Google refuses to index our domain. Any suggestions?
-
A very similar question was asked previously. (http://www.seomoz.org/q/why-google-did-not-index-our-domain) We've done everything in that post (and comments) and then some.
The domain is http://www.miwaterstewardship.org/ and, so far, we have:
- put "User-agent: * Allow: /" in the robots.txt (We recently removed the "allow" line and included a Sitemap: directive instead.)
- built a few hundred links from various pages including multiple links from .gov domains
- properly set up everything in Webmaster Tools
- submitted site maps (multiple times)
- checked the "fetch as googlebot" display in Webmaster Tools (everything looks fine)
- submitted a "request re-consideration" note to Google asking why we're not being indexed
Webmaster Tools tells us that it's crawling the site normally and is indexing everything correctly. Yahoo! and Bing have both indexed the site with no problems and are returning results. Additionally, many of the pages on the site have PR0 which is unusual for a non-indexed site. Typically we've seen those sites have no PR at all.
If anyone has any ideas about what we could do I'm all ears. We've been working on this for about a month and cannot figure this thing out.
Thanks in advance for your advice.
-
You make excellent points. I'll escalate this to "the pros" and see if they're able to bring their guru powers to bear on the trouble.
Thanks again Ryan for all your advice. It is greatly appreciated.
-
Looking at the site I can confirm the following:
-
the home page is tagged index follow
-
the status code for the home page is 200, an OK response
-
the robots.txt file is valid and clear
-
your crawl reports look fine to me
-
you stated your sitemap is received and 73 of 75 pages are indexed
-
your site is clearly not in Google's index as a site:miwaterstewardship.org search shows nothing.
-
I looked at your sitemap. I am not familiar with .aspx sitemaps but it does contain valid html links which apparently is enough for Google to utilize
-
you stated your site is not under penalty, as per Google
The possibilities are:
-
one of the pieces of information we are depending on is incorrect
-
we are overlooking a key piece of information
-
our understanding of SEO in this case is not complete
-
there is an issue with Google which is preventing your site from being indexed.
At this point I would suggest using your 1 PRO question on this issue, and reference this Q&A thread. While I don't believe we missed anything we should get the team to look at this issue and rule out every last possibility.
-
-
Thanks for the suggestions, Ryan. All of the previous changes were made before Google did it's last crawl. Here's the other info...
URLs Submitted = 78 / URLs in Web Index = 75 / The sitemap status is green check mark and it was downloaded today--June 14.
Geographic target has not been selected. Google has always been able to determine the crawl rate. I just changed the preferred domain to www.miwaterstewardship.org. That's the only change made recently.
This is another piece that baffles me. Check out the crawl stats for the site here: http://netvantagemarketing.com/temp/miws-crawl-stats.png
The bot is crawling an average of 63 pages per day and there's crawling activity since the middle of March. STILL, though...the domain absolutely will not appear in the index.
We're working with the client right now to see if we can get the site changed to a new IP address. The thought is that perhaps Google has somehow historically blocked the IP that it lives on now and changing to a new IP might get us out of jail. SUPER long shot...but those are the kinds of things we're trying now.
Thanks again for the help.
-
I was able to verify your robots.txt file is correctly set up. Did you make the changes before Google crawled the site on Saturday? You are correct that your site is not in the index. I would guess the robots.txt file was not modified until after the crawl. If it was adjusted pre-crawl, below are the next steps you can take.
Let's take a fresh look at your site:
-
you have a valid robots.txt file
-
your home page has a valid "index, follow" tag (not necessary, but it doesn't hurt either)
-
you have checked WMT and confirmed your site was crawled
In WMT, Site Configuration > Sitempas there is a "URLs submitted" field and a "URLs in web index field". What are those numbers please?
- It's a bit far reaching but while you are there please go over to your Settings tab in WMT. Geographic Target should not be checked, or if it is then Target Users in US should be selected. Preferred domain should be "www.miwaterstewardship.org" and I would recommend "Let Google determine my crawl rate" option unless you have a specific reason for doing otherwise.
-
-
Well...we're still in the virtual doghouse so-to-speak...
I made the changes that Ryan suggested on Friday. Webmaster Tools reports that the GoogleBot crawled the site on Saturday and that everything is OK in its eyes. Google responded to our reconsideration request over the weekend and stated very specifically that no actions were taken by the Google Spam team which would affect the rankings of our site or domain.
Still, if you search info:miwaterstewardship.org in The Ol' Goog, it continues to report that the site does not exist in the Google database.
Are there any other ideas of what we might be able to try?
This is a Dot Net Nuke site. Is there a DNN setting somewhere which might indicate to Google that it should not report our domain in search results?
Thanks for the looks and the help.
-
I agree with Ryan, your backlinks look great, website is structured well and has a great looking design. No signs of you breaking any of googles TOS.
-
Thank you EGOL. I consider myself a student of SEO, definitely not a master.
The Q&A forums here have given me a great opportunity to learn about SEO. I have been spending all my time this past month un-learning all the bad information I gathered from the internet, and learning SEO the right way.
The Matt Cutts videos, SEOmoz webinars, blogs and pro Q&A have all been immensely helpful. Those resources, along with the replies you and other mozzers offer have provided me an incredibly rich learning experience.
Thanks for noticing.
-
Thanks, Ryan. I noticed this as well but figured I'd leave it alone since Webmaster Tools was telling me "all is well" with the robots.txt file. I'll add the code like you suggest and we'll see what happens.
Thanks again.
-
Ryan, you have been giving some really valuable answers. Nice. Keep up the great work!
-
Fix your robots.txt. It is not set up as you suggested.
http://www.miwaterstewardship.org/robots.txt
User-agent: * Sitemap: http://www.miwaterstewardship.org/SiteMap.aspx I am unsure of what action a search engine would take upon encountering your code, but based on your post it seems that it blocks all agents. The correct code would be:
User-agent: *
Disallow:Sitemap: http://www.miwaterstewardship.org/SiteMap.aspx For more information about robots.txt you can take a look at: [http://www.robotstxt.org/robotstxt.html](http://www.robotstxt.org/robotstxt.html)
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Still Taking 2 - 3 Days to Index New Posts
My website is fairly new, it was launched about 3.5 months ago. I've been publishing new content daily (except on weekends) since then. Is there any reason why new posts don't get indexed faster? All of my posts gets +1's and they're shared on G+, FB and Twitter. My website's at www.webhostinghero.com
Technical SEO | | sbrault740 -
Staging site and "live" site have both been indexed by Google
While creating a site we forgot to password protect the staging site while it was being built. Now that the site has been moved to the new domain, it has come to my attention that both the staging site (site.staging.com) and the "live" site (site.com) are both being indexed. What is the best way to solve this problem? I was thinking about adding a 301 redirect from the staging site to the live site via HTACCESS. Any recommendations?
Technical SEO | | melen0 -
Correct linking to the /index of a site and subfolders: what's the best practice? link to: domain.com/ or domain.com/index.html ?
Dear all, starting with my .htaccess file: RewriteEngine On
Technical SEO | | inlinear
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.inlinear.com$ [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://inlinear.com/$1 [R=301,L] RewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} ^./index.html
RewriteRule ^(.)index.html$ http://inlinear.com/ [R=301,L] 1. I redirect all URL-requests with www. to the non www-version...
2. all requests with "index.html" will be redirected to "domain.com/" My questions are: A) When linking from a page to my frontpage (home) the best practice is?: "http://domain.com/" the best and NOT: "http://domain.com/index.php" B) When linking to the index of a subfolder "http://domain.com/products/index.php" I should link also to: "http://domain.com/products/" and not put also the index.php..., right? C) When I define the canonical ULR, should I also define it just: "http://domain.com/products/" or in this case I should link to the definite file: "http://domain.com/products**/index.php**" Is A) B) the best practice? and C) ? Thanks for all replies! 🙂
Holger0 -
Pages removed from Google index?
Hi All, I had around 2,300 pages in the google index until a week ago. The index removed a load and left me with 152 submitted, 152 indexed? I have just re-submitted my sitemap and will wait to see what happens. Any idea why it has done this? I have seen a drop in my rankings since. Thanks
Technical SEO | | TomLondon0 -
Will Google index a site with white text? Will it give it bad ratings?
Will google not rank a site bc pretty much all the copy is white (and the background is all white)? Here's the site in question: https://www.dropbox.com/s/6w24f6h5p0zaxhg/Garrison_PLAY.vs2-static.pdf https://www.dropbox.com/sh/fwudppvwy2khpau/t43NozpG3E/Garrison_PLAY.vs3.jpg thanks--if you need me to clarify more let me know TM Humphries LocalSearched.com
Technical SEO | | CloudGuys0 -
Mobile Google Not Indexing Mobile Website
Google currently does not index our mobile website. It has the WWW website in it's index. When a user from a mobile phone clicks on a mobile search result for WWW we redirect them to our mobile website. This is posing problems for us as our mobile website is a fraction of the # of pages/sections as our WWW. So for example, mobile search results show that we have a "careers" section; but that's not the case for the mobile website. As a result a user gets a 404. How do we force mobile Google to index our mobile website instead of our WWW?
Technical SEO | | RBA0 -
Google , 301 redirects, and multiple domains pointing to the same content.
Google, 301 redirects, and multiple domains pointing to the same content. This is my first post here. I would like to begin by thanking anyone in advance for their help. It is much appreciated. Secondly, I'm posting in the wrong place or something please forgive me simply point me in the right direction I'm a quick learner. I think I'm battling a redirect problem but I want to be sure before I make changes. In order to accurately assess the situation a little background is necessary. I have had a site called tx-laws.com for about 15 years. It was a site that was used primarily by private resource and as such was never SEO'd. The site itself was in fact quite Seo unfriendly. despite a complete lack of marketing or SEO efforts, over time, SEO aside, this domain eventually made it to page one of Google Yahoo and Bing under the keywords Texas laws. About six months ago I decided to revamp the site and create a new resource aimed at a public market. A good deal of effort was made to re-work the SEO. The new site was developed at a different domain name: easylawlook up.com. Within a few months this domain name surpassed tx-laws in Google and was holding its place in position number eight out of 190 million results. Note that at this point no marketing has been done, that is to say there has been no social networking, no e-mail campaigns, no blogs, -- nothing but content. All was well until a few weeks ago I decided to upgrade our network and our servers. During this period there was some downtime unfortunately. When the upgrade was complete everything seemed fine until a week or so later when our primary domain easy law look up vanished off Google. At first I thought it was downtime but now I'm not so sure. The current configuration reroutes traffic from tx-laws to easylawlookup in IIS by pointing both domains to the same root directory. Everything else was handled through scripting. As far as I know this is how it was always set up. At present there is no 301 Redirect in place for tx-laws (as I'm sure there probably should be). Interestingly enough the back links to easylaw also went away. Even more telling however is that now when I visit link: easylawlookup.com there is only one link, and that link is to a domain which references tx-laws not easy law. So it would appear that I have confused Google with regards to my actual intentions. My question is this. Right now my rankings for tx-laws remain unchanged. The last thing I want to have happen is to see those disappear as well. If easy law has somehow been penalized and I redirect tx-laws to easy through a 301 will I screw up my rankings for this domain as well? Any comments or input on the situation are welcome. I just want to think it through before I start making more changes which might make things worse instead of better. Ultimately though, there is no reason that the old domain can't be redirected to the new domain at this point unless it would mean that I run the risk of losing my listings for tx-laws, ending up with nothing instead of transferring any link juice and traffic to easy law. With regards to the down time, it was substantial over a couple of weeks with many hours off-line. However this downtime would have affected both domains the only difference being that the one domain had been in existence for 15 years as opposed to six months for the other. So is my problem downtime, lack of proper 301 redirect, or something else? and if I implement a 301 at this point do I risk damaging the remaining domain which is operational? Thanks again for any help.
Technical SEO | | Steviebone0 -
New Domain Page 7 Google but Page 1 Bing & Yahoo
Hi just wondered what other people's experience is with a new domain. Basically have a client with a domain registered end of May this year, so less than 3 months old! The site ranks for his keyword choice (not very competitive), which is in the domain name. For me I'm not at all surprised with Google's low ranking after such a short period but quite surprsied to see it ranking page 1 on Bing and Yahoo. No seo work has been done yet and there are no inbound links. Anyone else have experience of this? Should I be surprised or is that normal in the other two search engines? Thanks in advance Trevor
Technical SEO | | TrevorJones0