A Blog Structure Dilemma We're Facing...
-
We're launching a pretty large content program (in the form of a blog) and have a structure issue:
Big fans of Wordpress for efficiency reasons, but our platform doesn't allow hosting of a wordpess (or other 3rd party) blog on the primary domain where we want it. site.com/blog
Here are the options:
1. Sub-domain: We can easily put it there. Benefit is we use the efficient Wordpress tools and very fast to setup etc. Downside is that the root domain won't get benefit of any backlinks to the blog (as far as I understand). I also don't believe the primary domain will benefit from the daily fresh/unique content the blog offers.
2. Custom Rig: We could create our own manual system of pages on the site to look just like our blog would. This would allow us to have it at site.com/blog and benefit from any backlinks and fresh content. The downside is that it won't be as efficient to manage.
3. External Site: Create a different site just for the blog. Same issue as the sub-domain I believe.
User Experience is a top priority, and all of the above pretty much can accomplish the same UX goal, with #3 requiring a some additional strategy on positioning.
Is #1 of #3 going to be a big regret down the road though, and is the backlink/content benefit clearly worth doing #2?
(correct me if I'm wrong on my assumptions with #1 but at least with the backlinks I'm almost certain that's the case)
Many thanks for your inputs on this.
-
Matt Cutts
Subdomains vs. Subdirectories What's the difference between using subdomains and subdirectories? When it comes to Google, there aren't major differences between the two, so when you're making that decision, do what works for you and your visitors. http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/01/feeling-lucky-at-pubcon.html
Deb, it really is a pretty personal choice. For something small like a blog, it probably won’t matter terribly much. I used a subdirectory because it’s easier to manage everything in one file storage space for me. However, if you think that someday you might want to use a hosted blog service to power your blog, then you might want to go with blog.example.com just because you could set up a CNAME or DNS alias so that blog.example.com pointed to your hosted blog service. http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/subdomains-and-subdirectories/
-
I also noticed that the sitelinks often include links from subdomains.
And Matt Cutts has said its a personal choice, and GWMB states it makes no difference to them.
I have had good results so far with Sub Domains, I remeber asking you for advice about a year or 2 ago. you recommended good linking between sub and root domains to show the connection.
i have followed that advice, and the sitelinks for my sites in google reflect the subdomians as sub categories of the root.
so i am convinced subdomains act like subfolders, at least they have so far for me.
-
Great idea -- and the link Scot posted is perfect. However our platform doesn't give us access to mod_proxy or htaccess, so we are unable to setup the reverse proxy. unfortunately. Sigh.
-
Agreed - Google is consolidating subdomain links in Google Webmaster Tools, but as far as I know, that does not reflect a change in how the algorithm works. Subdomains can still fragment and split link-juice. The change is more of an accounting trick, for lack of a better word.
-
Thanks, Hugh! I'm in the same boat as SEOPA with 3dcart and this seems like the best solution.
This post by Slingshot SEO seems relevant (What is a Reverse Proxy and How Can it Help My SEO?).
-
Hm. Right, I think I have another suggested solution of sorts - it's tricksy and you'd need an expert to set it up, but it'd solve your problems.
In short, if you run a reverse proxy serving your site itself on a server which ISN'T your BigCommerce server, you can tell it to fetch your main site for your www.yourdomain.com URL, and your blog (live, not cached) for www.yourdomain.com/blog. Probably your best option would be to use a reverse proxy like Varnish or Nginx, both of which are normally used for performance reasons - however, they can also be used to effectively "combine" two servers into one.
So, you'd move your DNS record to point to the reverse proxy, then set the proxy up to fetch content from your ecommerce site and your blog site.
Issues:
-
You'd need another server, and you'd need root access and an expert sysadmin to set it all up.
-
I don't know how well BigCommerce would handle a reverse proxy - but frankly, they SHOULD be able to handle it OK if you talk to their sysadmins.
Advantages:
- This would also give you massive redundancy in case of high traffic - reverse proxy setups are usually used to improve performance. You'd be Digg-proof!
It's complex, but I can see it working! Just another suggestion.
More info on reverse proxies - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_proxy
-
-
Hm. It seems to me that you've just got a routing issue - there MUST be a way to fix this.
Can you run a mod_rewrite .htaccess or similar on the server?
-
It's a platform issue. BigCommerce. Everything else has been fantastic with them, but our only option for WordPress is to host on a subdomain.
The clear answer is that having it in a directory is better, but doing so means we need to have a very manual setup and lose the efficiencies/functionality of wordpress.
-
No opinion here.
In late 2010 we redirected to popular subdomains to folders in the root. The results have been kickass. Kickass.
-
Here is a post from earlier in the year with a similar discussion (didn't see that one before I posted this). Also looks like similar differences of opinion, though some more sources sited. http://www.seomoz.org/q/corporate-blog
Because of the lack of consensus, I'm curious to research more. Just want to make sure I/we didn't miss anything over the past few months.
-
The problem with this idea, it occurs to me on second thoughts, will be comments. Having dynamically user-generated content will be tricky with this workaround.
Aside from that, rsync and W3TC are both enterprise-level stable solutions, so it SHOULD work - but I agree, it's doing something new, and new's always a bit risky.
Would you be able to go into any detail as to why you can't host WP? Is it a hosting company issue, a platform language issue, or something else?
-
James: do you have a source for the statement that Google now treats subs as a key site element?
-
Interesting. I need to research this more. It sounds like it's prone to errors, but maybe not.
-
If I could not have the blog that is going to receive massive work in a subfolder I would be looking for a different platform for the site or a different method of creating the blog.
Placing that blog on a subdomain or on a satelite site is like tossing away great content imo.
-
Google now treats sub domains as a key element of the site
[citation needed]
Though I know you're talking about - http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/08/reorganizing-internal-vs-external.html
However, as far as I'm aware, there's no information yet as to how Google are changing the weighting of these links (or even if they are), so I'd still be wary of charging ahead with a subdomain
-
Can you rsync or otherwise automatically copy content onto your primary web server? If so, there may be a way to combine the best of all worlds.
Set up your Wordpress platform somewhere else - doesn't matter where. Make sure Google isn't crawling it to avoid duplicate content penalties.Install a caching solution like W3 Total Cache which writes the entire blog as static HTML to the disk.
Now, have a frequently-updating automatic synchronisation tool copy those files from the location on your blog server to the local directory on your web server corresponding to yourdomain.com/blog . Set up the same rewrite rules on your main server as W3TC uses on your blog server.
You should now have an automatically-updated static copy of your blog hosted under yourdomain.com/blog . As a bonus, it'll be fast as hell and stable as a large room full of horses.
The actual setup's a bit of a faff, but my (non-pro SEO) intuition is that it'll be the best solution SEO-wise.
-
Thanks for the input, James. Agreed on the external site. I didn't know about subs being treated as a key element now. So other sites linking to posts on the blog (if the blog is on blog.site.com) will still benefit the primary domain?
Having it in a folder is doable, but more difficult to manage ongoing. I think it's a question of 'how much better' is it to have at site.com/blog...
-
If you can not get it onto a sub folder ie site.com/blog then the next best is to have it on a sub domain blog.site.com
Google now treats sub domains as a key element of the site, yet sub folders work better for internal linking.
I would not put it on an external site.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Not sure how we're blocking homepage in robots.txt; meta description not shown
Hi folks! We had a question come in from a client who needs assistance with their robots.txt file. Metadata for their homepage and select other pages isn't appearing in SERPs. Instead they get the usual message "A description for this result is not available because of this site's robots.txt – learn more". At first glance, we're not seeing the homepage or these other pages as being blocked by their robots.txt file: http://www.t2tea.com/robots.txt. Does anyone see what we can't? Any thoughts are massively appreciated! P.S. They used wildcards to ensure the rules were applied for all locale subdirectories, e.g. /en/au/, /en/us/, etc.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SearchDeploy0 -
Google's 'related:' operator
I have a quick question about Google's 'related:' operator when viewing search results. Is there reason why a website doesn't produce related/similar sites? For example, if I use the related: operator for my site, no results appear.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ecomteam_handiramp.com
https://www.google.com/#q=related:www.handiramp.com The site has been around since 1998. The site also has two good relevant DMOZ inbound links. Any suggestions on why this is and any way to fix it? Thank you.0 -
Releasing Multiple Language Blog Articles ?
I was hoping anyone could give me some advice on my situation Our blog is a huge traffic source for us, we frequently release fresh blog articles on our English language website bringing lots of relevant traffic for a variety of different relevant topics Some of these articles would be very useful and relevant for visitors to our German website so i would like to get them translated and posted on our separate German language blog on our separate German website. The article text will not change much as the information is the same for Germany also How should i go about this without running into duplicate content issues with Google I looked into rel=alternate and realized that i cannot use this over two separate websites, i also thought about rel=canonical but it doesn't look like this would be suitable either Can anybody please give me any advice or thoughts on this ?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Antony_Towle0 -
Dilemma: Should we use pagination or 'Load More' Function
In the interest of pleasing Google with their recent updates and clamping down on duplicate content and giving a higher preference to pages with rich data, we had a tiny dilemma that might help others too. We have a directory like site, very similar to Tripadvisor or Yelp, would it be best to: A) have paginated content with almost 40 pages deep of data < OR > B) display 20 results per page and at the bottom have "Load More" function which would feed more data only once its clicked. The problem we are having now is that deep pages are getting indexed and its doing us no good, most of the juice and page value is on the 1st one, not the inner pages. Wondering what are the schools of thought on this one. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | danialniazi0 -
Re-Direct Users But Don't Affect Googlebot
This is a fairly technical question... I have a site which has 4 subdomains, all targeting a specific language. The brand owners don't want German users to see the prices on the French sub domain and are forcing users into a re-direct to the relevant subddomain, based on their IP address. If a user comes from a different country, (ie the US) they are forced on the UK sub domain. The client is insistent on keeping control of who sees what (I know that's a debate in it's own right), but these re-directs we're implementing to make that happen, are really making it difficult to get all the subdomains indexed as I think googlebot is also getting re-directed and is failing to do it's job. Is there are a way of re-directing users, but not Googlebot?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | eventurerob0 -
301 redirects and Blogger - moving blog
Is there any way to add 301 redirects to individual posts on a blogger-hosted blog? We're getting ready to finally move our blog off of Blogger and onto our own webserver. We're probably going to use BlogEngine.net to run it. right now the blog is located at blog.MySite.com. We're probably going to move it to MySite.com/Blog. We don't have any really popular posts and we only really get ~10 visits a day on about 70 posts. Just trying to figure out the best way to handle this without inadvertently shooting myself in the foot.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | _JP_0 -
Can literally any site get 'burned'?
Just curious what people think. The SEOMOZ trust on my site has gone up, all while Google is dropping us in rankings for lots of keywords. Just curious if this can happen to anyone or once you are 100% 'trusted' you're good. We went from 120,000 page views down to about 50,000. All while doubling content, improving the design(at least from a user perspective), and getting more natural links. Seems counter intuitive to Google's mantra of ranking quality. I would guess 'authority' sites never get hit by these updates right? So when you make it you've made it.(at least from a dropping like a rock perspective, obviously you have to keep working). I'm guessing we just need a bunch more quality links but would hate to work on building links, quality content, trust etc for it to be something so finicky long term.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | astahl110 -
Don't want to lose page rank, what's the best way to restructure a url other than a 301 redirect?
Currently in the process of redesigning a site. What i want to know, is what is the best way for me to restructure the url w/out it losing its value (page rank) other than a 301 redirect?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | marig0