Why are we not seeing similar traffic patterns in a new market?
-
Good afternoon!
We have a large real estate site with over 400,000 urls. We do pretty well with long-tailed search terms (like addresses--- 123 Main Street, Atlanta GA) so we get a decent amount of traffic (3,500-4,000 uniques a day). 2 months ago we opened up in a new market (Nashville) and hoped to see similar traffic for that market after a few of months, but so far we haven't. In fact, we only get about 200 visits a day. I can't seem to figure out why it's taking so long for us to generate similar traffic in Nashville that we see in Atlanta. All of the Nashville properties are in our sitemap and are being indexed by Google. Any ideas why we aren't seeing similar effects?Thanks in advance for any help you can provide!
David
-
400,000 isn't an unreasonable number of pages on a real estate site if they have reasonable amounts of unique content and the pages are implemented well within the site.
That said, it's much more difficult to pull off with a site that has lower DA & PA and few links.
-
True, I don't think site size will by itself hurt you, but I do think there is something to building your site up over time.
I think having a great first impression goes a long way. If google finds the bathroom stall before it sees the grand lobby then google my just quite at " this is a crap website."
... granted, I've never built a website with 400,000 pages... I mean there are a lot of bugs in the world, but would you read 400,000 pages about pest control?
-
Here are a few of the questions I would start with from what you have asked:
- How much of each site's traffic is coming from Google?
- How many inbound links does the original site have?
- How thin is the content of the new site?
- How quickly were the 400,000 pages added to the new site?
- How many of those pages are indexed by google right now?
- How original is the content?
While domain age in of itself isn't always a factor, a site's history in the search engine is. I am going to assume that your new site is created dynamically. If you simply plop down 400,000 pages then it's going to take some time for google index and evaluate all of those pages. Whereas your older site may have started with more history. It may have begun with a few less pages and gradually built up.
From my own personal experience, I have used the same format on several different websites and while it would seem that since the formula is the same and the search engine is using the same set of rules, I still get varying results. The formula works most of the time so I just move on and let the sites simmer. If formula A never kicks in then I move to formula B.
You may want to try a different city to check your formula A and make sure that your first success wasn't just lucky.
-
Number of URLs alone independent of anything else shouldn't be a reason to randomly deindex a lot of your site to an arbitrary number. Can you offer any more background on your suggestion?
-
You say that you have "400,000 urls" and you do not seem to realize that THIS is the problem!
You need to de-index a lof your site to gain the trust back from Google.
Trust does not come from having 400.000 urls - it comes by having 200 + good pages with original content per location.
-
Hi David,
I'm following up on older questions that are still marked unanswered. Are you still seeing this discrepancy, or has it sorted itself out now that you've had the site up longer? Are you still looking for advice about this issue?
-
It looks like the disparity of traffic is largely due to your recent entry into the market, the primary contributor to the SEO factors already mentioned. Many factors are at play, as usual, and here are some interesting sidenotes:
(According to Wikipedia)
The Atlanta metropolitan area, with 5,268,860 people,<sup id="cite_ref-3" class="reference">[4]</sup> is the third largest in the Southern United States and ranks fourth in the number of Fortune 500 companies headquartered within city boundaries, behind New York City, Houston, and Dallas. Atlanta Metropolitan Area ranks as the 10th largest cybercity (high-tech center) in the US, with 126,700 high-tech jobs (tech jobs=high turnover=more home sales=internet savvy population).
Atlanta is far more dynamic in the real-estate market than Nashville
The Nashville metropolitan area = 1,600,358
Music industry professionals don't tend to move around much, especially country music industry professionals.
My opinion: with time and some SEO effort, you can reduce the traffic gap, but not close it.
-
In order to rank for specific terms you must have relevant links with the right anchor text to those pages. If you have just made more pages and are only linking to yourself then you are effectively trying to just tell everyone that you are an authority without anyone else's opinion. So if you aren't being voted for (ie linked to) by other pages to say that your Nashville pages are what they are then you may just have a whole lot of low authority pages and need to build up more value.
Taking a look at your site you only have a little over 1000 links to your site with most of them going to the domain. deep linking is going to be key to your success or else you are trying to determine your own relevance.
hope this helps
-
This is a side note to the previous comments. You can try to boost your rankings quickly (quick is relative) with social media metrics. This is a real-estate agent in my city, http://hometourgoodness.com/ he gets a lot of interaction on Facebook and Twitter. If you are able to engage in social media you will boost your in-bound traffic, and help serps.
-
For me this is guess work as I don't know the URLs, but is it possible that people in Nashvile use other search terms than you are ranking for or have other ways to search for property? ans do you use those search terms as well? I've seen somthing simular within Germany where it turned out people were using a slightly different version of the keywords.
Are all pages in the Nashville section being measured properly? Is the GA code implemented on all the pages? As you mention that you have only 70% of traffic compared to that of Atlanta.
And I think it could also be a matter of trust. is your brand new in the Nashville area? Than people might be more responsive towards your competitors.
Geddy
-
Hi Barry-
We are not ranking as well for Nashville, but we follow the same formula for links/layout in both markets. We don't have any inbound links to property pages (example: http://clickscape.com/9753-Palmeston-Place-0-Johns-Creek-GA), but we rank on the first page of SERPs in Atlanta for these similar long-tailed terms due to site architecture/navigation. The formula is not working in Nashville and I was just curious if there was a reason why that might be.
Also, you are correct. The search volume in Nashville is about 70% of the volume in Atlanta so that definitely plays a role.
-
Are you ranking as well for terms in Nashville the same as Atlanta?
I would imagine other sites are outranking you and you need to build 'Nashville' specific links into some of your pages to start showing up.
Also are the search volumes for real estate terms as large in Nashville as Atlanta?
A combination of all of these could be the cause of the lower search volumes.
-
All thing being equal, the age of a domain accounts for a very tiny amount of ranking weight, if any at all. It's not really ever a reason I would give for why a website is or is not ranking for any given set of terms.
-
First, are you being outranked by competitors? Try doing some long tail searches similiar to what you get for areas like Atlanta.
If you seem to be ranking for those searches just as well as you normally would, it could be that areas like Nashville have less heavy internet users. Keep in mind that you're likely to have more results for a good ranking result based in NYC compared to the boondocks of Oregon... simply because of the number of people in the area searching for the item in quesiton.
-
Some of the following will be guesswork since you didn't provide any URLs, but I'll try my best. This old (Atlanta targeted) website, has it been around for a (quite) longer time than the newer (Nashville) domain? Besides the amount of links the older domain has most likely collected, domain age appears to influence ranking on its own (even though only slightly, #10 in the ranking factors http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors#ranking-factors). Does the Nashville targeted website have the same amount of local (and related) backlinks as the Atlanta targeted website? You've mentioned that the Nashville website is only live for about 2 months, which I'd consider a really short time to draw any real conclusions to be honest.
With some more time and the same effort as you've put into the Atlanta targeted website, I'm sure the new one will perform in a similar fasion!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does Search Console data include GMB traffic? Branded CTR is 37.8%- Good or Bad?
Hey all, Per Search Console our branded keyword CTR is 37.8%. But when that keyword is searched our GMB listing shows up on top of the #1 result. For the same 90 day period GMB shows another 35% visits to our GMB (based on the number of impressions and visits to our GMB page) listing when the same keyword is searched. My question is this. Does Search console data include clicks that came from our GMB listing or not? My thinking is like this: If GMB traffic is not calculated in search console then it means that 72.8% of people looking for our brand will end up on our site on way or another 9organic #1 result plus GMB listing visits) We are also doing PPC for this very keyword that has gets almost 20% of the remaining traffic. So after adding all up we are loosing about 8% of our branded traffic to people who are doing adwords. When you search our brand you normally see 2, 3 competitor's adwords ads. Does anyone know how this works exactly? And if you don't mind sharing your branded keyword CTR's, so I can compare to ours please. I would love to compare to a site that actually has a GMB listing ranking for the same keyword Thanks in advance, Davit
Reporting & Analytics | | Davit19850 -
Seeing very few pages analysed re: Mobile usability, in Google Seach Console - why?
Hi Mozzers, Under Mobile Usability, in Google Search Console, I am seeing very few website pages getting analysed - 10 out of 40 static pages, on the website in question. Is this to be expected or does this indicated an indexing problem on mobile?
Reporting & Analytics | | McTaggart0 -
Organic search traffic down 60% since 8/1/18\. What now?
I have a small health & fitness blog, and my Google search traffic suddenly dropped 60% around August 1 (I've attempted to link an image). My rank has dropped for 86 keywords. I have no manual penalty, so I'm guessing I was affected by the algorithm change. My technical skills are VERY limited. I've tried to find answers on my own, but every time I try to "fix" something, I only seem to make it worse. I do seem to have some structural/performance issues with my site (e.g., lots of 404 errors from uninstalled plugins and unwanted permalinks). I asked my server for assistance (I used managed Wordpress hosting), and they said they couldn't help. As you can imagine, this is quite devastating, and I have no clue where to go from here. I don't know if I'm allowed to link to my site here, but it's mommyrunsit dot com. Any assistance is greatly appreciated. Thanks. Sharon 0lPu4wY
Reporting & Analytics | | RoniFaida1 -
Google Analytics unexplainable traffic spike
Viewing this report **Behaviour > Site content > All pages **with primary dimensions of **Page ** and **Page title **are showing different results for one specific page on our site. We noticed a huge spike in pageviews and entrances to that specific page on our site. The user flow report shows traffic going through and from the page (in high volume) from other pages on the site which suggests that it's not the usual case of spam referrals. When I view the report above by page, I get unrealistic data. Over 600% increase in pageviews and over 900% increase in entrances. When I view by page title however, I get realistic results. Can anyone help shed some light on why these two reports will be different? Anyone else seeing similar issues?
Reporting & Analytics | | OptiBacUK0 -
Does this traffic drop look like Penguin to you?
Dear Community In early October, I noticed a sharp drop of the rankings of the main KW of a website I manage: idee-sol.fr. This, of course I immediatelly attributed to penguin 2.1. While researching on the experience other webmasters have had with this unfortunate situation, I noticed that most of them had very sharp drops of traffic in a relatively small time, e.g.: a drop of 80% in a couple of days. But on idee-sol, the drop looks less steep yet equally worrying. Was the cause of this traffic/ranking drop due to penguin 2.1 exclusively or to penguin + something else (or not penguin at all?) I'm including an image of the "non paid search" report of analytics. dPnphnr
Reporting & Analytics | | Masoko-T0 -
Our Firefox organic traffic seems to have been re-allocated to direct - anyone know why?!
In Google Analytic, the majority of organic traffic via Firefox browsers to one of our websites suddenly dropped off, and an immediate lift in direct traffic via Firefox browsers appeared. This trend has continued ever since. I've searched to find Firefox releases that might have affected it (eg. security/cookie settings), but haven't been able to find anything, or talk of this happening to other people, and the anomaly doesn't appear in our other website analytics either...anyone have any ideas?! The attached GA graphs show Firefox browser versions 21.0 and 22.0, but it's the same story across all versions. (You can also see that I'd also filtered out traffic via IOS 6 and Android 4 operating systems to remove any effect from these known issues). Thanks for any help that you can offer! kPRnrcd.png dy0Bjg7.png
Reporting & Analytics | | HubMDP1 -
My website traffic drop two times
Hi all, on our website www.watchalyzer.com I have unique content that we are writing especially for this online magazine. In last two months our traffic dropped two times. First time on October 20th and after 20 days traffic got back on November 10th. Second time traffic dropped on November 15th and it is still down Does somebody have idea what could be reason for this and how it can be fixed? thanks, Nikola
Reporting & Analytics | | GearyLSF0 -
For an optimized site, any available stats / guesstimates on what is avg % of traffic to homepage vs. second-level pages?
I'm interested in passing this info on to a client who experienced a period of time when an incorrect GA code was installed on their homepage. They were able to get Google stats on second level pages only. This is a site that gets 80 + % of visits from organic search engine referrals. They do minimal advertising. Thanks in advance.
Reporting & Analytics | | alankoen1230