WordPress Duplicate Content Issues
-
Everyone knows that WordPress has some duplicate content issues with tags, archive pages, category pages etc...
My question is, how do you handle these issues?
Is the smart strategy to use robots meta and add no follow/ no index category pages, archive pages tag pages etc?
By doing this are you missing out on the additional internal links to your important pages from you category pages and tag pages?
I hope this makes sense.
Regards,
Bill
-
Hey Bill
I like to start with this standard setup (image/chart from my wordpress post on moz);
Pages, Posts, Categories - Index
Tags, Dated Archives, Subpages, Author Archives - noindex
You can check out the full post - I will be updating the Yoast Screenshots very soon!
-Dan
-
Thanks for article,
Now 2 years ahead, are there any important updates for preventing duplicate content/titles?
-
Most of the Plugins for wordpress use canonical urls.
-
Unless I'm missing something here, wouldn't it be easier to set the canonical tag for the main post? There are also plugins like SEO Ultimate that handle this automatically.
-
I posted this article I wrote the other day for someone asking a similar question.
With the Yoast SEO Plugin I no-index everything except Categories. You can see how I set mine up under section 3. Indexation.
Here is the original question that Sha submitted:
http://www.seomoz.org/q/what-is-with-wordpress-dupe-issues -
Bill-
There are several SEO plugs available for WP that will handle these issues. Yes, you are right that adding "noindex" will be beneficial on tag, category, and archive pages. The idea here is avoiding duplicate content issues. BTW, check out: Yoast SEO for Wordpress.
Here is how the values for the robots meta tag work:
- noindex will keep a page from being crawled
- nofollow will prevent a page's links from being followed
I agree with noindex'ing these pages; though I would argue that a nofollow is still worth leaving out. If these pages have any juice you want to allow this to flow to the other links on the page.
-
The WP on my blog is set up as follows (this is a blog that gets between four and ten short posts per day - about two to four sentences, each post linking to an article or other content on a topic-related website)
Homepage: Full text of the most recent 25 posts are displayed. Pagination pages are not indexed (blocked by robots.txt).
Post Pages: Full text is displayed and the title plus a few words of 20 related posts are displayed.
Category Pages: I have over 100 categories and each post is placed into at least two categories (one by location and one by topic). Some posts go into three or four categoreis - sometimes more. Each category page displays the full text of the most recent 25 posts. Categories do not have pagination pages (blocked by robots.txt).
All of the above pages are fully indexed and a long list of category pages appears in the left-side navigation. I don't use tag pages or archive pages. There is a lot of dupe content in this system but so far I am lucky that it does not cause a problem. The category pages pull a lot of organic search traffic.
In January of each year I delete all of the posts that are over a year old. Before doing that I identify those that are pulling reasonable traffic and either redirect them to a permanent page about same topic, write an article about that topic and redirect, or recycle that post. All the rest are redirected to the homepage of the blog.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Content Issues: Duplicate Content
Hi there
Technical SEO | | Kingagogomarketing
Moz flagged the following content issues, the page has duplicate content and missing canonical tags.
What is the best solution to do? Industrial Flooring » IRL Group Ltd
https://irlgroup.co.uk/industrial-flooring/ Industrial Flooring » IRL Group Ltd
https://irlgroup.co.uk/index.php/industrial-flooring Industrial Flooring » IRL Group Ltd
https://irlgroup.co.uk/index.php/industrial-flooring/0 -
Purchasing duplicate content
Morning all, I have a client who is planning to expand their product range (online dictionary sites) to new markets and are considering the acquisition of data sets from low ranked competitors to supplement their own original data. They are quite large content sets and would mean a very high percentage of the site (hosted on a new sub domain) would be made up of duplicate content. Just to clarify, the competitor's content would stay online as well. I need to lay out the pros and cons of taking this approach so that they can move forward knowing the full facts. As I see it, this approach would mean forgoing ranking for most of the site and would need a heavy dose of original content as well as supplementing the data on page to build around the data. My main concern would be that launching with this level of duplicate data would end up damaging the authority of the site and subsequently the overall domain. I'd love to hear your thoughts!
Technical SEO | | BackPack851 -
Tricky Duplicate Content Issue
Hi MOZ community, I'm hoping you guys can help me with this. Recently our site switched our landing pages to include a 180 item and 60 item version of each category page. They are creating duplicate content problems with the two examples below showing up as the two duplicates of the original page. http://www.uncommongoods.com/fun/wine-dine/beer-gifts?view=all&n=180&p=1 http://www.uncommongoods.com/fun/wine-dine/beer-gifts?view=all&n=60&p=1 The original page is http://www.uncommongoods.com/fun/wine-dine/beer-gifts I was just going to do a rel=canonical for these two 180 item and 60 item pages to the original landing page but then I remembered that some of these landing pages have page 1, page 2, page 3 ect. I told our tech department to use rel=next and rel=prev for those pages. Is there anything else I need to be aware of when I apply the canonical tag for the two duplicate versions if they also have page 2 and page 3 with rel=next and rel=prev? Thanks
Technical SEO | | znotes0 -
Wordpress: Tags generate duplicate Content - just delete the tags!?
Asking people, they say tags are bad and spamy and as I can see they generate all my duplicate page content issues. So the big question is, why Google very often prefers to show in SERPS these Tag-URLS... so it can't be too bad! :)))? Then after some research I found the "Term Optimizer" on Yoast.com ... that should help exactly with this problem but it seems not to be available anymore? So may be there another plugin that can help... or just delete all tags from my blog? and install permanent redirects?
Technical SEO | | inlinear
Is this the solution?0 -
Duplicate content due to csref
Hi, When i go trough my page, i can see that alot of my csref codes result in duplicate content, when SeoMoz run their analysis of my pages. Off course i get important knowledge through my csref codes, but im quite uncertain of how much it effects my SEO-results. Does anyone have any insights in this? Should i be more cautios to use csref-codes or dosent it create problems that are big enough for me to worry about them.
Technical SEO | | Petersen110 -
Duplicate page content issue needs resolution.
After my last "crawl" report, I received a warning about "duplicate page content". One page was: http://anycompany.com and the other was: http://anycompany.com/home.html How do I correct this so these pages aren't competing with each other or is this a problem?
Technical SEO | | JamesSagerser0 -
Duplicate Content
Hello All, my first web crawl has come back with a duplicate content warning for www.simodal.com and www.simodal.com/index.htm slightly mystified! thanks paul
Technical SEO | | simodal0 -
Different TLD's same content - duplicate content? - And a problem in foreign googles?
Hi, Operating from the Netherlands with customers troughout Europe we have for some countries the same content. In the netherlands and Belgium Dutch is spoken and in Germany and Switserland German is spoken. For these countries the same content is provided. Does Google see this as duplicate content? Could it be possible that a german customer gets the Swiss website as a search result when googling in the German Google? Thank you for your assistance! kind regards, Dennis Overbeek Dennis@acsi.eu
Technical SEO | | SEO_ACSI0