Any ranking success with Moz Local?
-
In the last three months, our Tampa office has gone from a listing score of 2% to 72% and is considerably higher than everyone else on the first page for Moz Local...but we are on the 13th page! We have not improved at all, even though our score has dramatically.
I know that the listing is only a part of the local equation, but it just a little shocking to me we haven't moved up even one page. Anyone have any success with this tool that translated to increased rankings for local? If so, how long did it take you to see results?
Thanks,
Ruben
-
Excellent discussion going on here, ladies and gents! I am so impressed by the deep questions and answers present here. Our community makes me proud!
Ruben, I'd like to bring up a couple of things to add to this good topic.
-
You might like to read my Moz Post http://moz.com/blog/local-landing-pages-guide which covers the concept of building out pages for various locations in some depth.
-
Citations are a big part of the picture - absolutely! They serve 2 main functions which are a) to help customers find you on a wide variety of platforms and b) to build a consistent, trustworthy body of information about your business on the web, which is then crawled by search engines, causing them to have confidence in the cluster of data they have about your business which can then increase your chances of being considered a relevant answer for certain queries.
So, it's a 1-2 punch kind of thing, building citations. There are direct benefits in a customer finding your listing on a site like Superpages and indirect benefits in the consistency and prevalence of your citations helping search engines to feel confident about the validity and prominence of your business.
This being said, it's my belief and understanding that it takes time for validity/prominence to actually start affecting rank. Every local business platform has its own schedule for taking a citation from zero to live, and then I have to think about search engine bots picking this up and stirring it around in the bucket in which they've got all my other business data. Then, I have to take into account whether my citation building has, in fact, surpassed what my direct local competitors have done or has simply brought me on par with them, meaning citation building will not be the difference-maker I'd love it to be, because my toughest competitors have done the same thing I have (meaning, I'm going to have to find some other way to distance myself from the field).
In sum, citation building is a must-do for any local business that doesn't want to fall behind in their niche, but it takes time to see the positive effects from it and the level of positivity is going to directly relate to the stiffness of the competition. You are in a tough market - law in major cities, which I would consider one of the most difficult ranking environments. Yes, you've got to get those citations in good shape, but my honest appraisal of this is that you are going to have to go way beyond these basics to surpass what is doubtless a highly active/ heavily marketed competitor base. The usual advice of build excellent content, implement on-page Local SEO, build citations, earn reviews is going to be common to all your competitors', so finding something that they're not all already doing may be necessary to see yourself rise in the SERPs by dint of some extra creative, superior effort.
Hope these thoughts are helpful! Glad you brought up this topic, and I hope once Moz Local has had a few more months to bake in the oven, we'll be able to publish some case studies that prove a correlation between participation and positive results!
-
-
Will do, thanks!
- Ruben
-
I concur wholeheartedly with every point Robert has made.
Bottom line, and you know this - you said you did - Moz is only one piece of the puzzle. As Robert said, it's in its early days, but I like it. For $49 it doesn't promise the world. It says it'll update 10 of the most important recipients and aggregators of local data with our your most important local data. It does that. And it provides a wealth of educational material to accompany it.
I recommend you take Robert up on his offer or continue down the path of self-optimization making sure you fill in remaining blanks. I have a post on how to do local SEO if you want to start there. It won't answer all your questions, nor will it result in as good an outcome as you'll get from hiring a pro like Robert, but it might help.
Donna
-
Ruben
I did not mean for that to come off as harsh or a judgement, it was meant really as being based on what you had written. When I re-read it, to me it seemed a bit blunt. Sorry.
With what you are trying to accomplish around Tampa, there are some things you need to change with all you are doing and, unfortunately, they are a bit long for this format. I am willing to provide you a site you can look at that I know they will not mind where you can see in real life the way to approach this. If you will email or PM me, I will provide that to you. (I am unwilling to put a site name out for this forum since it is a client site and not one I own.)
With your last statement:_ Though, now it looks like I have some other strategies thanks to you all to implement, and that's exciting, but I'm still disappointed. MozLocal, at least for me, has been completely worthless. _I think you have to put it into perspective.
For me, as an agency, most of these Local tools we do not use. I am speaking to any like Yext, etc. and including Moz Local in that. I want to be clear that my respect for Moz is only 1000 times more than Yext, and their product has been out a relatively short amount of time. If there has been a company I have come to trust it is Moz, so if they are not providing a service at the highest level, I believe they will make it right and you should email them or put in a support ticket.
With any SaaS, you have to be very clear what it is they are providing and I will tell you oftentimes I have to force myself to take the time to read everything they say they are supplying so I can be clear as to what I will or will not receive. As an agency and having a bit of notoriety, I get a call a day about ranking software, linking software, Local software, etc. I try a lot of it, but only end up using any of it rarely. We use Moz analytics, megalytics (which IMO is the best reporting software in the business), MajesticSEO, SEMRush, ahrefs, etc.
With the Local like Yext, I think it is simply not appropriate to accept money over time and then if someone quits paying you take down all their info. There is NO WAY that taking it down will improve the outcomes of Yext and certainly it will damage the business. In essence a person/business is held hostage. I do not know what Moz does, but IMO Yext is in it for the money based on their actions. It is not about improving outcomes.
So, with the local, once you have your listings correct, you are at a place where you then must maintain your NAP and guard it and then make sure your site is as optimized as possible to take advantage of Local.I know that is a lot to take in, but I hope it provides clarity.
Best,
Robert
edited to provide info on valuing Local SaaS
-
"I think the issue you are having is looking at Moz Local as if it is a tool to guarantee you will show up on page one of the 7 pack.:"
I do not think that at all, and that's the part I want to make clear. I have not seen ANY change in the ranking. When I saw Moz's pitch about this product, yes, I thought it might get me a really good ranking, but at the very least, I would have sworn there would be some improvement.
When I went through the Moz Pro software and optimized all my pages, etc, etc, I saw massive improvement. This product...nothing.
Though, now it looks like I have some other strategies thanks to you all to implement, and that's exciting, but I'm still disappointed. MozLocal, at least for me, has been completely worthless.
-
You can rank in both Ruben. We handle several law firm clients and about 30 sites for them. Yes, I have clients who are in Houston and other near areas and we do have them ranking in both areas. You are doing overkill if you are trying to do a separate page for every service at the firm for each location for simply business reasons. First and foremost, a search on Tampa is more "locally" global. In other words there are people in Trinity or St. Pete, etc. who will search on attorney Tampa. There are not that many in Tampa who will search attorney Trinity. So, you need a Tampa page minimally for the Tampa office. Kemprugelawgroup.com/Tampa... /Trinity, etc. Here is how I would set it up. The site would be a Tampa site with dropdown menu for "areas Serviced" or something similar. You might have Trinity, St. Pete, and Clearwater. (Just because a bunch of people will want to say you cannot do that- yes you can. What you cannot do is say you have an office in those other areas when you do not.) Frankly, if you handle it correctly, you can even show up for those searches.
I think the issue you are having is looking at Moz Local as if it is a tool to guarantee you will show up on page one of the 7 pack. I think that is a much more dynamic process than listing with data aggregators, citation sites, etc. It would be nice if someone from Moz Local would chime in here.
I suggest you create two pages for any city you want to rank in. One will be your "contact" page and one a "content" page. We try out variations until we find which works best for a given site in terms of ranking in local and organic. One page for each.
LMK if this helps you understand it a bit better.
Robert
-
Sorry. It's a best practice and has been for a while. Extra work, but adds clarity for visitors and search engines alike.
-
Hi Donna,
Well, I was under the impression, if you have two brick-and-mortar offices then you can rank in each location, but I didn't know I needed separate pages for everything. I...guess that's wrong. I will check out the SEJ article; I appreciate you providing it for me.
Thanks,
Ruben
-
Robert,
I understand what you are saying about how to check where you rank, but not how we are optimized for Trinity and not Tampa. Earlier this year, we opened a second office in Tampa. After we got verified by Google and everyone else. I got MozLocal to help us rank there.
I made sure to add our new phone, address and everything else to the site. So, I'm not sure what else I could do other than that for on-page optimization? I guess I could build out separate pages for each location as Donna suggested?
Either way, I'd greatly appreciate any concepts you'd like to share with me on any ways to improve our performance. Feel free to respond here, message me or email me at ruben@kempruge.com
Thanks,
Ruben
P.S. I'm glad you liked it here!
-
I agree with Robert, you're mixing apples and oranges - trying to rank in Trinity and Tampa at the same time. You're also correct in noting that listings are only part of the equation.
Search Engine Journal published a post back in April that succinctly summarizes what you need to do to rank well in multiple locations. It also points you to the Google's Places Quality Guidelines if you're not already familiar with them.
Bottom line though, you need a dedicated page per location on your website. Each location page has to be clearly differentiated with a unique (and local !) phone number and content. This is the page you should be submitting to Google Places via Moz Local.
Make sense? Or am I telling you something you already know?
-
Ruben,
I hate to hear anyone is struggling to rank locally and I have an agency and we do Local for clients. I am a huge Moz fan, but do not use the Moz Local. I am answering because you are making an assumption that I think I can assist in. When I read what Moz Local does, they get you listed on the major data aggregators (easy big picture version). You are located in Trinity, FL. (I had a business in Tampa for several years).
When I search from a computer based in Trinity with an incognito search for - Personal Injury Lawyer - you are ranked second in the 7-pack and 4th in organic.When I add - Tampa - to the search (and computer still in Trinity) you are not in the 7 pack, but you are ranked 20th in organic (page 2 # 10) for ..../personal-injury.
The issue is you are locally optimized for Trinity FL where you are. (So, I guess, it is working for you.) The problem is if you are trying to rank locally in Tampa even though really your are in the Tampa/St. Pete/ Clearwater area, you are really in Trinity and you are ranking well there. To truly know how you rank, you have to be set to an incognito or &PWS=0 search and have the computer geo located to the area you are searching for.
I know this is confusing and I also know it makes people want to go get virtual offices ( don't do it please), but there are other tools you can use to assist you beyond just optimizing locally and still being able to rank in some of these areas. LMK if you understand and I will be happy to lay out a few concepts that might help.
Best of luck
Robert (I miss running around the bay there!)
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Local Recreational Marijuana Dispensaries Disappearing from Google Maps when Plurals used.
This is the second time I have posted this question and never got a satisfactory result. I have an SEO client in Tacoma Wa and when you type (Dispensaries Near Tacoma they are in the Top 3 snack pack and the Google maps shows 20 other similar businesses. However, when you search (Dispensary Near Tacoma) only 3 or 5 recreational marijuana shops show up and my client disappears. Someone earlier suggested it could be because of the categories selection, but that can't affect ALL the other shops and like I said it happens in other cities. for example Dispensary Near Olympia vs Dispensaries Near Olympia. I have the full write up and pictures and diagrams on my blog. Please HELP! This could affect your future clients also. https://isenselogic.com/local-business-disappearing-on-google-maps-when-plurals-used/
Local Listings | | isenselogic0 -
How to create a filter view to view local search traffic in google analytics ?
Id like to be able to drill down into the local search traffic for a site in google analytics, i know i can get some analytics data via google's local places dashboard, but id like to see a more detailed chart in google analytics. I read this article and installed this filtered view dashboard from Local U, but it seems its stopped working since it was originally published back in July 13. Is there a more up to date method for capturing this data ?
Local Listings | | jpeg800 -
For Google's Structured Data, should I change my listings from Product schema to Local Business schema?
I was reading Google's Structured Data spec, and I'm considering changing the schema of our listing pages from the Product schema to the Local Business schema. Is this a good idea? To give you a little more info, the pages that I'm classifying are listings for physical spaces that our website rents out for activities, such as meetings. Here's an example of a listing: https://www.peerspace.com/pages/listings/550ddcde2f352d0800fc186b Our goal is to add the proper schema.org tags to the page so that our spaces show up in local searches, such as "meeting space in San Francisco." The problem is that when we add location microdata (addressLocality, addressRegion, etc.) to our current "Product" schema, Google tells us that "Products" can't have a location. However, we aren't quite a "Local Business" either, since we don't publicly share our space's street addresses—only the space's neighborhood/city/state for privacy reasons. As a result, we get an error from Google's Structured Data Tool as a "Local Business" page because "streetAddress" is required for Local Businesses. Should we switch to the Local Business schema anyway, even though we get structured data errors for streetAddress? Or is it better not to include the location information in the microdata so that we don't have errors? Does Google penalize you for incomplete tags? Any input is appreciated!
Local Listings | | stuartstein0 -
Average Percentage of Clicks on Google (Adwords vs Local 3 Pack vs Organic)
Does anyone know the allocation, percentage-wise, of clicks that go to Adwords vs Local 3 Pack vs Organic on Google Search (average)?
Local Listings | | OhYeahSteve0 -
What is the radius for local search results
Does anyone know if there is a specific radius google uses to display local search results or is it simply based on the number of competitors or industry vertical.
Local Listings | | coolhandluc
Let's say I am based in covent garden London and I am looking for an indian restaurant. I assume that all results will be very localized as there are plenty of Indian restaurants in convent garden. But If i was looking for, let's say "wooden pipe shop" (i believe there is none in convent garden) what would google display? how far away from my desired location will google be able to extend it's results to?0 -
Local Directories: What are the best practices for manually updating over 500 listings?
We are currently using an aggregator for a client, but we will be manually updating 5 different local directories that are not included in the distribution for over 500 locations. I am wondering if there are any local experts that have a set of best practices/processes for this type of scenario?
Local Listings | | PureVisibility0 -
Local domains vs. subfolders?
I am in the process of rebranding a B2B website for a UK company that has been established on a .net address for ten years. The CMS is Wordpress. The company has previously had localised content on .net/de, .net/au extensions for various regions where they have offices (US, Oz, various Europe.) I am getting varied and at times conflicting feedback from the creative agency, inhouse digital staff, and IT about the best way to proceed with the new website and in particular its future local language versions. Question 1: If we change the .net website to a .com address, will 301 redirects safeguard our SEO real estate? Question 2: we own the .com extension and have been using it for some back office stuff. It was purchased because it was advised that the .net did not carry much credibility in the US, is this correct? Question 3: If we change the .net to the .com which is hosted in the US, will we wipe our search rankings on Google for the UK and non-US locations? I saw this post and wondered:
Local Listings | | LConnect
http://moz.com/community/q/uk-rankings-disappeared-after-us-website-launch Question 4: is hosting the regional site best done on a local domain (we own a bunch) or does that not really matter? Question 5: If we use a WP plug in and just use subfolders for translating and localising content (US, Germany, Australia), what is the best way of serving that content for local PR? Sorry about the many questions 🙂 Guni0 -
Local Subdomain vs. Local Subfolder
I know this is an issue that's been discussed here ad nauseum but I have, possibly, an interesting case. A third party company created our local search pages, and they perform very highly in SERPs, but are subdomains (local.website.com). But my problem comes down to two things, one of which isn't necessarily a subdomain vs. subfolder issue. 1.a. With the subdomain local.website.com we rank much higher for local search than we do for regular search on our main domain and it's respective keywords, would changing these subdomains to subfolders keep the link juice that the subdomain currently possesses and actually help our website rankings? b. And what strikes me as the most puzzling is that on local.website.com ALL of the content is identical (I can thank Copyscape for that) to the other local search pages on our own site and various other sites in our industry. I know the duplicate content is hurting our domain, which makes it even more confusing that our subdomain is ranking so highly for things like "diamonds by the yard florida". 2. We're an online only company, and I feel as though gaming the local search function isn't exactly something we should be doing, both from an ethical and an SEO standpoint. Is there any evidence that abusing the local search functions can have a negative affect on a domain's rankings? Hopefully this makes sense, if anyone needs clarification please let me know and I'll endlessly clarify. Thanks,
Local Listings | | allurez0