What's the best strategy for reducing the number of links on a blog post?
-
I'd like to optimize my blog better for search. The first reccomendation I got from my SEOMoz Pro Campaign Crawl was that I needed to reduce the number of links per page on my site. I have lots of links from navigational items in the sidebar that people do click on. I'd really like to keep some or all of the tags and categories I list. Comments are another issue. Most of our posts get about 10 comments. However, our best posts get 50-100 comments. Those comments create a lot of links.
I was planning on attempting to reduce the number of links using javascript but I guess Google understands javascript now. I may still do this b/c our pages are huge and some progressive rendering would likely help the user experience.
Can you use javascript (ajax or otherwise) to limit the number of links on your page in a way that helps your SEO efforts? Any specific suggestions for reducing links that come from comments and navigational items?
How much will reducing the number of links on a given page help with SEO? Any simple way to estimate or quantify this without diving in?
Thanks in advance!
-
Your domain strength is pretty high, so on your home page and top pages, those navigational links are going to be fine, but you could nofollow the bulk of them on the individual blog pages.
You already have the tweet and facebook like buttons that are getting use, but you might be able to add some easy to copy & paste code, similar to a badge, to try and boost inbound links (http://www.seomoz.org/dp/badges). Also, since you have so much content you could try getting a Polyvore-like feature added to your site that helps people make a collage from the different wedding details they like. (http://www.polyvore.com/).
I didn't dig too deeply so these are just off-the-cuff examples, but hopefully enough to spark some ideas for you.
-
Anyone have any thoughts about whether or not I should attempt to reduce the number of links in the sidebar via javascript? I've got 160 navigational links. Should I try to load these in via Javascript? How would Google react to that?
-
Hey Ryan, thanks for taking a look. nofollowing the comment links is a good idea!
I'm under the assumption the assumption that nofollow links are still hurting my SEO efforts do to how Google passes page rank through links.
Thanks for the tips on looking at other blogs and seeing how they use nofollow. Again, I guess the big guestion is should I be reducing the number of links on my site (including the number of nofollow links).
Can you give a more specific example of "hooks for people to link back to"?
-
Hi Tait. I went through one of the blog posts with 20+ comments and saw that most of the links via user names are pretty wedding relevant--wedding photographers, profiles back to your own site, some broken links--plus they're already nofollowed already. It'd be a good idea to apply nofollow to the individual comment links as well below the user name.
If you have the SEOmoz toolbar you can turn on "Show Nofollows" here and see all the different links the 'moz is disregarding. All the "Browse Category" links at left are nofollowed, the section tags, and the function links (Add Image or Video URLs...) I think you could take a similar tack with your blog and apply any incoming link juice to a few select links that are the focus of that blog post. That way you're leaving the option open for people to be social via your blog and provide links for people to click, but the technical focus is around your target keywords.
To get more insight on where you could apply nofollows, just leave the "Show Nofollows" highlighter on in the tool bar and surf the web for a bit: competitors, blogs that would likely be in a competitive niche, etc. You should be able to get a pretty good idea fairly quickly from that exercise.
Last, coming up with hooks for people to link back in to individual blog posts would be handy as any juice coming in would then be redistributed to your most targeted links.
-
That seems like a pretty practical solution. Some people won't stop by any more but those are the people who are just trying to promote themselves. I wonder if it might actually increase comments b/c now the form will be even shorter and simpler to fill out.
-
It sounds like you are getting good contributions and are doing a proper job of blocking the weasels.
What do you think of eliminating the "website" field of the comment form? I would eliminate it if it was on my site.
-
Thanks EGOL. To be clear, we remove most comments with links embedded in the text (unless they are relevant). However the "website" field of the comment form creates a nofollow link to a site if filled in.
I don't want to remove comments. People really do contribute in our comments section. Having comments show people stopping by our blog that we have a nice little community of readers. While there is some abuse we work to remove spammy comments and blacklist domains that continue to spam us.
-
Those comments create a lot of links"
There is what I would ATTACK. A lot of those links are placed there by people who probably don't give a rat's behind about your content - they are simply there to drop a link on you. Consider the content of these comments and ask if they are honest contributors.
I would disable links in comments or moderate them out.
"How much will reducing the number of links on a given page help with SEO?"
I believe that relevant links are helpful for SEO. However, I also believe that if you have a blog about knitting and it is getting links dropped on it to men's health products, hotels in Turkey and online casinos, then you better pray that Google doesn't drop your rankings.
I have a blog and used to allow comments. I turned them off because even with a plug-in to block spam comments a lot of undesired comments were getting in. Some comments came from people who are in my industry but were trying to use my blog as a signpost for their business. So, I cut the comments and now run a bully pulpit. Less work for me and less odor on the blog.
I was sad to lose comments from a few genuine contributors... but this is a better balance for me.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Parsing jQuery Links as Real Links
While trying to diagnose a recent Google penalty I found out that links were being parsed by Google even though they were made using jQuery. I had the linkify plugin on my site and configured it to convert URLs to links on all of my pages. Today I found links to other sites of mine from sites that should not have been linking to them and found that the links came from pages whose links were generated via jQuery. This makes me wonder, how do I know if Google is counting javascript generated links? Is it possible that my native ad widgets are creating links that Google might count? Since I don't own any of the sites that advertise via the widgets I don't know how to tell if they are getting link juice or not. It used to be that Google didn't parse javascript, so you could add as many links to your site via javascript as you wanted without being seen by Google as linking to those sites. Does anyone know of a jQuery plugin that does turn URLs into clickable links that Google won't parse as real links?
On-Page Optimization | | STDCarriers0 -
Can bots crawl this homepage's content?
The website is https://ashleydouglas.com.au/ I tried using http://www.seo-browser.com/ to see if bots could see the content on the site, but the tool was unable to retrieve the page. I used mobile-friendly test and it just rendered some menu links - no content and images. I also used Fetch and Render on Search Console. The result for 'how google sees the page' and 'how a visitor sees the page' are the same and only showing the main header image. Anything below isn't shown. Does this mean that bots can't actually read all content on the page past the header image? I'm not well versed with what's going on with the code. Why are the elements below the header not rendering? Is it the theme? Plugins? Thank you.
On-Page Optimization | | nhhernandez0 -
Understanding why our new page doesn't rank. Internal link structure to blame? + understand canonical pages more.
Hi guys. Sorry it's an essay...BUT, i think a lot of you will find this an interesting question. This question is in 2 (related) parts, and I imagine it would be an 'advanced' SEO question. Hoping you guys can help bring some real insight 🙂 Always amazed at the quality for this forum/ community. **Context... ** We had a duplicate content issue caused by this page and it's product permutations, so we placed canonical tags on all the product permutations to solve it. Worked a treat. However, we now have more **product ranges. **We now sell Diaries, Notebooks & Music books, which are clearly different from one another. So...we've placed canonical tags on all the product permutations leading back to the 'parent' theme. In other words, all the diary permutations 'lead back' to the diary page. All the notebooks permutations 'lead back' to the main notebook page. So on and so forth. Make sense so far? Context end..... Issue. Amazingly our Diary page outranks our notebook pagefor the search term 'Design your own Notebook'. The notebook page is well optimised for this search term, and the diary page avoids the word 'notebook' altogether (so no keyword cannibalisation going on). Possible reason? Our Diary page has a vast amount of internal links to it throughout our site. The notebook page has only a few. Could this be the issue? If so, what reading/ blogs/ content/ tools would you recommend to help understand and solve this problem? i.e) Better understanding internal link structure for SEO. 2nd part of the question (in the context of internal linking for SEO). When there are internal links to a page with a conical tag does that 'count' towards the 'parent page', or simply towards that specific page? I really hope that makes sense. If it's clear as mud just shout. Isaac. EDIT: All pages in question have been indexed since we added these changes to the site.
On-Page Optimization | | isaac6630 -
SEO Structure - Best Advice
Hi Mozzers, I'm wondering if I need to tweak my SEO friendly URL structure slightly. Example: http://www.vintageheirloom.com/vintage-celine/celine-bags would this be better for SEO if it was: http://www.vintageheirloom.com/vintage-celine/bags Perhaps the repetition of 'celine' is unnecesary, but OpenCart ecommerce CMS requires a plugin / modification to enable multiple use of a single term like e.g. 'bags'. Any benefit for $30? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | well-its-1-louder0 -
Product links on homepage
Hi, I;m wondering if it really does aid SEO or even hinder it now to have lists of top selling products as links on the base of each page. This was recommended to us sometime ago by a consultant so we did it but is it outdated? I'm concerned it may penalise our pages now by creating too many links? opinions appreciated. wwww.gourmetdirect.com and scroll down to see what I mean
On-Page Optimization | | GourmetDirect0 -
Internal links
Hi, I am working on a project with very few really important pages - its now about 20 pages and this number will not increase to more than 30 by the end of the year. Today the majority of these Pages is 2 clicks away from the Homepage for navigational reasons. Now I am wondering: 1. If I should set links from the Homepage directly to these Pages to pass more juice?
On-Page Optimization | | Naturalmente
2 If you would suggest so - how would you recommend me to do this in Terms of usability and SEO? thanks in advance for your help.0 -
Internal Linking
Hi Everyone, Should i be careful of how many internal links I have on one page? For example if i have a page that contains 700 words, can i have 5, 10, 15 internal links linking to other pages on my website? Is there a ratio for best practice. I know that internal linking is important for spiders to crawl your website but at the same time dont make it look spammy. I hope this makes sense. Thanks for any help.
On-Page Optimization | | Paul780 -
Too many on page links
I'm having trouble interpreting this data. It says several of my blog pages have too many on page links, some as high as 140 and there is no example of a blog post that they are referring to. What am I missing? I never post more than a handful (5-7) in our 600-1000wd blogs. When I drill down, it doesn't give me very much information except "Found over 41 years ago" off to the right. When I click on the "too many on page links" URL, it provides a long list of website pages that are renamed with the blog name. huh? A lot of this stuff isn't very intuitive, SEOMoz.
On-Page Optimization | | amandahx20