Does this mean my pages are ranking better?
-
In GWT impressions are down 17%, clicks are up 57%. Is it safe to assume that pages are ranking better for my site?
We have earned a couple great links in the past month..
-
So, the short answer is "no". It's possible that something else changed on the page, or something happened to boost CTR (a seasonal change, an outside event that increased product interest, etc.). In GWT, you can drill down and look at CTR on a keyword basis. Take it with a grain of salt, but essentially you need to segment. What pages are the new clicks landing on? What specific keywords are driving traffic to those pages? Have the rankings for those keywords changed? Actually load up those queries - did something else on the SERP change (a new feature, a competitor's site changing, etc.)?
Also, why are impressions down 17%? It's possible you lost ranking on some keywords, and those particular keywords just happened to have low CTR, while you gained ranking on some higher CTR keywords. Odds are, this is a more complex picture than just a movement in one or two keywords.
-
here is a blog by Dr. Pete that was just posted today regarding whether you should use GWT or some other methods
http://moz.com/blog/comparing-ranktracking-methods-browser-vs-crawler-vs-webmaster-tools
-
I agree with Jesse & Greg on this one each of them have come up with very clear simple answers to your question.
the idea of analyzing click impressions through Google Webmaster tools when you have access to Google analytics and your end goal is to find out if you are doing better in the SERPS
tells me you should be using one of the tools below. They will tell you exactly what has gone up and what has gone down.
https://moz.com/researchtools/rank-tracker
You may also utilize tools such as
while it is not perfect it will give you a good amount of insight into the keywords you do not already know you might be ranking for.
I hope this helps,
Thomas
-
I wouldn't be looking/analyzing clicks and impressions through GWT much if at all to be honest.
-
-
Are you using Google Analytics? Is is connected to your Webmaster Tools account? Perhaps viewing the data from within GA could give you some more insight.
-
Ok... What does impressions down and clicks up suggest? I think it's interesting..
-
You can use this to https://serps.com/tools/rank_checker
-
I agree with Jesse he hit it on the head.
-
I have a pro account and track my rankings but as another member just asked in QA they seem to fluctuate like crazy. Traffic is growing, but I'm a seasonal business and we're getting into winter.
Impressions down and clicks up seems like Rankings are improving. After reading Dr. Pete's blog today and looking at GWT today it prompted me to ask the question.
-
Why not just check your rankings?
Or start a Moz account where they can track that for you
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Sizable decrease in amount of pages indexed, however no drop in clicks, impressions, or ranking.
Hi everyone, I've run into a worrying phenomenon in GSC and im wondering if anyone has come across something similar. Since August, I have seen a steady decline in the number of pages that are indexed from my site, from 1.3 million down to about 800,000 in two months. Interestingly, my clicks/impressions continue to increase gradually (on the same pace they have been for months) and I see no other negative side affects resulting from this drop in coverage. In total I have 1.2 million urls that fall into one of three categories, "Crawled - currently not indexed", "Crawl anomaly", and "Discovered - currently not indexed" Some other notes - all of my valid, error, and excluded pages are https://www. , so I don't believe there is an issue with different versions of the same site being submitted. Also, my rankings have not changed so I tentatively believe that this is unrelated to the Medic Update. If anyone else has experienced this or has any insight to the problem I would love to know. Thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | Jason-Reid0 -
Increase of non-relevant back-links drop page ranking?
Hi community, Let's say there is a page with 50 back-links where 40 are non-relevant back-links and only 10 are relevant in-terms of content around the link, etc....Will these non-relevant back-links impact the ranking of the page by diluting the back-link profile? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Rel canonical on other page instead of duplicate page. How Google responds?
Hi all, We have 3 pages for same topics. We decided to use rel canonical and remove old pages from search to avoid duplicate content. Out of these 3 pages....1 and 2 type of pages have more similar content where 3 type don't have. Generally we must use rel canonical between 1 and 2. But I am wondering what happens if I canonical between 1 and 3 while 2 has more similar content? Will Google respects it or penalise as we left the most similar page and used other page for canonical. Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Translate page?
Hi Guy's I have a question about Google asking me to translate the page when i search on brandname. It's in the Dutch Google and the searchquery is: "rotomshop" I can find why Google wants to translate the page because all our settings are Dutch. Does anyone have a suggestion? Thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | Happy-SEO1 -
Ahrefs - What Causes a Drastic Loss in Referring Pages?
While I was doing research on UK Flower companies I noticed that one particular domain had great rankings (top 3), but has slid quite a bit down to page two. After investigating further I noticed that they had a drastic loss of referring pages, but an increase in total referring domains. See this screenshot from ahrefs. I took a look at their historical rankings (got them from the original SEO provider's portfolio) and compared it to the Wayback Machine. There did not seem to be any drastic changes in the site structure. My question is what would cause such a dramatic loss in total referring pages while showing a dramatic increase in referring domains? It appears that the SEO company was trying rebound from the loss of links though. Any thoughts on why this might happen? 56VD5jD
Algorithm Updates | | AaronHenry0 -
Rankings drop
Hi! Since the new Penguin rollout, we've seen rankings drop for http://www.leanonturkey.co.uk/ for the terms 'turkey recipes' (UK) and 'low fat recipes' (UK) from #4 and #15 respectively. This may be down to very strong competition, but I'm also concerned over the on-page content, which may not be detailed enough. Any tips would be much appreciated!
Algorithm Updates | | neooptic0 -
Google and Content at Top of Page Change?
We always hear about how Google made this change or that change this month to their algorithm. Sometimes it's true and other times it's just a rumor. So this week I was speaking with someone in the SEO field who said that this week a change occurred at Google and is going to become more prevalent where content placed at the "top of the fold" on merchant sites with products are going to get better placement, rather than if you have your products at top with some content beneath them at the bottom of the page. Any comments on this?
Algorithm Updates | | applesofgold0 -
Does Google index Wordpress pages with frames
Does Google or other search engines index Wordpress pages that use frames? Here is the site in question: http://www.source-nutrition.com/son/
Algorithm Updates | | BradBorst0