Changing my site (dramatically)
-
I am about to do a complete site change. I am going to WordPress. I am ranked #2 on SERPS. Will I lose rank for changing everything on my site? I have 500 pages indexed but I am about to have 30k indexed. It is a real estate site that is switching from a "framed" solution, to a listing indexed solution.
If I make good use of my keywords etc (on site optimization) will I be at risk of losing risk just for changing my site?
-
I have thousands of duplicate content warning.
I am using a hosted server/realtor package that doesn't let me see the source code. I basically have duplicates of every page on my site some how. I've used the company for 8 yrs though. I am in deep trouble. I fear I can't stay with them.
-
Joseph,
In scenarios like these, I put together a site map and review the overall value of the site and what it's providing to it's users.
Once I know what the value that I am currently providing, I put together an action plan (301 redirects, site optimization, site architecture etc...) with the proposed site changes and see if it will benefit the visitor by restructuring the site.
Once you are able to visualize the overall flow of the old site and the new site then you make decisions on whether or not it's worth while to move forward. Keep in mind that whatever you are doing has to give users a reason to use your website and stay on it.
It's possible you should start with some conversion optimization of certain pages to find where your leaks are, try and plug them and keep forging forward.
If you find that it's impossible to plug the leaks in your current structure than you may need to do what you are describing in your post.
-
No, no - if you set up the 301s then the originals don't have to remain. A visiting browser knows right away that the old page is gone and has bene permanently replaced.
However, Egol's advice is spot-on. This is complicated, and you have a LOT of pages involved. Your best bet is to hire an expert to help you with this. It may cost you some $$, but it'll pay off in a hurry.
I'm not pitching myself here - in fact, keep me out of the running so that it's clear I have no axe to grind.
But this is very, very technically complex.
-
This may be harder than I could have imagined. If 90% of the backlinks on my site are my root domain (PensacolaRealEstate.com) then I should not lose any link juice, right? The backlinks will lead to my root domain, period; however, if I change my site and cut off some of the URLs then I lose the backlinks to that page. This could cause my domain authority (a sum of ALL my backlinks to ALL my pages in the domain) but not my page strength (the root domain). Right?
If I were to set up these 301 redirects, it means I have to leave the files for those pages on the server but not actually link my new site to them, right?
-
Don't rush into this. You gotta do it smart.
When you change your site the goal should be to improve it and make it more competitive.
That is done by carefully improving the structure and the optimization... and also preserving your link assets with 301 redirects. Also avoiding problems like changing the URLs without redirecting.
If you don't know how to do these things it is essential to get a competent person to help you or to do it for you. There are lots of good instructions for moving a site on the web.
Now... your 30K pages.... Those could suck a lot of strength from your site. These could produce a duplicate content problem (Panda).
I would not be surprised if your rankings dropped after adding them. To minimize ranking loss you want to have very few links into them from the rest of your site and all of those pages linking out generously to the rest of your site.
To minimize panda problems you might combine some of these listings, placing several on a page. This page count reduction can reduce the rankings loss.
The problem with that is having enough links into those pages to get them indexed and hold them in the index. So if you put all of them up at the same time you will need fifty to sixty really strong links that hit nodes deep in the site. These links will channel spiders deep into the site and force them to chew their way out through those pages, indexing them as they go.
These links must be permanent or be held in place until other links are developed. If you remove them then google spider action will fall on those pages and google will forget them.
If you don't have experience with big sites find someone who has that experience who can help you design the structure of these new pages.
(not recommending myself... I only work on my own sites)
-
Chances are the listings are repeated on other web sites, so those probably won't have much positive impact on your rankings. They shouldn't do much harm, either, except that Google's going to waste a lot of time crawling all those duped pages.
The best way to preserve what you can is to ensure that you redirect all of the old page addresses to their new equivalents. So, if you have a page like:
and it will now be:
Set up a 301 redirect from the first to the second URL. That will ensure that search engines can quickly update their indexes.
Also, be sure to set up a full XML site map and submit it to Google and Bing Webmaster Tools. That'll give you very rapid feedback regarding any problems.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Rel-nofollow for price comparison site?
I run a price comparison site, so we have TONS of outbound links. Should my outbound links be marked with 'rel=nofollow'?
On-Page Optimization | | lancerpanz0 -
"Turning off" content to a site
One site I manage has a lot of low quality content. We are in the process of improving the overall site content but we have "turned off" a large portion of our content by setting 2/3 of the posts to draft. Has anyone done this before or had experience with doing something similar? This quote from Bruce Clay comes to mind: “Where a lot of people don’t understand content factoring to this is having 100 great pages and 100 terrible pages—they average, when the quality being viewed is your website,” he explained. “So, it isn’t enough to have 100 great pages if you still have 100 terrible ones, and if you add another 100 great pages, you still have the 100 terrible ones dragging down your average. In some cases we have found that it’s much better, to improve your ranking, to actually remove or rewrite the terrible ones than add more good ones.” What are your thoughts? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | ThridHour0 -
Is there a way to tell Google a site has duplicated content?
Hello, We are joining 4 of our sites, into 1 big portal, and the content from each site gonna be inside this portal and sold as a package. We don't wanna kill these sites we are joining at this moment, we just wanna import their content into the new site and in a few months we will be killing them. Is there a way to tell Google to not consider the content on these small sites, so the new site don't get penalised? Thanks,
On-Page Optimization | | darkmediagroup0 -
Changing domain name
Hello, we have 10 websites in same niche, and plan to build one strong site by making a 301 redirect from all sites to one. We think to do redirect each site to subfolder like this: www.newdomain.com/site1 www.newdomain.com/site2 www.newdomain.com/site3 www.newdomain.com/site4 www.newdomain.com/site5 www.newdomain.com/site6 www.newdomain.com/site7 www.newdomain.com/site8 www.newdomain.com/site9 www.newdomain.com/site10 And in root domain place unique content updated daily. Is this would work? Or this is bad idea? Looking to hear from a qualified technicians advice. Thanks in advance!
On-Page Optimization | | bele0 -
How quickly should I change/edit sites to avoid potential over optimization penalty?
Regard today's White Board, I'm wondering how quickly one should start changing title tags, page content, footer links, etc. on sites? I operate a few different sites and some of them definitely have things that need to be changed. Would it be weird or trigger something in Google if all the sites were changed in 24 - 48 hours? Thanks for your help!
On-Page Optimization | | jdrrocks0 -
Changing of title page and description
Can I ask how long after changing the Title and Description tags on a website do people have to wait to see these changes reflected in Google? I changed a site of mine a couple of weeks back, pinged the site to google and had well over 5,000 googlebots to the page (not a result of pinging, I get that anyway), yet Google continues to display the old listing. Any secret techniques to speeding this up? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | Grumpy_Carl0 -
Moving a site as a folder of existing one
We have the following case: Site A with domain authority 65 and 2,750 linking root domains (139K total links) and Site B with domain authority 68 and 1,336 linking root domains (38K total links) There's a suggestion to move Site A as a folder of Site B so it becomes something like this: domainB.com/domainA using 301 redirects for the existing domain A. We'd like to better understand what such move will result in. I imagine at first Site A will drop in rankings, but after that will it be better for it to be under Site B domain? Also, moving all the pages a step behind in the URL path may slightly affect their rankings. What do you think? Would you move Site A or leave it as a separate domain? I understand there can't be an exact estimation what will happen, but I'll appreciate your thoughts.
On-Page Optimization | | lgrozeva0 -
Site structure for services and blog articles
Hi, looking for some advice on the structure for a relatively small site (around 200 pages). I'd like a structure where we can talk about our services as well as write blog articles on topics that relate to our services. We'll have loads more content in the blog area than in the services area. I was thinking of this: option 1: /services /services/copywriting
On-Page Optimization | | JaspalX
/services/social-media
/services/press-releases etc. and categories for articles where we'd give tips, talk about trends etc. /copywriting
/social-media
/effective-press-releases
etc. would it be better to have a different structure, say: option 2: /copywriting
/copywriting/services
/copywriting/articles OR option 3: /copywriting-services
/copywriting-blog OR option 4: /services/copywriting
/blog/copywriting OR is there another, better way perhaps? Of course the internal anchor text links to the services/blog articles pages will be tuned to try and make it clear what each section is about i.e. our services vs. industry trends/comments/tips for the blog.0