Website Hit by Penguin Update Rising Back From The Dead?
-
I have a website that had been hit quite hard by the Google Penguin update, losing about 75% of its traffic. The website dropped to positions 300 - 400 for it's most significant keywords.
The website had some unnatural links but not that much, maybe about 10 to 20 unnatural links and I've had them all removed about a month ago by the SEO company (submitcomfort.com).
Another issue with this website is that it was hacked in early 2012 and hackers used a writeable directory to store porn stuff (my website has absolutely nothing to do with porn!). That said, the website acquired lots of backlinks from porn and warez websites.
But today I noticed that impressions are now up by 23% and clicks are up by 54% according to Google Webmaster Tools and it's now ranking in positions 30 to 50 for it's main keywords.
So my question is: was that a penalty that's just been lift off? How can it come back from the dead like this?
I'm investigating before reinvesting time and money in this website because I'm not sure if this is temporary.
Thank you
-
I think you could be right. I've seen a lot of people saying their SERPS are moving (either up or down) and of course everybody starts to wonder if something is happening Penguin wise. But as the day moves on, I'm seeing more Panda related issues in the forum than Penguin.
-
@marie I don't think it's a penguin update happening now, it might be a panda refresh, as last week itself matt cuts said next penguin update will be after few months because it's an early stage. Check seoroundtable's blog about it
-
There were indeed some duplicate content issues as I set a lot of pages to "noindex" (I forgot to mention this earlier).
That said, the website was hit on April 24 so I assume that the Penguin update was the major cause of drops in rankings.
-
Link Research tools by Chris Cemper has just released a "link detox tool" that you can use once for a tweet.
It highlights the most suspect links (based on a number of factors) making it "quick and easy" to identify dodgy pages with links to your site
Our websites haven't been hit by any penalties, but there are over 100 suspect links reported that i will manually go through to confirm, and then send removal requests where necessary.
http://www.linkresearchtools.com/news/link-detox-clean-backlink-profile/
-
If it wasn't ranking for it's brand name it certainly sounds like a manual penalty rather than Penguin.
Regarding the unnatural links messages Google definitely did start sending them before June of 2012. The big batch of 700,000 that got sent out to people happened in Jan/Feb 2012.
I'm thinking that there was something else going on here such as a malware issue, accidental noindexing, a robots.txt problem or something else. Another possibility is if there was a duplicate content issue. For example, let's say there was a lot of text on your homepage that was duplicated elsewhere. Then, if the issue was corrected you could have regained your rankings.
At this point, really, it's a mystery, but the good news is that you are ranking again! Woohoo!
-
Interesting to hear a possible positive story of a site begining to recover from Google changes.
It sound like you have taken some positive action in rectifying the issues you became aware of, which is what Google is saying webmasters should do - so well done.
It would seem Google has picked up on this and re-indexed the site accordingly.
-
By the way, the website wasn't even ranking in the top 10 positions for it's own brand name... Now it's back to #1 and all it's social networking pages (FB page, Twitter page, etc.) are following just after.
-
No I didn't get the unnatural links warning in WMT but that was at the time Google didn't send any warnings (late April 2012). Google started to send warning only in late June I think.
-
I'm confused. Did you have an unnatural links warning in your WMT? Did you have a warning of malware in your WMT?
I'm guessing this is more to do with the porn on your site and recovery was connected to the removal.
With that being said, there are some grumbles around the SEO forums of something going on. It certainly is possible that a Penguin refresh is happening, but no official word yet.
-
Did you send a reconsideration request to Google? => No
-
I used the same company that had built the links (submitcomfort.com). They charged me $250 to do so but this isn't only for the website discussed here, it's for 4 of my websites.
It was easier this way as they had access to the accounts they used to post the articles / backlinks (articlesfactory.com, articlealley.com, etc.)
-
Honestly, I did nothing but ask the SEO company to remove the links.
This wasn't one of my most lucrative websites so I stopped updating it and focused on the most lucrative ones.
Come to think of it, I also removed a WP plugin which added keywords from incoming searches to the sidebar. I was concerned it could be perceived as keyword stuffing by Google.
My website had been hit twice by the Penguin update (1.0 and 1.1).
-
Congratz on the recovery. Can you share more on the service you've used to remove the links ? (process and all).
Thanks.
-
Good job in recovering.
If you were effected by penguin, there are a few things you have to consider.
You can have been effected and notified by Google in GWT that your site has a unnatural link profile thus they are penalizing you till they are removed.
Another is that the penguin update caused your's link profile to be less valuable thus pushing down your rankings.
If you did remove those links, it should be a reason why rankings have increased to near or close to where they were before.
Another thing is that even though someone hacked the site, Google won't go penalize you for it. If you removed all the harmful malicious things, they won't punish you. As to the porn and warez links, they are usually and mostly nofollow links.
Continue removing any and all bad links and continue link building and your ranking will improve. Getting from 2nd page to 1st page can hugely increase your traffic.
-
All penalties from Google expire - none of them last forever. So it's quite possible your penalty has expired. It sounds like the unnatural link removal has been noticed by the algorithm. While you won't receive a message about this, it will silently lift the penalty if the problem has been resolved.
-
What have you changed on the website other than remove the bad backlinks and get rid of the porn directory?
Did you send a reconsideration request to Google?
Have you been updating the site with new content?
Has the SEO company been building more links?
From what I have read, It looks like you are starting to recover.There is no way to know for sure unless you give it a month or 2. Just keep getting great back links with brand terms and check your progress in a month or two. If all looks good, i would say its safe to assume the penalty has been lifted..
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
All backlinks not showing on my website
hey folks, i am fairly new to SEO and i have noticed that i have backlinks that tools like ubersuggest or SEM rush are nothshowing my product is lazyapply.com. -> It's an automated job search application can anyone suggest me what should id do ? PS - for example i have backlink from crunchbase.com but my website is not showing me that
Link Building | | viveklazy0 -
Free tool which includes a link back to my site
On one of my sites I provide a free tool to other webmasters to use that allows them to copy some code to use the free tool on their website and under the tool on it says "Powered by: mysite.co.uk" with a link to "mysite.co.uk". Now I have no real control over which sites can come and use this free tool (a tool to test how fast an internet connection is), on the whole though it is aimed at a specific niche but a range of sites do use it which means good or crap sites can pick up the free code to place into their sites. The link to mysite.co.uk is now always mysite.co.uk as the anchor text, I used to use the websites name (which is the actual name of the URL - link to site at end of post) so the links were keyword rich but only to my sites genuine name, however I now just leave it as the URL to my site. I am not aiming to do anything untowards with the linking other than to get the acknowledgement that it was provided for free by my site, however I'm wondering if google etc will be able to tell they are natural and not dodgy? My site is: http://bit.ly/MsNQwS (n.b. a new improved test is being created before anyone says it's not accurate). 🙂
Link Building | | Wardy0 -
Domain name holding pages link back, good or bad?
We are a web design and hosting company http://www.spiralsites.com But when we register domains for clients, or they take email only or a name is parked we have it using a holding page which can be seen as follows: http://www.jcevents.co.uk/ is this a good thing? Bad thing? Could it would it should it benefit our rankings? Should we do more to make it look less like our main site and actually try to use it better to help rank our other services pages?
Link Building | | spiralsites0 -
What would you do about dead inbound links?
Hey guys, I recently asked a question similar to this, but wanted to spark up a bit of a discussion around it to see what everyone's feelings were on it. The web is always changing - as we're all too aware - so links you may have obtained (by however means) let's say 2 years ago may not be 'active' now. By that I mean you may have had a link from "example_-website.com" in 2010 and now "example-_website.com" is no longer an active website - but still shows a parked domain. The thing is... this parked domain is still cropping up in OSE, suggesting that Google may still believe there's a link there - and may not have re-crawled that site to prove otherwise. The issue I've had with this is an SEO company built links to the sites I'm working on now (one of the sites has been penalised as a result of their link building). These links aren't 'active' anymore and when viewed on OSE, they just head straight to a parked domain with no visible (or in-source) link to my site. What are everyone's feelings on this? What would you all do? I'm in two minds whether to re-write a section of the website.... but I'm swaying towards creating better content and NOT re-directing the old URLs to it (just contact the decent links and ask for a change of link). Looking forward to seeing your responses and speaking to you all! Nick
Link Building | | Danapollo0 -
Links from Real Estate Websites Link Page, Do or Don't?
It seems that real estate sites have at times been under heavier scrutiny from the search engines. But real estate agents get networking, which makes acquiring those links a little bit easier. Plus with localization of search, I think real estate sites may give off a good GEO scent. Should SEO's go for links from real estate websites? Does a reciprocal link devalue said links?
Link Building | | Thos0030 -
How do I back track Broken Links?
SEOMOZ is great, it told me all the pages with 404 errors, however what would be more useful is if it told me where those links were located? Is this not available through this site, or am I just not seeing that information? If anyone knows of a how to, that is easy to moderate in difficulty to back track broken links I would appreciate it.
Link Building | | ENSO0 -
Link from an app to a website?
I know someone who has a phone app and wants to put a link to my website in the app. Are there any SEO benefits from this at all or would it only be good for generating traffic?
Link Building | | mascotmike0