Redirecting https pages
-
If I add 301 redirects from the https versions of the root domain to the http:www.website.com (canonical version), will this prevent users from being able to access the https version? I believe the https version is only accessed once users log into the site.
Thank you!
-
To directly answer your question, Erin, a 301 redirect will indeed prevent users from accessing the https versions of your pages and is not the recommended approach.
Is there a reason you want to prevent users/search engines from accessing the https versions of your pages?
Simply ensuring that all links within the site navigation point to http versions, and setting a rel=canonical on all https versions back to the http versions, should do the trick.
Best,
Mike -
What you want to do is setup the redirect for all pages "except" those pages that you want to require a person to use the https.
As an example on a site I work on, we have two areas /cart/ and /account/ that represent when someone is checking out or when they are logged into their account and want to update payment options, respectively. You would exclude these folders from the https to http 301 redirect so that users could then use that part of the site in secure mode.The rest of the site you want to have the https 301 to http. The reason you go through all this is that a http and https versions of the site, if spidered, would be considered duplicate content and you want to prevent that.
The other part of this would be that you do not want the search engines (usually) to spider the shopping cart and user login sections of a site. Nofollow noindex all links that lead to those pages and also put those folders in robots.txt - that will keep the bots out of there.
One other thing. Make sure that your templates and content within the https sections of the site link out to the non https urls. The 301 will help with this, but why link to the wrong URL anyway?
All of that said. If your site is one that you deal with highly sensitive information (medical, financial come to mind) then you may simply want to have the site run as https. You would need to bulk up your server resources to handle this as https can slow things down a little bit, but it can be done.
-
It is going to be a little bit more difficult than that. Unless you have a wildcard certificate your ssl certificate is not good for sub domains. www.site.com is considered a sub domain of site.com. That being said, I would use url rewriting to handle the problem. Here is a small example of what you could use.
Rewrite Rules for site.com
RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase /Redirect from example.com to www.site.com
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^site.com [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.%{HTTP_HOST}/$1 [R=301,L]Turn SSL on for payments
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off
RewriteCond %{SCRIPT_FILENAME} /payments.php [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://%{HTTP_HOST}/$1 [R=301,L]Turn SSL off everything but payments
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} on
RewriteCond %{SCRIPT_FILENAME} !/payments.php [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://%{HTTP_HOST}/$1 [R=301,L]You will have to enter the other pages that you want to be ssl too, this should get you started though.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should I redirect or add content, to 47 Pages?
We have an insurance agency website with 47 pages that have duplicate/low content warnings. What's the best way to handle this? I'm I right in thinking I have 2 options? Either add new content or redirect the page? Thanks in advance 🙂
On-Page Optimization | | laurentjb1 -
Finacial pages markup
I was wondering if there is away to use Schema for stock market pages?
On-Page Optimization | | ciznerguy0 -
On Brand Queries Google does not shows my home page first instead of it shows internal pages.
Also on my brand query it doesn't shows sitelinks. What may be the reason?
On-Page Optimization | | vivekrathore0 -
Page authority still on 1 after url change and 301 redirect
Hi Moz analytics suggestion to help ranking is to have a keyword or phrase in the url so I advised a client to do this they changed one of their pages urls, this page previously had a page authority of 26 since the change its gone down to 1.
On-Page Optimization | | genkee
I advised them that they must do a 301 from the old page but they took a few weeks to do this, would this of affected it why is it not showing up yet its been 3 weeks now, since the 301 and 5 weeks since the url change.0 -
Redirecting pages (old site to new site)
I have a question- there is one location, one set of pages for both the old and new site on the same host environment so when I did the redirect it get into a loop trying to redirect from itself to itself Not sure how its gonna affect SEO. Will pages get hit for duplicate content?
On-Page Optimization | | Yanez0 -
Pages exclusion
Hi there! I don't want to "make relevan"t 3 of the pages my website has. Should I give them a title and a description even if I dont't want them to be shown in the SERPs? Is there any penalty from google if I don't do so? I guess no but just to confirm. Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | juanmiguelcr0 -
SEO Value of Within-Page Links vs. Separate Pages
Title says it all. Assuming that you're talking about similar content (let's say, widgets), which is better: using within-page links for variations or using separate pages? I.e., do we have a widget page and then do in-page links to describe green, blue, and red widgets, or separate pages for each type of widget? In-page pro: more content on a single page, thus more keywords, key phrases, and general appearance of real content. In-page con: Jakob Neilsen says they're confusing. Also, for SEO, you only get one page title, rather than a separate page title for each. My personal bias is for in-page, since I hate creating dozens of short pages for what could be on one page, but my suspicion is that separate pages are better for SEO.
On-Page Optimization | | maxkennerly0 -
On page internal link text
Hi, I'm in the process of rebuilding/designing an existing well ranking niche bespoke software site and have the following question - In the footer, I'm planning on linking to the main landing pages (blue widget software, red widget software etc theres about 7 in total). In these links I want to know if its best to have the word "software" in each link as I'm scared of it looking spamy. We sell custom software, and a lot of the keywords that currently attract traffic (as reported in analytics) end in the word software, for example - blue widget software red widget software In the footer would you end each link with software or not? How much effect would this have on rankings? Thanks in advance.
On-Page Optimization | | JamesJacobs0