is to create & categorize content in a way that easily satisfies your user's intent. Categories = broad topics/areas of interest your ideal buyer wants to read about (broad keyword search phrases). Articles/posts = focus on one specific question related to the broad category (longtail phrases).
For example: let's say you have a shoe company and you've created a style blog that discusses the latest trends. One option is to do what a lot of companies do, and choose generic blog categories like trends, inspiration, comfort, etc...
Let's say you research and decide write an article called: Best Shoes To Wear To Coachella (because it's a longtail keyword). How do you categorize it? It's definitely goes in trends, but it's also kind of inspirational, and you also have a section about comfortable shoes to wear to Coachella. You can't choose just one category, so you end up adding the post to 4-5 categories.
The biggest problem with this type of organization structure is not duplicate content - it's that users (a) can't easily find your content because they don't know what your categories mean and (b) they're confused about what content they've already read, because they see the same articles in multiple categories.
In my opinion, the better way to choose categories and article topics, as I sort of mentioned above, is to start with broad topics that people want to learn about.
Instead, you might choose categories based on popular search queries. For example: Festival Shoes, New This Season, Celebrity Favs, How To Wear It, etc. In this case, your article: Best Shoes To Wear To Coachella would go under the festival shoes category. You could also have articles about Stagecoach, SXSW, etc. This isn't the best example, but I hope this make sense!
Long story short: done correctly, this type strategy is helpful in a number of ways: (1) your user is able to easily understand where to find the information they're looking for, (2) you avoid duplicate content, because your articles are written to correspond with 1 (maybe 2) categories, and (3) your category pages will be hyper-optimized for lots of longtail keywords that are related to your main category keyword. This will make your category pages like mini-landing pages that have a higher probability of ranking broad/more competitive keywords.
I hope this helps!
-
Hi Lindsay, Good questions. My recommendation would be to place a cononical tag on your posts and consider setting your category page to noindex.
As for the disclaimer, you can wrap that in the following tags to tell Google that it should not index that specific content.
<code>This (X)HTML content will NOT be indexed by Google.</code>
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How Am I Linked to These Sites?
I was going through Google Analytics, specifically looking at the Channels under Acquisition. I found a number of sites that Google is giving credit as sources of traffic.
Reporting & Analytics | | TowerMarketing
When I went to the sites, however, and searched the page source for links to my site, I could not find any. My site is www.towermarketing.net. The sites being listed by GA are:
blackhawkhardware.com
musicas.baixar-musicas-gratis.com If anyone can tell me how Tower is getting traffic from these sites, and what I can do to fix it - because at this point I am considering them spam - I would appreciate it. Thanks!0 -
Site operator result anomaly
"Site:" search for site:http://www.mycity4kids.com/Bangalore/activity-based-approach is showing 76 results.I am using SERPS Redux to collect all the indexed pages, but when I re-checked indexed status of these pages using "site operator" google showed that these pages are not indexed. What is the possible explanation for this? Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | prsntsnh0 -
Had suspicious spike in Adsense clicks, next day site ranking tanks
Yesterday, one of my sites had extreme Adsense clicks for several hours in the morning, which brought it up to CTRs of around 120%. My normal CTR is about 10-15%. It added several hundred dollars income over and above my normal amount. After that, it went back to normal. I have waited to see if Google would adjust the income down, as someone or some bot seemingly clicked the heck out of the site's ads. Nothing has been adjusted; it's been 24 hours. Question #1: what usually causes this type of insane clicking to occur (i.e. competitors messing me?) Then, today I noticed something else disturbing. I cannot find my site in the top 100 SERPs for the main keyword. I was at #1 for a couple years, then, when I changed themes from Thesis to Genesis (site otherwise exactly the same) a couple months ago, I bounced around various positions on the first page. In the last couple weeks we've been bouncing between the teens and the thirties. Two days ago we were at #15. (the site is still indexed when I use "site:" to check. It seems awfully coincidental that yesterday I had the Adsense click explosion, and today I'm not even in the top 100 for the first time in my pretty stable two-year history, and have no idea how far behind 100 I am. I went to Google Webmaster Tools and see no errors or warnings relating to this. Adsense has not sent me any messages. So... Question #2: does Google search apply some sort of penalty to site that have suspicious Adsense clicking? By the way, I don't have any funny business going on with any bad SEO practices, it's all above board, and I have thousands of real readers each day Liking and commenting on the pages. It's a very real site. Note: I have been checking the ranking each day via a Google Incognito window and searching for the term. Of course I use MOZ but I do the Incognito search for a quick real time check, which I've found to be accurate.
Reporting & Analytics | | bizzer0 -
Google Tag Manager breaking integration
Using Live Chat's (www.livechatinc.com) Google Analytics integration was populating events and virtual pageviews into my analytics account. I've since added Tag Manager and moved my analytics tracking code into there, but since doing so, the integration no longer seems to work as there is no population of either events or pageviews anymore. Anyone else had any experience of something similar? Any other suggestions (beyond not using GTM for analytics code anymore)? I was considering setting up the event tracking code manually in GTM, but not really sure how to do so seeing as I'm not sure what to fire the different events on. This is the live chat JS code:
Reporting & Analytics | | AdrianCordiner0 -
How Accurate Is Google Analytics Audience Location
Cioa from Latitude 53.92705600 Longitude -1.38481600 Clients love to know which part of the country there visitors originate adn cant get enough of this type of data:
Reporting & Analytics | | Nightwing
http://i216.photobucket.com/albums/cc53/zymurgy_bucket/country-level_zps41f273a3.jpg But just how innacurate is this data when you consder is getting the data from isp locations put another way if i was sat in darkets deepest hole of Paisley Scotland and my ISP was in London would i be tagged as visitor originating in London? Ta muchly,David0 -
Google not reading my canonical links
Hi All, New to SEOmoz but so far love it. My reports list tons of duplicate links and webmaster tools does as well. In fact it just updated last night and added several hundred more. I have the canonical tag on my products. Here is a product example page: http://www.stonehousecollection.com/card/funny-christmas-cards/KX296a.html Thank you for the help. Matt
Reporting & Analytics | | mker0 -
Google Analytics Site Search to new sub-domain
Hi Mozzers, I'm setting up Google's Site Search on a website. However this isn't for search terms, this will be for people filling in a form and using the POST action to land on a results page. This is similar to what is outlined at http://support.google.com/analytics/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=1012264 ('<a class="zippy zippy-collapse">Setting Up Site Search for POST-Based Search Engines').</a> However my approach is different as my results appear on a sub-domain of the top level domain. Eg.. user is on www.domain.com/page.php user fills in form submits user gets taken to results.domain.com/results.php The issue is with the suggested code provided by Google as copied below.. Firstly, I don't use query strings on my results page so I would have to create an artificial page which shouldn't be a problem. But what I don't know is how the tracking will work across a sub-domain without the _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', '.domain.com']); code. Can this be added in? Can I also add Custom Variables? Does anyone have experience of using Site Search across a sub-domain perhaps to track quote form values? Many thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | panini0 -
Can you get local search numbers/traffic out of Google Analytics?
With Google's new local search I am more curious as to market penetration on keywords that are now localized to my different US cities. I understand that you can separate out Google traffic based on regional Google domains, but I am curious if there is an effective way to separate out searches and keywords based on a my local US Metros? If google cannot do this, any recommendations on products that can? Thanks.
Reporting & Analytics | | Thos0031