Internal keyword linking - short or long string
-
I've seen a couple of people leave comments about keyword linking being too specific.
If I"m doing a lot of internal keyword linking and I want to rank well for 'widgets', is it better that most of the links just use the word 'widgets' or should some of the links have more words in them.
ie: 'red and blue widgets' - 'buy these widgets online' etc.
-
There's no direct evidence that over-doing your internal commercial linking (i.e. linking with your primary keyword internally in a site) causes problems, but it certainly doesn't look professional to continually link to your car insurance page with the anchor text "car insurance". There has been some speculation that internal linking like this can cause issues, but I haven't seen it tested or proven yet in the way that having too many inbound links like this has been tested / confirmed.
I would certainly not overdo this sort of linking despite there being no solid evidence that I am aware of, partially because of the unprofessional vibe it gives a page (related to everything David has mentioned above) and partially because I am sure it sends sub-optimal signals to Google regardless of whether it is considered a ranking factor.
-
I dont think having a whole site full of exact match links will benefit anyone. Users, your site, or your rankings. Here is why:
A user is browsing your site. they come to the word "widgets" in a sentence that is linked. They keep reading. They come to the word "widgets" in a sentence that is linked. They keep reading. They come to the word "widgets" in a sentence that is linked. They keep reading. They come to the word "widgets" in a sentence that is linked. They keep reading. They come to the word "widgets" in a sentence that is linked. They keep reading. They come to the word "widgets" in a sentence that is linked. They leave, because the site doesn't offer them anything in terms of excitement, information, or value.
In reality, you would be lucky to have a user read that long. As you read that above, it becomes apparent how proper anchor text can benefit your users. Lets look at another example:
A user is browsing your site. They come to the word "widgets" in a sentence that is linked. They keep reading. The next sentence speaks about the benefits of using said widget, and links using the text "how widget works". They keep reading. The next sentence compares your widget to another, similar widget offered by a competitor, using a infographic. The infographic has a buttom that says "view the full comparison". They start clicking, and reading your subpages. They find useful info, that answers the question of why they came there in the first place. Better yet, because your site rocks, they share it with a friend.
I could go on, but I think you get the idea. I know you want to rank for your keyword, but don't focus strickly on that. Here is an article I found useful, (ironically its from the MOZ blog) but it gives a different perspective on site design and optimizing around a users experience. http://moz.com/blog/most-entertaining-guide-to-landing-page-optimization
On top of all that, I'm betting Google wants to see your links used in the proper way, meaning creatively. You can include your widget keyword in your links, but don't use it the same way every time.
-
I would vary them when possible. Most can be for the exact keyword but I think some variation is better as well, maybe even a few "here" links, actual links put as anchor text, etc.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
ASP Canonical and Internal Linking
Hello - I'm working with a large ASP website and trying to troubleshoot issues I believe might be related to how the canonical element is used. On page - all internal links, including navigation links, use the following format (uppercase) - website.com**/F**older/Folder/Product . So, any page navigated to will always display the uppercase version of the URL. And, all of these pages have the canonical tag pointing to the lowercase version of the URL. The pages included in Google's index are all lowercase versions of the URL like this - website.com**/f**older/folder/product . My concern is that a lot of internal authority flow is being impacted/negated because all internal links point to the uppercase versions of URLs and all those pages reference the lowercase version URL in the canonical reference. Is this a valid concern?
On-Page Optimization | | LA_Steve0 -
Outbound links
Hi everyone, Just a quick question about using info/statistics from other sources in my articles. If I use a quote/piece of info from another online article do I just say where it's from and link to it? Is this acceptable or do you have to get permission? I find the whole permissions thing quite confusing! I know that outbound links are good for SEO so just wanted to check this. Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | ClareO0 -
Low quality links
I remember finding a tutorial on MOZ about how to remove low quality links. But i cant find it now. can someone help?
On-Page Optimization | | kevinbp0 -
Internal Linking
I am trying to figure out internal linking. Please help me. Your "root domain" (the top level example.com) is the easiest to rank on a SERP. When you build Page Rank on this page, you want to make sure the majority of the PR goes into internal pages that matter. To do this you determine what internal pages are most important and put them on the menu bar. You then link to these pages in the body text, or via side bars. This will ensure that the PR is flowing from the root domain into the internal pages multiple times. The second part is to link from these secondary pages back to the main page. Correct? When you build back links on the internal page, you want to pass the PR back to the main page... Please discuss this...
On-Page Optimization | | JML11790 -
Footer-links (navigation)
I want to put navigation links in my footer. I watched the (distilled) whiteboard friday video saying it can be a penalty. How are links in the footer different from links in the navigation. Why don't you get "hit" for putting the word "Real Estate Listings" in the navigation menu? It appears on every one of the 30k pages. I don't get why the links in the footer would have a negative effect if the links in the navigation don't. My example is a real estate website. When people are browsing properties (30k), it is convenient that at the end of the page there is a navigation of areas. I could put the navigation on the sidebar but that would be in essence, the same thing. A wordpress site would dynamically include that sidebar on every page.
On-Page Optimization | | JML11790 -
Links in header tags
Hello Seomozzers I have a query, is it good to have links in h2, h3, h4 tags. Does it have a positive factor over on page optimisation or a negative factor. Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | usef4u0 -
Keyword domains
Hello, I am the proprietor of RacquetSource.com, Is there any merit to using keyword domains and have them redirect to the site, or a specific page on the site? For Example, the keyword term, Squash Racquets, if I were to purchase a domain name, squash-racquets.com and have it redirect to http://www.racquetsource.com/squash-racquets-s/95.htm will this effect positively to my search ranking of the keyword term Squash Racquets? Any insight would be greatly appreciated. Cheers Geoff
On-Page Optimization | | GeoffBatterham0 -
Links from my homepage
I am redesigning my homepage completely. What criteria should I use to decide which pages to link to from the homepage?
On-Page Optimization | | mascotmike0