Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.

Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.

Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).

Schema.org vs data-vocabulary.org

On-Page Optimization

3

5

10675

Log in to reply

rahijain last edited by

Hi, I am implementing the rich snippets on an e coomerce site.

Should we implement schema.org or data-vocabulary.org?

As i feel data vocabulary is more used by google in showing rich snippets.
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0
sachin.kaushik last edited by

Need to know which is best out of the two.

I also read somewhere that JSON is becoming the standard. Confused!! Please help..
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0
Copstead @rahijain last edited by

Plus today's blog post discusses Rich Snippets. http://www.seomoz.org/blog/a-visual-guide-to-rich-snippets
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0
rahijain @Copstead last edited by

you say so and seomoz also says so. then i am going with schema.org. Just read some negative posts on schema.org. Just wanted to confirm.

Thanks
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 0
Copstead last edited by

schema.org is becoming the standard.

Here is a great post from SEOmoz: Schema.org - Why Your'e Behind if You're Not Using It...
1 Reply Last reply
Reply Quote 1

Got a burning SEO question?

Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.

Start my free trial

Browse Questions

View

From

Sorted by

With category

Explore more categories

Related Questions

Why is Moz's Schema so bare

I use to use Moz as an example by looking at their site using Google's Rich snippet tool, Today I checked and it is so bare with errors https://search.google.com/structured-data/testing-tool/u/0/#url=moz.com What happen?Why the sudden change?
On-Page Optimization | | uBreakiFix

0
Schema for Rebate

Let's say I have a list of rebates available in either a fixed or percentage based format. I'm looking for the most appropriate schema.org code to use for this, currently using aggregateOffer for the list and referencing the name of each rebate, but search console advises that "lowprice" isn't specified, and I only seem to be able to specify a fixed price in the local currency here. I don't think using "lowprice" is appropriate here because this isn't a list of products with the lowest price, but it's a list of rebates to choose from. Is there anything that is more appropriate to use in this case than aggregateOffer?
On-Page Optimization | | meqdiw46ao

0
Schema.org usage when there is no specific value available

Hi, I have a question on the usage of schema structure for reviews and especially for the “description” part. Most of the reviews have feedback included, which is used as “description” in the schema. But what should be done if there is no feedback thus no “description” available? Leave “description” in the schema, without value ("description": "",) or remove “description” from the schema? André
On-Page Optimization | | ConclusionDigital

0
301 vs 410

Hello everyone! I'm going through a large list of old 404 links that search console has given me and a lot of these links need to be 301'd. My question is, should I 410 some of these links if I can't find a good place to 301 to? Or is there another thing I should do that is better practice. Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | KathleenDC

0
Video schema

My question is if for video schema to work is needed for the video to be on your website or you can do a video schema with a youtube video from your youtube channel
On-Page Optimization | | maestrosonrisas

0
Discrepancy between SeoMoz vs Google Webmaster tools

SeoMoz reports over 70 4xx client server errors on my site, but Google Web Master Tools does not report any broken links. There are not any broken links on any of the pages that it is reporting. Could there be another reason for the 4xx errors besides broken links?
On-Page Optimization | | AndyHawkins

0
.us VS .com

In general from what I have experienced a location specific extension such as .co.uk geo-targeted to the same location gives the best results when ranking BUT when I look at results from the US, page after page shows results of .com, surely if my above statement is true then a .us domain extension should rank better then a .com.
On-Page Optimization | | activitysuper

0
The best country specific strategy vs. an incumbent exact match domain

We are the single reseller in our country of a niche software, which has a quite general but non-competitive name. The name is already taken buy others in our country TLD, and in 1st rank. They are not related to our industry/business. Let's say our software is named blah, which could be the best country specific strategy we could have? Register a new country TLD domain with the blah in it? Something like blah-country.tdl. bl-ah.tdl? blah-software? Best Regards
On-Page Optimization | | wppseo

0