What is wrong with my site?
-
I could use suggestions/input.
My site is consistently being beaten by doorway pages with zero to no content. In fact, on the keyword "lawrenceville plumber" I am being beaten by a KID with a blank wordpress installation.
I really need help determining what my issues are and what I can do to help. According to all of the graders, ranks, etc my site is great. I have written tons of unique content, have added a blog unique articles and self-helps.
Please help!
My site is www.akinsplumbing.net.
Thanks!
-
Wouldn't worry too much about keyword density. It was possibly a factor in the early age of search engines. But today there's no correlation.
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/10-myths-that-scare-seos-but-shouldnt-whiteboard-friday
-
Hi Chuck,
Sorry to hear you're having ranking problems. If your site has been around for awhile, it's usually it's a combination of several factors that come into play.
Short of doing a full site audit, I did notice that a lot of your anchor text seems highly optimized:
http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/anchors?page=1&site=www.akinsplumbing.net%2F&sort=domains_linking_page&source=phrase&target=domainAnd a lot of your links come from the same few sites, including the footer of the aforementioned tattoo parlor. These links are generally found site-wide, in the footer, such as on this page:http://www.dec-international.com/products.html
Also, OSE shows a lot of links from related sites like this: http://bestathensplumber.com/contact-us/ (although it looks like the link has bee recently removed). These are apparently sites owned by your company.
The takeaway is Google will most likely devalue these links, and may even penalize you for not only over-optimization, but for too many inter-linking sites (link-network) If you own multiple sites, it's okay to interlink them a little bit, but in a way that's natural and included in your editorial content.
My best advice would be to try to trim some of these links, and work to replace them with hard-fought editorial links.
Hope this helps! Best of luck with your SEO!
-
Okay, I got my keyword density to 3% and 3.5%. That's about the best I can do. Having plumbing in your company name makes it hard, but I figured out a work around.
Any other suggestions guys? I really appreciate the help. This has hurt us pretty bad!
-
I do my business' SEO. I own a bankruptcy firm, so we're in the same boat SEO wise. I've found that content really helps you move up the rankings. I have a competitor with thousands of inbound links who used to beat the hell out of me, but he never added content.
I blog regularly. It's tough to get in the habit. I try to write three 500 word posts at a time and then schedule them to publish every other day. It helps you Google that you have a fresh site. It also helps you hit the long tail searches like "hair clog in drain."
Also, I second Quilbur. Having two closely related sites can hurt you.
-
The ranking problem is more recent. I will adjust the density to closer to 2% . I was told to stay around 2-6%, but you aren't the first person to advise that. The Plumbing keyword is difficult because it's in our company name.
-
Hi Chuck,
Along with what Johannes mentioned, I noticed that you have two websites.
- Akins Plumbing
- Akins Plumbing and Septic
While these sites are different, the content is very similar and so, you my be beating yourself up with the two. Also, I noticed you have many many links to a tattoo parlor, that may not be helping much either.
A few years ago, I had two sites in a situation such as yours. I got rid of one to save the other. Worked out great! Thats just my two cents.
Best of luck
-
Hello chuckakins,
I noticed that the keyword density for your homepage is a little bit too high.
- plumbing has 6.79 %
- atlanta has 6.04 %
- plumber has 4.53 %
To avoid to be filter for over optimization (especially since Penguin), try to bring the keyword density to a natural level. Around 2 % should be good.
Even though you seem to have a good amount of incoming links and Google in honoring that with a PageRank of 3, a lot of incoming links have the keywords plumbing, atlanta and plumber in their anchor text (-> Opensiteexplorer). To Google that might not seem like the links are build naturally.
Did you always have ranking problems or is that something more recent?
Hope this helps you a little bit.
Johannes
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is it posible to improve site rankings working only with an other site?
Hi everyone, i´ll try to explain a situation is happening to me, i´m goint to try to explain the case (im writing the sites without links for explication purposes. Site 1: Adventurerooms Site 2: Adventureroomsmallorca Site 3: Adventureroomsmadrid (the new site) What happen is that at first there was only Adventurerooms and Adventureroomsmallorca, Adventurerooms was for Madrid and linked to the one in Mallorca too, was kind of giving the information for Madrid but in first page split with a link to Mallorca. In a new strategy we create Adventureroomsmadrid for Madrid, and leave Adventurerooms for Spain (with links to Adventureroomsmadrid and Adventureroomsmallorca. We redirect the info for Madrid in Adventurerooms to Adventureroomsmadrid with 301 redirections. We work during this 3 months in Adventureroomsmadrid making content in the blog, and improving (now Adventureroomsmadrid is Moz 15 (perhaps even more), and Adventurerooms is Moz 10. Surprising Adventurerooms is getting better in its search rankings, even when we took away content from it and even without working well. Adventureroomsmadrid is also improving but not as much as Adventurerooms (i know that is a new site, only 3 months), but Adventurerooms gets better results with no content and only DA of 10. I hope i´ve explain the case with my english so the question is: "Is it posible to improve site rankings working only with an other site?" Thanks in advance
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | webtematica0 -
301 old site to new site?
I have client with an old site - www.bestfamilylawattorney.com - which had a lot of spammy links (and bad rankings). Instead of fixing those issues, we started a new URL - www.berenjifamilylaw.com - with new content and redesign. Should I do a 301 redirect from old to new domain? If the old site was being penalized, would a 301 transfer that penalty? I just want to make sure I don't end up hurting the new site after doing all the work to start fresh. Thanks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mrodriguez14400 -
SEO site Review
Does anyone have suggestions on places that provide in depth site / analytics reviews for SEO?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Gordian0 -
Technical Site Questions
When i do a google cache of our site, i see 2 menus, our developers say that's because the 2nd is for the mobile menu - is that correct, as when i look up other sites that have mobile rendering they only have one menu visible. Plus GWT's has the number of internal links per page at least x2 what they should have - are they connected? Secondly when i do a spider test through http://tools.seobook.com/general/spider-test/ it shows all "behind the scenes text" eg font names, portals, sliders, margins - "font size px" is shown as 17 times and a density of 2.15% - surely this isnt correct as google will be thinking that these are my keywords !? My site is www.over50choices.co.uk Thanks Ash
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AshShep10 -
Why do some sites have several types of sitemap?
Hello Mozzers, I often seem to work on websites with several types of sitemaps - e.g. an html sitemap - an xml sitemap - almost always with identical structure and content. Does anybody know the thinking behind this? Currently looking at site with php and xml sitemap sitting alongside one another. I'm guessing one is for site users to read (and also to aid indexing) and the other for search engines, to further aid indexing. Does Google have any preferences? Is there anything you should be wary of re: Google, if there are multiple sitemaps?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | McTaggart0 -
New Site Structure and 301s
We're moving towards a new site with new site structure. The old site has numerous backlinks to past events that won't be published on the new site. The new site will have about 60 future events that are currently active on the old site as well. I was wondering the best way to move forward with the 301 redirect plan. I was considering redirecting the old site structure to an "archive.ourdomain.co.uk" subdomain and redirecting the 60 or so active events to their equivalents on the new site. Would this be a sensible plan? Also for the active events, is there any difference between: _redirecting the old page to the archive page and then forwarding to the equivalent on the new page _ and redirecting the old page directly to the new page
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | chanm790 -
Not ranking well after site was hacked
My site was hacked and that seemed to have a pretty big effect on search rankings. I'm pretty sure I've gotten the hack completely removed (as of 10/16.) During the hack and even now, all of my posts created after Aug 1 don't rank in regular Google searches at all even if I search for the titles in quotes. But I can tell they are indexed because I see them when I do a site search in Google. And I see that they are cached. Posts from before Aug 1 rank well in Google searches. The issue with August and after posts no longer appearing started in mid September. Prior to that the some of the August posts were actually performing very well. The September date corresponds to when we first started working on removing the hack. It looks like the August and after posts all have a pagerank of 0, whereas the mozrank is much higher. I've request reconsideration from Google and was told that no manual action was taken against my site. I know that's a lot of background, but I'm wondering how long do I need to wait before the August and after posts start ranking? Is there anything I can do in the mean time to address this pagerank issue?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Chris-at-Magoosh0 -
Scapers and Other Sites Outranking
Post panda, there is definitely more talk about scrapers or other (more authoritative) sites outranking the original content creators in the SERPS. The most common way this problem is addressed (from what I've seen) is by rewriting the content and try your hardest to be the first one to be indexed or just ignoring it from an on page standpoint and do more link dev. Does anyone have any advice on the best way to address? Should site owners be looking deeper into their analytics and diagnostics before doing the rewrites?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Troyville0