How on earth is a site with ONE LINK ranking so well for a competitive keyword?
-
Ok, so I'm sure you get the gist of what I'm asking about in my question.
The query is 'diy kitchens' in Google UK and the website is kitchens4diy[dot]com - which is ranking in third from my viewing.
The thing is, the site has just ONE BACKLINK and has done for a good while. Yet, it's ranking really well.
What gives?
-
Hey Matthew
We have some sites in similar fields ranking highly in local and organic and have done no link building at all. New players, outperforming established players, in organic and local and no links have been built. Times are changing and whilst links (the right kind) are still powerful, there is a multifactorial way of doing things that in many cases is more powerful when going up against folks who have just tried to heavily go after one aspect.
I tend to think and our recent experience shows this that search has several factors and the effectiveness of each factor is amplified to some extent when they all work together. Brand, URL, Local, Citations, Links, Content, On Page etc.
The keyword in the brand / URL is a great example of this where it can still seemingly help as long as it is not abused and forms part of a larger cohesive strategy. A recent client starting out was advised by us to add the location they serve to the company name and it has worked out fabulously for them. This is a local client ranking in organic and local well above the competition with only 8 weeks or so of very light local SEO (and again, whilst it was one of my guys that did the work, I am sure there was no links built as it was just a whole lot easier than that).
Still, there is no better tool than an experiment so try adding some citations and see if you can influence your clients listing as performance for every keyword in every market is different so only through close analysis and tinkering will you know exactly what will move the dial for your client.
Marcus
-
With regards to the co-occurrence of the keyword and brand comment, I'd just like to point out that in this case they are effectively the same thing. From a branding perspective, if you are choosing a name for your business you could not do better than incorporating a relevant keyword you're trying to rank for.
-
I suspect this is the biggest factor in its ranking, you're right. Which shouldn't be the case, of course.
-
Hey Marcus,
First off, great response. I appreciate the time you've taken out to reply with such detail.
Now, to address the points you've raised;
-
I think we can both agree on that.
-
The keyword is probably more competitive than you think. Like I've just mentioned above, there was a great deal of spam EMD sites infiltrating the search over the past few months and they've only just been removed.
-
It's been there for at least two or three months by my reckoning. The competition was spammy. Now, less so.
4, 5) Interesting. Although, I doubt it's intentional. I know people say the future is "linkless" but this is taking it to the extreme.
-
-
Well I would say that their domain name is definitely having something to do with them ranking well
I know EMD (Exact Match Domain) have taken hits from google, but this is not an EMD, but very close.
-
Hey Rikki,
The one link they have comes from here;
http://www.globalknives.org.uk/best-quality-kitchen/
Although, I can't see whereabouts it is on the page.
Our client's site is one of those on the second page with decent DA/PA. Only today have I actually noticed the removal of some spam EMD sites from the search that were infiltrating the results. The keyword is probably a lot more competitive than you may think.
-
I will like to ask
- Has the keyword recently been searched or came into search
We can give you an example of one of the blogs which is :- http://www.highsecurityplates.com
The keywords - high security number plates, high security plates are recently been on search in google.co.in for last 1 yr.. Hardly any link building has been done.. Still we recvd a traffic of over 1000 visitors every day 2 months back which though fallen to 150 visitors - though ranking remains intact. when ever there is a news in media the traffic increases
However, the site is ranking number 1 from the very first month till now despite of many high competition sites
So, this could apply to the site given, if the keyword competition is not much...
-
Hey Matthew
There is really no substitute for tinkering and running some experiments of your own but we can do a bit of digging and see what we can turn up here.
1. The site is weak from a link perspective, no doubt about it
2. The keyword is only returned as moderately competitive (34%) in the Moz keyword tool and there are other sites in the top 10 with only one link.
3. How long as the page been there? How spammy is the competition?
4. They do have some decent UK citations which you can dig into like this:
"Kitchens4DIY" "DY5 1TX" -site:kitchens4diy.com
You can even expand that to look for the keyword in those citations to see if we are seeing more of this co-occurance that is such a hot topic at the moment:
"Kitchens4DIY" "DY5 1TX" -site:kitchens4diy.com "diy kitchens"
5. They also have tons more unstructured citations with the brand + keyword combination.
"Kitchens4DIY" -site:kitchens4diy.com "diy kitchens"
Summary
- The keyword is not terribly competitive in link power terms
- There does not appear to be tons of competing sites for the term
- This is a new site with no negative equity
- Possible spam signals amongst the competition
- Lots of unstructured and a reasonable amount of structured citations
- Frequent co-occurrence of the keyword and brand
- Homepage title is well optimised for this term
Obviously, this is a five minute analysis but really, I see no mystery here. The keyword is not competitive, the site is new, has a clean profile, plenty of citations and good co occurrence of the keyword.
Would be interesting to see your clients site to do a side by side comparison though as that would likely reveal more insights than this general overview.
I wrote about this a little here if it helps:
http://www.bowlerhat.co.uk/blog/types-of-citations-for-seo/
Hope that helps you dig in and build your plan of attack!
Marcus
-
I was expecting to see a page which is very well optimised and with lots of content but it only seems to use that phrase once on the page and doesn't have it in either the H1, Bold tag or an image alt. The page content seems very average too.
I guess its not a massively competitive phrase but the other sites on that page (and a few on the pages below) do have decent DA and PA. What is the one link they have? Is it a strong one with exact anchor text for that phrase?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Do you think profanity in the content can harm a site's rankings?
In my early 20's I authored an ebook that provides men with natural ways to improve their ahem... "bedroom performance". I'm now in my mid 30s, and while it's not such an enthralling topic, the thing makes me 80 or so bucks a day on good days, and it actually works. I update the blog from time to time and build links to it on occasion from good sources. I've carried my SEO knowledge to a more "reputable" business, but this project is still interesting to me, because it's fully mine. I am more interested in getting it to rank and convert than anything, but following the same techniques that are working to grow the other business, this one continues to tank. Disavow bad links, prune thin content.. no difference. However, one thing I just noticed now are my search queries in the reports. When I first started blogging on this, I was real loose with my tongue, and spoke quite frankly (and dirty to various degrees). I'm much more refined and professional in how I write now. However, the queries I'm ranking for... a lot of d words, c words (in the sex sense)... sounds almost pornographic. Think Google may be seeing this, and putting me lower in rankings or in some sort of lower level category because of it? Heard anything about google penalizing for profanity? I guess in this time of authority and trust, that can hurt both of those... but I wonder if anyone's heard any actual confirmation of this or has any experience with this? Thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | DavidCapital0 -
Rankings Change
Hi I've noticed some ranking drops on 15th Jan, I saw there was an update on Jan 8th - could this have had a knock on effect a week later?
Algorithm Updates | | BeckyKey0 -
Why would Google read different pages to rank for a keyword?
I have noticed a large drop in a number of keywords in the latest rankings report. I have checked the results on the 'Ranking History Graph' and it appears that Google is reading different pages for the specific keyword and therefore, giving large fluctuations in ranking dependant on the page from week to week. Why would this be happening?
Algorithm Updates | | Benjamin3790 -
Youtube, Video SEO, & my site
For our business we are building a collection of videos ranging including product info, how-to's, and some funny content. My understanding is that if you embed these onto my site from youtube you don't get any credit for these videos on the web site even if submitting a video sitemap. My thinking is to post these videos to youtube and to host them on our own site and submit a video sitemap including the videos on our site. We would change the name, description, etc. on youtube vs. what's o our web site. Question is - is this the best strategy? Do I get penalized for duplicate content? They are important for both the social aspects of youtube and the content vaue of our web site.
Algorithm Updates | | uwaim20120 -
Google Page Rank?
We have had a quality website for 12 years now, and it seems no matter how many more links we get and how much new content we add daily, we have stayed at PR3 for the past 10 years or so. Our SEOMoz domain authority is 52. We have over 950,000 pages linking to us from 829 unique root domains. Is this in line with PR3 or should we be approaching PR4 soon? We do daily blog posts with all unique, fresh quality content that has not been published elsewhere. We try to do everything with 'white hat' methods, and we are constantly trying to provide genuine content and high quality products, and customer service. How can we improve our PR and how important is PR today?
Algorithm Updates | | applesofgold0 -
Organic ranking vs Local ranking
After reading this blog entry from Dr Pete on Mirametrix, my question would be:
Algorithm Updates | | echo1
What's more important for a local company, being in the 7 pack or in the top 10 organic results? Which one attracts more clicks? Is the optimization for local ranking just became more important than the traditional SEO?0 -
How do blog comment/forum back links compare to editorial back links?
I know that Google prefers a varied back link profile, and so it's ideal to get both - but I wanted to know, are followed back links from blog comments, forum posts etc. (i.e. The low-hanging fruit) weighted significantly lower by Google than links appearing within the of a page, for example? If so, is it possible to quantify by how much?
Algorithm Updates | | ZakGottlieb710 -
Site Usage Statistics and organic ranking
I'm not sure if anyone has tested this properly but i'm begining to suspect that google is using site usage statistics as a site quality guide and ultimately as a ranking variable. The this what i've seen so far on one of my sites (site A) Week 1= bounce rate (83.88%), Avg time on site (0:0:57), Pages/visit (1.28) no changes made to the site apart from the usual link building. Week 2: Traffic drops by 30%, Keywords generating traffic drops by 39%. Bounce rate (87.25%), Avg time on site (0:0:43), pages/visit (1.21). I replaced all affiliate links on my homepage to internal pages where the chunk of the content is and did a reconsideration request. Week 3: Traffic goes up by 30%, keywords generating traffic goes up by 65%, Bounce rate (30.41%), Avg time on site (0:3:02), Pages/visit (3.74). This is not the most scientific test but surely google must be using these variables and a ranking factor? Anyone seen something along these lines or have thoughts on it?
Algorithm Updates | | clickangel0