My site was hit by the Penguin Update, Now What?
-
My site is very young, having only been up for about a month and a half. Despite being nascent we were seeing a ton of organic traffic.
Enter Google Penguin update....
Traffic is down 40% or so over the past week. So, assuming the damage has been done, the question is, what do we do next to start moving back towards where we were? If we're doing everything everything right do we just chalk it up to the fact that our site is very new and stay the course on original content and link building?
I know you can submit your site for reconsideration which is something that we are going to do this week, but I wonder what else we can do to start edging back to where we were pre-penguin update.
Maybe this would be a good Whiteboard Friday topic.
-
Until the public gets educated on the "Alternatives" we're stuck. Sorry
-
I'll be checking out your site! thanks!
I too was hit very hard by Penguin. I'm still not sure why, and actually, that's the main reason I am now here. I have noticed, at least in my niche, that the big names moved closer to the top of page 1 in Google, which pushed me down!
The big company I compete with has domain authority much higher than mine, they have millions of incoming links, and that's because they're a huge company! I do think the little guy got hurt most, no doubt in my mind.
But I can't change this, so it's best to focus on those things we have control over, and Georg, I think you have mentioned the most important issues. I have been reviewing all my backlinks, and I just discovered that one Site links to m 690 times, yet to only 28 pages.
I'm thinking that 'looks' like spam. So I investigated further, and the topics of the pages linking to me did not add one bit of value and were not relevant in the least. I hate to get rid of 690 backlinks, but I think they are hurting me more than helping me.
-
Frankly, I think it is over for the SEO business.
I agree that a lot of the low value methods and the SEOs who have built a business upon them are in trouble. Imagine how many clients are calling them!
-
Hi Grant,
you are not alone...
My site lost 50% traffic. I've already created a question: http://www.seomoz.org/q/lost-50-google-traffic-in-one-day-panic
The reasons are - probably:
a) over optimization of your site
b) bad links from outer web space...
c) bad anchor texts
I am still investigating why our site was hit that hard.
I've created a new website: http://www.seo-stories.com for all pengiun victims.
Ich hope that helped a bit.
Best wishes,
Georg.
-
Me too... I am down 40%. I used to get traffic on over 7,000 keywords monthly. A have a 500 page website so the usually jargon about "build quality content and you are safe" is a failed strategy.
I think you have to look deeper at Google's big picture strategy (its ugly).
Every time there is a major change in the search algorithm they make all prior SEO work nearly worthless.
Why would Google do that?
Three reasons:
1. They think they own the internet. They have been muscling in on organic search results for years. They now give Google products more and more space on landing pages and using Google maps is a take over of the internet. Do you have any doubt that they will eventually charge for Google maps and thus eliminate the need for a great portion of organic content. Isn't it amazing that they prohibit "link building schemes" yet that is where they get all of their profits i.e., Adwords. The internet was created to be a public resource utility. It's a Google owned corporate asset now and to a great extent they control the value of everyone's website.
2. Google has hijacked the internet. When they reshuffle the search results they create a lot of new losers who need to buy Adwods to recoup traffic. But note, there are not an equal amount of new winners. Many of the top rank positions in my niche are from (sterile) government sites and Wikipedia. (they don't buy Adwords) Neither do they pick up the phone and give people personal advice 24/7 (like I used to).
3. Big brand companies have been pressuring Google for years. Big companies want the little guy out of the internet and with every algorithm they get closer to their goal. Smaller companies don't have the resources to "start over" every 12 months, big companies do.
Frankly, I think it is over for the SEO business. (that's the way Google wants it) How can someone charge people a reasonable fee when Google can shuffle the deck anytime they want and make that work worthless?
It's become an anti-trust issue they need new competitors and consumers need choices. I liked the old search results better... but I don't have the choice and neither does anyone else. I also want to opt out of Adwords and local maps too. Their billion dollar link building schemes is a violation of my SEO policy.
Looking for a new line of work... another attack on the little guy. (it's Pottersville on a global scale)
Good luck..
Bri
-
Google is not looking at reconsideration submissions for the penguin update. I feel your pain. My site is about six month old and we were ranked in the top ten for 33 of our target keywords. Now we only have one in the top ten and the rest are all over 35... We don't have any of the spam stuff google listed... Not sure how to cope.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What is the best way to become a published writer / blogger for bigger industry sites?
I'm a younger SEO manager and wanted to started establishing my name throughout the industry through well written blogs, expert articles, and any advice that is needed. I know a lot of answers will be to start my own blog and establish that and I'll get noticed, but is there a good way to make the first contact with industry sites to get an article or blog post published to their site? Or is it a pretty tight "gotta know someone" inner circle?
Industry News | | MERGE-Chicago0 -
Backlink Query. Unranked pages of High Ranking sites.
Hi, So I was just wondering if someone with more knowledge than myself can answer this question for me. I have a site - currently sat on page 2 of google. On-site optimisation is done, however I am struggling to get backlinks that are from highranking pages. I am new to SEO so need a hand. My understanding of backlinks is that the higher the PR of the site that links to your 'money' site, the better that link is, and that these links are very hard to come by. (something that I am finding). Many times I have found sites that have a high rank and offer for a free listing, only for me to fill in details and get listed on a sub-page that has no ranking whatsoever. So my question is, are these kind of links worth the effort? Do they actually have any effect on rankings? And generally would anyone have any tips on the best sites to get links? Thanks
Industry News | | Chstphrjohn0 -
Google Penguin 2.0 - How To Recover?
Hi all,
Industry News | | chanel27
Last year, we have engaged a SEO company who promised to bring us to the first page on Google. But after 4 months, we actually found out that he might be using doing non quality mass link building tactic and this caused our ranking for all 3 sites we given to him to drop in ranking overnight on 22nd May 2012 after the Google Penguin 2.0 rolled out. Is there anything we can do to recover?1 -
Do rankings return to previous rank after a site has been un-indexed?
My client has had a site since 1996 (the first one was a www subdomain, his current site has no www). He came to my company for SEO about a year ago, after having a WordPress site that was accidentally set to not be crawled/indexed by search engines. We set the site to be indexed and added a blog. Since then, he has had slow increase in keyword rankings (on page 3 or most globally searched terms) but is still nowhere near page 1 for most of his keywords. He thinks my company has done nothing, while I see the keyword improvements as a sign of success - slow, gradual - but going in the right direction. I don't know if he was ranking well before he had a site that was not set to be indexed - but if he was on page one, would he eventually return there? Or do we have to build everything over again?
Industry News | | Alex_Ratynski0 -
Google Webspam Algo Update 24/4/12
Having just checked our clients rankings 95% have not been affected, in fact many have moved up rankings. 1 or 2 have had big drops 😞 Who has been effected by this? The forums are full of people talking about sites being floored from the serp's. it will be interesting to follow the aftermath of this and get some insight into what exactly has changed!
Industry News | | ifluidmedia0 -
Google to Target Overly SEOd Sites
I just watched the video from Barry Schwartz talking about the new Update to come with the Google Algo. Video of his Friday Post: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJqSPT2NXdA I have also started reading on Webmasterworld on this topic: http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/4429947.htm What do you think Google has in the list of changes?
Industry News | | Ben-HPB0 -
Subdomains seen as one site
Earlier this month Google announced that sub-domains are now
Industry News | | AlanMosley
be treated as one site. At first I thought this was good news as I like to use
sub-domains for separation of categories and the like. But what about links
from one sub-domain to the other, they uised to be external links now they are
internal links. If you don’t have many external links, I would say that the
cross sub-domain links would have been important, if you have a lot of external
links then the flow of link juice would be of more benefit. I think overall its
is a good thing. Does anyone have any opinions about this or know of any writings
on the subject since this announcement? http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/08/reorganizing-internal-vs-external.html0 -
How do you value a site that generates no income before it's sold?
Hi, I'm currently creating a number of sites which target the wedding market. Each site is localized and specific to a niche within the wedding market. The intention is to create the site, rank it in the top position of Google and then sell it to a local business within that niche and area. The problem that i am having is that I don't know how to place a value on each site. I have factors taken from Google (using Market Samurai) so I know the broad and phrase match traffic details as well as the Google PPC average prices. My initial thought was to use the Google PPC price and multiply that by the number of organic visitors the site would receive if it was ranked #1 on Google. I appreciate that the PPC figures may be higher than what an advertiser would actually pay per click so I conservatively halved the Google PPC figure given in Market Samurai. Is this a good way of valuing the site or do I need to look at the value per customer to the business that I am trying to sell the site to and work from a conversion factor based on the number of visitors that the site would receive. If the site received 500 visitors per month and 5% of those became customers multiplied by the average profit per customer - that would give a monthly value of the website. I am very unsure as to what the best approach is here and look forward to hearing any advice and ideas from fellow members. Thanks, Michael
Industry News | | XSMedia0