How to estimate search volume for multiple long tail queries?
-
I am comparing Moz, WordTracker and Google keyword research tools and trying to figure out how I can compare the aggregated search volume for a page which targets several similar long-tail queries.
For instance, according to one tool, the query 'printable guitar sheet music' has 125 monthly searches, but many small variations of this also have a similar amount. Do I just make a reasonable list and calculate them? Or do I just use "125" as an abstract number of measurement with no concrete reference to a **real **number of searchers, but useful in comparing one keyword to the next, and assume that all key words have a similar degree of consorting variations?
I seem to remember Google used to give away some pretty damned useful information in the keyword search tool, including monthly search volume. But now it looks like the metric is not actual search volume, but a 1-100 score based on the search volume.
So my questions are:
-
Should I try to convert these numbers into real search figure estimates or just use them for comparing one to the next?
-
Should I worry about trying to combine the aggregated variations of long tail keyword searches, or should I just choose one good keyword and let that represent all possible variations?
-
-
I'm taking our web pages and trying to figure out if they're targeted poorly or written using terms that the average searcher would not think to ask.
This is good. Nice work.
-
Thanks! I'm checking that out. As I mentioned in another response, these are super-long-tail keywords because rather than looking for opportunities for new content, I'm also looking for opportunities to reshape some existing content to get more matches. Sometimes, as an Educated Person, I sit down and write some page title that, as it turns out, nobody else in the world would think of except me. I have 10 years of experience in my topic and my audience sometimes has 1 week of experience, so they will use different vocabulary. In order to make sure my content can reach people who need it, I'm looking backwards to see how I may have used the wrong words.
-
That's a good point. Another thing is I'm looking at really long-tail stuff. That's because some of my efforts are going backwards. I'm taking our web pages and trying to figure out if they're targeted poorly or written using terms that the average searcher would not think to ask.
I'm not quite up-to-speed on the Knowledge Box but considering the places where I have seen it used, I don't think it quite works yet on my niche.
I am waiting for them to implement this feature for guitar diagrams. People often search for reference guitar information such as scales and chords. I'm happy to markup my content for the Knowledge Box.
-
I highly recommend checking out Long Tail Pro. It uses the GAKP but its interface is much easier to use rather than using Google directly. Also, you can plug in a couple of keywords and generate thousands of long tail keyword phrases and filter by search volume, organic competition, keyword difficulty (uses the Moz API), etc. While the data is still from Google and the keyword data may not be 100% accurate, I think it will get you a lot closer to what you are trying to accomplish than you would using any of these other tools.
-
Or do I just use "125" as an abstract number of measurement with no concrete reference to a real number of searchers
I take a quick look at the numbers in wordtracker. I am not trying to get into a big mathematical exercise. When looking at wordtracker I am just trying to make a "yes" or "no" decision about creating content.... or trying to make a "this keyword" or "that keyword" decision on how to optimize.
I am highly inclined to mathematics but I don't spend much time on these numbers. I do know some people who would make a three-day study about this with spreadsheets because they are thinkin' about writing a two paragraph page. That is a total waste of their time.
Is the wind blowing or ain't it? Get to work or abort. It is that simple.
The more important question about these number is: "Are people really searching for the same meaning of the keyword?"
Take an example the word "sapphire"..... You got in mind a blue gemstone... but that word could be used for graphics cards, pokemon, credit cards, mobile phone windows, Ford motor cars, strippers, who knows what else... so most of that volume that you saw in wordtracker and got excited about is not relevant to what you are selling.
In this Q&A we see lots of people pouring buckets of money into a website and their competitors are not who they think they are. They just looked at these numbers instead of trying to understand what people are lookin' for and more importantly, who is competing.
Sometimes the strength of the sites going after the small part of the volume is overwhelming compared to the sites who have the information that everybody is lookin' for. That, in my opinion, is why Google started Knowledge Box... and where they now display Knowledge Box they have given minor volume competitors better positions in the SERPs and pushed the sites with what people are looking for down to second and third page - because they want you to use the Knowledge Box. They want searchers to think "Google got the info" - even though they scraped it from my site and gave me a link in microscopic black font while links to alternative searches on money keyword with lots of ads are in big blue font.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Target Search Terms Changed - does this affect traffic?
We spent the last 12 months targeting a particular search term (mortgage broker) and have been ranking well for it consistently for about 6 months now. We have decided to change the target search term to something else (insurance broker) but noticed that our traffic has started to decline since we started doing this. We are still ranking well for the initial search term, and our ranking is slowly improving for the new targeted search term in SERPs but traffic is down about 60% from January. Is it normal/expected for this to happen?
Keyword Research | | monique-plaw1 -
How can you perform a simulated search query from another location?
In order to review the search results for different locations (New York, London, Paris, Berlin, etc.) I have tried several ways to simulate a search query from different locations. None of the ways I tried gave me the correct results, mostly because Google recognized my location anyway. Tools such as Browserstack also didn't give me the results I hoped for. Any ideas how to generate search results from different locations?
Keyword Research | | Digital-DMG0 -
Multiple Locations
Hi Community, I am having a little difficulty with a new company I am working with that has multiple brick and mortar stores. They have 5 locations. 3 in Portland, OR, 1 in Los Angeles and 1 in Las Vegas. The is technically an e-commerce site but the employer wants to drive customers into local showrooms unless they live outside of local areas. They have every minimal traffic outside of local areas. At the moment the page title is "Company Name | Rugs Portland, Los Angeles and Las Vegas. Their PR is #1 in Google for Rugs Portland, Las Vegas and number #5 for Rugs Los Angeles. They are not in the top 50 for the term "rug". My question is, "Should I leave the title alone or break up each location into separate landing pages and tackle long-tail keywords that are not local and have more monthly searches?" Also, Domain Authority is 33. Thanks for the help,
Keyword Research | | Mike.NW0 -
Question about ranking for long tail keywords
So I am looking at some long tail keywords for my web design company, for example: "website development and design company" The top results are websites that are not optimized for that specific keyword but about "web design & development" in general. The top ranking sites also have quite high PA with lots of links. If I were to create a page specifically about that term would it be fairly easy to rank for since the top ranking pages are not optimized for that keyword?
Keyword Research | | WebAdvancedUK0 -
Am I blind or has Google finally shut down its "Related Searches" option?
I know I just used this a few days ago, so I was surprised when doing keyword research today that I could no longer access the "Related Searches" feature in Google search. Has anyone else noticed this? It's a pity if it's gone, although I think Google announced it was going to shut this down over a year ago. They said the same thing about the "Patent" search too, but it is still available. I know using "Related Searches" was really popular with SEOs so I am wondering if anyone else is as sad-faced as I am? Or perhaps was it just bumped today so Google could have fun with their April Fool's beta test of Google "Nose" ?
Keyword Research | | danatanseo0 -
Is there an ideal ratio of keyword difficulty to search volume?
I used the keyword research tool to pull data on potential keywords, the report returns a percentage to represent the competition and difficulty of a keyword. Is there an ideal ratio of percent difficulty to search volume
Keyword Research | | AdviceElle0 -
Top Queries By Coutnry or Language?
Is there a tool or resource that provides top keywords by country or language? Something like https://freekeywords.wordtracker.com/top-keywords.html
Keyword Research | | jargomang0 -
Rank list of keywords by searches per month
Hi I would like to rank a list of keywords by searches per month in google.com.au, How could I do this?
Keyword Research | | Adsau0