Shoing strong for last 2 years for search terms NOW GONE! What happened?
-
Hi All! I have a 9-11~ my website www.popscrap.com has been showing strong (top 2) for about 2 years now for many of the search terms we are targeting (scrap software; scrap medal software; recycling software; etc.), and I just noticed today that we are nowhere. What do you suggest for troubleshooting this to find the cause and fix?
Thanks!
-
Well, I removed the suspect content, and after 2 weeks, nothing. Then I added Google Authorship to each page, and the NEXT DAY the site is back in the top positions for our target terms, and the leads are pouring in. Was it the Google Authorship? It certainly felt like it. But I thought that was not a ranking factor.
Anyway, thanks for all the support! BB
-
On a quick look my gut instinct is that this is ok. However, on a site: search I'm seeing that you have over 19,000 pages indexed in Google. That's a bit of a Panda flag for me as most likely there are not 19,000 unique pages that add value on your site.
-
Thanks for the response, Marie
I asked the question as I was wondering whether I'd need to add "boilerplate" text to each description to fill it out. I'd rather not as a) it's not very scaleable and b) I'm not sure it would add value to our users per se, as in the main people want to see pictures. Here's an example of one of the shorter descriptions we run.
-Is the content the same MLS description that is on multiple sites? If so, then I'd noindex it Of the 4,500 pages, 95-98% are content that's unique to our site (the other ~2-5% are managed by individual realtors who I'm guessing probably copy and paste descriptions from their own sites. We're not in the US so aren't part of the MLS network).
-Do users engage with your content? Mos' def.
-
It's hard to say what Google views as thin. Here are some factors I would consider when making that decision:
-Is the content the same MLS description that is on multiple sites? If so, then I'd noindex it.
-Do users engage with your content? Short content can be useful. If Google sees that people are actually engaging with your site then they will have no problem with thin content.
It sounds to me like these pages are probably ok. But I can't say for certain.
-
"Thin content" question:
I run a real estate website and carry about 4,500 property pages (each page consisting of between 5-13 photos and about 50-300 words of a property description) Might the pages of ~50 words run the risk of being deemed "thin content" even though they have photos on them?
I also have around 200-250 article pages that are far more text-heavy.
FWIW, I don't think I've been hit by Panda 4.0. (I've slid from about #8 to #12 over the past 2 weeks but I suspect that's more to do with sluggish content marketing/link-building). -
If unpublishing causes the pages to either be removed from your site or noindexed then yes, that's the same thing.
-
Thank you! But what about unpublising? Is that the same thing as removing, in the eyes of Google?I want to remove ALL pages under the "Scrap Laws" menu, because I think that is where the issue is. But I don't want to delete totally and have to recreate them all later. Thnaks again!
-
While you can test this over time, it would be difficult because you will never know if you've done enough to satisfy Panda. And really, you don't even know for sure if Panda is the culprilt. (I think it is, but no one can say for sure.)
So, let's say you took out some of the low quality content and a month later nothing has changed. That could mean that you didn't take out enough to make the Panda algorithm see your site as high quality. But, it could be that you just need more time. While some sites recover within one Panda refresh (and that usually happens approximately monthly), others seem to need several refreshes.
In regards to unpublishing vs deleting the content, you can either delete the pages or you can use a noindex tag to tell Google not to include the pages in the index. Having low quality pages on your site that are noindexed will not hurt you in the eyes of Panda.
-
Thanks Marie! I'm getting the feeling it's the content. Quick question: Could I just unpublish the content and then test over time, OR do I need to completely delete the questionable content from the site? Does Google see it if it is unpublished and still penalize?
-
There were two major algorithm updates last week - Panda and the Payday loans algorithm. Payday loans affects sites that had done really spammy link building and it is very unlikely that this affected you. But, Panda is certainly possible.
I haven't had a good look at the site, but I see that you have 263 pages indexed in Google. Are all of these pages high quality pages that Google would be proud to show to searchers? If you've got duplication amongst the pages or if you've got "unhelpful" pages that are indexed then you need to remove or noindex them. On a quick look here are some examples of pages that should be removed or noindexed:
http://www.popscrap.com/component/content/category/11-demo-articles
http://www.popscrap.com/component/users/?view=remind
http://www.popscrap.com/24-products/120-scrapshield - It looks like a good amount of the text on this page is on multiple pages of your site.
Of course, there could be other issues. If you've made any changes to the site recently then I'd look at those changes first, but otherwise I'd go on a thorough cleanup so that only the pages that are the best are shown to Google.
-
To help figure out what is causing the 404 errors do the following in webmaster tools:
-login to your websites profile, then on the left hand side navigation hit crawl > crawl errors > not found. Under not found review the list of URL's for clues (you can also click on an individual link to see where the 404 page was linked from). Depending on how large your site is, if the 747 not found URL's is a large percentage of your total page count, you could be experiencing a temporary rankings drop that will disappear one you fix your error pages. If you could add a link to a few of the 404 error pages we could help you figure out what is wrong with your site code or server setup.
-
Just my two cents friend..
4 days back, Google released Panda 4.0. You can check if that caused the drop.
Here is a tool that can help you find if any of the Google penalties are behind the drop:
http://www.barracuda-digital.co.uk/panguin-tool/
Once on the page, click on the 'Log-in to Analytics' button and allow the tool to access your Google Analytics account and check if the recent Panda caused the drop. Hope this helps.
Good luck. By the way, thin content is of no use these days and you should be investing all your quality time in producing quality content.
Best,
Devanur Rafi
-
I looked at some of your content, and some of it seems quite thin, such as the regulations for each state. There's really only a couple of sentences (in the instances that I saw) that deal with the individual state, and then there's a lot of boilerplate content, navigation, and other site elements that are the same from page to page. Just one more thing to think about.
-
It looks like google penalize you, it's happen to one of my websites on January, I was going nuts because I didn't see any message until 2 weeks after on my google webmaster tools. I would recommend a couple o days to see if you see something if not then try to check your links if a couple of websites you are linking got penalized they you can get in trouble too.
-
Kevin, any insight into where to start with respect to the 747 missing URL's?? What causes that? How to fix? Thanks!!
-
haha! Ok! Thanks Kevin!
-
No, no. My bad. You mentioned above that you've been ranking strong for two years, and then when I peaked at your site I saw the RT template. I wrongly assumed the Joomla template was released at the same time as the Magento template (I actually use the same exact template for Magento at www.88k.com.tw, although heavily modified). I was just thinking if you had done a site revamp with a new template that might be a factor in your recent bump off SERPs. Sorry to worry you about that. But it looks like you found an issue with the 404 errors. Good job.
-
Also, I just noticed this (see image). 747 missing URL's!?
-
What do you mean by "it's not 2 years old"? Is being under 2 years old a factor?
-
Thanks! Yes, it's Google. We actually are ranking better on Bing and Yahoo now!
Looked at Google Webmaster and it shows a steep drop on 5-21. (image attached)
-
A couple of things I'd do right away:
Look in Google Webmaster Tools to see if there are any notices there (I'm going to assume that it's Google where you are no longer ranking).
Look in your analytics to see if there was a particular day that you dropped off. You can then look to see if that coincided with any known algorithm update.
-
My bad. Looks like it is. It was release for Magento only late last year.
-
Always great to help out a fellow Rocketeer! Did you recently update your website, because that template is not 2 years old. This could certainly be a factor.
-
Thanks, Kevin. I haven't made any changes in months, and do not do any crazy linking schemes. Competitors seem to be at the same places on the page. We are the only one hit by this.
-
That's a tough one without more to go on. Google releases updates to it's ranking algorithm every so often and some site get hit hard. If you're content hasn't changed and you haven't engaged in any unusual activity in terms of link building or advertising, then I'd say wait it out. Give it a week or two, which is how long it's taken many other quality sites to bounce back from a Google update. Unlikely you'll have issues here, but you still might want to check your webmaster tools to see if any manual actions have been applied.
This might be a good time to go over your site, again, for the first time;-) See what could be done to answer visitor questions and lead them to the right pages.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Search function rendering cached pages incorrectly
On a category page the products are listed via/in connection with the search function on the site. Page source and front-end match as they should. However when viewing a browser rendered version of a google cached page the URL for the product has changed from, as an example - https://www.example.com/products/some-product to https://www.example.com/search/products/some-product The source is a relative URL in the correct format, so therefore /search/ is added at browser rendering. The developer insists that this is ok as the query string in the Google cache page result URL is triggering the behaviour, confusing the search function - all locally. I can see this but just wanted feedback that internally Google will only ever see the true source or will it's internal rendering mechanism possibly trigger similar behaviour?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MickEdwards1 -
Not showing up in search results for non-branded terms
Hello! Can anyone see any glaring reasons why this post: "98 Book Marketing Ideas That Can Help Authors Increase Sales" isn't on page one of Google — or even page 10! — for the term "book marketing ideas"? Many other sites with lower domain and page authority — even ones linking to this article — are ranking on the first ten pages for this term, and I can't figure out why we're not appearing anywhere. The same thing is happening for ALL of our other blog posts, and the keywords they're optimized for. According to GA, the only terms we're getting clicks from are branded keywords. This subdomain is now 2 years old, and the domain bookbub.com has been around for 5 years. Our domain authority is 61. We have the Yoast SEO plugin installed and are following all the standard SEO best practices. We have enough external links to at least be ranking within the first 10 pages of this Google search. I feel like there's something technically wrong, maybe in the code or backend, but nobody here can figure it out, and our hosting provider WP Engine has no ideas. Moz is returning crawl errors on our site, mainly "Error Code 804: HTTPS (SSL) Error Encountered" and "Error Code 803: Incomplete HTTP Response Received." I have confirmed with WP Engine that everything is set up correctly on our end, and that this is a known Moz issue. I've reached out to Moz's support team about this, and am awaiting a response. But what else am I missing? There's got to be something — I've been blogging for 10 years for different companies and my own personal websites, and I've never come across anything like this before. I'm completely stuck! I'd appreciate any insights you can offer. Thanks in advance! 🙂 EDIT: I heard back from Moz on those errors. The 804 errors are a Moz-side issue — their crawler isn't equipped to be able to handle SNI. They're looking into a resolution, and this wouldn't affect search engine crawlers. Regarding the 803 error: "When you see an 803 error, that means your site closed its TCP connection to our crawler before our crawler could read a complete HTTP response. You don't see this error when you go to the page in your browser because content-length is an outdated component for modern browsers and they will disregard this error, but the intention of our crawler is to report any errors that might be occurring. So the crawler is configured to detect and report such errors." The only thing I can think to do here is go back to WP Engine with this information, but other than that, I'm not sure what this could mean or how to fix it, or if this might be the underlying technical issue keeping us from ranking.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | bookbubpartners1 -
Some sitemap xml apprears in google search
some sitemap, i have observed, that google is showing in the result for our website.. wht is wrong? any idea?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Rahim1190 -
Finding Ranking for search term and increasing ranking
Hi. The company that I'm working with would like to rank highly in google for certain generic search terms (dentist, dentists, etc.). Certain websites the company has used to rank highly in google for generic keywords, but has not for years now since google has revised their algorithm so many times. Moz lists that the company websites are not found in the top 51+ results in google. My first question is: **Is there a way, apart from manually searching the results, to find the ranking position of the website in google? **Ideally, I would like to find a program that will do this. Second, I've been reading a lot of the great articles and comments on Moz, and I've been learning a lot more about SEO. My focus has shifted to spending more attention on User Experience and Social Media instead of placing the exact keywords in the pages / tags of the website. What area(s) should I be focusing on to best increase the ranking of the company website for certain generic terms? Ideally, I'd like to create good quality content, so that users will not instantly click away. I appreciate any thoughts or comments. Thank you in advance!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | americasmiles0 -
How did my dev site end up in the search results?
We use a subdomain for our dev site. I never thought anything of it because the only way you can reach the dev site is through a vpn. Google has somehow indexed it. Any ideas on how that happened? I am adding the noindex tag, should I used canonical? Or is there anything else you can think of?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | EcommerceSite0 -
Website using search term as URL brand name to cheat Google
Google has come a long way over the past 5 years, the quality updates have really helped bring top quality content to the top that is relevant for users search terms, although there is one really ANNOYING thing that still has not been fixed. Websites using brand name as service search term to manipulate Google I have got a real example but I wouldn't like to use it in case the brand mentions flags up in their tools and they spot this post, but take this search for example "Service+Location" You will get 'service+location.com' rank #1 Why? Heaven knows. They have less than 100 backlinks which are of a very low, spammy quality from directories. The content is poor compared to the competition and the competitors have amazing link profiles, great social engagement, much better website user experience and the data does not prove anything. All the competitors are targeting the same search term but yet the worst site is ranking the highest. Why on earth is Google not fixing this issue. This page we are seeing rank #1 do not even deserve to be ranking on the first 5 pages.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Jseddon920 -
Search instead of 404 - Vtex Brazil
Vtex in one of the best e-commerce in Brazil and I´ve just find out they transform any 404 page in a search page. Polishop ( http://www.polishop.com.br/ ) is one of their clientes and if you try to search any page it will never return a 404 error because convert any url in a search. Example: http://www.polishop.com.br/12345678 - 200: HTTP/1.1 200 OK ( it does not return a 404 code) I´m a little bit confused if this good or not... what do you think moz experts?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SeoMartin10 -
Blog Not Ranking Well at All in Search Engines, Need Help!
Hi Mozers, Need some help on a CMS I've been working with over the last year. The CMS is built by a team of guys here in Washington State. Basically, I'm having issues with clients content on the blog system not getting ranking correctly at all. Here's a few problems I've noticed: Could you confirm and scale these problems based upon being, "not a problem" "a problem" and "critical must fix" 1. The title tag is pulling from the title of the article which is also automatically generating a URL with underscores instead of dashes. Is having a duplicate URL, Title, and Title tag spammy looking to search engines? Are underscores on long URL's confusing google? Where shorter one's are fine (i.e. domain/i_pad/
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Keith-Eneix
(i.e.http://www.ductvacnw.com/blog/archives/2013/05/20/5_reasons_to_hire_a_professional_to_clean_your_air_ducts_and_vents), 2. The CMS is resolving all URL's with a canonical instead of a 301 redirect (I've told webmaster tools which preferred url should be indexed). Does using a canonical over a 301 redirect cause any confusion with Google? Is one better practice then the other? 3. The H1 tags on the blog pull from "blog category" instead of the title of the blog post. Is this is a problem? 4. The URl's are quite long with the added "archives/2013/05/20/5". Does this cause problems by pushing the main target keyword further away from the domain name? 5. I'm also noticing the blog post is actually not part of the breadcrumbs where we normally would expect that to populate after the blog category name, Problem? These are some of the things I've noticed and need clarification on. If you see anything else please let me know?0