Google can't discern the identity of my site
-
I have a website, http://NewYorkJazzEvents.com, that promotes jazz bands that are available for brides looking to hire a jazz band to perform at their wedding, or event planners looking to hire a jazz band to perform for a corporate event, etc. This identity, that my site is an Entertainment Agency, is made clear by all of the content on my site, as well as all of the content on its associated sites (such as its linked Facebook, YouTube, and Google Business pages, and many local citations). Yet, contrary to all of this data, the mere presence of the word "events" in my URL and business name has led Google to believe that my site is a Live Jazz Guide, i.e., a site that lists public performances of jazz groups in New York City.
The problem, then, is that Google displays the site when people search for local events listings, and not when they search for jazz bands to contract for private events.
For example, do a search for "jazz bands new york" and up pops the listings for sites catering to searchers looking to hire bands for private events, like Gigmasters, Gigsalad, right at the top of the list, followed by lots of individual bands. My site is buried (in my results, anyway), on the middle of page 2. (My paid Adwords ad, on the other hand, shows up at the top of paid ads.): https://www.dropbox.com/s/sv4we4gvnb6wkyb/Screenshot%202016-04-11%2019.22.40.png?dl=0
Now do a search for "new york jazz events." Boom! I'm #1 in the natural results, and, unlike in the search for "new york jazz band," my Google plus page and map (or is it the "knowledge graph"?) display right at the top of the right column: https://www.dropbox.com/s/nob24x1b8u1g4or/Screenshot%202016-04-11%2019.18.49.png?dl=0. (Pretty useless to people searching for live jazz listings in New York, though.)
(This, by the way, is an additional related frustration: why does Google display all of its local information (its map, links to my Google reviews, etc.) next to my site listing when people are searching for events, but but hides this valuable information next to my site listing when people are search for jazz bands (when my site comes up on page 2)?)
For a further confirmation of Google's confusion, see this data from Google that indicates the top search queries that it is using to display my site are centered around searches for local live jazz listings: Google Search Console > Search Traffic > Search Analytics > Queries: https://www.dropbox.com/s/t8blxv6a077iuw6/Screenshot%202016-03-07%2012.28.38.png?dl=0
See also see this data from Google that indicates that it see "events" (which it understands as local live jazz listings) rather than "new york jazz bands" as the essential keyword describing the identity of the site: Google Search Console > Google Index > Content Keywords: https://www.dropbox.com/s/6nk6skfgx9zjzgc/Screenshot%202016-03-07%2012.46.04.png?dl=0
It's been this way for several years. I thought Google was supposed to be smart, but it's pretty dumb in this case (all the other search engines, including Bing, are quite a bit more intelligent). All this trouble, essentially from a word within a URL?
Does anyone have an idea of the cause of this issue, and any potential cures? What can I do to clear up Google's confusion?
-
That's great, Chuck. So glad you found someone you might work with. Hope it works out really well!
-
Thanks again Ruth and Miriam, for all of your advice.
I've gone through the list of Moz recommended SEO consultants that Miriam linked to and found someone that I'd like to work with. Hopefully (assuming he's available) he'll be able to set me on the most efficient and cost-effective path to move forward.
-
I understand how hard attracting links can be, especially in a niche market. Building a solid inbound link profile often takes (even) more than being the best - it requires a lot of outreach and promotion. This is another area where an SEO professional might be able to help, because link outreach can be really time-consuming. I would recommend that you vet someone VERY carefully before engaging them to build links. Some things to watch out for:
Red flags:
- Guarantees (X links per month, etc)
- Buying links
- Placing links on networks of sites
- Mass directory submissions (although submitting to useful, relevant, human-curated directories can be worthwhile, it's an area to tread cautiously on)
Basically you want someone who is going to promote your business online with an eye toward attracting great links. It can be a very outreach- and relationship-based approach similar to PR in a lot of ways. Moz' Recommended list is a good place to start, and I personally recommend Jon Cooper from Point Blank SEO as person I know who is the best at this.
-
Hi Ruth,
Thanks very much for your advice. I've actually done your first suggestion (removing every possible instance of the word "events" within the text of the site). The 2nd is something I'll try as a last effort before rebranding. Thanks very much for the link to the Moz resource. So far as the third idea, attracting links, I'm in such a niche submarket that I've found that even though the site is the best (and more or less the only) of its kind, and already fairly loaded with relevant and useful content already, it doesn't attract any links, even though many related people (venues, party planners, photographers, caterers, etc.) have become familiar with it over the years.
-
I think Miriam has some great suggestions. Some other things to try, if you're not quite ready to move your site (or in addition to moving your site):
- Remove as many instances of the word "Events" from your site as you can. Replace them, where it makes sense to do so, with a more relevant keyword. This will be somewhat damaging to your brand if you are committed to the business name "New York Jazz Events," but may help reduce the "Events" signal you're sending.
- Look into markup with schema.org. Here's an intro to it on the Moz Learn section: https://moz.com/learn/seo/schema-structured-data. Marking up your data will help Google further understand what you do and don't do. This is another area where you may want to bring in a professional SEO consultant, since it can be a bit fiddly to implement.
- Create additional content around finding a jazz band, and try to build some more topical authority in that area by attracting links from other sites about jazz bands/finding a band for your event.
Good luck!
-
Hey Chuck,
Want to be sure to highlight here that I'm not saying the domain is the only reason for what you're experiencing. There could be more to this that a full audit of your website would discover. But it does seem like an obvious signal. Also not suggesting you have to use an EMD if you rebrand, but my gut feeling on this is that Google is correlating the word 'events' with their concept of what an event is (Google has even used Events as part of their Plus offerings to let people publish upcoming events).
So ... before you jump into a re-brand solely based on one idea from my first-glance look at your website, I'd really urge you to consider hiring a good SEO company to conduct a full audit of the website and the issue. Rebranding is a major undertaking! You might consider looking through our Recommend List here at Moz for companies with good reputations:
https://moz.com/rand/recommended-list-seo-consultants/
And I'm hoping you'll receive further feedback from the community
-
Hi Miriam,
Thanks for your response. I agree that that's what's probably happening. What I don't understand is the complete failure of Google's supposed sophistication, as described in the WhiteBoard Friday. The word "Events" on its own, is ambiguous; in one context, it could mean a wedding or corporate event, in another it could mean a concert, etc. The context of the content on my site and all the related sites that link to it makes the meaning unambiguously clear. Any visitor who even glances at the home page, much less everything else, gets it within seconds. The other search engines get it too. But Google doesn't.
You're right, I'm at a desperate enough at this stage right now to rebrand as an unambiguous string of keywords, NewYorkJazzBands. But that's not a brand (as is/was NewYorkJazzEvents), its a string of keywords, and will be perceived so by searchers. I also thought this is the sort of thing Google tries to discourage you from doing. But clearly, Google interprets the keywords in my current URL as superseding all the hundreds of other signals put together, so if that's what I need to do, I'll do it. At least I'll be in the running in the correct results for the correct search terms…
-
Hey Chuck,
At first glance, I'd say your domain name (http://NewYorkJazzEvents.com) would be sending a very strong signal to Google that your website is promoting jazz events in NY ... not that you are promoting wedding bands. Your case might well be one of the rare ones that calls for re-branding, but I'd also recommend spending a few minutes watching this recent WhiteBoard Friday which relates highly to the topic of how Google evaluates the quality of content:
https://moz.com/blog/google-may-analyze-evaluate-quality-content-whiteboard-friday
Hope this helps and that you'll get lots of good feedback from others in the community.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Best practices around translating quotes for international sites?
I'm working on a site that has different versions of the same page in multiple languages (e.g., English, Spanish, French). Currently, they feature customer testimonial quotes on some pages and the quotes are in English, even if the rest of the page is in another language. I'm curious to know what are best practices around how to treat client quotes on localized languages pages. A few approaches that we're contemplating: 1. Leave the quote in English and don't translate (because the customer quoted doesn't speak the localized language). 2. Leave the on-page quote in English, but provide a "translate" option for the user to click to see the translated version. The translated text would be hidden until the "translate" button is selected. 3. Go ahead and translate the quote into the local language. Appreciate your thoughts, thank you!
Local Website Optimization | | Allie_Williams0 -
Ecommerce Site Structure -- "/our_locations" page: helpful or harmful?
Hello! We are a retailer with brick and mortar stores in different cities. We have a website (ourbusiness.com), which includes a blog (ourbusiness.com/blog) and a separate ecommerce site for each store in subfolders (ourbusiness.com/Boston-store and ourbusiness.com/Atlanta-store). NB: We do this for non-business reasons and have no choice. So, this is not like REI (for example) or other stores with lots of locations but one central ecommerce operation. Most experts seem to recommend a site structure that echoes REIs. IE: a home page principally devoted to ecommerce (rei.com) includes an Our Locations-type page (rei.com/stores) which links to local store pages like (rei.com/stores/fresno) I understand how this would help REI, since their homepage is devoted to ecommerce and they need a store locator page that doesn't compete with the shopping experience. But since we can't send people to products directly from our home page, is there any reason for us not to put the store locator function right on the home page? That is, is there any reason in our case to prefer (A) ourbusiness.com/our_locations/Boston_store over (B) ourbusiness.com/Boston-store? As i see it, the extra page (/our_locations/) could actually hurt, as it puts products one click further away from customers, and one link deeper for bots. On the other hand, it may make the multi-store structure clearer to bots (and maybe people) and help us in local search. Finally, would it make a difference if there were 10 stores vs 2? Thanks for any thoughts!
Local Website Optimization | | RankAmateur...1 -
Site is not ranking, please help.
For some reason, we have been fighting and fighting to get a website to rank and no matter what we do- nothing seems to work. I'm just taking over the website handle it personally, but was curious if anyone here had advice on what the issue may be. It isn't even ranking for its brand name, any ideas? http://estesroofingtx.com/
Local Website Optimization | | spadedesign0 -
Optimizing dog walking site for search phrase "dog walkers nyc"
Background: We have a dog walking company that serves NYC. According to our AdWords campaign, most leads come from the search phrase: "dog walkers nyc." Question: If the goal is to get as much organic traffic as possible for the search phrase "dog walkers nyc," should we just optimize our http://barkbud.com/ domain for the search phrase "dog walkers nyc," OR should we also have a page like http://barkbud.com/dog-walkers-nyc/ optimized for the same phrase? Thanks!
Local Website Optimization | | BarkBud0 -
Schema markup for a local directory listing and Web Site name
Howdy there! Two schema related questions here Schema markup for local directory We have a page that lists multiple location information on a single page as a directory type listing. Each listing has a link to another page that contains more in depth information about that location. We have seen markups using Schema Local Business markup for each location listed on the directory page. Examples: http://www.yellowpages.com/metairie-la/gold-buyers http://yellowpages.superpages.com/listings.jsp?CS=L&MCBP=true&C=plumber%2C+dallas+tx Both of these validate using the Google testing tool, but what is strange is that the yellowpages.com example puts the URL to the profile page for a given location as the "name" in the schema for the local business, superpages.com uses the actual name of the location. Other sites such as Yelp etc have no markup for a location at all on a directory type page. We want to stay with schema and leaning towards the superpages option. Any opinions on the best route to go with this? Schema markup for logo and social profiles vs website name. If you read the article for schema markup for your logo and social profiles, it recommends/shows using the @type of Organization in the schema markup https://developers.google.com/structured-data/customize/social-profiles If you then click down the left column on that page to "Show your name in search results" it recommends/shows using the @type of WebSite in the schema markup. https://developers.google.com/structured-data/site-name We want to have the markup for the logo, social profiles and website name. Do we just need to repeat the schema for the @website name in addition to what we have for @organization (two sets of markup?). Our concern is that in both we are referencing the same home page and in one case on the page we are saying we are an organization and in another a website. Does this matter? Will Google be ok with the logo and social profile markup if we use the @website designation? Thanks!
Local Website Optimization | | HeaHea0 -
What is the best CMS Approach for Multilingual Versions of Site?
We have expanded into France and Brazil and now have a someone in-house that can translate to French and Brazilian Portuguese. I own ".fr" and ".com.br" versions of our domain. We are using Wordpress for our CMS. We are currently publishing about 2 articles a week on English site which we would be translating and publishing through new international sites (when appropriate). We will be changing out photos and videos at times in addition to all the text/copy. So, before I jump deep into this I wanted to reach out for help regarding the best modern approach to this. Should I use some sort of WP Plugin that will let me manage each of these through 1 WP install or is it better to run each separately through multiple WP installs? I want to achieve this while... avoiding any duplicate content penalties. provide easy admin/editor management of publishing content. Any help/advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Local Website Optimization | | the-coopersmith0 -
Can to many 301 redirects damage my Ecommerce Site - SEO Issue
Hello All, I have an eCommerce website doing online hire. We operate from a large number of locations (100 approx) and my 100 or so categories have individual locations pages against them example - Carpet Cleaners (category) www.mysite/hire-carpetcleaners
Local Website Optimization | | PeteC12
carpet cleaner hire Manchester www.mysite/hire-carpetcleaners/Manchester
carpet cleaner hire london
carpet cleaner hire Liverpool patio heater (category)
patio heater hire Manchester
patio heater hire London
patio heater hire Liverpool And so on..... I have unique content for some of these pages but given that my site had 40,000 odd urls, I do have a large amount of thin/duplicate content and it's financially not possible to get unique
content written for every single page for all my locations and categories. Historically, I used to rank very well for these location pages although this year, things have dropped off and recently , I was hit with the Panda 4.0 update which i understand targets thin content. Therefore what I am int he process of doing is reducing the number of locations I want to rank for and have pages for thus allowing me to achieve both a higher percentage of unique content over duplicate/thin content on the whole site and only concerntrate on a handful of locations which I can realistically get unique content written for. My questions are as follows. By reducing the number of locations, my website will currently 301 redirect these location page i have been dropping back to it's parent category.
e.g carpet cleaner hire Liverpool page - Will redirect back to the parent Carpet cleaner hire Page. Given that I have nearly 100 categories to do , this will mean site will generate thousands of 301 redirects when I reduce down to a handful of locations per category. The alternative Is that I can 404 those pages ?... What do yout think I should do ?.. Will it harm me by having so many 301's . It's essentially the same page with a location name in it redirecting back to the parent. Some of these do have unqiue content but most dont ?. My other question is - On a some of these categories with location pages, I currently rank very well for locally although there is no real traffic for these location based keywords (using keyword planner). Shall I bin them or keep them? Lastly , Once I have reduced the number of location pages , I will still have thin content until , I can get the unique content written for them. Should I remove these pages until that point of leave them as it is? It will take a few months
to get all the site with unique content. Once complete, I should be able to reduce my site down from 40,000 odd pages to say 5,000 pages Any advice would be greatly appreciated thanks
Pete0 -
Sites Verification Issues
We have a group of automotive dealerships by a website provider that causes issues when trying to verify our sites. Because they use Analytics for their data program, they install a code into our websites-stopping us from doing so properly in our back end. We also cannot verify ourselves in webmasters or adwords. We can't actually "own" any of our sites since they run a java query script from within the website. They also do not allow the use of iframes or scripts, so we can't even use the container to verify these sites. Any help or insight would be greatly appreciated as I am sure there is some way to break this to get our data and be verified.
Local Website Optimization | | spentland0