Will massive "sculpting" make a difference?
-
I'm working with a very popular blog that also is associated with related products we manufacture and sell ourselves.
The blog is about 99% blog content and about 1% product content.
If suddenly some 99% of a 5,000 page blog is changed to have the blog pages no-indexed, will the linkjuice be now more concentrated on the remaining 1%?
Also, be aware that this blog has lots of high quality backlinks from everyday recognizable magazines, newspapers and blogs. Of course, this is a highly competitive market place so I'm trying to leave no-stone-unturned here in working out the kinks.
In the old days, we sort-of-called this "pagerank sculpting" and the idea was to focus the linkjuce on certain pages and defocus it on other pages. It made sense to block certain pages that were not indexible but Google supposedly dinged that tactic years ago, and today people say this is act also helps as it conserves the crawl budget.
Might this make a difference these days??
Keep in mind that the 4,950 remaining pages are still followed, and all backlinks remain in place.
Will the site start ranking better for the keywords on the 50 indexed (product) pages?
-
Noindex + follow on your low quality pages will just allow your crawl budget to potentially be better spent on the content that you want Google to crawl and index. It's not going to boost the value of pages that are already indexed.
So if you have quality pages and product pages that Google isn't seeing due to wasted crawl budget and low quality pages, then noindexing them might be a strategy to consider. I'd also make sure the quality of the pages you want to have indexed is unique and of high quality.
-
And reading between the lines, my guess is you are saying yes, this matters a great deal - elsewise you wouldn't want to be advising lots of analysis before action. Am i right?
You are right.
At a high level, would blocking that old stuff (no index, yes follow) effectively refocus linkjuce on product pages?
I believe that linkjuice will still flow through these pages. Is that correct? Maybe, it depends upon how search engines have decided to process the flow of linkjuice through noindexed pages that are followed... and search engines can decide however they want and change their minds about it without announcement or regard.
So the question remains: will selectively noindexing large quantities of old poor-quality stuff help the relatively smaller quantities of product related stuff in Google's ranking algorhitm?
I don't know the answer to that question because I don't know how search engines handle the noindex. If this was my site, I would be redirecting to remove those pages from the index and push the value of any links to a relevant page on the website - if there is one.
Here is what I have done on a similar situation....
One one of my sites we were posting about six to ten very short news items per day. This was a news blog that covered emerging topics in our industry and related industries. They would get a lot of traffic for a few days and a few of them would attract a nice amount of traffic long term. We would allow them to remain in the blog archive until the first day of January, two years after they were posted. We would then redirect all of them as a group to the homepage of the news section of the website and delete them from the server. Before the redirect was done we would consider any of the posts that were still drawing traffic and write extended articles for those that were of merit.
We continue the news blog because.... lots of other industry related websites link to the homepage of the news section, lots of people have it book marked, it ranks well in search and gets thousands of views per day.
But the main reason we keep it... lots of visitors type our domain into the address window of their broswer or into a search box, land on our homepage and click "news". Google sees this activity because they are the most important search engine and they own the most important browser. Google sees thousands of people asking for our website by name. That in my opinion, is extremely important to the rankings of my website that people ask for us by name and Google sees it. So, if you have this it could be worth more than gold.
-
Indeed, that is what I do - however the question remains.
And reading between the lines, my guess is you are saying yes, this matters a great deal - elsewise you wouldn't want to be advising lots of analysis before action. Am i right?
So - here's some more details of the scenario:
Imagine a news related blog that was very popular and contained years worth of commentary that is about 99% non-product related, with zero useful internal links to products other than through menus and footers.
This 99% tends to be non-quality oriented pages - sure there's traffic due to the volume of pages but it does not convert, nor do people look at products when visiting the blog pages - and there is no question that the older stuff draws way less traffic than newer stuff.
Because there is so much of it, i can generally infer what the keywords are that are being used and they are not presently - nor will they ever be - useful within the broader product strategy of the site. Ads on those pages are also highly non-productive.
At a high level, would blocking that old stuff (no index, yes follow) effectively refocus linkjuce on product pages?
As an example, if this stuff went back 10 years, I might think about selectively blocking the oldest nine, with of course special attention to not block certain pages if any of them were ever-green, super linked, stood out for super-high engagement etc.
So the question remains: will selectively noindexing large quantities of old poor-quality stuff help the relatively smaller quantities of product related stuff in Google's ranking algorhitm?
-
Great answer. EGOL is correct in that you need to consider the performance of the pages you're considering no-indexing.
If this is a popular blog, it seems a reasonable assumption is that the content quality is good. Generally speaking, you don't want to noindex quality content that's driving traffic to your site.
I suspect a noindex strategy on 99% of content for a popular blog is a bad one. But as EGOL pointed out, it's impossible to say for sure without fully understanding your website and its metrics.
-
This is a very important question and you don't want to steer this decision using "shoot from the hip" answers or kibitzing.
I believe that a good answer to this question would require a person to become very very familiar with these 5000 blog posts, the links that flow into them, the amounts of traffic that they receive, their content quality and their search engine health.
If suddenly some 99% of a 5,000 page blog is changed to have the blog pages no-indexed, will the linkjuice be now more concentrated on the remaining 1%?
This is an extremely drastic move. There might be better ways to accomplish your goal of using the power of these pages to drive linkjuice. However, linkjuice is not the single factor here. Traffic, navigation structure, keyword reach of the site and many other things could be more important.
I don't want to give any specific advice because a well considered answer is what you need and I am unable to provide it. I don't think that anyone can given the information provided and without being extremely familiar with your website.
When I have made this type of decision with my own site (that I know extremely well from working on it every day for many years) I usually study on it for weeks, looking at traffic, conversions, content investment and more, then obtained second opinions to give me strength or weakness about making the move.
This is not a decision that is easy to make. Quick answers given here are going to come with risks.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Will our website traffic be adversely affected by Google by allowiing other sites to post our content on their sites?
Hi, We're a radio station posting original content each day. We belong to a sector of similar radio stations. It's been proposed that we all contribute content to this group
Link Building | | Hope-Media
so any radio station can grab this content and post it on their own websites. As the site with the most content and web traffic, could this potentially harm us?1 -
Asking a site to remove a "nofollow" on a link to our client
Hello, We created a good infographic for a client of ours and a large tech site (DA 86) picked up and ran a story on it. We didn't contact this company asking them to feature it, they have just picked it up through other shares around the Web. I understand that, at the end of the day, it's their prerogative whether to "nofollow" their links or not, but surely they should be giving our client some credit as they have clearly deemed the graphic newsworthy and felt that it would appeal to their readership. I've emailed said tech site, but to no avail. Does anyone have any advice on this? Or is it just a case of they can do what the heck they want? I know that our client will still benefit from the additional referral traffic, but a follow link would have been nicer! Cheers, Lewis
Link Building | | PeaSoupDigital1 -
What are the relative values of different PageRanks?
I'm planning a link-building campaign, and I've realised it'd be good to know the relative values of different PageRanks. e.g. does a PageRank 5 site have 10 times as much effect as a PageRank 4 site? Or 100 times? Or 2 times? I'm thinking, rather than spending ages getting 10,000 PageRank 3 links, I should just spend a bit less time trying to get a few PageRank 7+ links! I'm even considering offering incentives to staff for getting links - to do so it would be good to be able to value each PageRank accordingly. Any suggestions / knowledge / experience / stats gratefully received! Alex
Link Building | | reddogmusic0 -
Will a link from a competitor help me to out rank them?
Greetings mozers, One of my competitors and I both rank on the first page for our main keyword. They have 37k+ links, me only like 300 or so. My company actually has a business location though. This other site is just a listing of locations and they build sites for most of my competitors. If I were able to get listed on their site, would that make me a stronger competitior with them? And we would probably only get a brand term link from them but not a main keyword anchor text. Will it be as effective to get the link from them if it's only for my brand name? Thanks, Cy
Link Building | | Nola5040 -
Should Penguin makes me question all reciprical links, even relevant ones?
Prior to Penguin, I had begun a link building campaign of sorts for a tourism bureau. All it was designed to do was leverage a wealth of relevant link opportunities that were right under our noses...the bureau's own members. These restaurants, hotels, attractions, etc are extremely relevant web sites with respect to the tourism bureau's target and niche. The links were to be in the form of image badges stating "Proud member of..." with brand-only alt text and title tags. I will focus on keeping these links a reasonable percentage of the overall domains linking into the site, I will vary the alt text throughout, and cultivate the links slowly over a 5-month period. But since the bureau's site already drives traffic to these individual member sites, the links we cultivate will end up being reciprocal. Even though they are natural in the purpose they serve, should we be worried, and consider abandoning the program?
Link Building | | VCOMM0 -
What are "naked backlinks"?
Hello SEOmozers! I have a question for you all. What are "naked backlinks"? Can you also give an example? Thank you! woo aka STPseo
Link Building | | STPseo0 -
Link value of :"
Very recently linkedin changed the way they link. The links in the profile are no longer "nofollow" the new links are like this: <a href="[/redirect?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Estramark%2Enl%2F&urlhash=dWm-](view-source:http://www.linkedin.com/redirect?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Estramark%2Enl%2F&urlhash=dWm-)" target="_blank" title="New window will open" name="overviewsite"> (http://www.linkedin.com/redirect?url=http://www.stramark.nl/&urlhash=dWm-) Question: What impact does this redirect have for the linkvalue of a link from linkedin. ( it is better than nofollow but what is the impact of this redirect? what actually happens and is the value? URL for the profile i mentioned it on. http://www.linkedin.com/in/blomwouter
Link Building | | Stramark1 -
Urls rewriting "how to" with .htaccess
hi, Please i would need advices (links, tips, tool:generator ?) regarding url rewriting through .htaccess (newbee about it). It's a "refurbishing" website case , the domain doesn't change. But the CMS does ! I've got a list of urls (800) with which i don't want to loose rankings on : Here the type of old url syntax : http://www.mydomain.com/home/newscontent.asp?id=1133 Here the new url type would be: http://www.mydomain.com/name-of-the-article
Link Building | | mozllo
or/and
http://www.mydomain.com/category/Page-2 Tks a lot...0