Is Schema markup inappropriate for ?
-
Is Schema(.org) markup meant specifically to be used on text? Or can you use it in a similar way that you can use Open Graph Protocol?
For example, for awhile I've been using something like this on my site:
Because it's in the head section, it appears on every page. In review, this seems to be an incorrect use? Should I only be using Schema to mark specific text? If not, what are the consequences of using Schema like this?
-
Ok, now I got the questions... sry. I didn't know the answers but I start to google and... I'll be back
-
I know what it is and how to use it, that's not the question.
When you use JSON-LD, specifically in something like the head section, you're using it without context. When this code appears on every page, it's labeling a person that may or may not be mentioned.
From the Google Developer Page on 'Specify your social profiles,'
"The social profiles in your markup must correspond to the ones that users can see on the same page."
It sounds like using this method within the head, especially with phone numbers, email, address, URL, etc., can be marked as either A) hidden text, or B) as something that would cause the rest of your markup to be ignored.
In this case... why would you ever use JSON-LD? It would never directly point to the object that's marked up like the HTML version does.
Maybe that helps clarify the question,
"In review, this seems to be an incorrect use? Should I only be using Schema to mark specific text? If not, what are the consequences of using Schema like this?"
When, exactly, is it appropriate and inappropriate to use Schema? I'm looking for an expansion in details that the Google Developer page doesn't mention. Maybe someone has been using and studying it for awhile?
-
Thats the Json-LD Mark-Up for a person, wich you can use with google like the microdate. It doesn’t matter if you place it in the or the section, Google will have no problem reading the code. It could look like that:
- <script< span="">type="application/ld+json"></script<>
- {
- "@context":"http://schema.org",
- "@type":"Person",
- "address":{
- "@type":"PostalAddress",
- "addressLocality":"Seattle",
- "addressRegion":"WA",
- "postalCode":"98052",
- "streetAddress":"20341 Whitworth Institute 405 N. Whitworth"
- },
- "colleague":[
- "http://www.xyz.edu/students/alicejones.html",
- "http://www.xyz.edu/students/bobsmith.html"
- ],
- "email":"mailto:jane-doe@xyz.edu",
- "image":"janedoe.jpg",
- "jobTitle":"Professor",
- "name":"Jane Doe",
- "telephone":"(425) 123-4567",
- "url":"http://www.janedoe.com"
- }
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
[Organization schema] Which Facebook page should be put in "sameAs" if our organization has separate Facebook pages for different countries?
We operate in several countries and have this kind of domain structure:
Technical SEO | | Telsenome
example.com/us
example.com/gb
example.com/au For our schemas we've planned to add an Organization schema on our top domain, and let all pages point to it. This introduces a problem and that is that we have a separate Facebook page for every country. Should we put one Facebook page in the "sameAs" array? Or all of our Facebook pages? Or should we skip it altogether? Only one Facebook page:
{
"@type": "Organization",
"@id": "https://example.com/org/#organization",
"name": "Org name",
"url": "https://example.com/org/",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/xxx",
"https://www.facebook.com/xxx_us"
], All Facebook pages:
{
"@type": "Organization",
"@id": "https://example.com/org/#organization",
"name": "Org name",
"url": "https://example.com/org/",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/xxx",
"https://www.facebook.com/xxx_us"
"https://www.facebook.com/xxx_gb"
"https://www.facebook.com/xxx_au"
], Bonus question: This reasoning springs from the thought that we only should have one Organization schema? Or can we have a multiple sub organizations?0 -
Adding Schema and No index tags via GTM
If we were to deploy schema and noindex tags to our website via Google tag manager, would these tags be viewed and respected by other search engines?
Technical SEO | | GregLB0 -
Schema query
Hello All, I have implemented schema on product page. On My product page at left section there is one section i.e. "Popular Products" in that 5 Popular products are listed. Now when I visit ABCD product page then in "Popular Product" section also out of 5 products this ABCD product also listed. Finally when I check structured data testing tool in that following details are available for products - @type, @id, image, name, url, sku, category, description, offers & offers all details, Brand & brands all details ...now after that there in "Is Related To" in that five products following details are there - @type, @id, image, name, url & offers that's it. So my query is, is this consider as duplicate? or no issue at all with google? Thanks! 6dHvQ
Technical SEO | | wright3350 -
Schema markup
Hi, I'd love to use schema markup, but I don't think there is one for the type of products we sell (mortgages). Does anyone know of a way of using schema markup for a page like this: https://www.turnkeymortgages.co.uk/mortgage/mortgage-rates/ The regulator for mortgages (FCA) in the UK has rules about how products are displayed, we have to show all the information in the table (see the link), and the compliance text (your home will be repossessed....) with every product. This is why I haven't tried to 'cobble' something together from the existing markup available - I can't fall foul of the regulator (or be misleading to customers). Anyone have any thoughts on this? Or, should I just wait until Schema come up with a markup suitable for such products.
Technical SEO | | CommT0 -
Schema tags - Schema.org
We have rolled out Schema tags for our homepage which has been very beneficial for us. We obviously don't want to go overboard however; can you please clarify, should Schema tags be limited to the homepage location, or implemented through the site? Thanks
Technical SEO | | hickboy50 -
Schema.org : reviewCount & ratingValue - best practices for implementation?
I'd like to add our merchant review count and rating to our site and use the schema.org markup to indicate to the search engines what these are. The reason I'd like to do this is so that the star rating pulls through to the organic listing. Check out this example from several UK tight sites. Notice how the organic listings display the star rating... My questions are: Has anyone seen an example of this from Google.com (US site) I heard that you should only add this markup to the homepape - but couldn't find any Google documentation to back this up. Do you know if this can be applied throughout the site w/o penalty? Thanks everyone!
Technical SEO | | evoNick0 -
Markup reference data using Scheme.org
Can anyone point me to a page showing how to mark up reference data according to schema.org ? Ie glossary or dictionary page.
Technical SEO | | sprynewmedia0 -
Implementing Schema.org Metadata for Reviews
Does anyone have much experience implementing Schema.org metadata for reviews? I run and operate a website that reviews study abroad programs and we've started the process of implementing this code to receive rich SERP snippets. We're going to use the framework used here: http://schema.org/Review My main question is how long does it generally take to see the results? I would also like to hear from people who implemented this code, but ran into problems, and how they overcame them. Any other tips and advice would be greatly appreciated! Cheers, Andrew
Technical SEO | | dunklea0