What is the best practice for optimizing international websites? We operate a .co.uk and .com and obviously content is similar.
-
We have two (and soon to be more) international websites, all in English. The sites in question are WebHostingBuzz.com and WebHostingBuzz.co.uk. Obviously content is similar as we're providing a similar service but from different locations and different prices.
What is best practice here? Should we completely re-write the .co.uk content (this is the newer site) so it isn't penalized for scraping?
Any hints/tips would be appreciated.
-
Thanks David - much appreciated. We'll definitely be trying these.
-
Thanks Ryan! Cheers for the compliment
-
I really enjoyed your response David. I am learning aspects of international SEO and your reply really hit home for me. I never thought of changing the language code from EN to GB.
-
Hi Matt,
International SEO is always a fun question, especially when dealing with English speaking countries. Here's what I would do to help Google determine that this is a separate site and hopefully avoid any duplicate content issues - this will be specific to your UK site but the practice is universal:
-
List the UK phone number and address + any other specific UK contact info on every page (header + footer). The great thing is that you're already using the phone number and your registered business number in England. If it's ok with how you conduct business, I would also include the address in the footer as well
-
Change the HTML lang code to GB. Currently in the .co.uk source code you have: xml:lang="en" - what you need to be doing is specifying UK English like so: html lang="en-GB"
http://tlt.its.psu.edu/suggestions/international/web/tips/langtag.html#why
-
Double check webmaster tools for the UK site is targeting the UK
-
Ideally, you would want to change some of the text content to reflect differentiation between the English sites. I would simply paraphrase or rewrite the content from the American version and place it on the UK site.
-
If you see the .com version in the UK, don't panic. You'll need to build some links to the UK site ideally from .UK domains(co.uk, org.uk) and it should naturally sort itself out.
-
Something I've been wanting to try is the html link language tag. In this case it would work from the .com version link pointing to the .co.uk. W3 says it's not supported by browsers but doesn't mention crawlers - IMO it's worth a try if all else fails.
[http://www.webhostingbuzz.co.uk](<a href=)" hreflang="en-GB">Web Hosting Buzz
http://www.w3schools.com/tags/att_a_hreflang.asp
If you follow these instructions you should be fine, I mean apple.com and apple.com/uk are almost completely identical and they seem fine now. I haven't had any issues myself yet, and I've taken my own advice.
On a side note, I think I might become a customer - plans look pretty sweet
Good luck!
Dave
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does javascript generated content consider as regular content?
The website mentioned below, the content is generated using javascript, and content is something to do with Unicode char. The Unicode content creates as you scroll down. Will this content affect SEO https://www.myweirdtext.com/
On-Page Optimization | | teenmass423230 -
There is a copy of our website that is ranking. How can I let Google know our website is the authentic site?
I just found another copy of my old website and have no way to take it down. Unfortunately, it's ranking so he didn't place it as a nofollow. (My boss hired someone to redevelop our website before I came on board and never finished the project). So, could this be hurting us? I tried to look to see if we were being penalized and couldn't find that we were. Also, ever since we migrated to a new domain name, our ranking is tumbling. I've redirected properly and tested to make sure they're resolving correctly and they are. I have no idea what is going on. We've virtually lost all ranking. Any help would be much appreciated.
On-Page Optimization | | npuffer790 -
Is this keyword stuffing or best practice?
I'm a psychotherapist here in California. Its common practice for people to say "counseling and therapy" on their websites. Although the two are technically different, most people consider them to be synonyms. Do you think google would consider this practice to be keyword stuffing? Also, I am making a page for the forms I need people to fill out before they see me. Do you think it is bad to list links to the forms like this:
On-Page Optimization | | joebordersmft
-counseling / therapy intake form
-informed consent for counseling / therapy
as opposed to
-intake form
-informed consent
.....I think this falls under the idea that readability is important. I'm just really struggling because recently google decided my main keywords are things that have very little to do with therapy/counseling.0 -
Rich Snippets in wordpress websites
Hi all, What is the best and easiest plugin to configure and implement on WordPress blog websites? And what is the specific markup recommended for blog/article sites? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | emojo0 -
Nofollow on internal links
Hi, What do you all think about using nofollow on internal links? On pages that arent so important and use dofollow on important pages maybe for example from the sites menu.
On-Page Optimization | | Rob-0 -
Rel="canonical" Wordpress 2015 Best Practice
There are forum posts about how to insert rel="canonical" tags in Wordpress, but I've read about lots of changes in this space recently (updates to Yoast, for example). I'm having a problem with duplicate content on one of my sites, and it seems to be coming from multiple indexes of the same pages. I'll have a blog post show up under the posts, then the archives, then the tags. So, my question is, in early 2015, what are the current best practices for adding rel="canonical" tags in Wordpress? Thanks! Tim
On-Page Optimization | | TimLlew0 -
Is This A Reason To Move Content?
Dear All, I am questioning my initial decisions when I planned a site due to reading lots of info on moz. Although what I have read has made me question what I have already done, I can't find anything that is specific to my exact case, so here goes. I recently built a shopping cart in OpenCart. I want the site to have lots of information on the products it sells. I have populated each category with at least 1000 words of content that is specific to the products in that category, also I have some information pages that have no products in them at all, just copy. So the shopping site actually has a few pages that look like a static website and a few that look like a normal shopping cart. My thought behind this was I wanted the pages with lots of info to rank and become authoritative, in some way elevating the whole site. I have recently put a blog on the site, and a combination of that, and reading Moz has lead me think that I should move all the content from the category pages to the blog, and deep link each blog post to it's relevant products and category. From what I have read it would be easier to get the blog ranking and acknowledged as an authority rather than 30 category pages. Also each 1500+ word category page will make at least 3-4 nice blog posts, and each post can be focused on a single keyword rather than a large category page that has maybe 3-4 keywords it's trying to rank for. Also the blog is much better optimised than a standard OC category page (even using extensions with them). The only negative I can see is moving the content, but the site is less that 2 months old, and the amount of link juice it has is negligible. Does google cut new sites a bit of slack in these situations of moving content around, or will I be seen as 'up to something' by google? I guess my question is, am I barking up the right tree? Or is the old adage 'a little information is dangerous' true in this case, and I just about to make a load of work for the sake of it with no real benefit. However, if I am to make such a dramatic change to the sites architecture I think the time is now, before things start gaining juice & rank. I hope I have explained my situation clearly and I thank anyone who can offer me any advice. Great forum, Thank you, Ian
On-Page Optimization | | cookie7770