Filling Up Content For A New News Publishing Site
-
Hello, SEO Gurus.
I have a client whom I've been working with for a few months now, and part of our service offering is to publish and promote fresh, daily content on his site's blog. This strategy has been a huge success thus far, he is very happy with the content, etc.
Now, he is getting ready to launch a second site, which will be a news publishing site for his industry niche, and we will once again be providing the content on a daily basis: we're going to be producing 10 to 15 articles a day. It's a big operation for us.
The client, however, is concerned that he doesn't want the site to appear "thin" on content in the early going, and asked if it would be possible to populate the new site with the articles we wrote on the other site's blog.
My gut reaction to this is that it would be an exceedingly bad idea to do this. While we are the ones who authored the original content (and we've used author tags and publishing markup), the best bet is to simply start fresh. Besides that, seeing as we'll be pumping out tons of content on a daily basis, it won't take long to fill up the content coffers.
That being said, I just wanted to run this past you all and see if anyone had any alternative ideas on how to use the old content without it being duplicate content. I was thinking that maybe designating all of the old articles with noindex, nofollow could be an option?
Many thanks in advance for your time and attention.
Sincerely,
Mike
-
the articles are not evergreen
I have a "news" area on one of my sites. Instead of making the huge investment in authorship, I simply link with a comment to articles on other sites. This allows me to provide four, six, eight, ten items per day in just an hour. Writing (at least for me) would take a very long time.
If there is enough news in your niche and you can select the valuable stories then your site could become the "go to" location for people to keep up with the news. In my opinion, the human aggregator with some commentary is better than the robots.
If you do a good job and allow people to subscribe by RSS and email you might build up an extensive list of industry subscribers. Once you do that the stories will start coming to you instead of you hunting for them.
-
Many thanks - all of these comments have been great. I should clarify: 1) the articles are not evergreen; they are/were topical news articles. 2) The client's primary website is not a news/publishing site, but rather a lead generation site for his recruitment business. His new web property is essentially a completely different business endeavor: a niche publishing site. We've been using blogging on his lead generation site as a means of fast-tracking his search engine visibility and drawing in readers from his target demographic who can/could in turn become conversions. With the new site, We'll be driving web traffic to the site, and he'll be monetizing it vis a vis ads.
-
Agree. Rethink the strategy entirely.
-
I like both of the suggestions given by Online Marketing Guy and Anita Clark. Both are great ideas.
Online Marketing Guy's idea is fast and low cost. Anita's is high quality and an investment.
Before deciding I would look at the traffic coming into these articles. Are they getting traffic, are they earning links, is the traffic valuable. If the answer is "NO" then maybe a greater investment in content is not going to pay.
Now.... if this site belonged to me and I wanted to produce "news for an industry niche"... I sure would not build a second website. I would add that news to a blog on my primary site.
Divide and conquer has been a battle plan since the beginning of history. You are doing this for your enemy. Instead, unite the clans.
-
Since all the research has already been accomplished, why not re-write the old articles (not spun) with a fresh outlook/viewpoint/call-to-action and have the best of both worlds...lots of quickly created content that you are not afraid of indexing?
-
It's only duplicate content if it's indexed. So, you could noindex those pages, but, I would still keep a watchful eye in Google to see if they do or do not get indexed.
Also, since your not looking for an SEO benefit from these fluffer articles, put them in one category you will never use, and each month check to see if you have any pages indexed in that category. If Google does index them, then just use GWT to deindex that category and then you won't have to worry about it.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
New blog contributors
For context my website is a content resource portal. In SEO training I have been told that it is a good SEO move to have as many content contributors as possible. As a result we are pushing to recruit new content contributors so they can be listed as new contributors/authors on our site alongside their valuable content. Would this move be good for our SEO rankings and is there anything in particular to consider with this?
Content Development | | Chanice0 -
Do you think its better to have a published date AND a last updated date ? Does google even look if you updated but left the published date old
Do you think its better to have a published date AND a last updated date on Posts ? Does google even look if you updated but left the published date old I was thinking of adding a "last updated" field to my articles. But is it worth it? or should I just keep it uncluttered and leave only the last published date? I would think that Google would not notice if I updated a last updated meta field since their is a published date field already.
Content Development | | ianizaguirre1 -
Blog.site.com vs site.com/blog
Which is better for SEO: blog.site.com or site.com/blog. In other words, is it better to have the blog running in a subdomain or as a director within the main site? Right now we are running as a subdomain, but want to be sure Google isn't considering that a separate site. The blog shows up separately on Google Analytics, which makes me think site.com/blog is better if for no other reason, it would give our domain greater traffic. Not sure if this matters, but some site info: our site is a sharing economy tool for renting your stuff we are running the blog on Wordpress blog traffic is about 5% of total traffic
Content Development | | TapGoods0 -
How to best host a blog - standalone or on the site?
HI We are redesiging our site currently - at the moment we have a low key blog on the site which is pretty well hidden (to be changed with redesign) but is hosted as brand.com/blog name. I have been advised it might be a good idea on relaunch to have the blog as a standalone blog linking back to our main site but also having a graphic on the site that promotes the blog. The blog does not currently have the same name as the website so would work as a standalone site but I understand it would not have any seo benefits from the original site. I have seen on previous posts here that the best practise is domain.com/blog but wondered if anyone thought different? Hope someone can point me in the right direction. Thanks, Penny
Content Development | | Pday0 -
Where to outsource product pages contents?
We have been told to write good unique content for every products but we just don't have the skill nor the time. (english is not my first-language) Can anyone suggest where to find a good product content writer?
Content Development | | ringochan0 -
Content
Hi, We produce research report on same topic every year (e.g. cost of patrol in different part of the country) and publish them to a new url every time. What is the best way to do it? create new page every year or update the existing research report with modification Considering long term benefits. Thanks
Content Development | | APH0 -
Will our two retail sites get hit with duplicate content?
Our retail site just rolled out a second online store. The URL is new and it is showing some of the same products from the same vendors (probably about 40% of the fist store is in the second store). Down the road, we will remove the products from the first site, however, we are keeping it for now. The products show up on both sites, with the same images, and the same descriptions and almost the same URL query string. Are we going to get hit with any penalties due to duplicate content?
Content Development | | klmarketing0 -
Which is the best site to host photos on?
For SEO and in general, which is the best website to host photos on and why: Flickr.com or Picasa.com or Whosay.com?
Content Development | | tennisexpress0