Do i need a new dedicated server to increase my website speed
-
Hi, i have been talking to my hosting company about my site. I am having major problems with the speed of the site. My site is www.in2town.co.uk
Ever since i had to redesign my site after a major mistake was made by the hosting company, my site has been running slow and i have tried everything to sort this out including moving to a dedicated server.
The trouble is nothing is working and now my hosting companny have told me that i need a new dedicated server which will make it faster.
My site is in joomla and the hosting company have told me that the dedicated server below will make the site run faster, but shall i trust them or find another hosting company.
Intel i3 540 3.06 Ghz HT 4MB S-Cache
$219/mo $289/month500GBStorage6GBRAM10TBBandwidthI am using the following to test the speed of my site http://tools.pingdom.com/fpt/#!/r0spOGObd/www.in2town.co.uk and http://gtmetrix.com/reports/www.in2town.co.uk/kVV1mTDcThe trouble i have is, when you try loading the home page it is slow and when you try moving around the site it is slow.Can anyone please give me some advice.
-
I have seen your site and you have an excesive amount of files (scripts and images).
Two easy Joomla optimizations:
-
Reduce script (JS) count from 11 to 5 or 4. I recommned to install this joomla plugin for compression and packing: http://extensions.joomla.org/extensions/core-enhancements/performance/site-performance/7350
-
You could add a lazy loading plugin for improving image loading. I recommned this extension for Joomla: Lazy Loading Images
As Ryan mentions I would hire an experienced developer, but meanwhile this two plugins will make the difference.
-
-
Examples of images which appear distorted:
1. The below image size is 188 x 268. You are presenting it on your site as 300x218. There are two issues. First, the distortion. Secondly, you are forcing each user's browser to resize the image on page load which is a page speed issue.
http://www.in2town.co.uk/images/stories/soaps/sunitacorry.jpg.pagespeed.ce.5q59UUOvlk.jpg
2. This image seems to have been resized improperly and appears distorted to me. http://www.in2town.co.uk/images/stories/showbiz/300x218xalex-reid.jpg.pagespeed.ic.iCAezngCuF.jpg
It is my best guess you are obtaining images and resizing everything to 300x218. This work would best be done by a graphic artist.
Please take to heart what Keri shared. Ideally your site should have the following support at the very least: graphic artist/designer, web developer, writer. If you are filling the role of the writer that is fine, but at this time you do not have the skills in the other areas.
You are fighting for traffic in a competitive niche. Others have more staff and budgets. You can still compete but you require some help. The great thing about web development and graphic design is you can learn enough in a day to make your own web page or re-design an image. The challenge is it takes years and dedication to become skilled at these areas, and many people tackle these areas and get themselves into trouble.
I get the feeling you are asking a lot of people a lot of questions, and therefore you are receiving a lot of answers. Your current approach is a recipe for disaster. The "free advice" you are receiving is quite expensive.
-
There are lots of issues with the site many of which should be a quick fix which you can do yourself. Here's some starting points
1. You have a lot of Javascript files, look to combine some of them and then minify them (removing the excess spaces and line breaks), you can find tools online which will do this for you
2. Move some of the javascript files to the bottom of the page, especially the ones which are not needed before the page completes such as the social plug-ins.
3. Compress the images. You can optmise the image by "saving them for web" (as adobe cal it). You should be able to find a nice balance between file size and quality. If you have gif's consider using pngs instead
4. minify and combine your CSS files if you can
5. If the web server support compression (which it will do), have that enabled
6. You have some duplicate javascript and CSS files on some pages, these will not help you.
7. Some of your images, for instance http://www.in2town.co.uk/images/news/davidcameron2.jpg.pagespeed.ce._lClKIKud-.jpg, is being resized within the HTML http://www.in2town.co.uk/latest-uk-news/david-cameron-could-be-putting-the-uk-at-risk-with-defence-cuts which means you are loading an image bigger than you intend to use it, scale it back to the correct size and that'll help
-
thank you ryan and everyone else. can you tell me more about flickr and i will drop you an email. also can you give me some examples of the images that are not great.
i think one of the major problems i have had is, the template it self, it is from gavick.com and i do not think it has been put together properly.
i am not sure if anyone can confirm this but i am using the world news template. if anyone has advice on template clubs that offer a good magazine layout that is put together properly then please do let me know.
can you confirm about what the developer told me, he said the site is taking to long to contact the server. the reason why i am asking this is, if i am going to be throwing money at the site and it is a server issue as well then i need to get a new hosting company.
this morning i had it saying that it was taking 4 seconds for the server to respond. the hosting company is tmd in america.
the developer seems to think that i needed a new hosting company instead of increasing my package.
all this advice has been great, thanks
-
One thing nobody has brought up is what your time is worth, and the opportunity cost of trying to do so much yourself.
If you are spending four hours doing something that someone else could do in an hour, that's four hours that you've not been earning income by having appointments with clients, or four hours that you could have spent writing content where you're the expert.
One thought for a cost-effective way to do things yourself would be to go take classes at the UK equivalent to the community college. Take a class in Joomla and learn how to put together a site from a professional, and learn how to set up a development site for testing so people don't see the results of a test gone bad on your live site. Take a class in photoshop and digital image techniques so you can have professional-looking images on your site.
-
With regards to a joomla expert, feel free to shoot me an e-mail or call my office. I have an awesome Joomla group who is also quite inexpensive.
I have to be upfront with you. I have concerns about someone performing the requested work on your site for two reasons. First, when a site has multiple issues and someone works on fixing one particular issue, it may cause other aspects of the site to break due to poor site design. Secondly, you are working on the site at the same time making changes which is a major concern as well. I would suggest with whatever developer you work with, you will need to stop working on the site and trust the developer reports. I know it can be nerve racking when you are dependent on the site's income, but you are in a bad spot and even if everything goes perfect, you will still not be in a great spot but hopefully a bit better off.
All of your images appear to be 300 x 218 which is fine, but the images were not professionally re-sized. Several of them appear distorted which is a problem on any site's home page, but especially a fashion magazine site.
From a pure loading speed perspective, loading that many images from one local server will always be a speed issue. With that said, once the site is optimized and the page is loading better locally, a properly configured CDN will help. Another option would be using an image hosting service such as flickr which will take care of that for you.
-
thought i would share what my hosting company has just sent me
Well indeed the loading speed should be better with your new server. However you should note that we will also have to reinstall all of your caching engines and other speeding programs which will increase the performance of your web-site. However since you will receive more resources for your web-site indeed the loading speed should be increased.
Regarding the reports you are referring to you should note that the loading time of 3.5 seconds for a web-site with that many pictures and elements is a quite good loading speed and for every loading speed you will always get the time for which the pictures need to be loaded. In other words no matter what is the loading time (even if it is 1 second) you will always see the loading time and connecting time to the server as part of the global loading time (for example 1 second)
-
thanks donford. the hotel reviews section was like that because i have been working on the page and now sorted it out. i was just changing the width.
the footer has only just been put on there and was through the advice from a seo guy who said many of the popular magazines do it like that at the moment, so i thought i would give it a try and see how it works. going to give it a week then may take it down. got some more items to put on it.
the site is a work in progress, so adding things all the time but the major issue i have is trying to find out the problem on the speed. for example, going from the home page to the travel section it takes ages to load
what i could do with is a recommendation of a joomla expert to look at the site and see what the problem is and then i can then pay them to solve it.
as mentioned, i did hire someone and all they told me was the problem was the server and said that the site is taking ages for the server to respond, but that does not answer my question of why it takes a while from the home page to go to the travel section.
i will in a year or so get the whole site rebuilt but at the moment i am working on a small budget and need to work on the speed issue.
i tested a site after the developer guy said about the server. i got a site that has nothing on it and then put it through the tools as above, and the sites were coming back around 2 to three seconds and was showing a time delay from the server.
the only other thing the developer said to me was, are you sure you are on a dedicated server, then he checked and said i was although he found two sites on there that should not be on there. when i approached my hosting company they said it was a mistake but not on there part, they said they were not sure how the sites got on there and said it was a technical issue but the site is ok now
-
Diane,
I am doing my best to help but you are in a tough and perhaps impossible situation. Let's use a car analogy. You have car problems. You know the car is not running right but you are unsure what is wrong. The proper step would be to take the car to an expert mechanic for a full diagnosis. Once you have the car looked at by a true expert whom you can trust, you will have all your answers.
You can say "replacing the car is out of the question" but if the car requires major repairs, the cost of repairs might exceed the costs of replacement.
Your request is very dangerous because if you are not careful, you will find someone who will do exactly what you are asking. You may find someone who will ignore everything and just spend a few hours on optimizing the loading speed. You may have serious issues with your site that are being covered up. That is likely the case.
If you do not have the money to have the site properly fixed or rebuilt, then give it up. If you continue to push this position, you run a strong risk of being taken advantage of and losing even more money.
-
I have to get on board with Ryan here. I'm a web developer first and a SEO guy second. Your site doesn't look finished from a development standpoint.
In 3 clicks I found 3 pages with problems.
http://www.in2town.co.uk/Benidorm-News-and-Benidorm-Hotel-Reviews
Huge content column is squished to maybe 30 pixels due to add blocks. Huge turn off.
http://www.in2town.co.uk/Cheap-Flights-Gatwick
No content..?
And root http://www.in2town.co.uk/
Footer is all weird
I point these things out not to criticize you but to hopefully indicate that maybe there is some better way to spend your money initially. I would look to the Joomla forums for help with these issues and the optimization problem. On the surface it looks the site needs to finish its development cycle before you start evaluating dedicated servers. You may find that fixing the existing problems helps with the optimization issue and cost you less in the long run.
Hope this helps,
-
building a new site is out of the question, but how much do you think someone would charge to look at the site and speed it up.
i did get an expert involved the last time i asked this question and they checked the site out only for two hours as that all i had, and they said there was a delay from my hosting company. they said the site was having problems because the site was waiting for my hosting server to respond.
unfortunatly they did not give me much more than that and i was not impressed with the service. i wanted more answers than that. i know two hours was not long but i wanted to see what service i would get for my money before paying any more.
as with mechanics, you can get a good one and another who thinks they are a taxi driver and take you for a ride and i think the last one did just that.
-
You have a huge imbalance Diane. You are paying too much for hosting and not enough for web development. You have a basic Joomla site. If I recall you do not even have a shopping cart or any other major components.
I can't find the right analogy right now but I'll try this one....if your car is not running well you need a mechanic to fix it. Changing to supreme gasoline isn't going to fix it. Even changing to jet fuel wont help. You are throwing money at the problem.
I am worried because you have asked this question before, you have received a solid answer, but you keep asking. Eventually someone will say "sure, go ahead with the bigger server". If that is what you want, go for it.
-
the trouble i have is, the cost of having it rebuilt is not in my budget for at least another two years which is a huge headache. not sure what is vps. at the moment i am with tmd hosting.
the hosting company claim that if i get a bigger dedicated server then my problems will go away. i already pay around 150 dollars each month for the dedicated server that i am using
-
That dedicated server is overkill for your site. What you need is an experienced Joomla developer to review your entire site. As I recall from speaking with you previously, your site was not professionally built. It likely needs to be rebuilt by a professional developer. At the very least, it needs to be thoroughly reviewed.
I have a dedicated server similar to the one you mention and it is fantastic. It can hold dozens of sites like yours. You have a basic, low volume Joomla site.
You have VPS hosting now, correct? If so that is likely enough. You asked before and my advice was to rebuild your site. You can see inhouseseo is offering similar advice now. You can have the best server in the world but if your site is not properly built and optimized, it will load slowly.
You are looking at spending ?$220 - $290/month for hosting. Put that money into web development instead.
-
The CDN you used may not have been a good one. Akamai is a good CDN but it can be relatively expensive.
If I were you, I would use the page optimizer tool from Google. It is free and very useful. Plus, it is provided by the search engine that ranks your site.
If you are not tech savvy, you can hire and knowledgeable IC from sites such as Odesk, and have them help you with the tasks for a very low cost.
-
i have tried a cdn and it did not work out for me. when i had the cdn which i used through amazon, i was getting a lot of waiting time for the cdn which was making my site slower.
I am not a technical expert and unfortunatly do not have the funds to get an expert on board. the site is in joomla and it seems when i go from one page to another, so for example go from the home page to health section there is a long delay.
i am using gzip to compress the files but not sure how to do any of the others you have listed. i have dealt with the image size issue but cannot reduce the number of images as i need them.
-
The hosting service or server is a major factor, but it is not the only factor. If I were you, I would first focus on the issues that can and should be addressed on the site itself:
-
Compiling code into as few files as possible
-
Compressing the files
-
Making sure the code is written as efficiently and error-free as possible
-
Limiting the number and size of images that need to be loaded
-
Tweaking the code so important elements are loaded first
-
Making sure CSS is clean and the styling is done via CSS as opposed to done through the coding itself
-
Validating the code
-
You may want to consider a CDN
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Shall i index double pages of my website as compared to my competitors?
a:my competitors has indexed 10 pages (checked it with site:abcd.com and found 10 results) b:what if i index 20 pages of my site and create a lot of content which is also better than my competitors who will have the edge?
Reporting & Analytics | | calvinkj0 -
Page Speed or Site Speed which one does Google considered a ranking signal
I've read many threads online which proves that website speed is a ranking factor. There's a friend whose website scores 44 (slow metric score) on Google Pagespeed Insights. Despite that his website is slow, he outranks me on Google search results. It confuses me that I optimized my website for speed, but my competitor's slow site outperforms me. On Six9ja.com, I did amazing work by getting my target score which is 100 (fast metric score) on Google Pagespeed Insights. Coming to my Google search console tool, they have shown that some of my pages have average scores, while some have slow scores. Google search console tool proves me wrong that none of my pages are fast. Then where did the fast metrics went? Could it be because I added three Adsense Javascript code to all my blog posts? If so, that means that Adsense code is slowing website speed performance despite having an async tag. I tested my blog post speed and I understand that my page speed reduced by 48 due to the 3 Adsense javascript codes added to it. I got 62 (Average metric score). Now, my site speed is=100, then my page speed=62 Does this mean that Google considers page speed rather than site speed as a ranking factor? Screenshots: https://imgur.com/a/YSxSwOG **Regarding: **https://six9ja.com/
Reporting & Analytics | | Kingsmart1 -
Do Lot of Tracking via Tag manager Increase Bounce Rate?
Hello Expert, I am doing lots of tracking for my ecommerce site but I am not sure reason for increase in bounce rate as my traffic also increase but I want to make sure that my tracking not affecting my bounce rate. I do tracking via page views, events, custom html, etc so for all the applicable tags Non-Interaction Hit - I set "True" so I am right here? Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | dsouzac0 -
Drop in indexation but increase in organic traffic
We've had a puzzling drop in indexed pages on our ecommerce website. My crawl returns just over 25k items. Until 19/6 we had about 23-24k indexed. Then we experienced a sudden drop from 19/6 to 26/6: from 23,400 to 18,999, losing 4.4k pages from one week to the next. At the same time, our organic traffic has not decreased, it actually increased, however, it's only been a couple of weeks so that may be coincidence. A few things that have happened during the past few weeks: 31/5: we implemented pagination on category pages to avoid issues with duplicate content - could it be that this led to a decrease in indexed pages 3 weeks later? However, I can only find about 1.5k pages in my crawl that are page 2+ 18-19/6: we had some website outages over the weekend; as a B2B business, we don't get much traffic over the weekend, so I can't see an impact to traffic. However, the following week, indexation dropped by another 250 (then stayed the same this past week), so I don't think this was a factor. 21/6: we retired another website and migrated it to our main website. However, all pages were redirected to existing pages so no new pages were created for the migration. This doesn't really explain a decrease in indexation, but may account for some of the increase in organic traffic; however not all as the retired website hardly got any organic traffic. So, should we be worried? As our website is quite large, it would probably be quite difficult to pin point exactly which pages dropped off the index, but a loss of 19% of pages is quite significant. Then again, it doesn't appear to have negatively impacted organic traffic... Have you got any suggestions for what I should be looking at to find out what happened? Should I be worried at this point? I will definitely continue to have an eye on how our organic traffic (and indexation) develops but I am not sure if there is anything I can do at this point. I'd appreciate your advice on this, to make sure I am not missing something blindingly obvious. Thanks! RmWaNib JJm4tC3
Reporting & Analytics | | ViviCa10 -
The differences between New Users to User
Hi, Someone know the exact differences between the following Google Analytics metrics: "New Users" "User" Hope to get your support. Thanks in advance.
Reporting & Analytics | | Kung_fu_Panda0 -
Re-Launched Website: Developer Fogot to Remove noindex tags.
Our company's website has maintained decent rankings for the last 12 years we've been in business for our primary keywords. We recently had our website rebuilt from the ground up, and the developers left the noindex tags on all of our 400+ pages when we launched it. I didn't catch the error for 6 days. During which time, I used the Fetch feature in Google, submitting a site-wide fetch, as well as manual submissions for our top 100 URLs . In addition, every page that was indexed previously had a 301 set up for it, which was pointing to a destination with a noindex.
Reporting & Analytics | | yogitrout1
I caught the error today, and the developer removed the tags. Does anyone have any experience with a situation similar to this? In the SERPs, we are still ranking at this moment, and it's displaying our old URLs, and they are 301 redirecting just fine. But, what happens now? For 6 full days, we told Google not to index any of our pages, while also using the Fetch feature, contradicting ourselves.
Any words of wisdom or advice as to what I can do at this point to avoid potential fall out? Thanks0 -
Hi, my website suddenly fell to the sixth page. All of the keywords. Is this sandbox?
www.enakliyat.com.tr this is my website when, i write the google "enakliyat" i found my website in te sixth page. Two days ago my website was on the first in google. Do not understand what it is.
Reporting & Analytics | | iskq0 -
Implications of Google discontinuing Website Optimizer
Hi Guys, As most of you probably know, Google is discontinuing Website Optimizer and introducing Experiments within Google Analytics. However, doesn't this mean that now, every site you want to run an experiment for has to be using Google Analytics? This is possibly one of the motivations for them making the change I guess? I also find it inconvenient that every 'experiment' now has to be based on improving a pre-defined goal in Google Analytics. This means that for a lot of situations we'll be creating goals just for the experiment and the clients actual goal conversions will appear quite inflated. I guess we'll just have to filter the new 'goals' out from the actual goals.
Reporting & Analytics | | David_ODonnell1