SEO Package: Good Value?
-
I'm having a real hard time trying to dig through all the BS and find a reputable SEO company that delivers quality and value.
Anyway, here's a package that I'm considering from a company called eBrandz. It seems a bit overpriced to me, but I don't have a lot of experience with reputable SEO companies, so I'm hoping someone can weigh in - on both the package itself for the price, and the company (if you have any information about them).
$1500/month
-
8 Guest Posts (With 80 Bookmarks)
-
8 Articles with Syndication (With 80 Bookmarks)
-
1 Press Release (With Bookmarking)
-
75 "Curated Business Directory Submissions"
-
Social Bookmarking for 5 Urls (Each Url to 20 Sites)
-
1 (every other month) Video Creation (45 to 90 seconds) With Submission and Bookmarking.
-
-
Here is the link to the list of inbound marketing companies recommended by Moz: http://www.seomoz.org/article/recommended
-
That makes sense.
I guess my biggest problem with that is I'm not really sure what links are considered quality and which are considered spammy. Because in reality, every backlink you ATTEMPT to build is against what Google would like to see. In the perfect world, everyone would link out to great content when they came across it, and everyone would have an equal shot at getting their content viewed. But that's just not the case, which is why SEO exists.
But, I digress.
When doing press releases for example, how do you know which press release sites to submit to? How often should press releases be sent out? Use paid or free ones?
-
Some of these items throw up flags for me:
-8 guest posts - who is going to write them? If it's not you, then does the writer REALLY know your subject area? Where are they going to be posted? If a company has good connections and can guest post on authoritative blogs then this type of thing can be good (provided the articles are really good). But, if they are on unrelated sites, low authority sites, and sites that will simply take as many guest posts as they can publish then this is not only unhelpful but could harm your site in the eyes of Penguin.
-8 articles with syndication. Article syndication can be dangerous with today's SEO.
-75 directory submissions - I am highly doubtful that any company can find 75 relevant, non-spammy, authoritative directories to submit your site to. Right now, directory submissions seem to be not affected by Penguin too much, but I am guessing that the new Penguin that will be released in the future is going to go after directory submissions. At best you will get a little bit of link juice from 75 directory submissions. At worst you will be affected by Penguin.
I could go on.
$1500 is not an unreasonable price for a company that can truly do good SEO, but for that price I would want to see some really good content creation and promotion as well as excellent on page SEO. Google is making it harder and harder to rank sites by just mass building links.
I believe that SEOMoz has a list of recommended SEOs although I don't know much about the list. If I were hiring an SEO today I would ask for references from previous clients. Some may have trouble doing that because of non-disclosure agreements, but usually there is at least one client who is thrilled with the service enough to rave about it. I would also ask what they are going to do to make my site better and also what kind of places they are able to get links for me.
-
Be wary of agencies offering Cookie Cutter services, chasing the latest search algorithms.
While the below method is not as easier as just hiring a seo firm - in the long run you will have more control over your entire campaign - content, links etc.
Find yourself a good writer -they can write guest blog posts, articles and even your press release for at least 1/2 of what an agency will charge you. Use the writer when you need them. Chances are you won't need them full-time.
Use a search engine's advanced operators to query and find relevant links related to your industry. Can't do it to yourself? learn how to do it, than hire someone and teach them how to do it.
Find a company who specializes and video creation and have them do it for you.
I feel its better to do it yourself or in-house if you have employees/resources. You will have more control and accountability.
-
I'm very confident that I have a quality website built that visitors will love. I've received extremely positive feedback from the promotion that I've done so far. But again, getting eyes on the site is the issue, and the easiest way to do that is with getting ranked.
-
Yeah I pretty much have everything that I need as far tools go. I'm relatively experienced with building websites. Sold my last one a few months ago for $205,000. And I'm not trying to brag, I just understand the point you're trying to make and I want to make it clear that this isn't the typical newbie site.
My biggest challenge over the years has always been finding a reputable SEO company that I can trust. I can handle everything else myself. I just need quality backlinks coming in. And from my experience, it doesn't matter if you've got the greatest content in the world if you're not actively involved in SEO and getting that content to rank.
-
I recommend listening to this advice.
When hiring an SEO company think more along the lines of inbound marketing vs outbound marketing.
The SEO package you described sounds a little bit more like outbound marketing. The goal with your website should be to make it attractive and good enough that it attracts customers.
Garret
-
It really depends on what you are trying to do. For example, what keywords is the company trying to rank you for? What is your website?
Garret
eWebify
-
If I was going to purchase SEO services I would need more information than what you have posted.
In my opinion you should not buy SEO as if it were a commodity.
Let's say you invest in rare coins and I offer you a rare coin for $5000. You should have many questions...
What country is it from, what coin is it, what denomination, what date, what condition.
So, if someone offers you posts, articles, press releases, directory submissions, bookmarks, videos. You need to know more. Especially video... how would you like brand on YouTube with an idiot talking about your fine company - for 90 seconds.
.Now, looking at your package. Would I purchase it? Absolutely not. The only thing in that list that I might want is a video and I would rather pay $1500 for one great video and I would go to someone who knows what they are doing instead of buying it from someone who is selling spammy SEO packages.
If you have $1500. Consider spending it on a nice digital camera and lights or a nice video camera. Then start taking great photos to illustrate your website with fantastic photos of your products, how to use the, how to select them, etc. Videos work great here too.
I would spend the $1500 on assets for my website that will make people talk about it, share it, like it, link to it.
This is how I spend my time. I think that guest posts are crap unless they are a fantastic article on a website with millions of interested visitors. Syndicating content can get you in penguin and panda problems and social bookmarking is worthless unless it is being done for fantastic content in front of an audience who will salivate for it.
Do you have a digital camera" A video camera?
How many articles do you have on your site that are the best on the web for their topic.
If you don't have those , that is where to spend your time and money.
Once you have that in place then you have a website that is worth marketing. Then you are offering people fine wine. If they are not saying "Wow!" then your marketing is not getting a good return.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Diverse SEO On & Off page questions!
Hey everybody. I have been reading several resources on SEO, and wanted to know your opinion on these topics. I know they are diverse and should be on a different set of questions, but i wanted to give it a try. I run a Heavily Specialized Steel B2B eCommerce Site. So my question would be what is the importance of the following topics, taking into mind the nature of my site. The importance on how often the page is updated ? Recommendations on updating relatively static pages ? How important is to meet HTML and W3C Standards, also its validation. The NoFollow and Follow ratio of incoming links. Your opinion onthe inclusion of outbound links to other relevant pages. Is there a best practice? Any comment is welcome, and would be deeply appreciated. Regards,
Link Building | | JesusD1 -
Are PR releases good for Link Building?
I'm having a bit of a conundrum with Press Releases: I recently sent a press release on PRWeb (which I personally think is just "average" compared to others as it focuses mainly on the CBS network and is not focused at all unless you pay for an expensive release) and got over 100 incoming links from high PR news sites (according to Webmaster Tools) but these links had PRWeb in subtitle, so for all I know these were syndicated releases and not "Pick up By" as PRWeb reports. Will this affect Page Rank value or rankings for any keywords? Are these links treated only as temporary links or permanent back links? (I know sometimes they appear in Google News or Yahoo News, but disappear the next day) Was it valuable to the company? Our business is in health sector exclusively on East Coast U.S. and the release was seen all over the world and not one of the links coming back was from a health-related section. They were high rank online sites, but is there value in such links? added 11/30: I was reviewing competitors' link backs I found they did a lot of press releases and gained a high-level link back from each one. These were the best/highest-authority links they had. The syndicated releases were not even listed anywhere. And then I reviewed their SERPs... and guess what, their ranks increased with each one. (So I don't think "duplication" is an issue. If anything only the syndicated copies were penalized, but not the original one)
Link Building | | HMCOE0 -
What value do external broken links give to a domain?
I ask, as I've just used opensite explorer to look at external links a competitor has, and I've found the high value ones at the top of the list go to a page that no longer exists on their site. Are these stiill of value in the SERP's, or have they messed up by not putting a 301 redirect on them?
Link Building | | xposurecreative0 -
Canonical version and link value
Hi I have recently included rel canonical to point at new seo friendly urls. the new urls are not externally linked as new, however the old versions (with the rel can) are. The question is Do i need to make those linked to the new urls in order to transfer link value to those urls, or the fact that the old urls contain the canonical tags automatically also transfer the external link value too? thanks
Link Building | | Mrlocicero0 -
Good article distribution services?
Our site has a lot of content we are able to modify/distribute without too much time so I am planning to syndicate some of this using article distribution. Apart from Ezine articles, are there any other article distribution services I should/could consider using? I do know that I should also be focussing most of my resource on building high-quality links through guest blogs etc! However this seems like a relatively quick win. Thanks in advance
Link Building | | GBC0 -
Article Submission Old Hat or Still Good hat?
I have always used article submission sites such as ezine, article snatch etc... I have always seen the big ones as a good way of getting relevant content out into the internet network with the bonus of building quality links back. However I have now been reading a lot of conflicting information, since the latest update from Google that even an article being republished multiple times around the net will wipe out the positive impact of the article and bring no SEO benefit. I wanted to get feedback from the SEOmoz community to see if you now feel this is a pointless exercise and we should now be even more careful as to where our content is published.
Link Building | | iprosoftware0 -
Good Link VS Bad Bounce Rate what wins?
Hi all, this is only my second question on SEOmoz since becoming a member over three months ago so sorry if it’s a little bit basic. As small part of one of our websites promotion we have been giving really good advice on good authority blogs/forums related to our product website. One of the sites we have offered advice on is from a US website and we added a link to our guide for the problem to our UK site. In hindsight the product solution is not branded the same in the US so our bounce rate is over 90%. So the question is when is a link from a related site not worth the high percentage bounce rate?
Link Building | | jtay1230 -
What is the Value?
Hi there, I own a website (non-commercial) which has around 300 pages full of original content, in average about 500 words or so per page. I also own another website (commercial) I was thinking of pointing keywords for all of these pages in the non-commercial website pointing to the commercial website, all the articles are around 2-10 years old, what is the value of doing this sort of link building? Kind Regards,
Link Building | | Paul780