On Page vs Off Page - Which Has a Greater Effect on Rankings?
-
Hi Mozzers,
My site will be migrating to a new domain soon, and I am not sure how to spend my time.
Should I be optimizing our content for keywords, improving internal linking, and writing new content - or should I be doing link building for our current domain (or the new one)?
Is there a certain ratio that determines rankings which can help me prioritize these to-dos?, such as 70:30 in favor of link-building?
Thanks for any help you can offer!
-
Let's deal with 2nd question first re changing 301s. As I mentioned in your more recent question, the solution is to go back to the original redirect and rewrite it to go to the new correct location.
As long as you still control the original redirects, (which is why you'll want to maintain your old domain for at least 180 days, preferably permanently) there's almost never a reason to chain redirects together like that. Always better to rewrite the original to the new location. In addition to a number of technical benefits, it makes those redirects VASTLY easier to maintain.
As for a solid redirect plan - yes at its most basic it's a matter of ensuring you've catalogued ALL the old pages and written good redirects to the new pages. But there's plenty more to do if you want the transition to go really smoothly!
For example - as in the info above, you'll also want to check the old site for existing redirects and make sure they get included and rewritten as one-hop redirects to the new page.
Perfect example of this: original site had several vanity short URLS redirecting to landing pages. E.g. www.site.com/sale was redirected to www.site.com/category/colour/somereallylongurl
You not only want to redirect the /somreallylongurl page to it's new equivalent, you need to make sure you've also changed the /sale redirect to point directly to the new page as well (not having to go through /somereallylonurl to get there). Really look for these - there are often more of them than you think.
You'll want a quality assurance plan in place to test as many of the redirects as possible just as soon as the new site is live. One misplaced or forgotten "?" in a RegEx can completely foul things up. This is a daunting task, but it's essential to catch as many mistakes as possible before the search crawlers index the goofs (or your users run into them!). You'll probably want to divide this task amongst a group of testers. Watch especially for whether redirects resolve whether the address of a page ends with a "/" or not.
You'll also want a solid plan for how to ensure the search engines find and index those redirects and the new pages quickly. This is sometimes done by placing the old sitemap on the new site for at least a few days so that the search engine spiders are forced through the redirects for all the pages. Not everyone agrees with this approach, so you may want to research it further.
Here are several additional things you will absolutely need to do in Webmaster Tools.
- As soon as the new site is live, set up and verify a new Webmaster Tools account for Bing and Google. (You can even do this in advance using DNS verification method or if there's a placeholder page live at the new URL before the move)
- As soon as the new site is live, use the Change of Address tool in Google Webmaster Tools to point to the new domain.
- Use the "Fetch as Google" in Google Webmaster Tools to find and submit a series of pages in different sections of the new site. This step helps the engines find and start indexing your new pages faster. Note that in Google, you'll want to request "Submit URL and linked pages". You can do 10 of these a month, so pick pages from different sections of your site for best effect.
- Use the "Fetch as Bingbot" in Bing Webmaster Tools to to do the same thing you did in GWT above. Bing allows you to do 10 of these per day. and a total of 50/month. Use all of them, again from different sections of your site.
You'll also want to make certain you have an effective robots.txt file in place to ensure the search engine crawlers aren't wasting their crawl budget on useless pages.
Here's something else to think about. Can you get the owners of the sites that are giving you your most valuable incoming links to update their links to point directly to the new equivalent URLs? Doing this for even 10% of your top links has multiple benefits. The engines will find your new pages faster via the authoritative links, and those links won't lose any "juice" by having to pass through a 301.
As mentioned in my first reply, now would also be a really good time to get a few new links to the new site from some strong external pages.
You also need a solid plan for what tools you will use to monitor for missing/broken redirects and how you'll fix them quickly.
- Webmaster tools to watch for new 404s from incoming links
- Google Analytics (Make damn sure you have your tracking code included on your 404 page - many sites miss this so don't even see all the 404 hits).
- Open Site Explorer as a backup to Webmaster Tools for spotting broken incoming links
- Screaming Frog for an internal link scan to make sure you didn't create or inherit any broken links yourself accidentally
- When will you scan?
- Who will rewrite the .htaccess if fixes needed? (You don't want multiple people in there messing about).
- Who's responsible for updating the sitemap.xml file to the new one after a couple of days and resubmitting it to Google and Bing Webmaster Tools?
- Who will check GWT's Sitemap Details page to ensure the majority of the site is getting crawled and indexed, and will know what to do if it's not?
- Who will follow up with a search of the engines in several months to see if any of your old site URLs are still indexed and insure redirects are in placer for them as well?
The whole point to all these steps is to use every method at your disposal to insure both Google and Bing fully understand the relationship between the old & new site, and to push them to transfer the old site's authority, rankings and traffic to the new site as quickly and efficiently as possible. And even though Bing may send less traffic, you still can't afford to throw it away, so you'll need to monitor it's own Webmaster Tools as well as Google's.
Wow - I know that's a helluva load to think about so be sure to ask if there's stuff I haven't made clear enough.
Paul
P.S. The last thing is to accept that things will likely be a wild ride in the SERPs and traffic for at least two to three weeks after the move. Don't be tempted to overreact and start making large changes too soon if things look wonky at first. The only exception is 404s - fix those as soon as you detect them.
-
Everything makes sense up until you got to the ROCK-SOLID plan.
Shouldn't I just redirect all the pages to their matching page on the new domain?
For example siteA.com/article3 --> siteB.com/article3We may be removing pages, in which case I will either redirect them to the closest relevant page or the home page. Sound like a solid plan?
Also, one question about 301 redirecting.
Say I redirect siteA.com/article3 --> siteB.com/article3 with a 301 redirect,
and I realize I made a mistake and need to redirect it again to another page
siteB.com/article3 --> siteB.com/article4Do I lose another ~10% of link juice, or is it just considered a single redirect from
siteA.com/article3 --> siteB.com/article4 ?This question does not necessarily apply to just between domains, but 301 redirecting in general.
-
I agree with William. Offsite is the single most powerful aspect of your SEO, but it is just one part, and shouldn't be your sole focus.
I would prioritize like this initially:
1. Optimize current pages
2. Fix errors (404's, etc)
Then cycle through these:
3. Write New Content
4. Internal Link Building
5. External Link Building
So, you do the initial set up of your website, then go through the process of creating content, and building links. How you do the second part is really up to you.
- You could write the content first, and then try find links.
or
- You could find content that needs to be wrote, write it, then contact those people with insufficient information to link to you.
Either way the content is the medium you need in order to be most efficient at link building.
-
Here's how I look at it, Zora:
- On-page optimisation is now simply the price of admission. If you want to play effectively in search, good on-page is the foundation of everything else you're going to do. If you've got inadequate on-page optimisation, you're going to automatically compromise the effectiveness of all the off-page work you're doing.
- For example, good links to a page with confusing meta-data and poorly organised content are not going to bring much value. Plus they'll be a LOT harder to get in the first place.
- Really strong, high-quality, useful content will make it MUCH easier to attract links, whether naturally or through link building.
- 301 redirecting is considered to never pass quite as much "link juice" as a native link pointing directly to the landing page
With these things taken into account, my workflow in your situation would be
- to ensure the on-page optimisation for the new pages on new site is as strong as you can make it
- take time to research and write new, strong, linkworthy content for the new site
- do some solid advance planning and have an outreach plan ready to start trying to attract links to the new content as soon as the new site is up.
- any time left over, pre-plan further off-site link attraction strategies for the new site.
All this assumes you have an absolutely ROCK-SOLID plan for redirecting the URLs from the existing site to the new site, and a foolproof, tested implementation plan for those redirects (plus a solid strategy for monitoring and adjusting them instantly should any issues be discovered).
Does that make sense?
Paul
- On-page optimisation is now simply the price of admission. If you want to play effectively in search, good on-page is the foundation of everything else you're going to do. If you've got inadequate on-page optimisation, you're going to automatically compromise the effectiveness of all the off-page work you're doing.
-
Off-page optimization is more difficult hence it is much more powerful in rankings.
On-page SEO should always be the first thing you do because you can control it and easily fix and adjust everything. Off-page is more difficult since it requires partnerships and PR, which of course you can't control that easily.
-
Hi Zora,
My thoughts are that it really depends on the competition in your niche. If it is not very competitive then just the on site optimization itself should bring you good results. (quality , optimized content being key). If ,on the other hand, there is a lot of competition for the keywords that you are trying to rank for , you will have to do the whole bit (on site and off site) to get traction.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why is my home page ranking much higher than my collection page?
Hi everyone, Why is my client's home page ranking high for a certain keyword phrase rather than a collection page I have which is well optimised for this keyword? The collection page is on the 10th SERPs page. I did see there were keywords used in the footer of page and the keyword was also used in some intro text on the home page so I removed the keyword from these two places nearly 2 weeks ago and requested google to reindex both the collection page and home page and I've not seen any improvement of the collection page's ranking in SERPs. I also changed the meta description and meta title as the ctr was poor but there wasn''t that many impressions either. It is a competitive keyword organically so maybe the collection page's authority is just not good enough compared to the competitors hence why they are choosing the home page as it has higher page authority however this still is not helpful to searchers who land on home page. Does anyone have any ideas of what else I can do to get google to rank the ocllection page higher for the keyword instead of home page?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TZ19820 -
What is the impact of an off-topic page to other pages on the site?
We are working with a client who has one irrelevant, off-topic post ranking incredibly well and driving a lot of traffic. However, none of the other pages on the site, that are relevant to this client's business, are ranking. Links are good and in-line with competitors for the various terms. Oddly, very few external links reference this off-topic post, most are to the home page. Local profile is also in-line with competitors, including reviews, categorization, geo-targeting, pictures, etc. No spam issues exist and no warnings in Google Search Console. The only thing that seems weird is this off-topic post but that could affect rankings on other pages of the site? Would removing that off-topic post potentially help increase traffic and rankings for the other more relevant pages of the site? Appreciate any and all help or ideas of where to go from here. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Matthew_Edgar0 -
How does Googlebot evaluate performance/page speed on Isomorphic/Single Page Applications?
I'm curious how Google evaluates pagespeed for SPAs. Initial payloads are inherently large (resulting in 5+ second load times), but subsequent requests are lightning fast, as these requests are handled by JS fetching data from the backend. Does Google evaluate pages on a URL-by-URL basis, looking at the initial payload (and "slow"-ish load time) for each? Or do they load the initial JS+HTML and then continue to crawl from there? Another way of putting it: is Googlebot essentially "refreshing" for each page and therefore associating each URL with a higher load time? Or will pages that are crawled after the initial payload benefit from the speedier load time? Any insight (or speculation) would be much appreciated.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mothner1 -
Help! The website ranks fine but one of my web pages simply won't rank on Google!!!
One of our web pages will not rank on Google. The website as a whole ranks fine except just one section...We have tested and it looks fine...Google can crawl the page no problem. There are no spurious redirects in place. The content is fine. There is no duplicate page content issue. The page has a dozen product images (photos) but the load time of the page is absolutely fine. We have the submitted the page via webmaster and its fine. It gets listed but then a few hours later disappears!!! The site has not been penalised as we get good rankings with other pages. Can anyone help? Know about this problem?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CayenneRed890 -
Different Header on Home Page vs Sub pages
Hello, I am an SEO/PPC manager for a company that does a medical detox. You can see the site in question here: http://opiates.com. My question is, I've never heard of it specifically being a problem to have a different header on the home page of the site than on the subpages, but I rarely see it either. Most sites, if i'm not mistaken, use a consistent header across most of the site. However, a person i'm working for now said that she has had other SEO's look at the site (above) and they always say that it is a big SEO problem to have a different header on the homepage than on the subpages. Any thoughts on this subject? I've never heard of this before. Thanks, Jesse
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Waismann0 -
Will pages irrelevant to a site's core content dilute SEO value of core pages?
We have a website with around 40 product pages. We also have around 300 pages with individual ingredients used for the products and on top of that we have some 400 pages of individual retailers which stock the products. Ingredient pages have same basic short info about the ingredients and the retail pages just have the retailer name, adress and content details. Question is, should I add noindex to all the ingredient and or retailer pages so that the focus is entirely on the product pages? Thanks for you help!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ArchMedia0 -
New Domain name vs Low Ranked Existing Site
I am going to build a new site. I could hang it off an existing site with similar content or buy a new keyword rich domain and start over. The existing site does not have much trust or authority beyond the domain being registered for 5 plus years. I would prefer to start over and build linksfrom scratch but I realize we are starting at the bottom. The keywords we will be competing against are not super competetive so I think we can get ranking within 6 months or so. These post Panda days I am rethinking everything so any input is appreciated. I did a similar niche site a few years ago and found the site ranked well fairly quickly for its little nice. Today though it may be different. I have no experience in buying domains and would have no idea where to start there. New or existing? Thanks for any input.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Reportcard0 -
Re-platform effects on Page Rank
We are performing a major replatform for an ecommerce client who has many top listings on page 1 in Google SERPs for very competitive terms. We are implementing a 301 redirect for all existing URLs that they have now to the appropriate new URLs, but the client is concerned with how deploying a new site with 100% new URLs and site structure will impact their Page Rank. From our experience, the 301 redirects should cover it but wanted to see if there is a way to predictively forecast page rank effects as a result of re-platforming.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Bucktown0